跳到正文
MarketHOT
English
原文
圣路易斯联储 · 经济分析·· 3 天前精选AI 评分72

圣路易斯联储:美国9月失业率升至4.2%,非农就业仅增加2.9万人

Flash Report: Unemployment Rises Slightly, Job Growth Slows in September

AI 导读

圣路易斯联储经济分析称,美国失业率从8月的4.1%升至9月的4.2%;更精确的未四舍五入数据从4.141%升至4.175%,增加0.03个百分点。9月非农就业增加2.9万人,低于预测值的一半;7月和8月就业增长合计下修6万人。劳动参与率上升0.2个百分点至61.8%,就业人口比率上升0.1个百分点至59.2%。

推荐理由

报告显示9月失业率小幅上升、非农就业增长放缓,同时劳动参与率和就业人口比率略有改善,可用于了解劳动力市场变化。

正文 · 原文

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • The U.S. unemployment rate rose from 4.1% in August to 4.2% in September, a value similar to its 12-month average. More precise data show the rate increased slightly from 4.141% to 4.175%.
  • This very modest uptick was primarily driven by the combination of two offsetting forces: fewer unemployed people chose to stop looking for work and leave the labor force, and more unemployed people found jobs.
  • Nonfarm payroll growth slowed in September to 29,000 jobs — less than half as many as forecasts expected.

September 2026

4.175%

Precise Rate

Unemployment changed little in September, despite the rise in the headline rate to 4.2%. (See the FRED chart above.) The more precise unemployment rate showed a much more modest increase. Additionally, the labor force participation rate and employment-to-population ratio both improved again in September, albeit slightly. The labor force participation rate rose 0.2 percentage points to 61.8% and the employment-to-population ratio rose 0.1 percentage points to 59.2%.

Total nonfarm payroll growth continued to be volatile from month to month. The economy added a less-than-anticipated 29,000 jobs in September as payroll gains in August and July were revised downward by a combined 60,000 jobs — or 30,000 each month, on average.

Taken together, however, these data suggest the labor market remained healthy in September from a historical perspective, with conditions similar to those in recent months.

Next, the analysis takes a deeper look at how estimated flows into and out of unemployment during September affected the overall unemployment rate.

DATA HIGHLIGHTS

  • While the headline unemployment rate ticked up to 4.2% in September, the unrounded rate shows a smaller, 0.03 percentage point increase from August.
  • More unemployed people deciding to keep seeking work instead of leaving the workforce and more unemployed people finding jobs were the main factors behind the overall change in the unemployment rate.
Breaking Down the Monthly Change in Unemployment
Average Monthly Change in
Unemployment Rate
(Percentage Points)
People Losing or
Leaving Their Jobs
and Becoming
Unemployed
Unemployed People
Finding Jobs
People Previously
Not in the Labor
Force Who Are Now
Seeking Work
Unemployed Workers
Leaving the Labor Force
(e.g. Discouraged
Workers)
September 2026 +0.03 +0.85 -1.09 +1.11 -0.82
Last 3 Months -0.00 +0.83 -1.03 +1.11 -0.91
Last 12 Months -0.04 +0.89 -1.06 +1.11 -0.98
SOURCES: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and St. Louis Fed Research staff’s calculations.
NOTES: Average changes over the last 12 months exclude October and November, for which data were unavailable. Data are seasonally adjusted. The overall change is based on the precise unemployment rate for these periods; for example, the unemployment rates were 4.1754% in September and 4.1413% in August. The flow components into and out of unemployment add up to the change in unemployment with a negligible residual. See Maximiliano Dvorkin and Serdar Ozkan’s St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog post “The Recent Ins and Outs of Unemployment: Using Flows to Study Labor Market Dynamics” for more information about this method.

Compared with August, the 0.03 percentage point change in the unemployment rate was mostly due to the interplay between 1) lower-than-average transitions of unemployed people out of the labor force (e.g., discouraged workers), and 2) unemployed people finding jobs at a higher-than-average rate. The first pushes the unemployment rate up, while the second pushes it down. Other components of unemployment flows — people losing or leaving their jobs and people not in the labor force who began looking for work — were more in line with their recent averages. (See the table above.)

来源:圣路易斯联储 · 经济分析 · stlouisfed.org