[{"_1":2,"_3":-5,"_4":-5},"loaderData",{"_5":6,"_7":8},"actionData","errors","root",{"_96":97},"routes/item",{"_9":10},"item",{"_11":12,"_13":14,"_15":16,"_17":18,"_19":20,"_21":-5,"_22":23,"_24":25,"_26":27,"_28":29,"_30":29,"_31":32,"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":-5,"_46":47,"_48":-5,"_49":-5,"_50":51,"_52":53,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":57,"_59":60,"_61":40,"_62":63},"id","z0gpl3ttm8zkpg5x0t4a527go","revision",2,"title","Twin Vee Holdco提交Form S-4，拟与USFM合并并发行1,708.9万股PubCo普通股","originalTitle","Twin Vee Holdco Inc. (0002160682) (Filer)","summary","Twin Vee Holdco于2026年10月26日提交Form S-4，拟通过两步合并将Twin Vee PowerCats Co.与USFM Corporation纳入PubCo；交割时PubCo拟更名为USFM Corporation。","reason","source",{"_11":86,"_87":88,"_89":90,"_91":57,"_92":93,"_94":95},"links",{"_83":84,"_63":85},"publishedAt","2026-10-27T12:37:52.000Z","discoveredAt","2026-10-27T13:11:17.968Z","timelineAt","category","ai-products","tags",[80,81,82],"stockSymbols",[],"score",51,"selected",false,"channel","news","story",{"_72":73,"_15":74},"x","readingMode","full","author","language","body",{"_76":-5,"_63":77,"_78":-5,"_79":40},"outline",[],"relatedStories",[75],"indexable",true,"markdownAvailable","group",{"_64":65,"_43":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":70},"hasTranslation","bodyLanguage","original","factId","fm_Rl2vgQ0j0",{"_72":73,"_15":74},"reportCount",1,"additionalSourceCount",0,"developmentCount","publicId","73756b80-936d-498d-9087-01b32fa55fed","Twin Vee拟与USFM合并并更名为USFM",{"_72":73,"_15":74},"zh","

\n Table of Contents\n

\n As filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on October 26, 2026 \n

\n Registration No. 333-

\n UNITED STATES \n
\n SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION \n
\n Washington, D.C. 20549 \n

\n FORM S-4 \n

\n REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 \n

\n Twin Vee Holdco Inc. \n
\n (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Texas\n

\n (State or other jurisdiction of\n
\n incorporation or organization)\n

\n 3730\n

\n (Primary Standard Industrial\n
\n Classification Code Number)\n

\n 43-2274548\n

\n (I.R.S. Employer\n
\n Identification Number)\n

\n c/o Twin Vee PowerCats Co.\n
\n 3101 S. US-1\n
\n Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982\n
\n (772) 429-2525 \n

\n (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices) \n

\n Glenn Sonoda\n
\n c/o Twin Vee PowerCats Co.\n
\n 3101 S. US-1\n
\n Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982\n
\n (772) 429-2525 \n

\n (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service) \n

\n Copies to: \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Mitchell S. Nussbaum\n
\n Giovanni Caruso\n
\n Loeb & Loeb LLP\n
\n 345 Park Avenue\n
\n New York, NY 10154\n
\n Telephone: (212) 407-4000\n

\n Jeffrey J. Fessler\n
\n Jason R. Schendel\n
\n Eugene Choi\n
\n Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP\n
\n 30 Rockefeller Plaza\n
\n New York, NY 10112\n
\n Tel: (212) 653-8700\n

\n Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale of the securities to the public: As soon as practicable after this registration statement is declared effective and all other conditions to the Business Combination described in the enclosed joint proxy statement/prospectus have been satisfied or waived. \n

\n If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box: ☐ \n

\n If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering: ☐ \n

\n If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering: ☐ \n

\n Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. \n

\n Registrant: \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Large accelerated filer\n
\n

\n \n ☐ \n

\n Accelerated filer\n
\n

\n \n ☐ \n

\n Non-accelerated filer\n
\n

\n \n ☒ \n

\n Smaller reporting company\n
\n

\n \n ☒ \n

\n Emerging growth company\n
\n

\n \n ☒\n

\n If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ☐ \n

\n If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the appropriate rule provision relied upon in conducting this transaction: \n

\n Exchange Act Rule 13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender Offer) ☐ \n

\n Exchange Act Rule 14d-1(d) (Cross-Border Third-Party Tender Offer) ☐ \n

\n The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the SEC, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine. \n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n The information in the accompanying preliminary joint proxy statement/prospectus is not complete and may be changed. The registrant may not sell the securities described in the accompanying preliminary joint proxy statement/prospectus until the registration statement filed with the SEC is declared effective. The accompanying preliminary joint proxy statement/ prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. \n
\n

\n PRELIMINARY — SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED OCTOBER 26, 2026 \n

\n PROXY STATEMENT FOR SPECIAL MEETING OF\n
\n STOCKHOLDERS OF USFM CORPORATION \n

\n PROXY STATEMENT FOR SPECIAL MEETING OF\n
\n STOCKHOLDERS OF TWIN VEE POWERCATS CO. \n

\n PROSPECTUS FOR 17,088,714 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF\n
\n TWIN VEE HOLDCO INC.\n
\n (WHICH WILL BE RENAMED\n
\n USFM CORPORATION) \n

\n Dear Stockholders of USFM Corporation and Stockholders of Twin Vee PowerCats Co.: \n

\n On October 7, 2026, USFM Corporation, a Colorado corporation (“USFM”), Twin Vee Holdco Inc., a Texas corporation (“PubCo”), Twin Vee Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of PubCo (“Merger Sub I”), USFM Merger Sub Inc., a Colorado corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of PubCo (“Merger Sub II” and, together with Merger Sub I, the “Merger Subs”), and Twin Vee PowerCats Co., a Delaware corporation (“Twin Vee”), entered into that certain Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger (as it may be further amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”), as more fully described elsewhere in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus. The Merger Agreement amended and restated that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 12, 2026 (the “Initial Merger Agreement”), by and among Twin Vee, USFM, and USFM Merger Sub Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of USFM. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, upon the closing of the transactions contemplated thereby: \n

\n (i)\n
\n

\n \n Merger Sub I will merge with and into Twin Vee (the “First Merger”), in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), with Twin Vee continuing as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of PubCo (the “Surviving Company”); and \n

\n (ii)\n
\n

\n \n Merger Sub II will merge with and into USFM (the “Second Merger” and, together with the First Merger, the “Mergers” or the “Business Combination”) in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Colorado Business Corporation Act (the “Colorado Act”), with USFM continuing as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of PubCo (the “Surviving Corporation”). \n

\n In connection with consummation of the Business Combination, PubCo will be renamed “USFM Corporation.” The “Combined Company” shall refer to PubCo, as so renamed, immediately after the closing of the Business Combination (the “Closing”). \n

\n At the effective time of the Second Merger (the “Second Effective Time”), each share of common stock, no par value per share, of USFM (the “USFM Common Stock”), issued and outstanding immediately \n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n prior to the Second Effective Time (including any additional shares issued pursuant to the PIPE Investment, but excluding USFM Dissenting Shares (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement)) will be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of PubCo Common Stock such that the aggregate shares issued to former holders of USFM Common Stock will equal 93% of the issued and outstanding shares of PubCo Common Stock immediately following the Second Effective Time, calculated on a fully diluted basis. Each outstanding warrant issued in the PIPE Investment (a “PIPE Warrant”) will be terminated and exchanged for a warrant of PubCo (a “PubCo Warrant”) to acquire one share of PubCo Common Stock for each share of USFM Common Stock underlying such PIPE Warrant, on the same terms and conditions, including vesting and exercisability, as applied to the PIPE Warrant immediately before the Second Effective Time. The outstanding warrant held by FG Merchant Partners, LP (the “FG Warrant” and collectively with the PIPE Warrants, the “USFM Warrants”) will similarly be terminated and exchanged for a PubCo Warrant (the “FG Exchange Warrant”) to acquire one share of PubCo Common Stock for each share of USFM Common Stock underlying the FG Warrant. No fractional shares of PubCo Common Stock will be issued in the Mergers; any fractional share that a Twin Vee stockholder or USFM stockholder would otherwise be entitled to receive will be rounded down to the nearest whole number. \n

\n Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, prior to the Closing, Twin Vee will undertake a restructuring (the “Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring”) pursuant to which (i) Twin Vee will form Twin Vee Bahama Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Twin Vee (“Assetco”), which was formed on July 16, 2026; (ii) Twin Vee will contribute to Assetco substantially all of its assets and liabilities other than $700,000 in cash and the liabilities related to the Delaware Matter (as defined in the Merger Agreement) (collectively, the “Company Assets and Liabilities”), which Company Assets and Liabilities relate principally to Twin Vee’s marine business, which is Twin Vee’s sole operating business, in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Assetco; (iii) Twin Vee will form a Delaware statutory trust (the “CVR Trust”) and contribute all of the outstanding equity interests of Assetco to the CVR Trust in exchange for all of the CVR Trust’s contingent value rights interests; and (iv) Twin Vee will distribute those contingent value rights interests to each holder of Twin Vee Common Stock as of a record date to be determined, on a pro rata basis (each such interest, a “Contingent Value Right” or “CVR”), after which Twin Vee will retain no ownership or other interest, whether in the form of stock, trust interests or otherwise, in either Assetco or the CVR Trust and Twin Vee’s sole asset shall be $700,000 in cash and sole liabilities shall relate to the Delaware Matter (as defined in the Merger Agreement). Each CVR will represent such holder’s indirect beneficial interest in Assetco and the Company Assets and Liabilities held by it. Following the Closing, the CVR Trust is expected to seek to sell the Company Assets and Liabilities, with any net proceeds of such sales to be distributed to CVR holders in accordance with the terms of the CVR Trust agreement and the CVR agreement, which have not yet been finalized. Neither Assetco nor the CVR Trust will be a subsidiary of PubCo, USFM or the Combined Company following the Closing. The CVRs will not be transferable except in limited circumstances, will not be listed for trading on any securities exchange and will not represent any right to receive shares of PubCo Common Stock or any other equity interest in the Combined Company. For more information, see “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Contingent Value Rights” and “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Twin Vee and the Business Combination.” \n

\n For additional information, see “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — The Merger Agreement.” \n

\n This joint proxy statement/prospectus covers the registration of the Combined Company Common Stock. The Combined Company will be a Texas corporation. \n

\n In connection with the Business Combination, certain related agreements have been entered into or will be entered into on or prior to the Closing, including a registration rights agreement to be entered into between USFM and PubCo at the Closing (the “Registration Rights Agreement”). For additional information, see “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Related Agreements” in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n The Twin Vee Common Stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) under the ticker symbol “VEEE”. PubCo will apply to have the Combined Company Common Stock listed on the NYSE, NYSE American (or such other exchange as the parties to the Merger Agreement shall mutually agree including Nasdaq). It is a condition of the consummation of the Business Combination that the Company Consideration Shares shall have been approved for listing on the NYSE, NYSE American or such other national securities exchange as the parties shall mutually agree, but there can be no assurance such listing conditions will be met or that PubCo will obtain such confirmation from such exchange. If such listing \n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n conditions are not met or if such confirmation is not obtained, the Business Combination will not be consummated as the parties do not intend to waive the applicable condition set forth in the Merger Agreement. \n

\n Conflicts of Interest \n

\n Because the chief executive officer and sole member of the board of directors of USFM has interests that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), the interests of the other holders of USFM Common Stock, a conflict of interest may exist in determining whether the Business Combination with Twin Vee is appropriate. Such interests include that Mr. Robert Price, the Chief Executive Officer and sole member of the board of directors of USFM, beneficially owned approximately 15.26% of the outstanding USFM Common Stock as of October 26, 2026. When you consider the recommendation of the USFM board of directors in favor of approval of the USFM Business Combination Proposal and the other proposals, you should keep in mind that Mr. Price has interests in such proposals that are different from, or in addition to, your interests as a stockholder. \n

\n These interests may influence USFM’s sole director in making his recommendation that you vote in favor of these proposals. These interests were considered by the USFM board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n Twin Vee’s officers and directors have interests that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), the interests of the other holders of Twin Vee Common Stock. The existence of financial and personal interests of Twin Vee’s directors and officers may result in a conflict of interest on the part of one or more of the directors or officers between what he, she or they may believe is in the best interests of Twin Vee and its stockholders and what he, she or they may believe is best for himself, herself or themselves in determining to recommend that stockholders vote for the proposals described below. When you consider Twin Vee’s board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that Twin Vee’s directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. \n

\n These conflicts of interest include, among other things, the interests listed below: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Joseph C. Visconti (a) is the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and President of Twin Vee, (b) beneficially owned approximately 1.89% of the outstanding Twin Vee Common Stock as of October 26, 2026, and (c) submitted a non-binding letter of intent with other members of Twin Vee’s management, to enter into a strategic business transaction with Twin Vee, prior to Twin Vee’s execution of the Initial Merger Agreement. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Preston Yarborough (a) is the Vice President and Director of Twin Vee, (b) beneficially owned approximately 0.18% of the outstanding Twin Vee Common Stock as of October 26, 2026, and (c) submitted a non-binding letter of intent with other members of Twin Vee’s management, to enter into a strategic business transaction with Twin Vee, prior to Twin Vee’s execution of the Initial Merger Agreement. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Kevin Schuyler (a) is a member of the Twin Vee Board of Directors (the “Twin Vee Board”) and the Special Committee of the Twin Vee Board (the “Twin Vee Special Committee”), (b) beneficially owned approximately 0.16% of the outstanding Twin Vee Common Stock as of October 26, 2026, and (c) may be appointed to the board of directors of the Combined Company upon closing of the Business Combination and may be entitled to certain compensation and other benefits in connection with such directorship. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Larry Swets Jr. (a) is a member of the Twin Vee Board and the Twin Vee Special Committee, (b) beneficially owned approximately 1.16% of the outstanding Twin Vee Common Stock as of October 26, 2026 and approximately 10.47% of the outstanding USFM Common Stock as of October 26, 2026, and (c) is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Greenland Energy Company (“GEC”), whose Chief Executive Officer and Director (Mr. Robert Price) also serves as the Chief Executive Officer of USFM. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Carol Craig (a) is a member of the Twin Vee Board and the Twin Vee Special Committee, (b) may be appointed to the board of directors of the Combined Company upon closing of the Business \n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Combination and may be entitled to certain compensation and other benefits in connection with such directorship, and (c) is a member of the Board of Directors of GEC. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Michael P. Dickerson, Twin Vee’s Interim Chief Financial Officer, beneficially owns approximately 0.72% of the outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock as of October 26, 2026. \n

\n See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” in Twin Vee’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on February 27, 2026 and which is incorporated herein by reference, and other similar disclosures in Twin Vee’s other SEC filings. \n

\n See also “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” in this joint proxy statement/prospectus for a further discussion of these considerations.

\n USFM Special Meeting \n

\n The USFM board of directors cordially invites the stockholders of USFM to attend a special meeting (the “USFM Special Meeting”) of stockholders of USFM, on [ ] at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time virtually via live webcast at https://www.cstproxy.com/[ ], or at such other time, on such other date and at such other place to which the meeting may be adjourned or postponed. For purposes of attendance at the USFM Special Meeting, all references in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus to “present in person” or “in person” shall mean virtually present at the USFM Special Meeting. \n

\n At the USFM Special Meeting, USFM stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon (a) a proposal to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement (the “USFM Business Combination Proposal”), and (b) a proposal to approve the adjournment of the USFM Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes for the approval of the USFM Business Combination Proposal at the USFM Special Meeting (the “USFM Adjournment Proposal”). The USFM Business Combination Proposal and the USFM Adjournment Proposal are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the “USFM Stockholder Proposals”. \n

\n The Business Combination will be consummated only if the USFM Business Combination Proposal is approved at the USFM Special Meeting and if the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and the Share Issuance Proposal (as defined below) are approved at the Twin Vee Special Meeting, which is in turn also cross-conditioned on the USFM Business Combination Proposal. Unless waived by the parties to the Merger Agreement, each of the USFM Business Combination Proposal, the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and the Share Issuance Proposal is cross-conditioned on the approval of each other. The USFM Adjournment Proposal is not conditioned upon the approval of any other proposal. Each of these proposals is more fully described in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus, which each stockholder is encouraged to read carefully and in its entirety. \n

\n USFM is providing the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus and accompanying proxy card to USFM’s stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be voted at the USFM Special Meeting and at any adjournments of the USFM Special Meeting. Information about the USFM Special Meeting, the Business Combination and other related business to be considered by USFM’s stockholders at the USFM Special Meeting is included in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus. Whether or not you plan to attend the USFM Special Meeting, you are urged to read the accompanying joint proxy statement/ prospectus, including the Annexes and other documents referred to therein, carefully and in their entirety. You should also carefully consider the risk factors described in “Risk Factors” beginning on page 43 of the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n On October 7, 2026, after careful consideration, the board of directors of USFM determined that the Business Combination is advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, USFM and its stockholders, and recommended that stockholders vote “FOR” each of the proposals presented at the USFM Special Meeting. When you consider the recommendation of the board of directors of USFM, you should keep in mind that USFM’s directors and officers may have interests in the Business Combination that conflict with your interests as a USFM stockholder. See the section entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination.” \n

\n A majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the USFM Stockholder Proposals by the USFM stockholders constitutes a quorum of the USFM stockholders for action on the USFM Stockholder Proposals at the USFM Special Meeting. \n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n The USFM Business Combination Proposal requires approval by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the Merger Agreement by the holders of USFM Common Stock. \n

\n The USFM Adjournment Proposal will be approved if the votes cast by holders of USFM Common Stock favoring the action exceed the votes cast by holders of USFM Common Stock opposing the action. \n

\n Concurrently with entering into the Initial Merger Agreement on July 12, 2026, a Twin Vee stockholder, in its capacity as holder of shares or other equity interests of Twin Vee, entered into a Company Support Agreement with USFM (the “Support Agreement”) pursuant to which such stockholder agreed, among other things, to vote its shares of Twin Vee Common Stock for the approval of the Merger Agreement and against any alternative proposal. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the Support Agreement terminates upon the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms. As of the record date for the Twin Vee Special Meeting, such Twin Vee stockholder accounted for approximately 5.47% of the number of then-outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock and approximately 5.47% of the voting power of the then-outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. \n

\n Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the USFM Special Meeting, please vote as soon as possible by following the instructions in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus to make sure that your shares are represented at the USFM Special Meeting. If you hold your shares in “street name” through a bank, broker or other nominee, you will need to follow the instructions provided to you by your bank, broker or other nominee to ensure that your shares are represented and voted at the USFM Special Meeting. \n

\n If you sign, date and return your proxy card without indicating how you wish to vote, your proxy will be voted FOR each of the proposals presented at the USFM Special Meeting. If you fail to return your proxy card or fail to instruct your bank, broker or other nominee how to vote, and do not attend the USFM Special Meeting in person, the effect will be, among other things, that your shares will not be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the USFM Special Meeting and will not be voted. A failure to vote will have the same effect as a vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting so long as a quorum is established. An abstention will be counted towards the quorum requirement. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal, but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting so long as a quorum is established. If you are a stockholder of record and you attend the USFM Special Meeting and wish to vote in person, you may revoke your proxy by transmitting a revocation to USFM or by attending the USFM Special Meeting and voting in person. \n

\n Twin Vee Special Meeting \n

\n The Twin Vee Board cordially invites the holders of Twin Vee Common Stock to attend a special meeting (the “Twin Vee Special Meeting”) of stockholders of Twin Vee, on [ ] at 10 a.m. Eastern Time virtually via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/[ ], or at such other time, on such other date and at such other place to which the meeting may be adjourned or postponed. For purposes of attendance at the Twin Vee Special Meeting, all references in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus to “present in person” or “in person” shall mean virtually present at the Twin Vee Special Meeting.

\n The holders of record of Twin Vee Common Stock (“Twin Vee Stockholders”) at the close of business on [ ], 2026 are entitled to notice of and to vote and have their votes counted at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and any adjournment of the Twin Vee Special Meeting. \n

\n At the Twin Vee Special Meeting, Twin Vee Stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon (a) a proposal to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement (the “Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal”), (b) a proposal, for purposes of complying with the applicable listing rules of Nasdaq, authorizing the issuance by PubCo of the Company Consideration Shares in connection with the First Merger and PubCo Common Stock in connection with the Second Merger and the resulting change of control of Twin Vee (the “Share Issuance Proposal”), (c) proposal to elect five directors to serve on the Combined Company’s board of directors upon consummation of the Business Combination until the 2027 annual meeting of stockholders of the Combined Company, and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation, removal or death (the “Director Election Proposal”), and (d) a proposal to approve the adjournment of the Twin Vee Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes for the approval of the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, the Share Issuance Proposal or the Director Election Proposal at the \n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Twin Vee Special Meeting (the “Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal,” and together with the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, the Share Issuance Proposal and the Director Election Proposal, the “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals”). The Business Combination will be consummated only if the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and the Share Issuance Proposal are approved by the Twin Vee stockholders and the USFM Business Combination Proposal is approved by the USFM stockholders. Accordingly, even if the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal is approved, the Business Combination will not be consummated unless the USFM Business Combination Proposal and the Share Issuance Proposal are approved by the USFM stockholders and the Twin Vee stockholders, respectively (unless waived by the parties to the Merger Agreement). The Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal and the Director Election Proposal are not conditioned upon the approval of any other proposal set forth in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus. Each of these proposals is more fully described in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus, which each stockholder is encouraged to read carefully and in its entirety. \n

\n Twin Vee is providing the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus and accompanying proxy card to Twin Vee Stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be voted at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and at any adjournments of the Twin Vee Special Meeting. Information about the Twin Vee Special Meeting, the Business Combination and other related business to be considered by Twin Vee Stockholders at the Twin Vee Special Meeting is included in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus. Whether or not you plan to attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting, you are urged to read the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the Annexes and other documents referred to therein, carefully and in their entirety. You should also carefully consider the risk factors described in “Risk Factors” beginning on page 43 of the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus.

\n On October 4, 2026, after careful consideration, the Twin Vee board of directors determined that the Business Combination is advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, Twin Vee and its stockholders, and recommended that its stockholders vote “FOR” each of the proposals presented at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. When you consider the recommendation of the board of directors of Twin Vee, you should keep in mind that Twin Vee’s directors and officers may have interests in the Business Combination that conflict with your interests as a stockholder of Twin Vee. See the section entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination.” \n

\n The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal requires approval by an affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. The Share Issuance Proposal requires approval by an affirmative vote of the holders of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock having a majority of the voting power of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. The five director nominees receiving the affirmative vote of a plurality of the voting power of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the Director Election Proposal shall be elected to the Combined Company’s board of directors. The Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal requires approval by an affirmative vote of the holders of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock having a majority of the voting power of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by a proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. \n

\n Concurrently with entering into the Merger Agreement, a Twin Vee stockholder, in its capacity as a holder of shares or other equity interests of Twin Vee, entered into the Support Agreement with USFM pursuant to which such stockholder agreed, among other things, to vote its shares of Twin Vee Common Stock for the approval of the Merger Agreement and against any alternative proposal. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the Support Agreement terminates upon the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms. As of the record date for the Twin Vee Special Meeting, such Twin Vee stockholder accounted for approximately 5.47% of the number of then-outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock and approximately 5.47% of the voting power of the then-outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. \n

\n Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting, please vote as soon as possible by following the instructions in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus to make sure that your shares are represented at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. If you hold your shares in “street \n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n name” through a bank, broker or other nominee, you will need to follow the instructions provided to you by your bank, broker or other nominee to ensure that your shares are represented and voted at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. \n

\n You are urged to attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting virtually at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/[ ], but if you are unable to do so, the Twin Vee Board would appreciate you submitting a proxy to have your shares voted as promptly as possible by using the internet or telephone or by returning by mail the enclosed proxy card, dated and signed.

\n Twin Vee PowerCats Co. \n
\n 3101 S. U.S. Highway 1 \n
\n Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 \n
\n (772) 429-2525 \n

\n If you have any questions regarding the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus or how to vote your shares of Twin Vee Common Stock, please contact Twin Vee’s proxy solicitor D.F. King & Co., Inc., whose contact details are directly below: \n

\n D.F. King & Co., Inc. \n
\n 28 Liberty Street, 53rd Floor \n
\n New York, New York 10005 \n
\n Toll-Free: (800) 791-3320 \n
\n E-mail: TwinVee@dfking.com \n

\n If you sign, date and return your proxy card without indicating how you wish to vote, your proxy will be voted FOR each of the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals. If you fail to return your proxy card or fail to instruct your bank, broker or other nominee how to vote, and do not attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting in person, the effect will be, among other things, that your shares will not be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and will not be voted. If you attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting in person and you fail to vote, your shares will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present. The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal requires approval by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock entitled to vote thereon. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal. Approval of the Share Issuance Proposal requires an affirmative vote of the holders of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock having a majority of the voting power of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by a proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. Accordingly, abstentions on the Share Issuance Proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Share Issuance Proposal. The five director nominees receiving the affirmative vote of a plurality of the voting power of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the Director Election Proposal shall be elected to the Combined Company’s board of directors. “Plurality” means that the individuals who receive the largest number of votes cast “FOR” are elected as directors. A Twin Vee stockholder’s failure to vote by proxy or to vote in person at the Twin Vee Special Meeting will have no effect on the Director Election Proposal. You may vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” authority to vote for each of the director nominees with respect to the Director Election Proposal. A “WITHHOLD” vote will have no effect on the outcome of the Director Election Proposal. For the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal to be approved, it must receive an affirmative vote of the holders of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock having a majority of the voting power of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by a proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the matte. Accordingly, abstentions on the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal. Because the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals are considered non-routine matters, brokers may not exercise their discretion to vote uninstructed shares on any of the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals. If the broker or nominee that holds your shares of Twin Vee Common Stock does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a non-routine matter, the organization that holds your shares will not be able to vote your shares. If you are a stockholder of record and you attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting and wish to vote in person, you may revoke your proxy by transmitting a revocation to Twin Vee or by attending the meeting and voting in person. \n

\n On behalf of the USFM board of directors and the Twin Vee board of directors, USFM and Twin Vee would like to thank you for your support and look forward to the successful completion of the Business Combination. \n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Sincerely, \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Robert Price
Chief Executive Officer
USFM Corporation

\n Joseph C. Visconti\n
\n Chairman of the Board of Directors of\n
\n Twin Vee PowerCats Co.\n

\n NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES REGULATORY AGENCY HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THE TRANSACTIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ACCOMPANYING JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS, PASSED UPON THE MERITS OR FAIRNESS OF THE BUSINESS COMBINATION OR RELATED TRANSACTIONS OR PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE DISCLOSURE IN THE ACCOMPANYING JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY CONSTITUTES A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

\n The accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated [ ], 2026 and is first being mailed to USFM’s stockholders and Twin Vee’s stockholders on or about [ ], 2026.\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n USFM CORPORATION \n
\n 1707 Cole Blvd., Suite 200 \n
\n Golden, CO 80401 \n

\n NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF USFM CORPORATION\n

\n TO BE HELD ON [ ], 2026 \n

\n TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF USFM CORPORATION: \n

\n NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting (the “USFM Special Meeting”) of the stockholders of USFM Corporation, a Colorado corporation (“we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” or “USFM”), will be held on [ ], 2026, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time virtually via live webcast at https://www.cstproxy.com/[ ], or at such other time, on such other date and at such other place to which the meeting may be adjourned or postponed. For purposes of attendance at the USFM Special Meeting, all references in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus to “present in person” or “in person” shall mean virtually present at the USFM Special Meeting. USFM cordially invites you to attend the USFM Special Meeting, which will be held for the following purposes: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1 — The USFM Business Combination Proposal — a proposal to approve and adopt the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 7, 2026, by and among USFM Corporation, a Colorado corporation (“USFM”), Twin Vee Holdco Inc., a Texas corporation (“PubCo”), Twin Vee Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of PubCo (“Merger Sub I”), USFM Merger Sub Inc., a Colorado corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of PubCo (“Merger Sub II” and, together with Merger Sub I, the “Merger Subs”), and Twin Vee PowerCats Co., a Delaware corporation (“Twin Vee”) (as it may be further amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub I will merge with and into Twin Vee, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the DGCL, with Twin Vee continuing as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of PubCo (the “First Merger”); and Merger Sub II will merge with and into USFM in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Colorado Act (the “Second Merger” and, together with the First Merger, the “Mergers” or the “Business Combination”), with USFM continuing as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of PubCo (the “Surviving Corporation”) (the “USFM Business Combination Proposal”). \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 2 — The USFM Adjournment Proposal — to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the adjournment of the USFM Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes for the approval of the USFM Business Combination Proposal at the USFM Special Meeting (the “USFM Adjournment Proposal”). \n

\n The Business Combination will be consummated only if the USFM Business Combination Proposal is approved at the USFM Special Meeting and if the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and Share Issuance Proposal are approved at the Twin Vee Special Meeting, which is in turn also cross-conditioned on the USFM Business Combination Proposal. Unless waived by the parties to the Merger Agreement, each of the USFM Business Combination Proposal, Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and Share Issuance Proposal is cross-conditioned on the approval of each other. The USFM Adjournment Proposal is not conditioned upon the approval of any other proposal. Immediately after the closing of the Business Combination, PubCo will be renamed “USFM Corporation” and the “Combined Company” shall refer to the combined company as so renamed. \n

\n These items of business are described in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus, which USFM encourages you to read carefully and in its entirety before voting. \n

\n Only holders of record of USFM Common Stock at the close of business on [ ], 2026 are entitled to notice of and to vote and have their votes counted at the USFM Special Meeting and any adjournment of the USFM Special Meeting. \n

\n The accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus and accompanying proxy card is being provided to USFM’s stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be voted at the USFM Special \n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Meeting and at any adjournment of the USFM Special Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the USFM Special Meeting, all of USFM’s stockholders are urged to read the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the Annexes and the documents referred to herein, carefully and in their entirety. You should also carefully consider the risk factors described in “Risk Factors” beginning on page 43 of the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus.

\n On October 7, 2026, after careful consideration, the board of directors of USFM determined that the Business Combination is advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, USFM and its stockholders, and unanimously recommended that stockholders vote “FOR” each of the proposals presented at the USFM Special Meeting. When you consider the recommendation of the board of directors of USFM, you should keep in mind that USFM’s directors and officers may have interests in the Business Combination that conflict with your interests as a USFM stockholder. See the section entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination.” \n

\n The Business Combination is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain closing conditions, including the approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby by the Twin Vee stockholders, as described in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus. There can be no assurance that the parties to the Merger Agreement would waive any such condition, to the extent waivable. \n

\n Twin Vee Common Stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”) under the ticker symbol “VEEE”. PubCo will apply to have the Combined Company Common Stock listed on the NYSE, NYSE American (or such other exchange as the parties to the Merger Agreement shall mutually agree including Nasdaq). It is a condition of the consummation of the Business Combination that PubCo receive confirmation from the NYSE, NYSE American (or such other exchange as the parties to the Merger Agreement shall mutually agree including Nasdaq) that the Combined Company Common Stock have been conditionally approved for listing on such exchange, but there can be no assurance such listing conditions will be met or that PubCo will obtain such confirmation from such exchange. If such listing conditions are not met or if such confirmation is not obtained, the Business Combination will not be consummated as the parties do not intend to waive the applicable condition set forth in the Merger Agreement. \n

\n The USFM Adjournment Proposal will be approved if the votes cast by holders of USFM Common Stock favoring the action exceed the votes cast by holders of USFM Common Stock opposing the action.\n

\n If you sign, date and return your proxy card without indicating how you wish to vote, your proxy will be voted FOR each of the proposals presented at the USFM Special Meeting. If you fail to return your proxy card or fail to instruct your bank, broker or other nominee how to vote, and do not attend the USFM Special Meeting in person, the effect will be, among other things, that your shares will not be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the USFM Special Meeting and will not be voted. A failure to vote will have the same effect as a vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting so long as a quorum is established. An abstention will be counted towards the quorum requirement. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting so long as a quorum is established. \n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Your attention is directed to the remainder of the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus following this notice (including the Annexes and other documents referred to therein) for a more complete description of the proposed Business Combination and related transactions and each of the proposals. You are encouraged to read the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus carefully and in its entirety, including the Annexes and other documents referred to therein. If you have any questions or need assistance voting your USFM Common Stock, please contact USFM’s proxy solicitor: \n

\n Advantage Proxy, Inc.
P.O. Box 10904 Yakima, WA 98909
Attn: Karen Smith
Toll Free Telephone: (877) 870-8565
Main Telephone: (206) 870-8565
E-mail: ksmith@advantageproxy.com

\n Thank you for your participation. USFM looks forward to your continued support. \n

\n /s/ Robert Price
Chief Executive Officer
USFM Corporation
[ ], 2026

\n ****\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n TWIN VEE POWERCATS CO.\n
\n 3101 S. US-1\n
\n Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 \n

\n NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF TWIN VEE POWERCATS CO.\n

\n TO BE HELD ON [ ], 2026 \n

\n TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF TWIN VEE POWERCATS CO.: \n

\n NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting (the “Twin Vee Special Meeting”) of stockholders of Twin Vee PowerCats Co., a Delaware corporation (“we,” “us,” “our,” or “Twin Vee”), will be held on [ ], 2026, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time virtually via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/[ ], or at such other time, on such other date and at such other place to which the meeting may be adjourned or postponed. For purposes of attendance at the Twin Vee Special Meeting, all references in the accompanying joint proxy statement/ prospectus to “present in person” or “in person” shall mean virtually present at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. Twin Vee cordially invites you to attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting, which will be held for the following purposes:

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 1 — The Director Election Proposal — to consider and vote upon a proposal to elect five directors to serve on the Combined Company’s board of directors upon consummation of the Business Combination until the 2027 annual meeting of stockholders of the Combined Company, and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation, removal or death (the “Director Election Proposal”). \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2 — The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve and adopt the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 7, 2026, by and among USFM Corporation, a Colorado corporation (“USFM”), Twin Vee Holdco Inc., a Texas corporation (“PubCo”), Twin Vee Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of PubCo (“Merger Sub I”), USFM Merger Sub Inc., a Colorado corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of PubCo (“Merger Sub II” and, together with Merger Sub I, the “Merger Subs”), and Twin Vee PowerCats Co., a Delaware corporation (“Twin Vee”) (as it may be further amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub I will merge with and into Twin Vee, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the DGCL (the “First Merger”), with Twin Vee continuing as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of PubCo (the “Surviving Company”); and Merger Sub II will merge with and into USFM in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Colorado Act (the “Second Merger” and, together with the First Merger, the “Mergers” or the “Business Combination”), with USFM continuing as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of PubCo (the “Surviving Corporation”) (the “Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal”). Immediately after the closing of the Business Combination, PubCo will be renamed “USFM Corporation” and the “Combined Company” shall refer to the combined company as so renamed. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 3 — The Share Issuance Proposal — a proposal, for purposes of complying with the applicable listing rules of the Nasdaq, authorizing the issuance by PubCo of the Company Consideration Shares in connection with the First Merger and PubCo Common Shares in connection with the Second Merger (the “Share Issuance Proposal”). \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 4 — The Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal — to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the adjournment of the Twin Vee Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes for the approval of the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, the Share Issuance Proposal, or the Director Election Proposal at the Twin Vee Special Meeting (the “Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal,” and together with the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, the Share Issuance Proposal, and the Director Election Proposal, the “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals”). \n

\n The Business Combination will be consummated only if the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and the Share Issuance Proposal are approved by the Twin Vee stockholders and the USFM Business \n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Combination Proposal is approved by the USFM stockholders. Accordingly, even if the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal is approved, the Business Combination will not be consummated unless the Share Issuance Proposal and the USFM Business Combination Proposal are approved (unless waived by the parties to the Merger Agreement). The Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal and the Director Election Proposal are not conditioned upon the approval of any other proposal set forth in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n These items of business are described in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus, which Twin Vee encourages you to read carefully and in its entirety before voting. \n

\n The holders of record of Twin Vee common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Twin Vee Common Stock”), at the close of business on [ ], 2026 are entitled to notice of and to vote and have their votes counted at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and any adjournment of the Twin Vee Special Meeting. \n

\n The accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus and accompanying proxy card is being provided to holders of Twin Vee Common Stock in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be voted at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and at any adjournment of the Twin Vee Special Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting, all of Twin Vee’s stockholders are urged to read the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the Annexes and the documents referred to herein, carefully and in their entirety. You should also carefully consider the risk factors described in “Risk Factors” beginning on page 43 of the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n On October 4, 2026, after careful consideration, the Twin Vee board of directors approved the Business Combination and recommended that its stockholders vote “FOR” each of the proposals presented at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. When you consider the recommendation of the board of directors of Twin Vee, you should keep in mind that Twin Vee’s directors and officers may have interests in the Business Combination that conflict with your interests as a stockholder of Twin Vee. See the section entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination.” \n

\n The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of at least 1/3 of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote as of the record date is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal requires approval by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock entitled to vote thereon. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal. Approval of the Share Issuance Proposal requires an affirmative vote of the holders of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock having a majority of the voting power of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by a proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. Accordingly, abstentions on the Share Issuance Proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Share Issuance Proposal. The five director nominees receiving the affirmative vote of a plurality of the voting power of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the Director Election Proposal shall be elected to the Combined Company’s board of directors. “Plurality” means that the individuals who receive the largest number of votes cast “FOR” are elected as directors. A Twin Vee stockholder’s failure to vote by proxy or to vote in person at the Twin Vee Special Meeting will have no effect on the Director Election Proposal. You may vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” authority to vote for each of the director nominees with respect to the Director Election Proposal. A WITHHOLD vote will have no effect on the outcome of the Director Election Proposal. For the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal to be approved, it must receive an affirmative vote of the holders of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock having a majority of the voting power of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by a proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. Accordingly, abstentions on the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal. Because the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals are considered non-routine matters, brokers may not exercise their discretion to vote uninstructed shares on any of the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals. If the broker or nominee that holds your shares of Twin Vee Common Stock does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a non-routine matter, the organization that holds your shares will not be able to vote your shares. If you are a stockholder of record and you attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting and wish to vote in person, you may revoke your proxy by transmitting a revocation to Twin Vee or by attending the meeting and voting in person. \n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n The Business Combination is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain closing conditions, including the approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby by the USFM stockholders, as described in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus. There can be no assurance that the parties to the Merger Agreement would waive any such condition, to the extent waivable. \n

\n Concurrently with entering into the Merger Agreement, a Twin Vee stockholder, in its capacity as a holder of shares or other equity interests of Twin Vee, entered into a Company Support Agreement with USFM (the “Support Agreement”) pursuant to which such stockholder agreed, among other things, to vote its shares of Twin Vee Common Stock for the approval of the Merger Agreement and against any alternative proposal. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the Support Agreement terminates upon the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms. As of the record date for the Twin Vee Special Meeting, such Twin Vee stockholder accounted for approximately 5.47% of the number of then-outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock and approximately 5.47% of the voting power of the then-outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. \n

\n If you sign, date and return your proxy card without indicating how you wish to vote, your proxy will be voted FOR each of the proposals presented at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. If you fail to return your proxy card and do not attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting in person, the effect will be, among other things, that your shares will not be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. If you attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting in person and you fail to vote, your shares will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present. \n

\n Your attention is directed to the remainder of the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus following this notice (including the Annexes and other documents referred to therein) for a more complete description of the proposed Business Combination and related transactions and each of the proposals. You are encouraged to read the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus carefully and in its entirety, including the Annexes and other documents referred to therein. If you have any questions or need assistance voting your Twin Vee Common Stock, please contact Twin Vee’s proxy solicitor: \n

\n D.F. King & Co., Inc.
28 Liberty Street, 53rd Floor
New York, New York 10005
Toll-Free: (800) 791-3320
E-mail: TwinVee@dfking.com

\n Thank you for your participation. Twin Vee looks forward to your continued support. \n

\n By Order of the Board of Directors of Twin Vee PowerCats Co. \n

\n [ ], 2026 \n

\n /s/ Joseph C. Visconti\n

\n Joseph C. Visconti, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Twin Vee PowerCats Co.\n

\n Table of Contents \n

	\n \n ABOUT THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS \n \n					\n 1\n
	\n \n TRADEMARKS \n \n					\n 2\n
	\n \n MARKET, INDUSTRY AND OTHER DATA \n \n					\n 2\n
	\n \n FREQUENTLY USED TERMS \n \n					\n 3\n
	\n \n CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS \n \n					\n 5\n
	\n \n QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS FOR STOCKHOLDERS OF USFM AND STOCKHOLDERS OF TWIN VEE \n \n					\n 7\n
	\n \n SUMMARY OF THE JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS \n \n					\n 25\n
	\n \n MARKET PRICE, TICKER AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION \n \n					\n 42\n
	\n \n RISK FACTORS \n \n					\n 43\n
	\n \n SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF USFM \n \n					\n 69\n
	\n \n SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF TWIN VEE \n \n					\n 75\n
	\n \n USFM STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL NO. 2: THE USFM ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL \n \n					\n 109\n
	\n \n TWIN VEE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL NO. 1: THE DIRECTOR ELECTION PROPOSAL\n \n					\n 110\n
	\n \n TWIN VEE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL NO.2: THE TWIN VEE BUSINESS COMBINATION PROPOSAL\n \n					\n 112\n
	\n \n TWIN VEE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL NO. 3: THE SHARE ISSUANCE PROPOSAL\n \n					\n 117\n
	\n \n TWIN VEE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL NO. 4: THE TWIN VEE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL \n \n					\n 119\n
	\n \n APPRAISAL RIGHTS AND DISSENTERS’ RIGHTS \n \n					\n 120\n
	\n \n USFM Stockholders \n \n					\n 120\n
	\n \n MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR HOLDERS OF USFM \n \n SECURITIES \n \n					\n 130\n
	\n \n MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES FOR HOLDERS OF TWIN VEE SECURITIES \n
	\n \n UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION \n \n					\n 138\n
	\n \n THE BUSINESS OF USFM CORPORATION \n \n					\n 147\n
	\n \n MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF USFM \n \n					\n 153\n
	\n \n MANAGEMENT OF USFM \n \n					\n 160\n
	\n \n INFORMATION ABOUT TWIN VEE \n \n					\n 162\n
	\n \n TWIN VEE’S MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS \n \n					\n 167\n
	\n \n MANAGEMENT OF THE COMBINED COMPANY FOLLOWING THE BUSINESS COMBINATION \n \n					\n 177\n
	\n \n EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION \n \n					\n 182\n
	\n \n BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES \n \n					\n 183\n
	\n \n CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS \n \n					\n 186\n
	\n \n DESCRIPTION OF THE COMBINED COMPANY’S SECURITIES \n \n					\n 188\n
	\n \n COMPARISON OF USFM’s STOCKHOLDERS’ RIGHTS \n \n					\n 199\n
	\n \n COMPARISON OF TWIN VEE’s STOCKHOLDERS’ RIGHTS \n \n					\n 214\n
	\n \n SECURITIES ACT RESTRICTIONS ON RESALE OF COMBINED COMPANY \n \n SECURITIES \n \n					\n 236\n
	\n \n STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS \n \n					\n 237\n
	\n \n STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS \n \n					\n 238\n
	\n \n LEGAL MATTERS \n \n					\n 239\n

\n i\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

	\n \n EXPERTS \n \n					\n 239\n
	\n \n DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS TO STOCKHOLDERS \n \n					\n 239\n
	\n \n WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION \n \n					\n 241\n
	\n \n INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS \n \n					\n F-1\n
	\n \n Annex A — Merger Agreement \n \n					\n A-1\n
	\n \n Annex B — Form of Articles of Incorporation of the Combined Company \n \n					\n B-1\n
	\n \n Annex C — Form of Bylaws of the Combined Company \n \n					\n C-1\n

\n ii\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n ABOUT THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS \n

\n This document, which forms part of a registration statement on Form S-4 filed with the SEC by PubCo (File No. 333-[ ]), constitutes a prospectus of PubCo under Section 5 of the Securities Act, with respect to the shares of PubCo Common Stock to be issued pursuant to the Merger Agreement if the Business Combination described below is consummated. This document also constitutes a notice of meeting and a proxy statement under Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act with respect to (i) the USFM Special Meeting at which USFM stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Business Combination, among other matters, and (ii) the Twin Vee Special Meeting at which Twin Vee stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Business Combination, among other matters. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Merger Agreement. \n

\n This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about Twin Vee from other documents that are not included in or delivered with this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This information is available to you without charge upon your written or oral request. You can obtain the documents incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov or by requesting them in writing or by telephone at the appropriate address below:

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n if you are a USFM stockholder:\n

\n USFM Corporation\n
\n 1707 Cole Blvd., Suite 200\n
\n Golden, CO 80401,\n
\n Attn: Chief Financial Officer\n
\n (872) 216-1518 \n

\n if you are a Twin Vee stockholder:\n

\n Twin Vee PowerCats Co.\n
\n 3101 S. US-1\n
\n Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982\n
\n Attn: Investor Relations\n
\n (772) 429-2525\n

\n You will not be charged for any of these documents that you request. To obtain timely delivery of these documents, you must request them no later than five business days before the date of the USFM Special Meeting or the Twin Vee Special Meeting, as applicable. This means that USFM stockholders requesting documents must do so by [ ], 2026, in order to receive them before the USFM Special Meeting, and Twin Vee stockholders requesting documents must do so by [ ], 2026, in order to receive them before the Twin Vee Special Meeting. \n

\n You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. No one has been authorized to provide you with information that is different from that contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated [ ], 2026, and you should assume that the information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is accurate only as of such date. You should assume that the information incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus is accurate as of the date of such incorporated document. Neither the mailing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to USFM stockholders or Twin Vee stockholders, nor the issuance by the Combined Company of shares of Combined Company Common Stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement, will create any implication to the contrary. \n

\n This joint proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, or the solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction to or from any person to whom it is unlawful to make any such offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction. Except where the context otherwise indicates, information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding Twin Vee has been provided by Twin Vee, and information contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding USFM has been provided by USFM. \n

\n In addition, if you have questions about the Business Combination or this joint proxy statement/prospectus, would like additional copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus or need to obtain proxy cards or other information related to the proxy solicitation, contact Advantage Proxy, Inc., the proxy solicitor for USFM, Attn: Karen Smith, Toll Free Telephone: (877) 870-8565, Main Telephone: (206) 870-8565, E-mail: ksmith@advantageproxy.com, or D.F. King & Co., Inc., the proxy solicitor for Twin Vee, 28 Liberty Street, 53rd Floor, New York, New York 10005, or Toll-Free Telephone: (800) 791-3320 or E-mail: TwinVee@dfking.com. You will not be charged for any of these documents that you request.

\n 1\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n See the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” for further information. \n

\n TRADEMARKS \n

\n This document contains references to trademarks and service marks belonging to other entities. Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus may appear without the ® or ™ symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that the applicable licensor will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, its rights to these trademarks and trade names. USFM and Twin Vee do not intend their use or display of other companies’ trade names, trademarks or service marks to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of them by, any other companies. \n

\n MARKET, INDUSTRY AND OTHER DATA \n

\n Certain industry data and market data included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus were obtained from independent third-party surveys, market research, publicly available information, reports of governmental agencies and industry publications and surveys. All of Twin Vee’s management’s estimates presented herein are based upon Twin Vee’s management’s review of independent third-party surveys and industry publications prepared by a number of sources and other publicly available information. All of USFM’s management’s estimates presented herein are based upon USFM’s management’s review of independent third-party surveys and industry publications prepared by a number of sources and other publicly available information. Third-party industry publications and forecasts generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources generally believed to be reliable. All the industry data, market data and related estimates used in this joint proxy statement/prospectus involve a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such data and estimates. Although USFM and Twin Vee have no reason to believe that the information from these industry publications and surveys included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is not reliable, USFM and Twin Vee have not independently verified this information and cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. In addition, USFM and Twin Vee believe that industry data, market data and related estimates provide general guidance, but are inherently imprecise. The industries in which USFM and Twin Vee operate are subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in the section entitled “Risk Factors.” These and other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the estimates made by the independent parties and by USFM and Twin Vee. \n

\n TECHNICAL REPORT SUMMARY \n

\n Information relating to the Project is derived from the technical report summary, entitled “Technical Report Summary for the Disko-Nuussuaq Project” (the “TRS”), issued on June 30, 2026, with an effective date of June 30, 2026, prepared by SRK Exploration Limited (“SRK”) and filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. SRK is the qualified person with respect to the Project (the “Qualified Person”) under Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K (“S-K 1300”) and meets all requirements of a qualified person under S-K 1300. All scientific and technical information that has been reproduced, referenced or otherwise derived from the TRS, has been approved, confirmed for completeness and accuracy and reviewed by the Qualified Person. \n

\n 2\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n FREQUENTLY USED TERMS \n

\n In this joint proxy statement/prospectus: \n

\n “Agreement End Date” means December 31, 2026. \n

\n “Applicable Stock Exchange” means The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC, the New York Stock Exchange, NYSE American, or any other national securities exchange on which the Twin Vee Common Stock or Combined Company Common Stock is listed. \n

\n “Assetco” means Twin Vee Bahama Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Twin Vee. \n

\n “Business Combination” means the business combination contemplated by the Merger Agreement. \n

\n “Closing” means the closing of the Business Combination. \n

\n “Colorado Act” means the Colorado Business Corporation Act. \n

\n “Code” means the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. \n

\n “Combined Company” means PubCo after Closing. \n

\n “Combined Company Common Stock” means the common stock of the Combined Company, with a par value of $0.001 per share. \n

\n “Company Consideration Shares” means the number of shares of PubCo Common Stock that would result in the former holders of Twin Vee Common Stock collectively holding 7% of the issued and outstanding shares of PubCo Common Stock immediately following the Second Effective Time, calculated on a fully diluted basis. \n

\n “Continental” means Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company. \n

\n “CVR” or “Contingent Value Right” means a contingent value rights interest in the CVR Trust distributed to holders of Twin Vee Common Stock in the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring. \n

\n “CVR Trust” means the Delaware statutory trust to be formed by Twin Vee in connection with the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring. \n

\n “DGCL” means the Delaware General Corporation Law. \n

\n “Director Election Proposal” means the proposal to elect five directors who, upon consummation of the Business Combination, will be the directors of the Combined Company. \n

\n “Exchange Act” means the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. \n

\n “Exchange Ratio” means the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the Company Consideration Shares by (ii) the total number of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock and shares of Twin Vee Common Stock subject to Twin Vee convertible securities outstanding immediately prior to the First Effective Time. \n

\n “First Effective Time” means the effective time of the First Merger. \n

\n “First Merger” means the merger of Merger Sub I with and into Twin Vee, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the DGCL. \n

\n “Merger Agreement” means the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 7, 2026, by and among USFM, PubCo, Merger Sub I, Merger Sub II and Twin Vee, as it may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time. \n

\n “Merger Sub I” means Twin Vee Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of PubCo. \n

\n “Merger Sub II” means USFM Merger Sub Inc., a Colorado corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of PubCo. \n

\n 3\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n “Merger Subs” means Merger Sub I and Merger Sub II. \n

\n “Mergers” means the First Merger and the Second Merger. \n

\n “Nasdaq” means The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC. \n

\n “NYSE” means the New York Stock Exchange. \n

\n “PubCo” means Twin Vee Holdco Inc., a Texas corporation. \n

\n “PubCo Common Stock” means the common stock of PubCo, par value $0.01 per share. \n

\n “SEC” means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. \n

\n “Second Effective Time” means the effective time of the Second Merger. \n

\n “Second Merger” means the merger of Merger Sub II with and into USFM, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Colorado Act. \n

\n “Securities Act” means the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended. \n

\n “Share Issuance Proposal” means the proposal, for purposes of complying with the applicable listing rules of Nasdaq, to authorize the issuance by PubCo of the Company Consideration Shares in connection with the First Merger and PubCo Common Stock in connection with the Second Merger. \n

\n “Surviving Company” means Twin Vee, as the surviving entity of the First Merger. \n

\n “Surviving Corporation” means USFM, as the surviving entity of the Second Merger. \n

\n “Twin Vee” means Twin Vee PowerCats Co., a Delaware corporation. \n

\n “Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal” means the proposal to approve the adjournment of the Twin Vee Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies. \n

\n “Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal” means the proposal to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement to be presented at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. \n

\n “Twin Vee Common Stock” means the common stock of Twin Vee, par value $0.001 per share. \n

\n “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals” means the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, the Share Issuance Proposal, the Director Election Proposal and the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal. \n

\n “Twin Vee Special Meeting” means the special meeting of the stockholders of Twin Vee, to be held on [ ], at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, via live webcast at https://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/[ ]. \n

\n “USFM” means USFM Corporation, a Colorado corporation. \n

\n “USFM Adjournment Proposal” means the proposal to approve the adjournment of the USFM Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies. \n

\n “USFM Business Combination Proposal” means the proposal to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement to be presented at the USFM Special Meeting. \n

\n “USFM Common Stock” means the common stock of USFM, no par value per share. \n

\n “USFM Stockholder Proposals” means the USFM Business Combination Proposal and the USFM Adjournment Proposal. \n

\n “USFM Special Meeting” means the special meeting of the stockholders of USFM, to be held on [ ], at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, via live webcast at https://www.cstproxy.com/[ ]. \n

\n 4\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS \n

\n This joint proxy statement/prospectus includes forward-looking statements regarding, among other things, the plans, strategies and prospects of USFM, Twin Vee, and the Combined Company. These statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of the management of USFM, Twin Vee, and the Combined Company. Although USFM, Twin Vee, and the Combined Company believe that their respective plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by these forward-looking statements are reasonable, none of USFM, Twin Vee, or the Combined Company can assure you that they will achieve or realize these plans, intentions or expectations. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Generally, statements that are not historical facts, including statements concerning possible or assumed future actions, business strategies, events or results of operations, and any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. These statements may be preceded by, followed by or include the words “believes,” “continues,” “estimates,” “expects,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “seeks,” “plans,” “scheduled,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “aims,” “works,” “focuses,” “aspires,” “strives” or “sets out” or similar expressions. \n

\n Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance, and the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward looking. You should understand that the following important factors, in addition to those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the documents incorporated herein by reference, could affect the future results of USFM and Twin Vee prior to the Business Combination, and the Combined Company following the Business Combination, and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially and adversely from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Forward-looking statements in this joint proxy statement/prospectus may include, for example, statements about: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could result in the failure to consummate the Business Combination; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to the Business Combination including, among others: (i) obtaining the approval of the Business Combination and related agreements and transactions by the respective stockholders of USFM and Twin Vee; (ii) effectiveness of the registration statement on Form S-4 of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part; (iii) receipt of approval for listing on the Applicable Stock Exchange of the shares of Combined Company Common Stock to be issued in connection with the Business Combination; (iv) the performance in all material respects of the respective covenants of USFM, Twin Vee, and PubCo to be performed as of or prior to the Closing; (v) the absence of any injunctions prohibiting the consummation of the Business Combination and (vi) the representations and warranties of USFM, Twin Vee, and PubCo remaining accurate (to such standards described in the Merger Agreement) as of the effective time of the Mergers; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances, including the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against USFM and/or Twin Vee following the announcement of the Merger Agreement and/or the transactions contemplated therein, that could give rise to the termination of the Merger Agreement; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the ability to meet and maintain the Applicable Stock Exchange’s listing standards following the consummation of the Business Combination, and the potential liquidity and trading of the Combined Company Common Stock; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the risk that the Business Combination disrupts current plans and operations of Twin Vee as a result of the announcement and consummation of the Business Combination; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the ability to recognize the anticipated benefits of the Business Combination, which may be affected by, among other things, competition, and the ability of the Combined Company to grow and manage growth profitably and retain its key employees; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n costs related to the Business Combination; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the Combined Company’s success in retaining or recruiting its officers, key employees or directors following the completion of the Business Combination; \n

\n 5\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM’s officers and directors allocating their time to other businesses and potentially having conflicts of interest with USFM’s business; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee’s officers and directors allocating their time to other businesses and potentially having conflicts of interest with Twin Vee’s business; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the Combined Company’s ability to achieve and maintain profitability; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the Combined Company’s ability to successfully monetize projects; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the Combined Company’s ability to attract and maintain an adequate customer base; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the Combined Company’s ability to continue to develop and enhance existing technology; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the Combined Company’s ability to successfully, or profitably, compete with current and new competitors; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n any significant disruption in or unauthorized access to USFM’s or Twin Vee’s computer systems or those of third parties that they utilize in their operations, including those relating to cybersecurity or arising from cyber-attacks; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the ability of the Combined Company to raise additional capital, if necessary, following the Closing; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n other factors detailed under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this document and in the documents incorporated herein by reference. \n

\n These and other factors that could cause actual results to differ from those implied by the forward-looking statements in this joint proxy statement/prospectus are more fully described under the heading “Risk Factors” in this document and in the documents incorporated herein by reference and elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and in the documents incorporated herein by reference. The risks described under the heading “Risk Factors” in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and in the documents incorporated herein by reference are not exhaustive. Other sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and in the documents incorporated herein by reference describe additional factors that could adversely affect the business, financial condition or results of operations of USFM and Twin Vee prior to the Business Combination, and the Combined Company following the Business Combination. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible to predict all such risk factors, nor can USFM or Twin Vee assess the impact of all such risk factors on the business of USFM and Twin Vee prior to the Business Combination, and the Combined Company following the Business Combination, or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those contained in any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements attributable to USFM, Twin Vee, the Combined Company, or persons acting on their behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements. These statements speak only as of the date hereof, and USFM and Twin Vee prior to the Business Combination, and the Combined Company following the Business Combination, undertake no obligations to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. \n

\n In addition, statements of belief and similar statements reflect the beliefs and opinions of USFM, Twin Vee, or the Combined Company, as applicable, on the relevant subject. These statements are based upon information available to USFM, Twin Vee, or the Combined Company, as applicable, as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and while such party believes such information forms a reasonable basis for such statements, such information may be limited or incomplete, and statements should not be read to indicate that USFM, Twin Vee, or the Combined Company, as applicable, has conducted an exhaustive inquiry into, or review of, all potentially available relevant information. \n

\n 6\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS FOR STOCKHOLDERS OF USFM AND STOCKHOLDERS OF TWIN VEE \n

\n The questions and answers below highlight only selected information from this document and only briefly address some commonly asked questions about the proposals to be presented at the USFM Special Meeting and the Twin Vee Special Meeting, including with respect to the proposed Business Combination. The following questions and answers do not include all the information that is important to USFM’s stockholders and Twin Vee’s stockholders. Please refer to the more detailed information contained elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the Annexes and the other documents referred to herein, carefully and in their entirety to fully understand the proposed Business Combination.

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Why am I receiving this joint proxy statement/prospectus? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n USFM stockholders are being asked to consider and vote upon, among other proposals, a proposal to approve the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement: (i) Merger Sub I will merge with and into Twin Vee, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the DGCL, with Twin Vee continuing as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of PubCo (the “First Merger”); and (ii) Merger Sub II will merge with and into USFM in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Colorado Act (the “Second Merger” and, together with the First Merger, the “Mergers” or the “Business Combination”), with USFM continuing as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of PubCo. In connection with the Business Combination, PubCo will be renamed “USFM Corporation.” See the section entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal” for more detail. \n

\n Twin Vee stockholders are being asked to consider and vote upon, among other proposals, a proposal to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement. See the section entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal” for more detail. \n

\n A copy of the Merger Agreement is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A and is incorporated herein by reference. You are encouraged to read this joint proxy statement/prospectus and all documents referred to herein (including the Merger Agreement) and incorporated herein by reference carefully and in their entirety. \n

\n YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO VOTE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER CAREFULLY REVIEWING THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS, INCLUDING THE ANNEXES AND THE ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF USFM AND TWIN VEE AND THE OTHER DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO HEREIN, CAREFULLY AND IN THEIR ENTIRETY. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What proposals are stockholders of USFM being asked to vote upon at the USFM Special Meeting? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n At the USFM Special Meeting, USFM is asking holders of USFM Common Stock to consider and vote upon: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1 — The USFM Business Combination Proposal — a proposal to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement (the “USFM Business Combination Proposal”); and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 2 — The USFM Adjournment Proposal — a proposal to approve the adjournment of the USFM Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes for the approval of the USFM Business Combination Proposal at the USFM Special Meeting (the “USFM Adjournment Proposal”). See “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal” and “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The USFM Adjournment Proposal.” \n

\n USFM will hold the USFM Special Meeting to consider and vote upon these proposals. This joint proxy statement/prospectus contains important information about the Business Combination and the other matters to be acted upon at the USFM Special Meeting. Stockholders of USFM should read it carefully. \n

\n 7\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n The existence of financial and personal interests of one or more of USFM’s directors may result in a conflict of interest on the part of such director(s) between what he, she or they may believe is in the best interests of USFM and its stockholders and what he, she or they may believe is best for himself, herself or themselves in determining to recommend that stockholders vote for the proposals. In addition, USFM’s management has interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. When you consider the USFM board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that USFM’s management has interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. These interests may influence USFM’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of these proposals. These interests were considered by the USFM board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What proposals are stockholders of Twin Vee being asked to vote upon at the Twin Vee Special Meeting? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n At the Twin Vee Special Meeting, Twin Vee is asking holders of Twin Vee Common Stock to consider and vote upon: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 1 — The Director Election Proposal — a proposal to elect five directors to serve on the Combined Company’s board of directors upon consummation of the Business Combination until the 2027 annual meeting of stockholders of the Combined Company, and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation, removal or death (the “Director Election Proposal”); \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2 — The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — a proposal to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement (the “Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal”); \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 3 — The Share Issuance Proposal — a proposal authorizing the issuance by PubCo of the Company Consideration Shares in connection with the First Merger and PubCo Common Shares in connection with the Second Merger (the “Share Issuance Proposal”); and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 4 — The Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal — a proposal to approve the adjournment of the Twin Vee Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes for the approval of the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, the Share Issuance Proposal or the Director Election Proposal at the Twin Vee Special Meeting (the “Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal,” and together with the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, the Share Issuance Proposal and the Director Election Proposal, the “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals”). \n

\n See “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The Director Election Proposal,” “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal,” “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 3: The Share Issuance Proposal,” and “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 4: The Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal.” \n

\n Twin Vee will hold the Twin Vee Special Meeting to consider and vote upon these proposals. This joint proxy statement/prospectus contains important information about the Business Combination and the other matters to be acted upon at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. Stockholders of Twin Vee should read it carefully. \n

\n 8\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n The existence of financial and personal interests of one or more of Twin Vee’s directors may result in a conflict of interest on the part of such director(s) between what he, she or they may believe is in the best interests of Twin Vee and its stockholders and what he, she or they may believe is best for himself, herself or themselves in determining to recommend that stockholders vote for the proposals. In addition, Twin Vee’s officers and directors have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. When you consider the Twin Vee board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that Twin Vee’s directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. These interests may influence Twin Vee’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of these proposals. These interests were considered by the Twin Vee board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Are the USFM Stockholder Proposals conditioned on one another? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n Unless waived by the parties to the Merger Agreement, each of the USFM Business Combination Proposal, the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and the Share Issuance Proposal is cross-conditioned on the approval of each other. The USFM Adjournment Proposal is not conditioned upon the approval of any other proposal set forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Are the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals conditioned on any other proposal? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n The Business Combination will be consummated only if the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, USFM Business Combination Proposal, and the Share Issuance Proposal are approved by the USFM or Twin Vee stockholders, as the case may be. Accordingly, even if the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal is approved, the Business Combination will not be consummated unless the USFM Business Combination Proposal and the Share Issuance Proposal are also approved (unless the applicable conditions are waived by the parties to the Merger Agreement). The Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal and the Director Election Proposal are not conditioned upon the approval of any other proposal set forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n It is important for you to note that if USFM’s and Twin Vee’s stockholders do not approve each of the USFM Business Combination Proposal, the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and the Share Issuance Proposal, as the case may be, then unless certain conditions in the Merger Agreement are waived by the applicable parties to the Merger Agreement, the Merger Agreement could terminate and the Business Combination may not be consummated. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Why is USFM proposing the Business Combination? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n On October 7, 2026, the USFM board of directors (i) approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Business Combination), (ii) determined that the Business Combination is advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, USFM and its stockholders and (iii) recommended that USFM’s stockholders approve and adopt the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Business Combination). In evaluating the Business Combination and making these determinations and this recommendation, the USFM board of directors consulted with USFM management and advisors and considered a number of factors, which are described in “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — USFM’s Board of Directors’ Reasons for the Business Combination” elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

\n Although the USFM board of directors believes that the Business Combination with Twin Vee presents a unique business combination opportunity and is in the best interests of USFM and its stockholders, the USFM board of directors did consider certain potentially material negative factors in arriving at that conclusion. These factors are discussed in greater detail in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business \n

\n 9\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Combination Proposal — USFM’s Board of Directors’ Reasons for the Business Combination,” as well as in the section entitled “Risk Factors.” \n

\n You should be aware that USFM’s directors and executive officers may have interests in the Business Combination as individuals that are in addition to, and may be different from, the interests of USFM’s stockholders generally. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination.” \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Why is Twin Vee proposing the Business Combination? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n On October 4, 2026, the Twin Vee board of directors (i) approved and adopted the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Business Combination), (ii) determined that the Business Combination is advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, Twin Vee and its stockholders and (iii) recommended that Twin Vee stockholders approve and adopt the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Business Combination). \n

\n In evaluating the Business Combination, the Twin Vee board of directors consulted with Twin Vee management, business advisors, stockholders and legal advisors and considered a range of factors and risks. For a description of the Twin Vee board of directors’ reasons for approving the Business Combination, including factors and risks considered by the Twin Vee board of directors, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — The Twin Vee Board of Directors’ Reasons for the Business Combination.” \n

\n Although the Twin Vee board of directors believes that the Business Combination with USFM presents a unique business combination opportunity and is in the best interests of Twin Vee and its stockholders, the Twin Vee board of directors did consider certain potentially material negative factors in arriving at that conclusion. These factors are discussed in greater detail in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — The Twin Vee Board of Directors’ Reasons for the Business Combination,” as well as in the section entitled “Risk Factors.” \n

\n You should be aware that Twin Vee’s directors and executive officers have interests in the Business Combination as individuals that are in addition to, and may be different from, the interests of Twin Vee’s stockholders generally. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination.” \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Why is USFM providing stockholders with the opportunity to vote on the Business Combination? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n The approval of the Business Combination by USFM’s stockholders is a condition to the Closing under the Merger Agreement and stockholder approval of the Second Merger is required under the Colorado Act. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Why is Twin Vee providing stockholders with the opportunity to vote on the Business Combination? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n The approval of the Business Combination by Twin Vee’s stockholders is a condition to the Closing under the Merger Agreement and stockholder approval of the First Merger is required under the DGCL. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What will happen in the Business Combination? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, among other things: \n

\n (i)\n
\n

\n \n Merger Sub I will merge with and into Twin Vee, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the DGCL (the “First Merger”), with Twin Vee continuing as the surviving corporation (the “Surviving Company”) and a wholly owned subsidiary of PubCo; and \n

\n 10\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n (ii)\n
\n

\n \n Merger Sub II will merge with and into USFM in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Colorado Act (the “Second Merger” and, together with the First Merger, the “Mergers” or the “Business Combination”), with USFM continuing as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of PubCo (the “Surviving Corporation”). \n

\n In connection with the Business Combination, PubCo will be renamed “USFM Corporation.” For further details, see “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — The Merger Agreement.” \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What will Twin Vee stockholders receive in return for USFM’s acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Twin Vee? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n On the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the First Merger (the “First Effective Time”), and as a result of the First Merger, each share of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Twin Vee (the “Twin Vee Shares”), that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the First Effective Time, including Twin Vee Shares held as a result of the termination of Company Convertible Securities (other than Twin Vee common stock warrants), but excluding certain Shares to be canceled pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and Dissenting Shares (as defined in the Merger Agreement), will be converted into the right to receive a pro rata portion of an aggregate number of shares of Combined Company Common Stock that represents 7% of the issued and outstanding Combined Company Common Stock immediately following the effective time of the Second Merger (the “Second Effective Time”), calculated on a fully diluted basis (the “Company Consideration Shares”). \n

\n In addition, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, prior to the closing of the Mergers, Twin Vee, Twin Vee Bahama Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Twin Vee (“Assetco”), and a to be formed Delaware contingent value rights trust (the “CVR Trust”), must consummate the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring (as defined below) pursuant to which such parties shall: (a) form Assetco as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company; (b) cause the contribution of all of the Company Assets and Liabilities (as defined in the Merger Agreement to generally include all of Twin Vee’s assets and liabilities other than $700,000 in cash and the liabilities related to the Delaware Matter (as defined in the Merger Agreement), which must be retained by Twin Vee as of the Closing) from Twin Vee to Assetco in exchange for all of Assetco’s issued and outstanding shares of capital stock (the “Assetco Contribution”), using a contribution agreement in a form reasonably satisfactory to USFM; (c) form the CVR Trust as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Twin Vee; (d) cause the contribution of all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Assetco from Twin Vee to the CVR Trust in exchange for all of the CVR Trust’s contingent value rights interests, using a contribution agreement in a form reasonably satisfactory to USFM; and (e) cause the distribution of the contingent value rights interests from Twin Vee to Twin Vee’s pre-Closing stockholders, using a distribution agreement in a form reasonably satisfactory to USFM, after which Twin Vee shall retain no ownership or other interest (whether in the form of stock, trust interests, or otherwise) in either the CVR Trust or Assetco (such steps collectively, the “Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring”). Following closing of the Mergers, the CVR Trust will seek to sell the Company Assets and Liabilities and any net proceeds received from such sales would ultimately accrue to the benefit of pre-Closing Twin Vee stockholders. \n

\n For further details, see the sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — The Merger Agreement” and “Risk Factors — Twin Vee stockholders may not receive any proceeds from the CVR Trust.” \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What equity stake will current USFM stockholders and Twin Vee stockholders hold in the Combined Company immediately after the consummation of the Business Combination? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n Pre-Closing USFM stockholders will hold 93% of the fully diluted outstanding equity of the Combined Company and pre-Closing Twin Vee stockholders will hold 7% of the fully diluted outstanding equity of the Combined Company, in each case, as of immediately following the Second Effective Time. \n

\n Please see “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information” for further information. \n

\n 11\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Who will manage the Combined Company? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n [ ], [ ], [ ], [ ] and [ ] have each been nominated to serve as directors of the Combined Company immediately upon completion of the Business Combination. The existing senior executive officers of USFM will become the senior executive officers of the Combined Company immediately following Closing. See “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 1 — The Director Election Proposal” and “Management of the Combined Company Following the Business Combination.” \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Are there any material U.S. federal income tax consequences to holders of Twin Vee Common Stock that are expected to result from the Business Combination? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n In general, it is intended that the Business Combination will qualify as a tax-deferred transaction. There is no authority directly on point addressing whether contingent value rights with characteristics similar to the CVRs should be treated for federal income tax purposes as a distribution of property with respect to Twin Vee Common Stock, as an “open transaction,” or in some other manner, and the proper characterization is inherently a factual question. Accordingly, holders of Twin Vee Common Stock are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding this issue. Twin Vee intends to report the issuance of the CVRs as a “closed transaction.” Under this construct, the CVRs would be treated either (i) as a distribution under Section 301 of the Code separate from the Business Combination, or (ii) as aggregated with, and treated as part of, the Business Combination, in which case the fair market value of the CVRs may be treated as taxable boot received by Twin Vee Stockholders in connection with the First Merger. You are strongly urged to read the sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences for Holders of Twin Vee Securities” and “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Related Agreements — Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the CVRs to U.S. holders of Twin Vee Common Stock”, and to consult with a tax advisor to determine the particular U.S. federal, state, local or foreign income or other tax consequences of the Business Combination to you. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the issuance of the CVRs, including any distributions under the CVRs? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n There is no authority directly on point addressing whether contingent value rights with characteristics similar to the CVRs should be treated for federal income tax purposes as a distribution of property with respect to Twin Vee Common Stock, as an “open transaction,” or in some other manner, and the proper characterization is inherently a factual question. Accordingly, holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding this issue. Twin Vee intends to report the issuance of the CVRs as a “closed transaction.” Under this construct, the CVRs would be treated either (i) as a distribution under Section 301 of the Code separate from the Business Combination, or (ii) as aggregated with, and treated as part of, the Business Combination, in which case the fair market value of the CVRs may be treated as taxable boot received by Twin Vee Stockholders in connection with the First Merger. Please review the information in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Related Agreements — Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the CVRs to U.S. holders of Twin Vee Common Stock.” \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What are the U.S. Federal Income Tax consequences of the Business Combination to U.S. Holders of USFM Common Stock and USFM Warrants? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n Subject to the limitations and qualifications described in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for holders of USFM securities,” it is intended that the exchange of USFM Common Stock for PubCo Common Stock pursuant to the Second Merger, taken together with the First Merger as integrated transactions, will qualify as an exchange of property described in Section 351(a) of the Code. Further, subject to the limitations and qualifications described in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for holders of USFM securities,” it is intended that the Second Merger qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368 of the Code (a “Reorganization”). However, the provisions of Section 351(a) of the Code are complex and qualification as a nonrecognition transaction thereunder could be adversely affected by events or actions that occur following the Business Combination that are beyond the control of USFM or PubCo. For example, if more than 20 percent of the PubCo Common \n

\n 12\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Stock were subject to an arrangement or agreement to be sold or disposed of at the time of their issuance in the Business Combination, one of the requirements for Section 351(a) treatment would not be met. We do not expect that any of the PubCo Common Stock issued in the Business Combination will be subject to an arrangement or agreement by its owner to sell or dispose of such shares upon the issuance of those shares in the Business Combination, but there can be no assurance in this regard. \n

\n Further, it is unclear whether the requirements of Section 368 of the Code can be satisfied and such qualification is not a condition of the Business Combination. There are many requirements that must be satisfied for the Second Merger to qualify as a Reorganization, some of which are based upon factual determinations and others are fundamental to corporate reorganizations. However, due to the absence of guidance directly on point as to how certain requirements of Section 368 of the Code apply to USFM, the qualification of the Second Merger as a Reorganization is uncertain. For example, to qualify as a Reorganization, the Second Merger must satisfy the “continuity of business enterprise” requirement under Section 368 of the Code. Because USFM was formed in late 2025 and does not have a long-established business history prior to entering into negotiations with Twin Vee, it is unclear as a matter of law whether its USFM’s business or assets would constitute a historic business or historic business assets for this purpose. In addition, Reorganization treatment could also be adversely affected by events or actions that occur prior to or at the time of the Second Merger, some of which are outside the control of USFM. \n

\n Accordingly, there are significant factual and legal uncertainties both as to whether the Mergers will qualify as an exchange as described in Section 351(a) of the Code and as to whether the Second Merger will qualify as a Reorganization. Any change that is made after the date hereof, including any inaccuracy of the facts or assumptions upon which such expectations were based, could adversely affect the intended tax treatment. Neither USFM nor PubCo intends to request a ruling from the IRS regarding the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the Business Combination, and no assurance can be given that the Business Combination will qualify for the intended tax treatment described above, or that the IRS will not challenge this position and that a court will not sustain such a challenge by the IRS. Further, the Closing is not conditioned upon the receipt of an opinion of counsel that the Mergers will qualify for the intended tax treatment described above. \n

\n The U.S. federal income tax treatment of the exchange of USFM Common Stock for PubCo Common Stock and the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the exchange of USFM Warrants for PubCo Warrants depends on whether the Mergers qualify as an exchange described in Section 351(a) of the Code and whether the Second Merger qualifies as a Reorganization. \n

\n Second Merger Qualifies as a Reorganization. If the Second Merger qualifies as a Reorganization, whether or not the Mergers qualify as a transaction described in Section 351, a U.S. Holder that exchanges USFM Common Stock for PubCo Common Stock and/or USFM Warrants for PubCo Warrants is generally not expected to recognize any gain or loss upon such exchanges, the aggregate tax basis of such U.S. Holder’s PubCo Common Stock will be the same as the aggregate tax basis of such U.S. Holder’s USFM Common Stock immediately before the Second Merger, the aggregate tax basis of such U.S. Holder’s PubCo Warrants will be the same as the aggregate tax basis of such U.S. Holder’s USFM Warrants immediately before the Second Merger, and the holding periods for such PubCo Warrants and PubCo Common Stock will include the holding periods of the USFM Warrants and USFM Common Stock exchanged therefor, provided that the USFM Warrants or USFM Common Stock, as the case may be, are held as capital assets at the effective time of the Second Merger. \n

\n Mergers Qualify Under Section 351 and the Second Merger Does Not Qualify as a Reorganization. If the Mergers qualify as a transaction described in Section 351 but the Second Merger does not qualify as a Reorganization, for a U.S. Holder that does not exchange USFM Warrants for PubCo Warrants but solely exchanges USFM Common Stock, the consequences are the same as described above in Second Merger Qualifies as a Reorganization. However, for a U.S. Holder that exchanges both USFM Common Stock and USFM Warrants, while the receipt of PubCo Common Stock in the Second Merger will be treated as tax-free consideration received in the exchange, the receipt of PubCo Warrants will be treated as taxable consideration received in the exchange. In such case, a U.S. Holder generally will be required to recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of gain realized by such holder (generally, the excess of (x) the sum of the fair market values of the PubCo \n

\n 13\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Warrants treated as received by such holder and the PubCo Common Stock received by such holder, if any, over (y) such holder’s aggregate adjusted tax basis in the USFM Warrants and USFM Common Stock, if any, exchanged therefor) and (ii) the fair market value of the PubCo Warrants received by such holder in such exchange. To determine the amount of gain, if any, that such U.S. Holder must recognize, the holder must compute the amount of gain or loss realized as a result of the Second Merger on a share-by-share and warrant-by-warrant basis by allocating the aggregate fair market value of the PubCo Common Stock and the PubCo Warrants received by such U.S. Holder among the USFM Common Stock and the USFM Warrants owned by such U.S. Holder immediately prior to the Second Merger in proportion to their respective fair market values. Any loss realized by a U.S. Holder would not be recognized. In this case, the holding period of the PubCo Common Stock received in the Second Merger will include the holding period during which the USFM Common Stock exchanged therefor was held by such U.S. Holder, and the holding period of PubCo Warrants received in the Second Merger will begin on the day after the Second Merger. A U.S. Holder that exchanges only USFM Warrants for PubCo Warrants (and does not also exchange USFM Common Stock) generally would recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the fair market value of the PubCo Warrants received and such holder’s adjusted tax basis in the USFM Warrants exchanged therefor.\n

\n Mergers Do Not Qualify Under Section 351 and the Second Merger Does Not Qualify as a Reorganization. If the Second Merger qualifies neither as a Reorganization nor as part of an exchange under Section 351, U.S. Holders generally would recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between the fair market value of PubCo Common Stock received by such U.S. Holders in the Second Merger and such U.S. Holders’ adjusted tax basis in the USFM Common Stock surrendered by such U.S. Holders in the Second Merger. Any gain or loss recognized would generally be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder had held the USFM Common Stock for more than one year (or short-term capital gain or loss otherwise). Long-term capital gains of non-corporate U.S. Holders (including individuals) are currently eligible for preferential U.S. federal income tax rates. However, the deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the PubCo Common Stock received in the Second Merger would equal the fair market value of such PubCo Common Stock on the Closing Date, and the U.S. Holder’s holding period in such PubCo Common Stock would not include the holding period for the USFM Common Stock surrendered in exchange therefor and would begin on the day following the Closing Date. The same general consequences would apply with respect to the exchange of the USFM Warrants for PubCo Warrants. \n

\n The rules governing the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the Business Combination are complex and will depend on a holder’s particular circumstances. For a more complete discussion of the U.S. federal income tax considerations of the Business Combination, see the discussion herein under “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.” All holders of USFM Common Stock and USFM Warrants are urged to consult with their tax advisors regarding the potential tax consequences to them of the Business Combination and the tax consequences if the Mergers were to fail to qualify as an exchange described in Section 351(a) of the Code or the Second Merger were to fail to qualify for Reorganization treatment as described above. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n When do you expect the Business Combination to be completed? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n It is currently expected that the Business Combination will be consummated in the fourth quarter of 2026 or the first quarter of 2027. The date of Closing depends, among other things, on the approval of the proposals to be put to USFM stockholders at the USFM Special Meeting. However, such meeting could be adjourned if the USFM Adjournment Proposal is adopted by USFM’s stockholders at the USFM Special Meeting and USFM elects to adjourn the USFM Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes for the approval of one or more proposals at the USFM Special Meeting. The date of Closing also depends, among other things, on the approval of the proposals to be put to Twin Vee stockholders at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. However, such meeting could be adjourned if the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal is adopted by Twin Vee’s stockholders at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and Twin Vee elects to adjourn the Twin Vee Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes for the approval of \n

\n 14\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n one or more proposals at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. For a description of the conditions for the completion of the Business Combination, see “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — The Merger Agreement.” \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What happens if the Business Combination is not consummated? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n If the Merger Agreement is not adopted by USFM stockholders and the Twin Vee stockholders or if the Business Combination is not completed for any other reason, Twin Vee stockholders will not receive any consideration for their Twin Vee Common Stock. Instead, Twin Vee and USFM will each remain independent companies, Twin Vee Common Stock is expected to continue to be traded on Nasdaq and to be registered under the Exchange Act and Twin Vee is expected to continue to file periodic reports with the SEC. See “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — The Merger Agreement — Termination Provisions.” \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Do I have dissenter’s rights in connection with the proposed Business Combination? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n Yes. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), Twin Vee stockholders have the right to dissent from the First Merger and to receive payment in cash for the fair value of their Twin Vee Common Stock as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “Delaware Court”), together with interest, if any, as determined by the Delaware Court, in lieu of the consideration such Twin Vee stockholder would otherwise be entitled to pursuant to the Merger Agreement. Twin Vee’s stockholders electing to exercise appraisal rights must comply with the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL in order to perfect their rights. Under the Colorado Act, USFM stockholders have the right to dissent from the Second Merger and to receive payment in cash for the fair value of their USFM Common Stock as determined by the district court for the county in Colorado in which the street address of USFM’s principal office is located (the “Colorado Court”), together with interest, if any, as determined by the Colorado Court, in lieu of the consideration such USFM stockholder would otherwise be entitled to pursuant to the Merger Agreement. USFM Common Stock is not listed on a national securities exchange and is not otherwise traded in an organized market, so the market-out limitation on appraisal rights under the Colorado Act does not apply. USFM’s stockholders electing to exercise appraisal rights must comply with the provisions of Article 113 of the Colorado Act in order to perfect their rights. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Appraisal Rights and Dissenters’ Rights” elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What do I need to do now? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n USFM and Twin Vee urge you to read this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the Annexes and the documents referred to herein and incorporated herein by reference, carefully and in their entirety and to consider how the Business Combination will affect you. You should then vote as soon as possible in accordance with the instructions provided in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and on the enclosed proxy cards. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n How do I vote? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n If you are a holder of record of USFM Common Stock on the record date for the USFM Special Meeting, you may vote in person at the USFM Special Meeting or by submitting a proxy for the USFM Special Meeting. If you are a holder of record of Twin Vee Common Stock on the record date for the Twin Vee Special Meeting, you may vote in person at the Twin Vee Special Meeting or by submitting a proxy for the Twin Vee Special Meeting. You may submit your proxy by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the accompanying pre-addressed postage-paid envelope. If you hold your securities in “street name,” which means your securities are held of record by a broker, bank or nominee, you should contact your broker, bank or nominee to ensure that votes related to the securities you beneficially own are properly counted. In this regard, you must provide the broker, bank or nominee with instructions on how to vote your securities or, if you wish to attend the USFM Special Meeting or the Twin Vee Special Meeting, as applicable, and vote in person, obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank or nominee. \n

\n 15\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n If my securities are held in “street name,” will my broker, bank or nominee automatically vote my securities for me? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n No. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the “beneficial holder” of the shares held for you in what is known as “street name.” If this is the case, this joint proxy statement/prospectus may have been forwarded to you by your brokerage firm, bank or other nominee, or its agent, and you may need to obtain a proxy form from the institution that holds your shares and follow the instructions included on that form regarding how to instruct your broker, bank or nominee as to how to vote your shares. Under the rules of various national and regional securities exchanges, your broker, bank or nominee cannot vote your shares with respect to non-discretionary matters unless you provide instructions on how to vote in accordance with the information and procedures provided to you by your broker, bank or nominee. If your broker, bank or other nominee were to submit a proxy with respect to your shares but not vote your shares on a particular proposal because it lacks discretionary authority and has not received voting instructions from you (a “broker non-vote”), that broker non-vote would be counted towards the quorum requirement (i) with respect to Twin Vee shares, and would have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals so long as a quorum is established (other than the Director Election Proposal, which will have no effect), and (ii) with respect to USFM shares, and would have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the USFM Business Combination Proposal, but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting, so long as a quorum is established. However, none of the proposals at the Twin Vee Special Meeting or the USFM Special Meeting are routine matters, so your broker, bank or other nominee will not have discretionary authority to vote your shares on any proposal to be voted on at the Twin Vee Special Meeting or the USFM Special Meeting absent your instructions, and, because it has no routine matter on which it can exercise discretionary voting authority, if you do not provide voting instructions we do not expect your broker, bank or other nominee to submit a proxy with respect to your shares at all. As a result, we do not expect there to be any broker non-votes at the Twin Vee Special Meeting or the USFM Special Meeting; instead, uninstructed shares held in street name are expected to be treated the same as shares for which no proxy card is returned at all, which means such shares will not be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present and will not be voted, which, (i) with respect to Twin Vee shares, like a broker non-vote, will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, but no effect on any other proposal presented at the Twin Vee Special Meeting, so long as a quorum is established, and (ii) with respect to USFM securities, like a broker non-vote, will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the USFM Business Combination Proposal, but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting, so long as a quorum is established. Your bank, broker or other nominee can vote your securities only if you provide instructions on how to vote. You should instruct your broker to vote your shares or securities in accordance with directions you provide. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What will happen if I abstain from voting or fail to vote at the USFM Special Meeting? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n If you sign, date and return your proxy card without indicating how you wish to vote, your proxy will be voted “FOR” each of the proposals presented at the USFM Special Meeting. If you fail to return your proxy card or fail to instruct your bank, broker or other nominee how to vote, and do not attend the USFM Special Meeting in person, the effect will be, among other things, that your shares will not be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the USFM Special Meeting and will not be voted. A failure to vote will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the USFM Business Combination Proposal but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting so long as a quorum is established. An abstention will be counted towards the quorum requirement. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the USFM Business Combination Proposal, but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting so long as a quorum is established. If you are a stockholder of record and you attend the USFM Special Meeting and wish to vote in person, you may revoke your proxy by transmitting a revocation to USFM or by attending the USFM Special Meeting and voting in person. \n

\n 16\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What will happen if I abstain from voting at the Twin Vee Special Meeting? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal requires approval by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock entitled to vote thereon. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal. Approval of the Share Issuance Proposal requires an affirmative vote of the holders of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock having a majority of the voting power of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by a proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. Accordingly, abstentions on the Share Issuance Proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Share Issuance Proposal. The five director nominees receiving the affirmative vote of a plurality of the voting power of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the Director Election Proposal shall be elected to the Combined Company’s board of directors. “Plurality” means that the individuals who receive the largest number of votes cast “FOR” are elected as directors. A Twin Vee stockholder’s failure to vote by proxy or to vote in person at the Twin Vee Special Meeting will have no effect on the Director Election Proposal. You may vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” authority to vote for each of the director nominees with respect to the Director Election Proposal. A “WITHHOLD” vote will have no effect on the outcome of the Director Election Proposal. For the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal to be approved, it must receive an affirmative vote of the holders of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock having a majority of the voting power of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by a proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. Accordingly, abstentions on the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal. Because the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals are considered non-routine matters, brokers may not exercise their discretion to vote uninstructed shares on any of the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals. If the broker or nominee that holds your shares of Twin Common Stock does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a non-routine matter, the organization that holds your shares will not be able to vote your shares. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What will happen if I sign and return my proxy card without indicating how I wish to vote? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n Signed and dated proxies for the USFM Special Meeting received by USFM without an indication of how the USFM stockholder intends to vote on a proposal will be voted “FOR” each proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting. The proxyholders may use their discretion to vote on any other matters which properly come before the USFM Special Meeting. \n

\n Signed and dated proxies for the Twin Vee Special Meeting received by Twin Vee without an indication of how the Twin Vee stockholder intends to vote on a proposal will be voted “FOR” each proposal presented at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. The proxyholders may use their discretion to vote on any other matters which properly come before the Twin Vee Special Meeting. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n When and where will the USFM Special Meeting be held? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n The USFM Special Meeting will be held on [ ], 2026 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time virtually via live webcast at https://www.cstproxy.com [ ], or at such other time, on such other date and at such other place to which the meeting may be adjourned or postponed. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n When and where will the Twin Vee Special Meeting be held? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n The Twin Vee Special Meeting will be held on [ ], 2026, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time virtually via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/[ ], or at such other time, on such other date and at such other place to which the meeting may be adjourned or postponed. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n How do I attend the USFM Special Meeting virtually? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n If you are a registered USFM stockholder, you will receive a proxy card from Continental, USFM’s transfer agent. The form contains instructions on how to attend the virtual USFM Special Meeting, including the URL address, along with your control number. You will need your control number for \n

\n 17\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n access. If you do not have your control number, contact Continental, USFM’s transfer agent, at (917) 262-2373 or proxy@continentalstock.com. \n

\n You can pre-register to attend the virtual USFM Special Meeting starting [ ] at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time. Enter the URL address https://www.cstproxy.com/[ ] into your browser, enter your control number, name and email address. At the start of the USFM Special Meeting you will need to log in again using your control number and will also be prompted to enter your control number if you vote during the USFM Special Meeting. \n

\n USFM stockholders who hold their shares through a bank, broker or other nominee will need to contact Continental to receive a control number. If you plan to vote at the USFM Special Meeting, you will need to have a legal proxy from your bank, broker or other nominee, or if you would like to join and not vote, Continental will issue you a guest control number with proof of ownership. In either case, you must contact Continental for specific instructions on how to receive the control number. Continental can be contacted at the number or email address above. Please allow up to 72 hours prior to the USFM Special Meeting for processing your control number. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n How do I attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting virtually? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n If you are a registered Twin Vee stockholder, you will receive a proxy card from Twin Vee. The form contains instructions on how to attend the virtual Twin Vee Special Meeting, including the URL address, along with your control number. You will need your control number for access. If you do not have your control number, contact D.F. King & Co., Inc., 28 Liberty Street, 53rd Floor, New York, New York 10005, Toll-Free: (800) 791-3320, E-mail: TwinVee@dfking.com. \n

\n You can pre-register to attend the virtual Twin Vee Special Meeting starting [ ] at 9 a.m. Eastern Time. Enter the URL address into your browser, www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/[ ], enter your control number, name and email address. At the start of the Twin Vee Special Meeting you will need to log in again using your control number and will also be prompted to enter your control number if you vote during the Twin Vee Special Meeting. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Who is entitled to vote at the USFM Special Meeting? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n USFM has fixed [ ], 2026 as the record date for the USFM Special Meeting. If you were a stockholder of USFM at the close of business on the record date, you are entitled to vote on matters that come before the USFM Special Meeting. However, a USFM stockholder may only vote his or her shares if he or she is present in person or is represented by proxy at the USFM Special Meeting. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Who is entitled to vote at the Twin Vee Special Meeting? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee has fixed [ ], 2026 as the record date for the Twin Vee Special Meeting. If you were a holder of Twin Vee Common Stock at the close of business on the record date, you are entitled to vote on matters that come before the Twin Vee Special Meeting. However, a holder of Twin Vee Common Stock may only vote his or her shares if he or she is present in person or is represented by proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n How many votes do I have? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n USFM stockholders are entitled to one vote at the USFM Special Meeting for each share of USFM Common Stock held of record as of the record date. As of the close of business on the record date for the USFM Special Meeting, there were [ ] shares of USFM Common Stock issued and outstanding. \n

\n Holders of Twin Vee Common Stock are entitled to one vote at the Twin Vee Special Meeting for each share of Twin Vee Common Stock held of record as of the record date. As of the close of business on the record date for the Twin Vee Special Meeting, there were [ ] shares of Twin Vee Common Stock issued and outstanding. \n

\n 18\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What constitutes a quorum? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n A quorum of USFM stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the USFM Stockholder Proposals by the USFM stockholders constitutes a quorum of the USFM stockholders for action on the USFM Stockholder Proposals at the USFM Special Meeting. As of the record date for the USFM Special Meeting, [ ] shares of USFM Common Stock would be required to achieve a quorum. An abstention will be counted towards the quorum requirement. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting so long as a quorum is established. A broker non-vote (to the extent there are any) will have the same effect as a vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal. \n

\n A quorum of Twin Vee stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. The holders of at least 1/3 of the shares of Twin Vee’s capital stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote, present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. As of the record date for the Twin Vee Special Meeting, shares of Twin Vee Common Stock constituting voting power of at least [ ] votes would be required to achieve a quorum. Abstentions will be considered present for the purposes of establishing a quorum.\n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What vote is required to approve each proposal at the USFM Special Meeting? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n The following votes are required for each proposal at the USFM Special Meeting: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n The USFM Business Combination Proposal: The USFM Business Combination Proposal requires approval by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the Merger Agreement by the holders of USFM Common Stock. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n The USFM Adjournment Proposal: The USFM Adjournment Proposal will be approved if the votes cast by holders of USFM Common Stock favoring the action exceed the votes cast by holders of USFM Common Stock opposing the action. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What vote is required to approve each proposal at the Twin Vee Special Meeting? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n The following votes are required for each proposal at the Twin Vee Special Meeting: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal requires approval by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock entitled to vote thereon. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n The Share Issuance Proposal: Approval of the Share Issuance Proposal requires an affirmative vote of the holders of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock having a majority of the voting power of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. Accordingly, abstentions on the Share Issuance Proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Share Issuance Proposal. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n The Director Election Proposal: The five director nominees receiving the affirmative vote of a plurality of the voting power of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the Director Election Proposal shall be elected to the Combined Company’s board of directors. “Plurality” means that the individuals who receive the largest number of votes cast “FOR” are elected as directors. A Twin Vee stockholder’s failure to vote by proxy or to vote in person at the Twin Vee Special Meeting will have no effect on the Director Election Proposal. You may vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” authority to vote for each of the director nominees with respect to the Director Election Proposal. A “WITHHOLD” vote will have no effect on the outcome of the Director Election Proposal.\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n The Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal: For the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal to be approved, it must receive an affirmative vote of the holders of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock having a majority of the voting power of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by a proxy at the \n

\n 19\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. Accordingly, abstentions on the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal. \n

\n Because each of the aforementioned Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals are considered non-routine matters, brokers may not exercise their discretion to vote uninstructed shares on any of the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals. If the broker or nominee that holds your shares of Twin Vee Common Stock does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a non-routine matter, the organization that holds your shares will not be able to vote your shares. \n

\n Concurrently with entering into the Initial Merger Agreement on July 12, 2026, a Twin Vee stockholder, in its capacity as a holders of shares or other equity interests of Twin Vee, entered into a Company Support Agreement with USFM (the “Support Agreement”) pursuant to which such stockholder agreed, among other things, to vote their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock for the approval of the Merger Agreement and against any alternative proposal. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the Support Agreement terminates upon the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms. As of the record date for the Twin Vee Special Meeting, such Twin Vee stockholder accounted for approximately 5.47% of the number of then-outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock and approximately 5.47% of the voting power of the then-outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What are the recommendations of USFM’s board of directors? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n USFM’s board of directors believes that the USFM Business Combination Proposal and the other proposals to be presented at the USFM Special Meeting are advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, USFM and its stockholders and unanimously recommends that its stockholders vote “FOR” the USFM Business Combination Proposal and “FOR” the USFM Adjournment Proposal. \n

\n The existence of financial and personal interests of one or more of USFM’s directors may result in a conflict of interest on the part of such director(s) between what he, she or they may believe is in the best interests of USFM and its stockholders and what he, she or they may believe is best for himself, herself or themselves in determining to recommend that stockholders vote for the proposals. In addition, USFM’s management has interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. When you consider the USFM board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that USFM’s management has interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. These interests may influence USFM’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of these proposals. These interests were considered by the USFM board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What interests does USFM’s management have in the Business Combination? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n Because the chief executive officer and sole member of the board of directors of USFM has interests that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), the interests of the other holders of USFM Common Stock, a conflict of interest may exist in determining whether the Business Combination with Twin Vee is appropriate. Such interests include that Mr. Robert Price, the Chief Executive Officer and sole member of the board of directors of USFM, beneficially owned approximately 15.26% of the outstanding USFM Common Stock as of October 26, 2026. When you consider the recommendation of the USFM board of directors in favor of approval of the USFM Business Combination Proposal and the other proposals, you should keep in mind that Mr. Price has interests in such proposals that are different from, or in addition to, your interests as a stockholder. \n

\n 20\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What are the recommendations of the Twin Vee board of directors? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n The Twin Vee board of directors believes that the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and the other proposals to be presented at the Twin Vee Special Meeting are in the best interests of Twin Vee and its stockholders and recommends that its stockholders vote “FOR” the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, “FOR” the Share Issuance Proposal, “FOR” each of the director nominees in the Director Election Proposal, and “FOR” the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal. \n

\n These interests were considered by the Twin Vee board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What interests do Twin Vee’s current officer and directors have in the Business Combination? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee’s officers and directors have interests that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), the interests of the other holders of Twin Vee Common Stock. The existence of financial and personal interests of Twin Vee’s directors and officers may result in a conflict of interest on the part of one or more of the directors or officers between what he, she or they may believe is in the best interests of Twin Vee and its stockholders and what he, she or they may believe is best for himself, herself or themselves in determining to recommend that stockholders vote for the proposals described below. When you consider the Twin Vee board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that Twin Vee’s directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. \n

\n These conflicts of interest include, among other things, the interests listed below: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n 21\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Carol Craig (a) is a member of the Twin Vee Board and the Twin Vee Special Committee, (b) may be appointed to the board of directors of the Combined Company upon closing of the Business Combination and may be entitled to certain compensation and other benefits in connection with such directorship, and (c) is a member of the Board of Directors of GEC. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Michael P. Dickerson, Twin Vee’s Interim Chief Financial Officer, beneficially owns approximately 0.72% of the outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock as of October 26, 2026. \n

\n See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n Q.\n
\n

\n \n Did USFM’s board of directors obtain a third-party valuation or fairness opinion in determining whether or not to proceed with the Business Combination? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n No. USFM’s board of directors did not obtain a third-party valuation or fairness opinion in connection with its determination to approve the Business Combination. USFM’s management and directors have substantial experience in evaluating the operating and financial merits of companies and concluded that their experience and backgrounds, together with the experience and expertise of USFM’s advisors and USFM’s due diligence investigation of Twin Vee, enabled them to make the necessary analyses and determinations regarding the Business Combination. \n

\n Q.\n
\n

\n \n Did Twin Vee’s board of directors obtain a third-party valuation or fairness opinion in determining whether or not to proceed with the Business Combination? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n Yes, Twin Vee’s board of directors received a fairness opinion from Houlihan Capital in connection with the Business Combination. However, Twin Vee has not obtained any third party valuation to determine the value of the Twin Vee Common Stock prior to the Closing or the value of the Company Consideration Shares or CVR Trust contingent value rights to be issued to the Twin Vee pre-Closing stockholders pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What happens if I sell my USFM Common Stock before the USFM Special Meeting? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n The record date for the USFM Special Meeting is earlier than the date of the USFM Special Meeting and earlier than the date that the Business Combination is expected to be completed. If you transfer your shares of USFM Common Stock after the record date, but before the USFM Special Meeting, unless you grant a proxy to the transferee, you will retain your right to vote at the USFM Special Meeting. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n May I change my vote after I have mailed my signed proxy card? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n Yes. If you have submitted a proxy to vote your securities and wish to change your vote, you may do so by delivering a later-dated, signed proxy card prior to the date of the USFM Special Meeting or the Twin Vee Special Meeting, as applicable, or by voting virtually at the USFM Special Meeting or the Twin Vee Special Meeting, as applicable. Attendance at the USFM Special Meeting or the Twin Vee Special Meeting alone will not change your vote. USFM stockholders may revoke their proxy by sending a notice of revocation to USFM at the address indicated on the accompanying proxy card, which must be received by USFM prior to the vote at the USFM Special Meeting. However, in the case of USFM stockholders, if your securities are held in “street name” by your broker, bank or another nominee, you must contact your broker, bank or other nominee to change your vote. If you are a Twin Vee stockholder, to change how your Twin Vee shares are voted or to revoke your proxy if you are the record holder, you may (1) notify Twin Vee’s Corporate Secretary in writing at Twin Vee PowerCats \n

\n 22\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Co., 3101 S US Hwy 1, Fort Pierce, Florida 34982; (2) submit a later-dated proxy (either by mail, telephone or internet), subject to the voting deadlines that are described on the proxy card or voting instruction form, as applicable; or (3) deliver to Twin Vee’s Corporate Secretary another duly executed proxy bearing a later date. If you are attending the Twin Vee Special Meeting virtually, you may change your vote electronically during the virtual meeting. For Twin Vee shares you hold beneficially, you may change your voting instructions by following the instructions provided by your broker or bank. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What happens if I fail to take any action with respect to the USFM Special Meeting? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n If you fail to take any action with respect to the USFM Special Meeting and the Business Combination is approved by USFM stockholders and the Business Combination is consummated, you will become a stockholder of the Combined Company, unless you properly exercise and perfect your appraisal and dissenters’ rights. See the section entitled “Appraisal and Dissenters’ Rights” elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/ prospectus. If you fail to take any action with respect to the USFM Special Meeting and the Business Combination is not approved, you will remain a stockholder of USFM. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What happens if I fail to take any action with respect to the Twin Vee Special Meeting? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n If you fail to take any action with respect to the Twin Vee Special Meeting and the Business Combination is approved by Twin Vee stockholders and the Business Combination is consummated, you will become a stockholder of the Combined Company, unless you properly exercise and perfect your appraisal and dissenters’ rights. See the section entitled “Appraisal and Dissenters’ Rights” elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/ prospectus. If you fail to take any action with respect to the Twin Vee Special Meeting and the Business Combination is not approved, you will remain a stockholder of Twin Vee. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n What should I do if I receive more than one set of voting materials? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n USFM stockholders may receive more than one set of voting materials, including multiple copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and multiple proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For example, if you hold your securities in more than one brokerage account, you will receive a separate voting instruction card for each brokerage account in which you hold securities. If you are a holder of record and your securities are registered in more than one name, you will receive more than one proxy card. Please complete, sign, date and return each proxy card and voting instruction card that you receive in order to cast a vote with respect to all of your securities. \n

\n Twin Vee stockholders may receive more than one set of voting materials, including multiple copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and multiple proxy cards or voting instruction cards. If you are a holder of record and your securities are registered in more than one name, you will receive more than one proxy card. Please complete, sign, date and return each proxy card and voting instruction card that you receive in order to cast a vote with respect to all of your securities. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Who will solicit and pay the cost of soliciting proxies for the USFM Special Meeting? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n USFM will pay the cost of soliciting proxies for the USFM Special Meeting. USFM has engaged Advantage Proxy, Inc. (“Advantage”) to assist in the solicitation of proxies for the USFM Special Meeting. USFM has agreed to pay Advantage a fee of $[ ], plus disbursements. USFM will also reimburse banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries representing beneficial owners of shares of USFM Common Stock for their expenses in forwarding soliciting materials to beneficial owners of shares of USFM Common Stock, and in obtaining voting instructions from those owners. USFM’s directors and officers may also solicit proxies by telephone, by facsimile, by mail, on the Internet or in person. They will not be paid any additional amounts for soliciting proxies. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Who will solicit and pay the cost of soliciting proxies for the Twin Vee Special Meeting? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n The Twin Vee Board is making this solicitation on behalf of Twin Vee. Certain of the Twin Vee directors, officers, and employees, without any additional compensation, may also solicit your vote in person, virtually, by telephone or by email or other electronic communication. Twin Vee has also retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. to act as a proxy solicitor for a fee estimated to be $15,000, plus reimbursement \n

\n 23\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n of out-of-pocket expenses. On request, Twin Vee will reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to Twin Vee stockholders. In addition to the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited by personal interview, telephone, email, text messages, and advertisement in periodicals and postings. Brokerage houses, nominees, fiduciaries and other custodians will be requested to forward solicitation materials to beneficial owners and will be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses incurred in so doing. Twin Vee may request by telephone, text, mail, electronic mail or other means of communication the return of the proxy cards. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Where can I find the voting results of the USFM Special Meeting? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n The preliminary voting results are expected to be announced at the USFM Special Meeting. USFM intends to publish final voting results of the USFM Special Meeting in a press release to be issued promptly after the USFM Special Meeting. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Where can I find the voting results of the Twin Vee Special Meeting? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n The preliminary voting results are expected to be announced at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. Twin Vee will publish final voting results of the Twin Vee Special Meeting in a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days of the Twin Vee Special Meeting. \n

\n Q:\n
\n

\n \n Who can help answer my questions? \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n If you are a USFM stockholder and you have questions about the Business Combination or if you need additional copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus, any document incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus or the enclosed proxy card, you should contact: \n

\n Advantage Proxy, Inc. P.O. Box 10904\n
\n Yakima, WA 98909\n
\n Attn: Karen Smith\n
\n Toll Free Telephone: (877) 870-8565\n
\n Main Telephone: (206) 870-8565\n
\n E-mail: ksmith@advantageproxy.com \n

\n If you are a Twin Vee stockholder and you have questions about the Business Combination or if you need additional copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus, any document incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus or the enclosed proxy card, you should contact: \n

\n D.F. King & Co., Inc. \n
\n 28 Liberty Street, 53rd Floor \n
\n New York, New York 10005 \n
\n Toll Free Telephone: (800) 791-3320 \n
\n TwinVee@dfking.com \n

\n You also may obtain additional information about Twin Vee from documents filed with the SEC by following the instructions in the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information.”\n

\n 24\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n SUMMARY OF THE JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS \n

\n This summary highlights selected information from this joint proxy statement/prospectus and does not contain all of the information that is important to you. To better understand the proposals to be submitted for a vote at the USFM Special Meeting or the Twin Vee Special Meeting, including the Business Combination, you should read this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the Annexes and other documents referred to herein, carefully and in their entirety. The Merger Agreement is the primary legal document that governs the Business Combination and the other transactions that will be undertaken in connection with the Business Combination. The Merger Agreement is also described in detail in this joint proxy statement/prospectus in the section entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — The Merger Agreement.”

\n The Parties to the Business Combination \n

\n PubCo \n

\n Twin Vee Holdco Inc. (“PubCo”) is a Texas corporation that was formed on October 5, 2026 for the sole purpose of entering into a business combination. PubCo’s principal executive offices are located at c/o Twin Vee PowerCats Co., 3101 S. US-1, Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982, and its telephone number is (772) 429-2525. \n

\n USFM \n

\n USFM Corporation (“USFM”) is a private, US-based mineral exploration and investment company based in Golden, Colorado, and was established to focus on advancing drilling to develop world class tier-1 assets and develop a Western-backed pipeline of magmatic Ni-Cu-Co-PGE resources. USFM is an early stage and emerging growth company and, as such, USFM is subject to all of the risks associated with early stage and emerging growth companies. \n

\n USFM’s primary focus is the exploration potential of the Disko-Nuussuaq Project in West Greenland (the “Project”). The Project is an early-stage nickel-copper-cobalt-platinum group element (“Ni-Cu-Co-PGE”) +/- gold exploration project and does not contain mineral resources or mineral reserves. USFM was incorporated in Colorado on October 27, 2025. USFM’s principal executive offices are located at 1707 Cole Blvd., Suite 200, Golden, CO 80401, and its telephone number is (872) 216-1518. \n

\n Merger Sub I \n

\n Twin Vee Merger Sub Inc. (“Merger Sub I”) is a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of PubCo that was formed on October 5, 2026 for the sole purpose of entering into a business combination. Merger Sub I has no assets, operations or liabilities. Merger Sub I’s principal executive offices are located at c/o Twin Vee PowerCats Co., 3101 S. US-1, Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982, and its telephone number is (772) 429-2525. \n

\n Merger Sub II \n

\n USFM Merger Sub Inc. (“Merger Sub II”) is a Colorado corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of PubCo that was formed on October 7, 2026 for the sole purpose of entering into a business combination. Merger Sub II has no assets, operations or liabilities. Merger Sub II’s principal executive offices are located at c/o Twin Vee PowerCats Co., 3101 S. US-1, Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982, and its telephone number is (772) 429-2525. \n

\n Twin Vee \n

\n Twin Vee PowerCats Co. (“Twin Vee”) is a designer, manufacturer and marketer of recreational and commercial power boats. Twin Vee’s common stock is listed on Nasdaq under the symbol “VEEE”. Twin Vee was incorporated in the State of Florida as Twin Vee Catamarans, Inc. on December 1, 2009 and reincorporated in Delaware on April 7, 2021 under the name Twin Vee PowerCats Co. ValueRich, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the state of Florida on July 11, 2003 and reincorporated in Delaware on \n

\n 25\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n March 3, 2006. On February 17, 2015 ValueRich, Inc. consummated the acquisition of Twin Vee Catamarans, Inc. On April 26, 2016, ValueRich, Inc. changed its name and began operating under the name Twin Vee PowerCats, Inc. On December 5, 2022, Twin Vee PowerCats, Inc. was merged into our company. Twin Vee manufactures a range of boats under the Twin Vee and Bahama Boat Works brands, designed for activities including fishing, cruising, and recreational use. Twin Vee PowerCats are recognized for their stable, fuel-efficient, and smooth-riding catamaran hull designs. Twin Vee is one of the most recognizable brand names in the catamaran sport boat category and is known as the “Best Riding Boats on the Water™.” Bahama Boat Works is an iconic luxury brand long celebrated for its unmatched craftsmanship, timeless aesthetic, and dedication to producing some of the finest offshore fishing vessels. Twin Vee’s principal executive offices are located at 3101 South US Highway 1, Fort Pierce, Florida 34982, and its telephone number is (772) 429-2525. \n

\n USFM Stockholder Proposals \n

\n The following is a summary of the proposals to be put to the USFM Special Meeting and certain transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Unless waived by the parties to the Merger Agreement, each of the USFM Business Combination Proposal, Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, and Share Issuance Proposal is cross conditioned on the approval of each other. The USFM Adjournment Proposal is not conditioned upon the approval of any other proposal set forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement will be consummated only if the USFM Business Combination Proposal is approved at the USFM Special Meeting and if the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and the Share Issuance Proposal are approved at the Twin Vee Special Meeting, which is in turn also cross-conditioned on the USFM Business Combination Proposal (unless waived by the parties).

\n On October 7, 2026, after careful consideration, USFM’s Board of Directors unanimously determined that the Business Combination is advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, USFM and its stockholders, and recommended that USFM’s stockholders vote “FOR” the proposals presented to USFM’s stockholders in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. When you consider the USFM board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that USFM’s directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination that may conflict with your interests as a stockholder of USFM. See the section entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” in this joint proxy statement/prospectus for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n The USFM Business Combination Proposal \n

\n As discussed in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, USFM is asking its stockholders to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement. \n

\n On October 7, 2026, USFM, PubCo, Merger Sub I, Merger Sub II and Twin Vee entered into the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement amended and restated that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 12, 2026 (the “Initial Merger Agreement”), by and among Twin Vee, USFM, and USFM Merger Sub Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of USFM. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement: \n

\n (i)\n
\n

\n \n Merger Sub I will merge with and into Twin Vee, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the DGCL (the “First Merger”), with Twin Vee continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of PubCo (the “Surviving Company”); and \n

\n (ii)\n
\n

\n \n Merger Sub II will merge with and into USFM in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Colorado Act (the “Second Merger” and, together with the First Merger, the “Mergers” or the “Business Combination”), with USFM continuing as the surviving entity and a wholly-owned subsidiary of PubCo (the “Surviving Corporation”). \n

\n In connection with the consummation of the Mergers, the Combined Company will change its name to “USFM Corporation.” The boards of directors of PubCo, USFM, Merger Sub I, Merger Sub II and Twin Vee have approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. \n

\n 26\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n At the effective time of the First Merger (the “First Effective Time”), each share of Twin Vee Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the First Effective Time, including Twin Vee Common Stock held as a result of the termination of Company Convertible Securities (other than Twin Vee common stock warrants) (other than treasury shares and Dissenting Shares (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement)), will be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of PubCo (the “PubCo Common Stock”) equal to the Exchange Ratio (the “Company Merger Consideration”), such that former holders of Twin Vee securities will collectively hold 7% of the issued and outstanding shares of PubCo Common Stock immediately following the Second Effective Time, calculated on a fully diluted basis. Outstanding Twin Vee equity awards, such as options and restricted stock units (the “Company Convertible Securities”) (other than Twin Vee common stock warrants), will be accelerated, fully vested and converted at the Exchange Ratio and then cancelled, and outstanding Twin Vee common stock warrants will instead be assumed by PubCo on the same terms and conditions (including vesting and exercisability), becoming exercisable for the number of shares of PubCo Common Stock determined by the Exchange Ratio. At the effective time of the Second Merger (the “Second Effective Time”), each share of common stock, no par value per share, of USFM (the “USFM Common Stock”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Second Effective Time (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any additional shares of USFM Common Stock issued prior to the Second Effective Time pursuant to the PIPE Investment (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement) but excluding any USFM Dissenting Shares (as defined in the Merger Agreement)) will be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of PubCo Common Stock such that former holders of USFM Common Stock will collectively hold 93% of the issued and outstanding shares of PubCo Common Stock immediately following the Second Effective Time, calculated on a fully diluted basis. Each outstanding warrant issued in the PIPE Investment (a “PIPE Warrant”) will be terminated and exchanged for a warrant of PubCo (a “PubCo Warrant”) to acquire one share of PubCo Common Stock for each share of USFM Common Stock underlying such PIPE Warrant, on the same terms and conditions, including vesting and exercisability, as applied to the PIPE Warrant immediately before the Second Effective Time. The outstanding warrant held by FG Merchant Partners, LP (the “FG Warrant” and collectively with the PIPE Warrants, the “USFM Warrants”) will similarly be terminated and exchanged for a PubCo Warrant (the “FG Exchange Warrant”) to acquire one share of PubCo Common Stock for each share of USFM Common Stock underlying the FG Warrant. No fractional shares of PubCo Common Stock will be issued in the Mergers. In respect of any such fractional shares to which any Twin Vee stockholder or USFM stockholder would otherwise be entitled, such fractional shares shall be rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares of PubCo Common Stock. Prior to the First Effective Time, PubCo, USFM and Twin Vee will appoint an exchange agent to distribute the merger consideration, and promptly after the First Effective Time, the exchange agent will mail each holder of record of Twin Vee Common Stock a letter of transmittal and instructions for surrendering their certificates or book-entry shares in exchange for the applicable merger consideration. For additional information, see “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — The Merger Agreement.” \n

\n Prior to the Closing, Twin Vee will undertake a restructuring (the “Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring”) pursuant to which (i) Twin Vee will form Twin Vee Bahama Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Twin Vee (“Assetco”), which was formed on July 16, 2026; (ii) Twin Vee will contribute to Assetco substantially all of its assets and liabilities other than $700,000 in cash and the liabilities related to the Delaware Matter (as defined in the Merger Agreement) (collectively, the “Company Assets and Liabilities”), which Company Assets and Liabilities relate principally to Twin Vee’s marine business, which is Twin Vee’s sole operating business, in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Assetco; (iii) Twin Vee will form a Delaware statutory trust (the “CVR Trust”) and contribute all of the outstanding equity interests of Assetco to the CVR Trust in exchange for all of the CVR Trust’s contingent value rights interests; and (iv) Twin Vee will distribute those contingent value rights interests to each holder of Twin Vee Common Stock as of a record date to be determined, on a pro rata basis (each such interest, a “Contingent Value Right” or “CVR”), after which Twin Vee will retain no ownership or other interest, whether in the form of stock, trust interests or otherwise, in either Assetco or the CVR Trust and Twin Vee’s sole asset shall be $700,000 in cash and sole liabilities shall relate to the Delaware Matter (as defined in the Merger Agreement). Each CVR will represent such holder’s indirect beneficial interest in Assetco and the Company Assets and Liabilities held by it. Following the Closing, the CVR Trust is expected to seek to sell the Company Assets and Liabilities, with any net proceeds of such sales to be distributed to CVR holders in accordance with the terms of the CVR Trust agreement and the CVR agreement, which have not yet been \n

\n 27\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n finalized. Neither Assetco nor the CVR Trust will be a subsidiary of PubCo, USFM or the Combined Company following the Closing. The CVRs will not be transferable except in limited circumstances, will not be listed for trading on any securities exchange and will not represent any right to receive shares of PubCo Common Stock or any other equity interest in the Combined Company. For more information, see “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Contingent Value Rights” and “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Twin Vee and the Business Combination.” The CVR Trust will be a Delaware statutory trust. The Delaware trustee of the CVR Trust has not yet been designated, however, such trustee will be a United States-based trust company with a national or regional presence. The agreements governing the CVR and the CVR Trust have not yet been put in place, however, generally speaking the CVRs will be non-voting economic interests entitling the holder thereof to cash distributions following the liquidation of the Company Assets and Liabilities. The Management Committee of the CVR Trust, once appointed, will manage the liquidation and monetization of the CVR Trust’s assets, whether such assets will be held directly by the CVR Trust or indirectly through Assetco. The CVR Trust, once formed, will be the sole stockholder of Assetco. Assetco is currently a wholly owned subsidiary of Twin Vee. The CVR Trust’s trust agreement is not expected to provide for the compensation of the Management Committee members, but to the extent the members of the Management Committee are directors or employees of PubCo, he or she will each continue to be compensated in their capacity as director or employees of PubCo. Accordingly, it is not expected that the Management Committee members’ compensation will impact the value of the assets in the CVR Trust available to Twin Vee pre-closing stockholders. \n

\n Representations, Warranties, and Covenants \n

\n The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants of Twin Vee, PubCo, the Merger Subs and USFM, including, among others, covenants that: (a) each party will conduct its business in the ordinary course of its business during the interim period between the execution of the Merger Agreement and the Second Effective Time or earlier termination of the A&R Merger Agreement, (b) each party will not engage in certain types of transactions or take certain actions outside the ordinary course during such period without the prior consent of the other party, and (c) USFM will use its reasonable best efforts to take all actions necessary, proper or advisable to consummate the transactions contemplated by the PIPE Investment (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement). The Merger Agreement also requires each of Twin Vee and USFM to call and hold a stockholder meeting and for Twin Vee’s board of directors to recommend that Twin Vee’s stockholders approve the Merger Agreement. \n

\n In addition, Twin Vee is subject to customary restrictions on its ability to solicit alternative acquisition proposals from third parties and to provide information to, and enter into discussions or negotiations with, third parties regarding alternative acquisition proposals. However, prior to the receipt of the approval of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement from Twin Vee’s stockholders, the solicitation restrictions are subject to a customary “fiduciary-out” provision that allows Twin Vee, under certain circumstances, to provide information to and participate in negotiations or discussions with third parties with respect to an alternative acquisition proposal if it determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be a violation of Twin Vee’s board of directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable law. In addition, Twin Vee’s board of directors, after satisfying certain notice requirements to USFM, may change its recommendation with respect to the Mergers if it determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the failure to do so under certain circumstances specified in the Merger Agreement would reasonably be expected to be a violation of Twin Vee’s board of directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable law. \n

\n Closing Conditions \n

\n Consummation of the Mergers is subject to various conditions, including (a) obtaining requisite approval of the Mergers from Twin Vee’s and USFM’s stockholders, (b) the Registration Statement (as defined in the Merger Agreement), of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, filed by PubCo with the SEC becoming effective, (c) the absence of certain laws or orders issued by certain specified governmental entities making illegal or permanently enjoining or prohibiting the Mergers, (d) the Company Consideration Shares being approved for listing on an Applicable Stock Exchange, (e) the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by the parties, subject to certain exceptions, (f) the absence of a \n

\n 28\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n material adverse effect on either party that is continuing, (g) consummation of the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring, and (h) delivery of a fairness opinion. \n

\n Termination Provisions \n

\n The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights, and provides that, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, USFM may be required to pay Twin Vee a termination fee of $500,000 and Twin Vee may be required to pay USFM a termination fee of $800,000. Specifically, if the Merger Agreement is terminated (a) in connection with a failure of USFM to obtain its stockholders’ approval of the Mergers or (b) subject to certain conditions, in the event the Mergers are not consummated prior to the “end date” of December 31, 2026, then, in either case, the $500,000 termination fee will be payable by USFM to Twin Vee upon termination of the Merger Agreement. In addition, if Twin Vee terminates the Merger Agreement (x) to accept a Superior Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement) in compliance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, (y) after Twin Vee shall have (i) within ten (10) Business Days of a tender or exchange offer relating to securities of Twin Vee having been commenced, failed to publicly recommend against such tender or exchange offer, (ii) Twin Vee shall have failed to publicly reaffirm its recommendation of the First Merger within 10 Business Days after the date any Acquisition Proposal (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement) shall have been announced, or (iii) a willful or material breach by Twin Vee of the exclusivity provisions of the Merger Agreement shall have occurred, or (z) following USFM’s determination that Twin Vee will likely fail to resolve the Reincorporation Matter (as defined in the Merger Agreement) (i) prior to December 31, 2026 or (ii) in a manner satisfactory to USFM in its sole discretion, then, in any such case, the $800,000 termination fee will be payable by Twin Vee to USFM upon termination of the Merger Agreement. \n

\n The foregoing description of the Merger Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Annex A and is incorporated herein by reference. \n

\n The Merger Agreement has been included to provide investors with information regarding its terms. It is not intended to provide any other factual information about Twin Vee, PubCo, the Merger Subs, or USFM. The representations, warranties and covenants contained in the Merger Agreement were made only for purposes of the Merger Agreement as of the specific dates therein, were solely for the benefit of the parties to the Merger Agreement, may be subject to limitations agreed upon by the contracting parties, including being qualified by confidential disclosures made for the purposes of allocating contractual risk between the parties to the Merger Agreement instead of establishing these matters as facts, and may be subject to standards of materiality applicable to the contracting parties that differ from those applicable to investors. The representations and warranties may also be subject to contractual standards of materiality that may be different from those generally applicable under the securities laws. Neither Twin Vee’s nor USFM’s investors are third-party beneficiaries under the Merger Agreement and should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants or any descriptions thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition of the parties thereto or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of representations and warranties may change after the date of the Merger Agreement, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in Twin Vee’s, USFM’s or PubCo’s public disclosures. \n

\n For further details, see “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — The Merger Agreement.” \n

\n The USFM Adjournment Proposal \n

\n If, based on the tabulated vote, there are not sufficient votes at the time of the USFM Special Meeting for the approval of one or more proposals at the USFM Special Meeting, USFM’s board of directors may submit a proposal to adjourn the USFM Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies. In no event will USFM solicit proxies to adjourn the USFM Special Meeting or complete the Business Combination beyond the date by which it may properly do so. The USFM Adjournment Proposal is not conditioned upon the approval of any other proposal. \n

\n For additional information, see “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The USFM Adjournment Proposal.” \n

\n 29\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n USFM’s Board of Directors’ Reasons for the Business Combination \n

\n On October 7, 2026, after careful consideration, USFM’s board of directors determined that the Business Combination is advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, USFM and its stockholders, and recommended that USFM’s stockholders vote “FOR” the proposals presented to them in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. In evaluating the Business Combination, the USFM board of directors consulted with USFM’s management and considered a number of factors and risks. For a description of the USFM board of directors’ reasons for approving the Business Combination, including factors and risks considered by the USFM board of directors, see the section entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — USFM’s Board of Directors’ Reasons for the Business Combination.” \n

\n Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals \n

\n The following is a summary of the proposals to be put to the Twin Vee Special Meeting and certain transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. The Business Combination will be consummated only if the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and Share Issuance Proposal are approved by Twin Vee’s stockholders and the USFM Business Combination Proposal is approved by the USFM stockholders. Accordingly, even if the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal is approved, the Business Combination will not be consummated unless the Share Issuance Proposal and the USFM Business Combination Proposal are approved. The Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal is not conditioned upon the approval of any other proposal set forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n On October 4, 2026, after careful consideration, the Twin Vee board of directors approved the Business Combination and recommended that its stockholders vote “FOR” the proposals presented to its stockholders in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. When you consider the Twin Vee board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that Twin Vee’s directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination that may conflict with your interests as a stockholder of Twin Vee. See the section entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” in this joint proxy statement/prospectus for a further discussion of these considerations.

\n The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal \n

\n Twin Vee is asking its stockholders to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement. For more information about the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, see the sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposals — The USFM Business Combination Proposal,” “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal” and “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal.”

\n The Share Issuance Proposal \n

\n Twin Vee’s stockholders are also being asked to approve the Share Issuance Proposal, authorizing the issuance of the Company Consideration Shares in connection with the First Merger and PubCo Common Shares in connection with the Second Merger. Unless waived by the parties to the Merger Agreement, approval of the Share Issuance Proposal is a condition to the consummation of the Business Combination and the Share Issuance Proposal is cross-conditioned on the approval of the USFM Business Combination Proposal and the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal. For additional information, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 3: The Share Issuance Proposal.” \n

\n The Director Election Proposal \n

\n The Twin Vee stockholders are also being asked to approve the Director Election Proposal. Upon the consummation of the Business Combination, the board of directors of the Combined Company will consist of five directors. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, PubCo and Twin Vee agreed to take all such action within their power as may be necessary or appropriate such that immediately following the First Effective Time, the PubCo Board shall initially consist of five (5) directors, a majority of which will be independent under NYSE, NYSE American or such other applicable national securities exchange rules and regulations, and all five (5) directors nominees, shall be designated by USFM. However, the Director Election Proposal \n

\n 30\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n is not conditioned on any other proposal described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Approval of the Director Election Proposal is also not a condition to the consummation of the Mergers. For additional information, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The Director Election Proposal.” \n

\n The Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal \n

\n If, based on the tabulated vote, a quorum is present at the Twin Vee Special Meeting but there are not sufficient votes at the time of the Twin Vee Special Meeting for the approval of the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, the Share Issuance Proposal, or the Director Election Proposal, the Twin Vee board of directors may submit a proposal to adjourn the Twin Vee Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies. This is separate from the Twin Vee board of directors’ ability to adjourn the Twin Vee Special Meeting for lack of a quorum, which does not require approval of the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal and may occur regardless of whether that proposal is approved. In no event will Twin Vee solicit proxies to adjourn the Twin Vee Special Meeting or complete the Business Combination beyond the date by which it may properly do so. For additional information, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 4: The Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal.” \n

\n The Twin Vee Board of Directors’ Reasons for the Business Combination \n

\n On October 4, 2026, the Twin Vee board of directors (i) approved and adopted the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Business Combination), (ii) determined that the Business Combination is advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, Twin Vee and its stockholders and (iii) recommended that Twin Vee stockholders approve and adopt the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Business Combination). After weighing various considerations, the Twin Vee board of directors determined that the Business Combination was in the best interests of Twin Vee and its stockholders and approved the Business Combination. \n

\n Related Agreements \n

\n This section describes certain additional agreements entered into or to be entered into pursuant to the Merger Agreement. For additional information, see “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Related Agreements.” \n

\n Support Agreement \n

\n Concurrently with entering into the Initial Merger Agreement on July 12, 2026, a Twin Vee stockholder, in its capacity as a holder of shares or other equity interests of Twin Vee, entered into a Company Support Agreement with USFM (the “Support Agreement”) pursuant to which such stockholder agreed, among other things, to vote its shares of Twin Vee Common Stock for the approval of the Merger Agreement and against any alternative proposal. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the Support Agreement terminates upon the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms. As of the record date for the Twin Vee Special Meeting, such Twin Vee stockholder accounted for approximately 5.47% of the number of then-outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock and approximately 5.47% of the voting power of the then-outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. \n

\n Registration Rights Agreement \n

\n At the Closing, USFM and Pubco will enter into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), pursuant to which, among other things, the parties thereto will be granted certain registration rights with respect to the shares of Pubco Common Stock underlying the FG Exchange Warrant and PIPE Warrants. \n

\n 31\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n The USFM Special Meeting \n

\n Date, Time and Place of the USFM Special Meeting \n

\n The USFM Special Meeting is to be held on [ ], at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, virtually via live webcast at https://www.cstproxy.com/[ ], or at such other time, on such other date and at such other place to which the meeting may be adjourned or postponed. Only stockholders who hold USFM Common Stock at the close of business on the record date will be entitled to notice of or vote at the USFM Special Meeting. \n

\n Voting Power; Record Date for the USFM Special Meeting \n

\n USFM stockholders will be entitled to vote or direct votes to be cast at the USFM Special Meeting if they owned USFM Common Stock at the close of business on [ ], which is the “record date” for the USFM Special Meeting. Stockholders will have one vote for each share of USFM Common Stock owned at the close of business on the record date. If your shares are held in “street name” or are in a margin or similar account, you should contact your broker to ensure that votes related to the shares you beneficially own are properly counted. As of the close of business on the record date, there were [ ] shares of USFM Common Stock issued and outstanding. \n

\n Quorum and Vote for the USFM Special Meeting \n

\n A quorum of USFM stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the USFM Stockholder Proposals by the USFM stockholders constitutes a quorum of the USFM stockholders for action on the USFM Stockholder Proposals at the USFM Special Meeting. As of the record date for the USFM Special Meeting, [ ] shares of USFM Common Stock would be required to achieve a quorum. An abstention will be counted towards the quorum requirement. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting so long as a quorum is established. A broker non-vote, if one were to occur, would likewise be counted towards the quorum requirement and would have the same effect as a vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal, but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting, so long as a quorum is established. However, because none of the proposals at the USFM Special Meeting are routine matters, brokers, banks and other nominees will have no discretionary authority to vote uninstructed shares held in “street name” on any proposal, and we therefore do not expect there to be any “broker non-votes” at the USFM Special Meeting. Shares held in “street name” for which no voting instructions are received are instead expected to be treated the same as shares for which no proxy card is returned: such shares will not be counted towards the quorum requirement. \n

\n The proposals presented at the USFM Special Meeting require the following votes: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n If you fail to return your proxy card or fail to instruct your bank, broker or other nominee how to vote, and do not attend the USFM Special Meeting in person, the effect will be, among other things, that your shares will not be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the USFM Special Meeting and will not be voted. A failure to vote will have the same effect as a vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting so long as a quorum is established. An abstention will be counted towards the quorum requirement. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal, but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting so long as a quorum is established. A broker non-vote, if one were to occur, would likewise be counted towards the quorum requirement and would have the same effect as a vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal, but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting, so long as a quorum is established. However, \n

\n 32\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n because none of the proposals at the USFM Special Meeting are routine matters, brokers, banks and other nominees will have no discretionary authority to vote uninstructed shares held in “street name,” and we therefore do not expect there to be any “broker non-votes” at the USFM Special Meeting; such uninstructed shares will instead be treated the same as shares for which no proxy card is returned and will not be counted towards the quorum requirement. \n

\n The Twin Vee Special Meeting \n

\n Date, Time and Place of the Twin Vee Special Meeting \n

\n The Twin Vee Special Meeting is to be held on [ ], at 10 a.m. Eastern Time virtually via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/[ ], or at such other time, on such other date and at such other place to which the meeting may be adjourned or postponed. Only stockholders who hold Twin Vee Common Stock at the close of business on the record date will be entitled to notice of or vote at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. \n

\n Voting Power; Record Date for the Twin Vee Special Meeting \n

\n Twin Vee stockholders will be entitled to vote or direct votes to be cast at the Twin Vee Special Meeting if they owned Twin Vee Common Stock at the close of business on [ ], which is the “record date” for the Twin Vee Special Meeting. In respect to the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals, each holder of Twin Vee Common Stock is entitled to one vote for each such share owned at the close of business on the record date. As of the close of business on the record date for the Twin Vee Special Meeting, there were [ ] shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. \n

\n Quorum and Vote for the Twin Vee Special Meeting \n

\n A quorum of Twin Vee stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of at least 1/3 of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote as of the record date is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. As of the record date for the Twin Vee Special Meeting, shares of Twin Vee Common Stock constituting voting power of at least [ ] votes would be required to achieve a quorum. Abstentions will be considered present for the purposes of establishing a quorum. \n

\n The proposals presented at the Twin Vee Special Meeting require the following votes: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal requires approval by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock entitled to vote thereon. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n 33\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n the voting power of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by a proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. Accordingly, abstentions on the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal. \n

\n Appraisal Rights and Dissenter’s Rights \n

\n USFM Stockholders \n

\n Under applicable Colorado law concerning dissenting shareholder appraisal rights, holders of USFM Common Stock have the right to demand appraisal of their shares of USFM Common Stock and obtain payment in cash for the fair value of their shares, but only if they perfect their dissenters’ rights of appraisal and comply with Article 113 of the Colorado Act attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B. \n

\n Summarized below and in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Appraisal Rights and Dissenters’ Rights — USFM Stockholder” are the dissenters’ rights of the holders of USFM Common Stock and the statutory procedures required to be followed in order to perfect such rights. Article 113 of the Colorado Act governs dissenters’ rights under the Colorado Act. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to Article 113 of the Colorado Act, which should be reviewed carefully by holders of USFM Common Stock. Failure to comply strictly with all conditions for asserting rights as a dissenting shareholder, including the time limits, will result in loss of such dissenters’ rights by the dissenting USFM stockholder. \n

\n The Merger Agreement provides that shares of USFM Common Stock that are outstanding immediately prior to consummation of the Second Merger and have not been voted in favor of, or consented to, the Second Merger will not be entitled to receive shares of PubCo Common Stock if the holder of the shares of USFM Common Stock validly exercises and perfects statutory appraisal rights with respect to such shares. However, the shares of USFM Common Stock will be automatically converted into the right to receive the merger consideration on the same basis that all other shares of USFM Common Stock are converted in the Second Merger when and if the holder of those shares of USFM Common Stock withdraws his, her or its demand for appraisal or otherwise becomes legally ineligible to exercise appraisal rights. \n

\n Any holder of USFM Common Stock who wishes to exercise dissenter’s appraisal rights under Article 113 of the Colorado Act or who wishes to preserve his, her or its right to do so should review Article 113 of the Colorado Act carefully. Failure to comply with the procedures set forth therein will result in the loss of such rights. \n

\n 34\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n customary and current valuation concepts and techniques generally employed for similar businesses in the context of the transaction, and without discounting for lack of marketability or minority status. You should be aware that the fair value of your shares of USFM Common Stock as determined under Article 113 of the Colorado Act could be more than, the same as or less than the merger consideration you would have received in the Second Merger if you did not seek appraisal of your shares of USFM Common Stock. \n

\n To be entitled to exercise appraisal rights, a holder of USFM Common Stock must (i) not vote or cause or permit his or her shares of USFM Common Stock to be voted in favor of the Merger Agreement; and (ii) deliver written notice to USFM prior to the USFM Special Meeting of such USFM stockholder’s intent to demand payment for his or her shares if the Mergers are consummated. Any written intent to demand payment should be signed and addressed as follows: USFM Corporation, 1707 Cole Blvd, Suite 200, Golden, Colorado 80401 Attention: Hassan R. Baqar. A holder of USFM Common Stock that fails to satisfy the foregoing requirements is not entitled to demand payment under Article 113 of the Colorado Act. Additional information regarding the process to perfect dissenter’s appraisal rights under Article 113 is described in the section entitled “Appraisal Rights and Dissenters’ Rights — USFM Stockholder” elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n Twin Vee Stockholders \n

\n If the First Merger is consummated, Twin Vee stockholders of record and beneficial owners of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock who continuously hold such shares of Twin Vee Common Stock through the First Effective Time, who do not vote their shares in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement, who properly demand appraisal of such shares in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL, and who otherwise comply with the statutory requirements of Section 262 of the DGCL will be entitled to seek appraisal by the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the “Delaware Court of Chancery”) of the “fair value” of their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. The amount determined to be fair value by the court will be determined as of the First Effective Time and could be more than, the same as or less than the merger consideration payable to Twin Vee stockholders pursuant to the Merger Agreement. Voting “AGAINST” or failing to vote “FOR” the adoption of the Merger Agreement by itself does not constitute a demand for appraisal within the meaning of Section 262 of the DGCL. \n

\n This section is intended as a brief summary of the material provisions of Delaware law pertaining to appraisal rights. The following discussion, however, is not a complete summary of the law pertaining to appraisal rights under the DGCL and is qualified in its entirety by the full text of Section 262 of the DGCL attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex C. Due to the complexity of the appraisal process, Twin Vee stockholders and beneficial owners of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock who wish to seek appraisal of their shares or who wish to preserve their rights to do so should review the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Appraisal Rights and Dissenters’ Rights — Twin Vee Stockholder” and the applicable provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL carefully and are encouraged to seek the advice of legal counsel and financial advisors with respect to the exercise of appraisal rights since failure to timely and fully comply with the procedures set forth therein will result in the loss of such rights. \n

\n Generally, to exercise appraisal rights, Twin Vee stockholders of record and beneficial owners of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock must (1) properly demand appraisal of such holder’s or owner’s shares of Twin Vee Common Stock, (2) not vote in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement (whether by voting against the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, abstaining or otherwise not voting with respect to the adoption of the Merger Agreement), (3) continuously hold (in the case of a holder of record) or own (in the case of a beneficial owner) such shares of Twin Vee Common Stock through the First Effective Time, (4) not withdraw their demands or otherwise lose their rights to appraisal, and (5) otherwise comply with the statutory requirements and satisfy certain ownership thresholds set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL, in which case, such Twin Vee stockholder may be entitled to have their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock appraised by the Delaware Court of Chancery and to receive payment in cash for the “fair value” of their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Mergers, together with (unless the Delaware Court of Chancery in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown) interest on the amount determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery to be fair value from the First Effective Time through the date of payment of the judgment. \n

\n 35\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Failure to follow exactly the procedures specified under Section 262 of the DGCL may result in the loss of appraisal rights. In addition, the Delaware Court of Chancery will dismiss appraisal proceedings in respect of Twin Vee unless certain stock ownership conditions are satisfied by the Twin Vee stockholders and beneficial owners of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock seeking appraisal. The DGCL requirements for exercising appraisal rights are described in further detail in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, which is qualified in its entirety by Section 262 of the DGCL, the relevant section of the DGCL regarding appraisal rights. If you hold your shares of Twin Vee Common Stock through a bank, broker or other nominee and you wish to exercise appraisal rights, you should consult with your bank, broker or other nominee to determine the appropriate procedures for the making of a demand for appraisal on your behalf by your bank, broker or other nominee. \n

\n See “Appraisal Rights and Dissenters’ Rights” elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n Proxy Solicitation \n

\n Proxies may be solicited by mail, telephone or in person. USFM has engaged Advantage Proxy, Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies. Twin Vee has engaged D.F. King & Co., Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies. \n

\n If a USFM stockholder grants a proxy, it may still vote its shares in person if it revokes its proxy before the USFM Special Meeting. A USFM stockholder also may change its vote by submitting a later-dated proxy as described in the section entitled “Special Meeting of Stockholders of USFM — Revoking Your Proxy.” \n

\n If a Twin Vee stockholder grants a proxy, it may still vote its shares in person if it revokes its proxy before the Twin Vee Special Meeting. A Twin Vee stockholder also may change its vote by submitting a later-dated proxy as described in the section entitled “Special Meeting of Stockholders of Twin Vee — Revoking Your Proxy.” \n

\n Interests of USFM’s Management in the Business Combination \n

\n In light of the foregoing, USFM’s chief executive officer and sole director will receive material benefits from the completion of the Business Combination and may be incentivized to complete the Business Combination with Twin Vee even if (i) Twin Vee is a less favorable target company or (ii) the terms of the Business Combination are less favorable to stockholders. As a result, USFM’s chief executive officer and sole director may have interests in the completion of the Business Combination that are materially different than, and may conflict with, the interests of other stockholders. \n

\n These interests may influence USFM’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of these proposals. These interests were considered by the USFM board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n Recommendation of the USFM Board of Directors to USFM Stockholders \n

\n USFM’s board of directors believes that the USFM Business Combination Proposal and the other proposals to be presented at the USFM Special Meeting are advisable and fair to, and in the best interests \n

\n 36\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n of, USFM and its stockholders and unanimously recommends that its stockholders vote “FOR” the USFM Business Combination Proposal and “FOR” the USFM Adjournment Proposal. \n

\n The existence of financial and personal interests of USFM’s chief executive officer and sole director may result in a conflict of interest on the part of such director between what he, she or they may believe is in the best interests of USFM and its stockholders and what he may believe is best for himself, in determining to recommend that stockholders vote for the proposals. In addition, USFM’s management has interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. When you consider the USFM board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that USFM’s management has interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. These interests may influence USFM’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of these proposals. These interests were considered by the USFM board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n USFM’s board of directors has unanimously approved each of the USFM Stockholder Proposals. \n

\n USFM’s board of directors unanimously recommends that USFM stockholders: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Vote “FOR” the USFM Business Combination Proposal; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Vote “FOR” the USFM Adjournment Proposal. \n

\n Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination \n

\n When you consider the recommendation of the Twin Vee board of directors in favor of approval of the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, you should keep in mind that Twin Vee’s directors and executive officers have interests in such proposal that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), those of Twin Vee stockholders. These interests include, among other things, the interests listed below: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Carol Craig (a) is a member of the Twin Vee Board and the Twin Vee Special Committee, (b) may be appointed to the board of directors of the Combined Company upon closing of the Business \n

\n 37\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Combination and may be entitled to certain compensation and other benefits in connection with such directorship, and (c) is a member of the Board of Directors of GEC. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Michael P. Dickerson, Twin Vee’s Interim Chief Financial Officer, beneficially owns approximately 0.72% of the outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock as of October 26, 2026. \n

\n See the section entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” in this joint proxy statement/prospectus for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n Recommendation of the Twin Vee Board of Directors to Twin Vee Stockholders \n

\n The Twin Vee board of directors believes that the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and the other proposals to be presented at the Twin Vee Special Meeting are in the best interests of Twin Vee and its stockholders and recommends that its stockholders vote “FOR” the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, “FOR” the Share Issuance Proposal, “FOR” each of the director nominees in the Director Election Proposal, and “FOR” the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal. \n

\n The existence of financial and personal interests of one or more of Twin Vee’s directors may result in a conflict of interest on the part of such director(s) between what he, she or they may believe is in the best interests of Twin Vee, its stockholders and what he, she or they may believe is best for himself, herself or themselves in determining to recommend that Twin Vee stockholders vote for the proposals. In addition, Twin Vee’s officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a Twin Vee stockholder. When you consider the Twin Vee board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that Twin Vee’s directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a Twin Vee stockholder. These interests may influence Twin Vee’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of these proposals. These interests were considered by the Twin Vee board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n The Twin Vee board of directors has approved each of the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals. \n

\n The Twin Vee board of directors recommends that Twin Vee stockholders: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Vote “FOR” the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Vote “FOR” the Share Issuance Proposal; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Vote “FOR” each of the director nominees in the Director Election Proposal; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Vote “FOR” the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal. \n

\n U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations \n

\n For a more detailed discussion of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Business Combination, see “U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences for holders of Twin Vee securities.” \n

\n Expected Accounting Treatment \n

\n The Mergers will be accounted for as a reverse recapitalization in accordance with GAAP. PubCo is a newly formed entity that does not meet the criteria to be the accounting acquirer under ASC 805-10-55-15. USFM has been determined to be the accounting acquirer based on the following factors: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n former USFM securityholders will hold 93% of Pubco on a fully diluted basis, and Company securityholders 7%; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM will designate all five members of the Pubco board of directors; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM’s senior management will comprise the senior management of Pubco, and all Company directors and officers will resign at closing; and \n

\n 38\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM’s operations will constitute the only ongoing operations of Pubco. \n

\n Reverse recapitalization. Following the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring, the Company will hold no operations and only nominal assets, consisting of $700,000 of cash, and therefore will not meet the definition of a business under ASC 805. Accordingly, the Mergers are treated as the equivalent of USFM issuing shares for the net monetary assets of the Company, accompanied by a recapitalization. The consequences are: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the Company’s net assets are stated at historical cost, with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM is the predecessor, and its historical financial statements will become the historical financial statements of Pubco; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM’s equity will be retroactively restated to reflect the number of Pubco shares received by USFM stockholders. \n

\n Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring. The Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring is a transaction of the Company, the accounting acquiree, and is completed before the Mergers. It is presented in a separate column and recorded at carrying amount as a non-reciprocal, pro rata distribution to the Company’s stockholders under ASC 505-60 and ASC 845-10-30-10, with no gain or loss recognized in the proforma financial statements. \n

\n PIPE Investment assumption. The proforma financial information accounts for only the committed PIPE Investments as of the date of joint proxy/prospectus filing. \n

\n Emerging Growth Company \n

\n USFM and Twin Vee each qualify as an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act, and each may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. Twin Vee is expected to cease to qualify as an emerging growth company as of December 31, 2026. \n

\n Further, section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. Each of USFM and Twin Vee has elected not to opt out of such extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, each of USFM and Twin Vee, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of USFM’s and Twin Vee’s financial statements with certain other public companies difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used. \n

\n The Combined Company will qualify as an emerging growth company. The Combined Company will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of: (i) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the Closing (b) in which the Combined Company has total annual gross revenue of at least $1.235 billion or (c) in which the Combined Company is deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of the Combined Company’s common equity that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700.0 million as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year’s second fiscal quarter; and (ii) the date on which the Combined Company has issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the prior three-year period. \n

\n 39\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Summary Risk Factors \n

\n You should consider all the information contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus in deciding how to vote for the proposals presented in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. In particular, you should consider the risk factors described under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 44. Some of these risks include, but are not limited to: \n

\n We will require significant additional capital to fund our business plan. \n

\n USFM and Twin Vee have a history of losses and expect to continue to incur losses in the future. \n

\n The Project is in the exploration stage. There is no assurance that we can establish the existence of any mineral reserve at the Project or any other properties we may acquire or obtain rights to explore in commercially exploitable quantities. Unless and until we do so, we cannot earn any revenues from these properties and if we do not do so we will lose all of the funds that we expend on exploration. If we do not establish the existence of any mineral reserve in a commercially exploitable quantity, the exploration component of our business could fail, which would significantly reduce the value of the Combined Company Common Stock. \n

\n The nature of mineral exploration and production activities involves a high degree of risk and the possibility of uninsured losses. \n

\n Commodity price volatility could have dramatic effects on our results of operations and our ability to execute our business plan. \n

\n Any material changes in mineral resource/reserve estimates and grades of mineralization will affect the economic viability of placing a property into production and a property’s return on capital. \n

\n We are subject to significant laws and governmental regulations that affect our operations and costs of conducting our business, and we may not be able to obtain all required permits and licenses to place our properties into production. \n

\n Land reclamation requirements for our properties may be burdensome and expensive. \n

\n We face intense competition in the mining industry. \n

\n We do not currently insure against all the risks and hazards of mineral exploration, development, and mining operations. \n

\n Geological complexity and data limitations in the Disko Island and the Nuussuaq Peninsula region may impair our ability to identify commercially viable prospects. \n

\n Our operations in Greenland are subject to unique regulatory, environmental, and political risks. \n

\n The Disko Island and the Nuussuaq Peninsula region is a high-risk, frontier exploration area with no prior successful commercial discoveries, and historical exploration efforts have been unsuccessful. \n

\n Operating in Greenland’s remote and harsh environment will result in significantly higher costs and logistical challenges compared to more developed regions. \n

\n Since Twin Vee’s directors and executive officers have interests that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), the interests of Twin Vee stockholders, a conflict of interest may have existed in determining whether the Business Combination with USFM is appropriate. \n

\n There has been no third-party valuation or appraisal of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock, the Company Consideration Shares, or the CVRs. \n

\n If you are a Twin Vee stockholder, you must make your own decision with respect to whether you should or should not exercise appraisal rights in connection with the First Merger. \n

\n Twin Vee stockholders may not receive any proceeds from the CVR Trust. \n

\n 40\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Notwithstanding stockholder ratification of the Reverse Stock Split, residual legal and business uncertainty concerning Twin Vee’s corporate history could adversely affect Twin Vee, the Business Combination or the Combined Company. \n

\n The CVRs that pre-Closing Twin Vee stockholders will receive in the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring will not be listed on any securities exchange, will be subject to significant transfer restrictions and may have little or no value. \n

\n The specific assets and liabilities to be held through Assetco, and the terms of the CVR Trust agreement and the CVR Agreement, have not yet been determined, which makes it difficult to evaluate the CVRs. \n

\n The CVRs may have no value, and Twin Vee stockholders may receive no payment in respect of their CVRs. \n

\n Payments on the CVRs, if any, will be made only after deduction of liabilities and expenses (including reserves for future expenses), and may be substantially less than the gross value of the Company Assets and Liabilities. \n

\n The CVRs are not transferable, will not be listed on any exchange, and there will be no market for the CVRs. \n

\n The CVRs do not represent an equity or ownership interest, and CVR holders will have no voting or other rights of an equityholder. \n

\n The trustee of the CVR Trust will control the disposition of the Company Assets and Liabilities, and CVR holders will have no consent or other right with respect to those decisions. \n

\n The tax treatment of the CVRs is uncertain, and Twin Vee stockholders may incur tax liability without receiving any corresponding cash distribution. \n

\n Subsequent to consummation of the Business Combination, the Combined Company may be exposed to unknown or contingent liabilities and may be required to subsequently take write-downs or write-offs, restructuring and impairment or other charges that could have a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations and its share price, which could cause you to lose some or all of your investment. \n

\n The historical financial results of Twin Vee and unaudited pro forma financial information included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus may not be indicative of what the Combined Company’s actual financial position or results of operations would have been or will be in future periods. \n

\n The Applicable Stock Exchange may not list the Combined Company Common Stock on its exchange, which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in the Combined Company Common Stock and subject the Combined Company to additional trading restrictions. \n

\n The market price of the Combined Company Common Stock could be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment. \n

\n If the perceived benefits of the Business Combination do not meet the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the market price of Twin Vee’s common stock may decline before the closing, or the market price of the Combined Company Common Stock may decline after the closing. \n

\n The Combined Company does not intend to pay dividends on its common stock. \n

\n Any future sales or offerings of the Combined Company Common Stock may cause substantial dilution to the Combined Company’s stockholders and may cause the price of the Combined Company Common Stock to decline. \n

\n 41\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n MARKET PRICE, TICKER AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION \n

\n Twin Vee \n

\n Twin Vee Common Stock is currently listed on Nasdaq under the symbol “VEEE.” The closing price of Twin Vee Common Stock on October 7, 2026, the last trading day before announcement of the execution of the Merger Agreement, was $10.35. As of the Record Date, the closing price for the Twin Vee Common Stock was $[ ]. \n

\n PubCo intends to apply to list the shares of Combined Company Common Stock on an Applicable Stock Exchange upon the Closing. \n

\n Holders of Twin Vee Common Stock should obtain current market quotations for their securities. The market value of these securities could vary at any time before the Business Combination. \n

\n Holders \n

\n Twin Vee. As of the record date for the Twin Vee Special Meeting, there were [ ] holders of record of Twin Vee Common Stock. The number of holders of record does not include a substantially greater number of “street name” holders or beneficial holders whose shares of Twin Vee Common Stock are held of record by banks, brokers and other financial institutions. See “Beneficial Ownership of Securities.” \n

\n USFM. As of the record date for the USFM Special Meeting, there were [ ] holders of record of USFM Common Stock. See “Beneficial Ownership of Securities.” \n

\n Dividend Policy \n

\n Twin Vee did not pay a cash dividend during the 2025 or 2024 fiscal years. Twin Vee presently intends to retain earnings, if any, to finance the development and growth of its business and operations and does not anticipate declaring or paying cash dividends on the Twin Vee Common Stock in the foreseeable future. Any future determination as to the declaration and payment of dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on then-existing conditions, including operating results, financial condition, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects, and other factors the board of directors may deem relevant. \n

\n The Combined Company presently intends to retain earnings, if any, to finance the development and growth of its business and operations and does not anticipate declaring or paying cash dividends on the Combined Company Common Stock in the foreseeable future. Any future determination as to the declaration and payment of dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on then-existing conditions, including operating results, financial condition, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects, and other factors the board of directors may deem relevant. \n

\n Price Range of USFM Securities \n

\n Historical market price information regarding USFM and the Combined Company is not provided because there is no public market for USFM’s or the Combined Company’s securities. For information regarding USFM’s liquidity and capital resources, see “USFM’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources.”\n

\n 42\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n RISK FACTORS \n

\n The occurrence of one or more of the events or circumstances described in these risk factors, alone or in combination with other events or circumstances, may have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and future prospects of the Combined Company, in which event the market price of its common stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment. \n

\n These risk factors are not exhaustive, and you are encouraged to perform your own investigation with respect to the business, prospects, financial condition and operating results of Twin Vee and USFM and the business, prospects, financial condition and operating results of the Combined Company following the completion of the Business Combination. You should carefully consider the following risk factors in addition to the other information included and incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including matters addressed in the section entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” before deciding how to vote your USFM Common Stock or Twin Vee Common Stock. Twin Vee and USFM may face additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known to them, or that they currently deem immaterial, which may also impair their or the Combined Company’s respective business, prospects, financial condition or operating results. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of PubCo, Twin Vee and USFM and the notes to the financial statements included therein \n

\n Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this subsection to “we,” “us” or “our” refer to the Combined Company. \n

\n Risks Related to the Combined Company’s Business \n

\n Increased levels of volatility or a rapid destabilization of global economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition. \n

\n In recent years, global financial conditions have been characterized by increased volatility which has impacted many industries, including the mining industry. Global financial conditions are subject to sudden and rapid destabilization in response to current and future events, as governmental authorities may have limited resources to respond to such events. Global capital markets continue to experience increased volatility in response to global events such as the significant increase in the rate of inflation in recent years, and the effects of certain countermeasures taken by central banks including increased interest rates. Future economic crises may be precipitated by any number of causes, including natural disasters, epidemics (such as the COVID-19 virus pandemic), geopolitical instability and war (such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Israel-Palestine conflict and the Israel/U.S. conflict with Iran), the failure of financial institutions, terrorism, material changes in the price of oil, the volatility of metal prices, and the volatility of global financial markets. Continued increased levels of volatility or a sudden or rapid destabilization of global economic conditions could negatively impact our ability to obtain equity or debt financing or to make other suitable arrangements to finance the Project which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition. \n

\n Our ability to continue to operate as a going concern depends on our ability to obtain adequate financing in the future. \n

\n Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to maintain continued support from our stockholders and creditors and to raise additional capital and implement our business plan. \n

\n There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain adequate financing in the future or that such financing will be on terms advantageous to us. However, management believes that we have sufficient working capital to meet our projected minimum financial obligations for the next fiscal year. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern. We are an exploration stage company, and we have incurred losses since our inception. \n

\n We will require significant additional capital to fund our business plan. \n

\n We will be required to expend significant funds to determine whether proven and probable mineral reserves exist at properties we have rights to explore, to continue exploration and, if warranted, to develop \n

\n 43\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n existing properties we have rights to explore, and to identify and acquire additional properties to diversify our property portfolio. We anticipate that we will be required to make substantial capital expenditures for the continued exploration and, if warranted, development of the Project. We have spent and will be required to continue to expend significant amounts of capital for drilling, geological, and geochemical analysis, assaying, permitting, and feasibility studies with regard to the results of our exploration at the Project. We may not benefit from some of these investments if we are unable to identify commercially exploitable mineral reserves. Our ability to obtain necessary funding for these purposes, in turn, depends upon a number of factors, including the status of the national and worldwide economy and the price of metals. Capital markets worldwide were adversely affected by substantial losses by financial institutions, caused by investments in asset-backed securities, and remnants from those losses continue to impact the ability for us to raise capital. We may not be successful in obtaining the required financing or, if we can obtain such financing, such financing may not be on terms that are favorable to us. \n

\n Our inability to access sufficient capital for our operations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. Sales of substantial amounts of securities may have a highly dilutive effect on our ownership or share structure. Sales of a large number of shares of the Combined Company Common Stock in the public markets, or the potential for such sales, could decrease the trading price of those shares and could impair our ability to raise capital through future sales of Combined Company Common Stock. We have not yet commenced commercial production at any of the properties we have rights to explore and, therefore, have not generated positive cash flows to date and have no reasonable prospects of doing so unless successful commercial production can be achieved at the Project. We expect to continue to incur negative investing and operating cash flows until such time, if ever, that we are able to enter into successful commercial production. This will require us to deploy our working capital to fund such negative cash flow and to seek additional sources of financing. There is no assurance that any such financing sources will be available or sufficient to meet our requirements. There is no assurance that we will be able to continue to raise equity capital or to secure additional debt financing, or that we will not continue to incur losses. \n

\n We have a limited operating history on which to base an evaluation of our business and prospects. \n

\n Since our inception, we have had no revenue from operations. We have no history of producing products from the Project. We would require further exploration work in order to reach the development stage. Advancing the Project into the development stage will require significant capital and time, and successful commercial production from the Project will be subject to completing feasibility studies, permitting and re-commissioning of the mine, constructing processing plants, and other related works and infrastructure. As a result, we are subject to all of the risks associated with developing and establishing new mining operations and business enterprises including: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n completion of feasibility studies to verify reserves and commercial viability, including the ability to find sufficient ore reserves to support a commercial mining operation; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the timing and cost, which can be considerable, of further exploration, preparing feasibility studies, permitting and construction of infrastructure, mining and processing facilities; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the availability and costs of drill equipment, exploration personnel, skilled labor, and mining and processing equipment, if required; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the availability and cost of appropriate smelting and/or refining arrangements, if required; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n compliance with stringent environmental and other governmental approval and permit requirements; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the availability of funds to finance exploration, development, and construction activities, as warranted; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n potential opposition from non-governmental organizations, local groups or local inhabitants that may delay or prevent development activities; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n potential increases in exploration, construction, and operating costs due to changes in the cost of fuel, power, materials, and supplies; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n potential shortages of mineral processing, construction, and other facilities related supplies. \n

\n 44\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n The costs, timing, and complexities of exploration, development, and construction activities may be increased by the location of the Project and demand by other mineral exploration and mining companies. It is common in exploration programs to experience unexpected problems and delays during drill programs and, if commenced, development, construction, and mine start-up. In addition, our management and workforce will need to be expanded, and sufficient support systems for our workforce will have to be established. This could result in delays in the commencement of mineral production and increased costs of production. Accordingly, our activities may not result in profitable mining operations and we may not succeed in establishing mining operations or profitably producing metals at any of our current or future project, including the Project. \n

\n USFM and Twin Vee have a history of losses and the Combined Company expects to continue to incur losses in the future. \n

\n We have incurred losses since inception, have had negative cash flow from operating activities, and expect to continue to incur losses in the future. \n

\n We expect to continue to incur losses unless and until such time as one of our properties enters into commercial production and generates sufficient revenues to fund continuing operations. We recognize that if we are unable to generate significant revenues from mining operations and/or dispositions of our properties or rights related thereto, we will not be able to earn profits or continue operations. At this early stage of our operation, we also expect to face the risks, uncertainties, expenses, and difficulties frequently encountered by companies at the start-up stage of their business development. We cannot be sure that we will be successful in addressing these risks and uncertainties and our failure to do so could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition. \n

\n Damage to our reputation could adversely affect our company’s operations and financial condition. \n

\n Our relationship with the communities where we operate is critical to ensure the future success of our existing operations and the construction and development of the Project. Reputational damage can be the result of the actual or perceived occurrence of any number of events and could include any negative publicity, whether true or not. There is an increasing level of public concern relating to the perceived effect of mining activities on the environment and on communities impacted by such activities. Certain individuals and groups who oppose resource development can often be vocal critics of the mining industry and its practices, including the use of hazardous substances in processing activities and effects on the environment. The increased use of social media and other web-based tools used to generate, publish and discuss user-generated content and to connect with other users has made it increasingly easier for such individuals and groups to communicate and share their opinions and views regarding our company and our activities. Adverse publicity generated by such persons related to extractive industries generally, or our operations or development activities specifically, could have an adverse effect on our reputation. Reputation loss, including reputation loss by other similar mining companies, may result in decreased investor confidence, increased challenges in developing and maintaining community and stakeholder relations and an impediment to our overall ability to advance the Project, which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and prospects. While we are committed to operating in a socially responsible manner, there is no guarantee that our efforts in this respect will mitigate this potential risk. We do not ultimately have direct control over how we are perceived by others, and reputational damage could adversely affect our operations and financial condition. \n

\n We rely on information systems that may become subject to security threats. \n

\n We have entered into agreements with third parties for hardware, software, telecommunications and other information technology (“IT”) services in connection with our operations. Our operations depend, in part, on how well we and our suppliers protect networks, equipment, IT systems and software against damage from a number of threats, including, but not limited to, cable cuts, natural disasters, terrorism, fire, power loss, hacking, phishing schemes, computer viruses, vandalism, fraud and theft. Our operations also depend on the timely maintenance, upgrade and replacement of networks, equipment, IT systems and software, as well as preemptive interventions and expenditures to mitigate the risks of failures and other IT system disruptions. Any of these and other events could result in information systems failures, delays and \n

\n 45\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n increases in capital expenses and which would negatively impact our ability to operate. The failure of any part of our information systems could, depending on the nature and degree of any such failure, adversely impact our reputation and results of operations. Our risk and exposure to these matters cannot be fully mitigated because of, among other things, the evolving nature of these threats. As a result, cybersecurity and the continued development and enhancement of controls, processes and practices designed to protect our systems, computers, software, data and networks from attack, damage or unauthorized access remain a priority. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance protective measures or to investigate and remediate any security vulnerabilities. \n

\n Although the Trump Administration has shifted the focus of the U.S. government away from environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters, continuing efforts to address such matters may negatively impact our business. \n

\n While the current Trump Administration has sought to scale back and dismantle federal ESG policies and regulations, ongoing attention to ESG matters, including those related to climate change and sustainability, and increasing societal, and investor and legislative pressures on companies to address ESG matters may result in increased costs, increased investigations and litigation or threats thereof, negative impacts on our access to capital markets, and damage to our reputation. Increasing attention to climate change, for example, may result in additional governmental investigations and private litigation, or threats thereof, against our company. In addition, some organizations that provide information to investors on corporate governance and related matters have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters, including climate change and climate-related risks. Such ratings are used by some investors to inform their investment and voting decisions. Unfavorable ESG ratings may lead to negative investor sentiment toward our company and to the diversion of investment to other industries, which could have a negative impact on our access to and costs of capital. Additionally, evolving expectations on various ESG matters, including biodiversity, waste, and water, may increase costs, require changes in how we operate and lead to negative stakeholder sentiment. \n

\n Risks Related to Mining and Exploration \n

\n We have not established that any of our mineral properties contain any mineral reserve according to recognized reserve guidelines, nor can there be any assurance that we will be able to do so. A mineral reserve is defined in subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act (“Subpart 1300”) as an estimate of tonnage and grade or quality of “indicated mineral resources” and “measured mineral resources” (as those terms are defined in Subpart 1300) that, in the opinion of a “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300), can be the basis of an economically viable project. In general, the probability of any individual prospect having a “reserve” that meets the requirements of Subpart 1300 is small, and our mineral properties may not contain any “reserves” and any funds that we spend on exploration could be lost. Even if we do eventually discover a mineral reserve on one or more of our properties, there can be no assurance that our properties can be developed into producing mines or that we can extract those minerals. Both mineral exploration and mineral development involve a high degree of risk, and few mineral properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. \n

\n The commercial viability of an established mineral deposit will depend on a number of factors including, by way of example, the size, grade, and other attributes of the mineral deposit, the proximity of the mineral deposit to infrastructure such as processing facilities, roads, rail, power, and a point for shipping, government regulation, and market prices. Most of these factors will be beyond our control, and any of them could increase costs and make extraction of any identified mineral deposit unprofitable. \n

\n 46\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n The nature of mineral exploration and production activities involves a high degree of risk and the possibility of uninsured losses. \n

\n Exploration for and the production of minerals is highly speculative and involves greater risk than many other businesses. Most exploration programs do not result in mineralization that is of sufficient quantity and quality to be profitably mined. Our operations are, and any future development or mining operations we may conduct will be, subject to all of the operating hazards and risks normally incidental to exploring for and developing mineral properties, such as, but not limited to: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n economically insufficient mineralized material; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n fluctuation in production costs that make mining uneconomical; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n labor disputes; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n unanticipated variations in grade and other geologic problems; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n environmental hazards; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n water conditions; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n difficult surface or underground conditions; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n industrial accidents; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n metallurgic and other processing problems; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n mechanical and equipment performance problems; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n failure of dams, stockpiles, wastewater transportation systems, or impoundments; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n unusual or unexpected rock formations; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n personal injury, fire, flooding, cave-ins and landslides. \n

\n Any of these risks can materially and adversely affect, among other things, the development of properties, production quantities and rates, costs and expenditures, potential revenues, and production dates. If we were to determine that capitalized costs associated with any of our mineral interests are not likely to be recovered, we would incur a write-down of our investment in these interests. All of these factors may result in losses in relation to amounts spent that are not recoverable, or that result in additional expenses. \n

\n Commodity price volatility could have dramatic effects on our results of operations and our ability to execute our business plan. \n

\n The price of commodities varies daily. Our future revenues, if any, will likely be derived from the extraction and sale of base and precious metals. The price of those commodities has fluctuated widely, particularly in recent years, and is affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including economic and political trends, expectations of inflation, currency exchange fluctuations, interest rates, global and regional consumptive patterns, speculative activities and increased production due to new extraction developments and improved extraction and production methods. The effect of these factors on the price of base and precious metals, and therefore the economic viability of our business, could negatively affect our ability to secure financing and could negatively affect our results of operations. \n

\n Estimates of mineralized material and resources are subject to evaluation uncertainties that could result in project failure. \n

\n Our exploration and future mining operations, if any, are and will be faced with risks associated with being able to accurately predict the quantity and quality of mineralized material and resources/reserves within the earth using statistical sampling techniques. Estimates of any mineralized material or resource/reserve on any of our properties would be made using samples obtained from appropriately placed trenches, test pits, underground workings, and intelligently designed drilling. There is an inherent variability of assays between check and duplicate samples taken adjacent to each other and between sampling points that cannot be reasonably eliminated. Additionally, there also may be unknown geologic details that have not been identified or correctly appreciated at the current level of accumulated knowledge about our properties.

\n 47\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n This could result in uncertainties that cannot reasonably be eliminated from the process of estimating mineralized material and resources/reserves. If such estimates proved to be unreliable, any plan implemented to exploit the mineralization based on those estimates may not lead to commercially viable operations. \n

\n As we have not completed feasibility studies on the Project and have not commenced actual production, we do not have mineral resources, and any estimates may require adjustments or downward revisions. In addition, the grade of mineral ore ultimately mined, if any, may differ from that indicated by future feasibility studies and drill results. Minerals recovered in small scale tests might not be duplicated in large scale tests under on-site conditions or in production scale. \n

\n Our exploration activities on our properties may not be commercially successful, which could lead us to abandon our plans to develop our properties and our investments in exploration. \n

\n Our long-term success depends on our ability to identify mineral deposits at the Project and other properties we may acquire, if any, that we can then develop into commercially viable mining operations. Mineral exploration is highly speculative, involves many risks, and is frequently non-productive. These risks include unusual or unexpected geologic formations and the inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment, or labor. The success of commodity exploration is determined in part by the following factors: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the identification of potential mineralization; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n availability of government-granted exploration permits; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the quality of our management and our geological and technical expertise; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the capital available for exploration and development work. \n

\n Substantial expenditures are required to establish proven and probable reserves through drilling and analysis, to develop metallurgical processes to extract metal, and to develop the mining and processing facilities and infrastructure at any site chosen for mining. Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on a number of factors that include, without limitation, the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade, and proximity to infrastructure; commodity prices; and government regulations, including, without limitation, regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals, and environmental protection. We may invest significant capital and resources in exploration activities and may find it necessary to abandon such investments if we are unable to identify commercially exploitable mineral reserves. The decision to abandon a project may have an adverse effect on the market value of our securities and the ability to raise future financing. \n

\n Our proposed operations, including exploration and, if warranted, development and operation of the Project, require permits from governmental authorities and will be governed by laws and regulations, including: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n laws and regulations governing mineral concession acquisition, prospecting, development, mining, and production; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n laws and regulations related to exports, taxes, and fees; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n labor standards and regulations related to occupational health and mine safety; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n environmental standards and regulations related to waste disposal, toxic substances, land use reclamation, and environmental protection. \n

\n Companies engaged in exploration and mining activities often experience increased costs and delays in production and other schedules as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and \n

\n 48\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n permits. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permits may result in enforcement actions, including the forfeiture of mineral claims or other mineral tenures, orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities requiring operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or costly remedial actions. We cannot predict if all permits that we may require for continued exploration, development, or construction of mining facilities and the conduct of mining operations will be obtainable on reasonable terms, if at all. Costs related to applying for and obtaining permits and licenses may be prohibitive and could delay our planned exploration and development activities. We may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of our mineral exploration or our mining activities, if any, and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of, or our failure to comply with, such laws, regulations, and permits. \n

\n Existing and possible future laws, regulations, and permits governing operations and activities of exploration companies, or more stringent implementation of such laws, regulations and permits, could have a material adverse impact on our business and cause increases in capital expenditures or require abandonment or delays in exploration. The Project is located in Greenland, which has numerous clearly defined regulations with respect to permitting mines, which could potentially impact the total time to market for the project. \n

\n Land reclamation requirements for our properties may be burdensome and expensive. \n

\n Although variable depending on location and the governing authority, land reclamation requirements are generally imposed on mineral exploration companies (as well as companies with mining operations) in order to minimize long term effects of land disturbance. \n

\n Reclamation may include requirements to: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n control dispersion of potentially deleterious effluents; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n treat ground and surface water to drinking water standards; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n reasonably re-establish pre-disturbance landforms and vegetation. \n

\n In order to carry out reclamation obligations imposed on us in connection with our potential development activities, we must allocate financial resources that might otherwise be spent on further exploration and development programs. We plan to set up a provision for our reclamation obligations on our properties, as appropriate, but this provision may not be adequate. If we are required to carry out unanticipated reclamation work, our financial position could be adversely affected. \n

\n We face intense competition in the mining industry. \n

\n The mining industry is intensely competitive in all of its phases. As a result of this competition, some of which is with large established mining companies with substantial capabilities and with greater financial and technical resources than ours, we may be unable to acquire rights to additional properties, if any, or financing on terms we consider acceptable. We also compete with other mining companies in the recruitment and retention of qualified managerial and technical employees. If we are unable to successfully compete for qualified employees, our exploration and development programs may be slowed down or suspended. We compete with other companies that produce our planned commercial products for capital. If we are unable to raise sufficient capital, our exploration and development programs may be jeopardized or we may not be able to acquire, develop, or operate additional mining projects. \n

\n A shortage of equipment and supplies could adversely affect our ability to operate our business. \n

\n We are dependent on various supplies and equipment to carry out our mining exploration and, if warranted, development operations. Any shortage of such supplies, equipment, and parts could have a material adverse effect on our ability to carry out our operations and could therefore limit, or increase the cost of, production. \n

\n Joint ventures and other partnerships, including offtake arrangements, may expose us to risks. \n

\n We may enter into joint ventures, partnership arrangements, or offtake agreements, with other parties in relation to the exploration, development, and production of the properties in which we have an interest. \n

\n 49\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Any failure of such other companies to meet their obligations to us or to third parties, or any disputes with respect to the parties’ respective rights and obligations, could have a material adverse effect on us, the development and production at our properties, including the Project, and on future joint ventures, if any, or their properties, and therefore could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial performance, cash flows and the market value of the Combined Company Common Stock. \n

\n We may experience difficulty attracting and retaining qualified management to meet the needs of our anticipated growth, and the failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. \n

\n We are dependent on a relatively small number of key employees, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The loss of any officer could have an adverse effect on us. We have no life insurance on any individual, and we may be unable to hire a suitable replacement for them on favorable terms, should that become necessary. \n

\n Our operations may be subject to litigation or other claims. \n

\n From time to time our operations may be subject to disputes that may result in litigation or other legal claims. We may be required to take countermeasures or defend against these claims, which will divert resources and management time from operations. The costs of these claims or adverse filings may have a material effect on our business and results of operations. \n

\n We do not currently insure against all the risks and hazards of mineral exploration, development, and mining operations. \n

\n Exploration, development, and mining operations involve various hazards, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, metallurgical and other processing problems, unusual or unexpected rock formations, structural cave-ins or slides, flooding, fires, and periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions. These risks could result in damage to or destruction of mineral properties, facilities, or other property, personal injury, environmental damage, delays in operations, increased cost of operations, monetary losses, and possible legal liability. We may not be able to obtain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums or at all. We may elect not to insure where premium costs are disproportionate to our perception of the relevant risks. The payment of such insurance premiums and of such liabilities would reduce the funds available for exploration and production activities. \n

\n We are a development-stage company with a limited operating history and no revenues. \n

\n We were formed in October 2025 and have not generated any revenues to date. Our business is subject to the risks inherent in the establishment of a new enterprise, including limited financial resources, lack of operating history, and unproven management systems. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in implementing our business plan, achieving commercial production, or generating positive cash flows. \n

\n We have not drilled any targets to date, and our business model is unproven in the Disko Island and the Nuussuaq Peninsula region. \n

\n We have not yet drilled any exploratory or development targets in the Disko Island and the Nuussuaq Peninsula region of Greenland. Our business strategy is focused on unlocking the high-quality mineral potential of this frontier basin through modern exploration techniques. There is no assurance that our planned drilling activities will result in discoveries or commercially viable production. Our ability to generate revenues and achieve profitability depends on our success in discovering and developing high quality minerals. If our exploration and development activities are unsuccessful, or if we are unable to execute them in a timely and cost-effective manner, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. \n

\n Risks Related to Greenland \n

\n Geological complexity and data limitations in the Disko Island and the Nuussuaq Peninsula region may impair our ability to identify commercially viable prospects. \n

\n The Disko Island and the Nuussuaq Peninsula region of Greenland is a frontier exploration area characterized by limited seismic data coverage and significant structural complexity. Current seismic data \n

\n 50\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n are reconnaissance-level only, with wide line spacing that limits the accuracy of trap definition and reservoir imaging. Pervasive igneous intrusions and faulting patterns may negatively affect trap integrity, migration pathways, and seismic interpretation. In addition, significant tertiary uplift and erosion have created uncertainty around thermal maturity, increasing the risk that certain formations may be gas-prone or non-prospective. These factors may result in unsuccessful drilling or lower-than-expected mineral recoveries, materially affecting our exploration program. \n

\n Our operations in Greenland are subject to unique regulatory, environmental, and political risks. \n

\n All of our license interests are located in Greenland, a jurisdiction with a developing regulatory framework for mineral exploration. Our operations are subject to local environmental and permitting regulations, including requirements related to exploration licenses, drilling approvals, and environmental protection. Changes in laws or regulations, delays in obtaining required permits, or increased environmental scrutiny could materially increase costs or delay our activities. In addition, Greenland’s political environment may evolve in ways that affect foreign investment, taxation, or licensing terms. Any adverse regulatory or political developments could materially and adversely affect our business. \n

\n Geopolitical tensions involving Greenland, including proposals for U.S. annexation, could create uncertainty and adversely affect our operations. \n

\n Greenland is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark that has been the subject of significant geopolitical attention in recent years. The United States government has expressed interest in acquiring or annexing Greenland for strategic and military purposes, which has been met with opposition from both Greenland and Denmark. These geopolitical tensions could create regulatory uncertainty, affect our relationships with Greenlandic authorities, or result in changes to the investment climate in Greenland, in particular investment and operations by U.S. companies in Greenland. Additionally, Greenland’s internal political dynamics, including movements toward greater independence from Denmark, could result in changes to the regulatory framework governing natural resource extraction. Any significant geopolitical developments affecting Greenland could materially and adversely affect our business, operations, the value of our licenses and, consequently, the market value of the Combined Company Common Stock. \n

\n Despite decades of geological study and exploration interest dating back to the late 1800s, no commercial mineral discoveries have been made in the Disko Island and the Nuussuaq Peninsula regions of Greenland. Previous exploration efforts produced mixed and mostly unsuccessful results. While we believe recent assessments support a probability of success, investors should be aware that this is a high-risk, frontier exploration program with a significant possibility that our drilling efforts will not result in any commercial discoveries. If our exploration activities are unsuccessful, we may not be able to recover our investment, and the value of our securities could decline significantly or become worthless. \n

\n Operating in Greenland’s remote and harsh environment will result in significantly higher costs and logistical challenges compared to more developed regions. \n

\n The Disko Island and the Nuussuaq Peninsula region is located in a remote area of western Greenland with no existing infrastructure, limited local labor, and no locally available equipment or services. All drilling equipment, personnel, and supplies must be transported to the site by a combination of marine and air transport during limited seasonal windows, and any minerals produced would need to be exported internationally as there is no domestic market. These factors are expected to result in significantly higher operating costs compared to more developed mineral exploration regions. Industry analysts have noted that the high costs of establishing operations in a new, remote environment with harsh Arctic weather conditions, combined with the expenses of exporting production, present substantial economic challenges. If we are unable to manage these costs effectively our operations may not be economically viable.] \n

\n Our operations in Greenland may be subject to increased scrutiny, opposition, and reputational risks due to concerns about climate change and environmental impacts of fossil fuel development in the Arctic. \n

\n Greenland’s rapidly melting ice sheet has become a prominent symbol of global climate change, and fossil fuel development in the Arctic region faces increasing opposition from environmental groups, \n

\n 51\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n institutional investors, and segments of the public. Our operations may be subject to protests, negative publicity campaigns, or other forms of opposition that could disrupt our activities, damage our reputation, or affect our ability to raise capital. Some institutional investors have adopted policies restricting or prohibiting investment in companies engaged in Arctic exploration. Additionally, any environmental incident or perceived harm to Greenland’s environment could result in significant reputational damage, regulatory action, and potential legal liability. These factors could materially and adversely affect our business, our ability to attract investment, and the trading price of our securities. \n

\n Risks Relating to Twin Vee and the Business Combination \n

\n Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this subsection to “we,” “us” or “our” refer to Twin Vee. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Michael P. Dickerson, Twin Vee’s Interim Chief Financial Officer, beneficially owns approximately 0.72% of the outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock as of October 26, 2026. \n

\n See “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” in this joint proxy statement/prospectus for a further discussion of these considerations.

\n 52\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n The exercise of Twin Vee’s directors’ and executive officers’ discretion in agreeing to changes or waivers in the terms of the Business Combination may result in a conflict of interest when determining whether such changes to the terms of the Business Combination or waivers of conditions are appropriate and in Twin Vee’s stockholders’ best interests. \n

\n In the period leading up to the closing of the Business Combination, events may occur that, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, would require Twin Vee to agree to amend the Merger Agreement, to consent to certain actions taken by USFM or to waive rights that Twin Vee is entitled to under the Merger Agreement. Such events could arise because of changes in the course of USFM’s businesses or a request by USFM to undertake actions that would otherwise be prohibited by the terms of the Merger Agreement. In any of such circumstances, it would be at Twin Vee’s discretion, acting through its board of directors, to grant its consent or waive those rights. The existence of financial and personal interests of one or more of the directors described in the preceding risk factors (and described elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus) may result in a conflict of interest on the part of such director(s) between what he, she or they may believe is best for Twin Vee and its stockholders and what he, she or they may believe is best for himself, herself or themselves in determining whether or not to take the requested action. As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, Twin Vee does not believe there will be any changes or waivers that Twin Vee’s directors and executive officers would be likely to make after stockholder approval of the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal has been obtained. While certain changes could be made without further stockholder approval, Twin Vee will circulate a new or amended joint proxy statement/prospectus and resolicit Twin Vee’s common stockholders if changes to the terms of the transaction that would have a material impact on its stockholders are required prior to the vote on the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal. \n

\n There has been no third-party valuation or appraisal of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock, the Company Consideration Shares, or the CVRs. \n

\n While a fairness opinion has been delivered to the Twin Vee Board in connection with the Business Combination, no independent party has been retained by Twin Vee or any other person to evaluate or render any appraisal with respect to the current or future projected value of Twin Vee Common Stock, the Company Consideration Shares, or the contingent value rights that will be issued to pre-Closing Twin Vee stockholders. The merger consideration as provided for in the Merger Agreement was determined based, in part, on the valuation of Twin Vee determined by the Twin Vee Board, which is based on criteria other than Twin Vee’s current or prospective asset value, earnings, net worth or other established criteria for value and therefore should not be considered a “market” or definitive valuation. While the Twin Vee Common Stock is traded on Nasdaq, trading volume has been unpredictable in recent months and on most days the trading volume is quite low. Therefore, trading prices of the Twin Vee Common Stock may not be indicative of the current or future fair market value thereof. No assurances can be provided that the merger consideration as provided for the in the Merger Agreement will have a value equal to or greater than the value of the Twin Vee Common Stock immediately prior to the Closing. \n

\n Twin Vee may complete another public offering or sell Twin Vee in the near future with a deemed value of the Twin Vee Common Stock that is higher than the value of the merger consideration as provided in the Merger Agreement. \n

\n From time to time, Twin Vee has conducted meetings and discussions with investment banking firms and other outside advisors regarding the prospects for successfully completing another public offering of Twin Vee’s equity or debt securities or a sale of Twin Vee to a third party other than USFM. If successful, such a hypothetical additional public offering may increase the liquidity and market value for the Twin Vee Common Stock. Our ability to successfully complete another public offering of our equity or debt securities is subject to a number of risks and contingencies (some of which are not within our control), including (i) the receptivity of the securities markets to offerings by companies in our line of business, (ii) our financial results, (iii) the absence of negative developments with respect to our business and (iv) successful completion of review of any registration statement by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee or predict with a high degree of certainty if or when we may be able to successfully complete another public offering. Furthermore, in lieu of another public offering, we may agree to sell Twin Vee in the future to a third party other than USFM. Any such sale of Twin Vee may reflect a price per share that is higher than the value of the merger consideration as provided in the Merger Agreement. If Twin Vee stockholders approve the Business Combination and the Business Combination successfully closes, you will \n

\n 53\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n be giving up the opportunity to dispose of your shares of Twin Vee Common Stock at a possibly higher price following another public offering or sale of Twin Vee to a third party other than USFM. If the Business Combination does not successfully close, no assurance can be given that Twin Vee will in fact proceed with another public offering or sale of Twin Vee to a third party other than USFM, or that any such transaction would actually yield a price per share that is higher than the merger consideration as provided in the Merger Agreement. \n

\n The value of Twin Vee may increase in the future even if there is not a subsequent public offering or sale of Twin Vee to a third party other than USFM. \n

\n Even if we do not complete the Business Combination, other sale of Twin Vee, or subsequent public offering of our debt or equity securities, the value of the Twin Vee Common Stock could increase substantially in the future. If the Business Combination does not close, we intend to continue to pursue the growth of our business. The development of our business may be very successful and may result in a substantial increase in the value of Twin Vee in the future. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, if the Twin Vee stockholders approve the Business Combination and the Business Combination actually closes, you will agree to sell your shares of Twin Vee Common Stock for the merger consideration as provided in the Merger Agreement. The value of such merger consideration may be less than the actual value of the Twin Vee Common Stock in the future in the event the Business Combination does not close. By voting “FOR” the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, assuming the Twin Vee stockholders approve the Business Combination and the Business Combination actually closes, you will irrevocably agree to sell your shares of Twin Vee Common Stock in exchange for the merger consideration as set forth in the Merger Agreement and you will irrevocably forego any future increase in the value of Twin Vee as a stand-alone public company with respect to those shares. \n

\n If you are a Twin Vee stockholder, you must make your own decision with respect to whether you should or should not exercise appraisal rights in connection with the First Merger. \n

\n You must make your own decision as to whether you should or should not exercise appraisal rights in connection with the First Merger pursuant to applicable Delaware law. Twin Vee and PubCo strongly urge you to consult your own financial, legal, accounting, tax, and other professional advisors regarding this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the Merger Agreement, the Mergers, and the other documents attached hereto or incorporated herein by reference before voting on the Business Combination or deciding to exercise statutory appraisal rights. While exercising statutory appraisal rights may ultimately yield a higher value for your shares of Twin Vee Common Stock, there are substantial costs and risks associated with pursuing such statutory appraisal rights. You must make your own determination whether or not to exercise statutory appraisal rights in connection with the First Merger. \n

\n The announcement of the proposed Business Combination could disrupt Twin Vee’s relationships with its stockholders, business partners, customers, and others, as well as its operating results and business generally. \n

\n Whether or not the Business Combination and related transactions are ultimately consummated, as a result of uncertainty related to the proposed transactions, risks relating to the impact of the announcement of the Business Combination on Twin Vee’s business include the following: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n its employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles, which might adversely affect the Combined Company’s ability to retain and hire key personnel and other employees; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n stockholders, business partners, customers and other parties with which the Combined Company maintains business relationships may experience uncertainty about its future and seek alternative relationships with third parties, seek to alter their business relationships with Twin Vee or fail to re-enroll or extend an existing relationship with Twin Vee; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee has expended and Twin Vee will continue to expend significant costs, fees and expenses for professional services and transaction costs in connection with the proposed Business Combination. \n

\n If any of the aforementioned risks were to materialize, they could lead to significant costs which may impact the Combined Company’s results of operations and cash available to fund its businesses. \n

\n 54\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Twin Vee stockholders may not receive any proceeds from the CVR Trust. \n

\n While Twin Vee must transfer substantially all of its assets and liabilities, excluding $700,000 in cash, to Assetco prior to the consummation of the Business Combination as part of the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring required by the terms of the Merger Agreement and the CVR Trust will seek to liquidate such assets and liabilities at the highest possible price, no assurances can be provided that the CVR Trust will generate any net liquid assets to distribute to the pre-closing Twin Vee stockholders through the CVR Trust. There are no assurances that the CVR Trust will be successful in seeking a buyer for such assets and liabilities or that proceeds received by the CVR Trust therefrom will exceed the CVR Trust’s costs and liabilities. The contingent value rights issued to the pre-closing Twin Vee stockholders pursuant to the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring may ultimately have no value and may expire worthless pursuant to their terms with no cash or other items of value being distributed by the CVR Trust to pre-closing Twin Vee stockholders in respect of their contingent value rights interests. No assurances can be provided regarding the value, if any, of the contingent value rights interests issued to pre-closing Twin Vee stockholders as part of the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring. \n

\n In April 2026, Twin Vee purported to reincorporate from Delaware to Nevada and its board of directors subsequently approved a 1-for-37 reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) in purported reliance on Nevada law. Twin Vee later determined that the Nevada reincorporation had not received the stockholder approval required under the DGCL, that Twin Vee had therefore remained a Delaware corporation at all relevant times, and that the Reverse Stock Split, having been approved only by the board of directors, had not been validly authorized as a matter of Delaware law. At a Special Meeting of Stockholders held on September 8, 2026, Twin Vee stockholders ratified the Reverse Stock Split pursuant to Section 204 of the DGCL and approved a corresponding Certificate of Validation. Although Twin Vee believes that this ratification eliminates the uncertainty surrounding the validity of the Reverse Stock Split, Section 204 of the DGCL permits any claim that the ratified act is void or voidable due to a failure of authorization to be brought within 120 days from the date the Certificate of Validation became effective. Twin Vee cannot assure you that no such claim will be brought within that period or, if brought, that it will not be resolved adversely to Twin Vee. In addition, prior to ratification, Twin Vee disclosed that the failure to ratify the Reverse Stock Split could have exposed it to claims that its outstanding share numbers should revert to pre-split levels, that issuances of Common Stock after the purported Reverse Stock Split (including issuances of Twin Vee equity awards and warrants) might not be valid, and that Twin Vee might be unable to validate its total outstanding shares of Common Stock in connection with the Business Combination or other strategic transactions. In fact, Twin Vee has received threats of legal claims related to the defective reincorporation, including a written demand from USFM. Any future claim relating to these matters, or any failure of the share and other Twin Vee Common Stock information reflected in this joint proxy statement/prospectus to be accurate as a result, could delay or disrupt the Business Combination, result in disputes over the number of shares of PubCo Common Stock issuable as merger consideration, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on Twin Vee, USFM, PubCo or the Combined Company. \n

\n Separately, and regardless of the stockholder ratification described above, the Merger Agreement gives USFM broad, unilateral discretion over whether the matters described above — referred to in the Merger Agreement as the “Reincorporation Matter” — have been adequately resolved, and USFM may exercise that discretion to unilaterally terminate the Merger Agreement in its sole discretion. Under the Merger Agreement, it is a condition to USFM’s obligation to close the Business Combination that Twin Vee shall have resolved the Reincorporation Matter to the satisfaction of USFM, in USFM’s sole discretion, which includes both obtaining the Twin Vee stockholder ratification of the Reverse Stock Split described above (which has already occurred) and the resolution and release of all claims, liabilities, damages, penalties and fees arising out of Twin Vee’s prior defective Nevada reincorporation. In addition, USFM may terminate the Merger Agreement at any time if USFM determines that Twin Vee will likely fail to resolve the Reincorporation Matter (i) prior to the Agreement End Date or (ii) in a manner satisfactory to USFM, in each case in USFM’s sole discretion. Because these determinations are committed to USFM’s sole discretion, USFM could elect to terminate the Merger Agreement on this basis even though Twin Vee stockholders \n

\n 55\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n have ratified the Reverse Stock Split, including if USFM believes that residual claims, liabilities or litigation relating to the defective reincorporation have not been adequately resolved or released. If USFM terminates the Merger Agreement on this basis, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, Twin Vee would be required to pay USFM a termination fee of $800,000, and Twin Vee stockholders would not receive the benefits of the Business Combination. Any such set of circumstances would have a material and adverse impact on Twin Vee’s business, results of operations, and financial condition. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — The Merger Agreement — Termination Provisions” for more information. \n

\n While Twin Vee will transfer substantially all of its assets and liabilities, excluding $700,000 in cash, to Assetco prior to the consummation of the Business Combination as part of the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring required by the terms of the Merger Agreement and the Trust will seek to liquidate such assets and liabilities at the highest possible valuation, no assurances can be provided that the Trust will generate any net liquid assets to distribute to the pre-closing Twin Vee stockholders through the Trust. The contingent value rights issued to the pre-closing Twin Vee stockholders pursuant to the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring will not be listed for trading on any securities exchange, are expected to be subject to significant restrictions on transfer, and do not represent an equity interest in PubCo, USFM, Twin Vee or the Combined Company. As a result, there may be no market for the CVRs, and Twin Vee stockholders may be unable to sell or otherwise monetize their CVRs. Following the Closing, the CVR Trust is expected to seek to sell the Company Assets and Liabilities held through Assetco, and any net proceeds would be distributed to CVR holders in accordance with the CVR Trust agreement and the CVR Agreement. There are no assurances that the CVR Trust will be successful in finding a buyer for such assets and liabilities or that proceeds exceeding the CVR Trust’s costs and liabilities will be generated by the CVR Trust therefrom. Because the value of the CVRs will depend entirely on the amount and timing of net proceeds, if any, realized from the eventual sale of the Company Assets and Liabilities, Twin Vee stockholders cannot be certain of the value, if any, they will ultimately realize from the CVRs, and the CVRs may have little or no value. \n

\n As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the CVR Agreement and the CVR Trust agreement governing the CVRs have not been finalized or entered into, and the Company Assets and Liabilities to be contributed to Assetco have not all been transferred. As a result, Twin Vee stockholders are being asked to approve the Business Combination without complete information regarding the assets and liabilities underlying the CVRs or the mechanics by which, and the extent to which, any value may ultimately be realized from the CVRs. \n

\n The CVRs may have no value, and Twin Vee stockholders may receive no payment in respect of their CVRs. \n

\n The sale, monetization or other disposition of the Company Assets and Liabilities held through Assetco is the sole source of potential value for the CVRs. There can be no assurance that Assetco or the CVR Trust will be able to sell the Company Assets and Liabilities for any particular price, within any particular timeframe, or at all. If the Company Assets and Liabilities cannot be sold for an amount sufficient to exceed the liabilities assumed by Assetco and the expenses of operating and winding down Assetco and the CVR Trust, the CVRs will have no value, and Twin Vee stockholders will receive no payment in respect of their CVRs. \n

\n Any proceeds realized from the sale of the Company Assets and Liabilities will first be applied to satisfy the liabilities retained by Assetco and to pay the fees and expenses of operating, administering and winding down Assetco and the CVR Trust, including trustee and administrative fees and reserves for future \n

\n 56\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n expenses, before any amount is distributed to CVR holders. The amount available for distribution to CVR holders may therefore be substantially less than the gross value of the Company Assets and Liabilities, and may be zero. \n

\n The CVRs are not transferable, will not be listed on any exchange, and there will be no market for the CVRs. \n

\n The CVRs are expected to be subject to significant restrictions on transfer, except in limited circumstances to be set forth in the CVR Agreement. As a result, there will be no public or other trading market for the CVRs. Twin Vee pre-Closing stockholders will have no ability to monetize their CVRs prior to receipt of any payment thereon, if any, and will bear the risk of any reduction in the value of the Company Assets and Liabilities without the ability to dispose of their CVRs. The CVRs are not expected to be registered under the Securities Act or any state securities laws. \n

\n The CVRs do not represent an equity or ownership interest, and CVR holders will have no voting or other rights of an equityholder. \n

\n The CVRs are contractual beneficial trust interests only and do not represent any equity, ownership or other interest in PubCo, USFM, Twin Vee, Assetco, the CVR Trust or any of their respective affiliates. CVR holders will have no voting, dividend or other rights typically associated with equity ownership, including no right to receive financial statements or other reports except as may be expressly provided in the CVR Agreement, no right to inspect books and records, no right to attend meetings, and no right to direct or participate in the management of Assetco or the CVR Trust. \n

\n The trustee of the CVR Trust will control the disposition of the Company Assets and Liabilities, and CVR holders will have no consent or other right with respect to those decisions. \n

\n The trustees of the CVR Trust will have control over the timing, terms and structure of any sale, monetization or other disposition of the Company Assets and Liabilities, including the selection of any purchaser, financial advisor, broker or other intermediary. CVR holders will have no consent, approval, direction, veto or other right with respect to any of these decisions, which may be made in a manner that adversely affects the value ultimately realized by CVR holders, including by selling the Company Assets and Liabilities for less than their potential value or by incurring costs that reduce the amounts available for distribution. \n

\n The tax treatment of the CVRs is uncertain, and Twin Vee stockholders may incur tax liability without receiving any corresponding cash distribution. \n

\n The U.S. federal income tax consequences of the receipt of CVRs in the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring and of any subsequent payments on the CVRs are uncertain and have not yet been finally determined. Depending on the tax treatment of the CVR Trust, a CVR holder may be required to take into account its allocable share of the CVR Trust’s income, gain, loss, deduction and credit for a given taxable year regardless of whether any cash distribution is made to CVR holders in that year. Twin Vee stockholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences of the receipt, ownership of, and any payment with respect to, the CVRs. \n

\n Please also carefully review the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Twin Vee’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by Twin Vee with the SEC on February 27, 2026, which is incorporated herein by reference, along with similarly titled sections in the other documents filed by Twin Vee with the SEC. \n

\n The Business Combination may be a taxable event for holders of Twin Vee Common Stock. \n

\n In general, it is intended that the Business Combination will qualify as a tax-deferred transaction. However, it is possible that the CVRs may be treated as taxable boot received by Twin Vee Stockholders in connection with the First Merger. You are strongly urged to read the sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” and “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Related Agreements — Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the CVRs to U.S. holders of Twin Vee Common Stock”, and to consult with a tax advisor to

\n 57\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n determine the particular U.S. federal, state, local or foreign income or other tax consequences of the Business Combination to you. \n

\n The tax treatment of the CVRs is uncertain. \n

\n There is no authority directly on point addressing whether contingent value rights with characteristics similar to the CVRs should be treated for federal income tax purposes as a distribution of property with respect to Twin Vee Common Stock, as an “open transaction,” or in some other manner, and the proper characterization is inherently a factual question. Accordingly, holders of Twin Vee Common Stock are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding this issue. Twin Vee intends to report the issuance of the CVRs as a “closed transaction.” Under this construct, the CVRs would be treated either (i) as a distribution under Section 301 of the Code separate from the Business Combination, or (ii) as aggregated with, and treated as part of, the Business Combination, in which case the fair market value of the CVRs may be treated as taxable boot received by Twin Vee Stockholders in connection with the First Merger. There can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position that could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to holders of the CVRs. For more information regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the CVRs, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Related Agreements — Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the CVRs to U.S. holders of Twin Vee Common Stock.” \n

\n Risks Relating to USFM and the Business Combination \n

\n Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this subsection to the “Company,” “USFM,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to USFM prior to the consummation of the Business Combination and the Combined Company after the consummation of the Business Combination. \n

\n Neither the USFM board of directors nor any committee thereof obtained a third-party valuation or opinion in determining whether or not to pursue the Business Combination. \n

\n Neither the USFM board of directors nor any committee thereof is required to obtain an opinion that the price that we are paying for Twin Vee is fair to us from a financial point of view and no such third-party valuation or opinion was obtained in connection with the Business Combination. USFM’s management and directors have substantial experience in evaluating the operating and financial merits of companies and concluded that their experience and backgrounds, together with the experience and expertise of USFM’s advisors and USFM’s due diligence investigation of Twin Vee, enabled them to make the necessary analyses and determinations regarding the Business Combination. In analyzing the Business Combination, the USFM board of directors and management conducted due diligence on Twin Vee. The USFM board of directors reviewed comparisons of selected financial data of Twin Vee with its peers in the industry and the financial terms set forth in the Merger Agreement and concluded that the Business Combination was advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, USFM and its stockholders. Accordingly, investors will be relying solely on the judgment of the USFM board of directors and management in valuing Twin Vee and assuming the risk that the USFM board of directors and management may not have properly valued Twin Vee and that certain members of USFM management may have interests that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with) the interests of the unaffiliated stockholders. \n

\n The USFM board of directors has not retained an unaffiliated representative to act solely on behalf of unaffiliated stockholders of USFM for purposes of negotiating the terms of the Business Combination on their behalf and/or preparing a report concerning the approval of the Business Combination. \n

\n The USFM board of directors is not required to retain an unaffiliated representative to act solely on behalf of unaffiliated stockholders of USFM for purposes of negotiating the terms of the Business Combination on their behalf and/or preparing a report concerning the approval of the Business Combination and has not retained such an unaffiliated representative or obtained a third-party valuation or fairness opinion in connection with its determination to approve the Business Combination. USFM’s management and directors have substantial experience in evaluating the operating and financial merits of companies and concluded that their experience and backgrounds, together with the experience and expertise of USFM’s \n

\n 58\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n advisors and USFM’s due diligence investigation of Twin Vee, enabled them to make the necessary analyses and determinations regarding the Business Combination. Accordingly, USFM’s stockholders will be relying solely on the judgement of the USFM board of directors in valuing Twin Vee’s business and assuming the risk that the USFM board of directors may not have properly valued the Business Combination and that certain directors and officers of USFM may have interests that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with) the interests of the unaffiliated stockholders. Not retaining such an unaffiliated representative may also lead an increased number of stockholders to vote against the Business Combination, which could potentially impact our ability to consummate the Business Combination. \n

\n Since USFM’s management has interests that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), the interests of our stockholders, a conflict of interest may have existed in determining whether the Business Combination with Twin Vee is appropriate as our initial business combination. \n

\n As a result, our management may have interests in the completion of the Business Combination that are materially different than, and may conflict with, the interests of other stockholders. \n

\n These interests may influence USFM’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of these proposals. These interests were considered by the USFM board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n The exercise of USFM’s directors’ and executive officers’ discretion in agreeing to changes or waivers in the terms of the Business Combination may result in a conflict of interest when determining whether such changes to the terms of the Business Combination or waivers of conditions are appropriate and in USFM’s stockholders’ best interests. \n

\n In the period leading up to the Closing, events may occur that, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, would require USFM to agree to amend the Merger Agreement, to consent to certain actions taken by Twin Vee or to waive rights that USFM is entitled to under the Merger Agreement. Such events could arise because of changes in the course of Twin Vee’s businesses or a request by Twin Vee to undertake actions that would otherwise be prohibited by the terms of the Merger Agreement. In any of such circumstances, it would be at USFM’s discretion, acting through its board of directors, to grant its consent or waive those rights. The existence of financial and personal interests of one or more of the directors described in the preceding risk factors (and described elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus) may result in a conflict of interest on the part of such director(s) between what he, she or they may believe is best for USFM and its stockholders and what he, she or they may believe is best for himself, herself or themselves in determining whether or not to take the requested action. As of the date of this joint proxy statement/ prospectus, USFM does not believe there will be any changes or waivers that USFM’s directors and executive officers would be likely to make after stockholder approval of the USFM Business Combination Proposal has been obtained. While certain changes could be made without further stockholder approval, USFM will circulate a new or amended joint proxy statement/prospectus and resolicit USFM’s stockholders if changes to the terms of the transaction that would have a material impact on its stockholders are required prior to the vote on the USFM Business Combination Proposal. \n

\n We and Twin Vee will incur significant transaction and transition costs in connection with the Business Combination. \n

\n We and Twin Vee have both incurred and expect to incur significant, nonrecurring costs in connection with consummating the Business Combination and operating as a public company following the \n

\n 59\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n consummation of the Business Combination. We and Twin Vee may also incur additional costs to retain key employees. Certain transaction expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement (including the Business Combination), including legal, accounting, consulting, investment banking and other fees, expenses and costs, will be paid out of the proceeds of the Business Combination or by the Combined Company following the Closing. However, if the Closing does not occur, each party to the Merger Agreement will be responsible for and pay its own expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. A significant portion of such transaction costs will be incurred whether or not the Business Combination successfully closes. See “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — The Merger Agreement.” \n

\n We cannot assure you that the due diligence conducted in relation to Twin Vee has identified all material issues or risks associated with Twin Vee, its business or the industry in which it competes. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that factors outside of Twin Vee’s and our control will not later arise. As a result of these factors, the Combined Company may be exposed to liabilities and incur additional costs and expenses and we may be forced to later write-down or write-off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in our reporting losses. \n

\n Even if our due diligence has identified certain risks, unexpected risks may arise and previously known risks may materialize in a manner not consistent with our preliminary risk analysis. If any of these risks materialize, this could have a material adverse effect on the Combined Company’s financial condition and results of operations and could contribute to negative market perceptions about its securities. Additionally, we have no indemnification rights against Twin Vee stockholders under the Merger Agreement and all of the purchase price consideration will be delivered at the Closing. \n

\n Accordingly, any stockholders of USFM who choose to remain Combined Company stockholders following the Business Combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their shares. Such stockholders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the unexculpated breach by our directors or officers of a fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws that the registration statement or joint proxy statement/prospectus relating to the Business Combination contained an actionable material misstatement or material omission. \n

\n The historical financial results included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus are not indicative of the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows that USFM, Twin Vee or the Combined Company may achieve in the future. This is primarily the result of the following factors: (i) the Combined Company will incur additional ongoing costs as a result of the Business Combination, including costs related to public company reporting, investor relations and compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; (ii) Twin Vee will transfer substantially all of its assets ad liabilities (other than $700,000 in cash and liabilities associated with an ongoing legal action) to the Trust, whose contingence value rights interests will be distributed to pre-closing Twin Vee stockholders pursuant to the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring, and (iii) the Combined Company’s capital structure will be different from that reflected in USFM’s and Twin Vee’s respective historical financial statements. The Combined Company’s financial condition and future results of operations could be materially different from amounts reflected in the historical financial statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/ prospectus, so it may be difficult for investors to compare the Combined Company’s future results to historical results or to evaluate its relative performance or trends in its business. \n

\n Similarly, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is provided for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of what the actual results of operations and financial position would have been had the Business Combination taken place \n

\n 60\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n on the dates indicated, nor are they indicative of the future consolidated results of operations or financial position of the Combined Company. The unaudited pro forma adjustments are based on information currently available, and assumptions and estimates underlying the unaudited pro forma adjustments are described in the accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information. If the actual facts are different than these assumptions, the amounts and shares outstanding in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information that follows will be different, and those changes could be material. See “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information” elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n The consummation of the Business Combination is subject to a number of conditions and if those conditions are not satisfied or waived, the Merger Agreement may be terminated in accordance with its terms and the Business Combination may not be completed. \n

\n The completion of the Business Combination is subject to a number of conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, as described in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus. Those conditions include, among other things, (i) approval of the Business Combination and related agreements and transactions by the respective stockholders of USFM and Twin Vee, (ii) effectiveness of the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, (iii) receipt of approval for listing on the Applicable Stock Exchange of the shares of Combined Company Common Stock to be issued in connection with the Mergers, (iv) the performance in all material respects of the respective covenants of USFM and Twin Vee to be performed as of or prior to the Closing, (v) the absence of any injunctions prohibiting the consummation of the Mergers and (vi) the representations and warranties of USFM and Twin Vee remaining accurate (to such standards described in the Merger Agreement) as of the effective time of the Mergers. If those conditions are not satisfied or waived, the Merger Agreement may be terminated in accordance with its terms and the Business Combination may not be completed. \n

\n In connection with the Business Combination, we will apply to have the Combined Company Common Stock listed on an Applicable Stock Exchange upon consummation of the Business Combination. We cannot assure you that we will be able to meet all initial listing requirements. Even if the Combined Company Common Stock is listed on an Applicable Stock Exchange, the Combined Company may be unable to maintain the listing of its securities in the future. \n

\n If the Combined Company fails to meet the listing requirements and an Applicable Stock Exchange does not list its securities on its exchange the Combined Company could face significant material adverse consequences, including: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n a limited availability of market quotations for the Combined Company Common Stock; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n reduced liquidity for the Combined Company Common Stock; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n a determination that the Combined Company Common Stock is a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in the Combined Company Common Stock to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for the Combined Company Common Stock; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n a limited amount of news and analyst coverage; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future. \n

\n The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities, which are referred to as “covered securities.” If the Combined Company Common Stock is not listed on an Applicable Stock Exchange, such securities would not qualify as covered securities and we would be subject to regulation in each state in which we offer our securities because states are not preempted from regulating the sale of securities that are not covered securities. \n

\n 61\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and our activities may be restricted, which may make it difficult for us to complete our initial business combination. \n

\n If we are deemed to be an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, our activities may be restricted, including: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n restrictions on the nature of our investments; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n restrictions on the enforceability of agreements entered into by us, each of which may make it difficult for us to complete our initial business combination; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n restrictions on the issuance of securities, each of which may make it difficult for us to complete our initial business combination. \n

\n In addition, we may have imposed upon us burdensome requirements, including: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n registration as an investment company with the SEC (which may be impractical and would require significant changes in, among other things, our capital structure); \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n adoption of a specific form of corporate structure; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy and disclosure requirements and compliance with other rules and regulations that we are currently not subject to. \n

\n In order not to be regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, unless we can qualify for an exclusion, we must ensure that we are engaged primarily in a business other than investing, reinvesting or trading of securities and that our activities do not include investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading “investment securities” constituting more than 40% of our total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. \n

\n Changes in laws or regulations or in how such laws or regulations are interpreted or applied, or a failure to comply with any laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, may materially and adversely affect us, including our ability to complete the Business Combination. \n

\n We are subject to laws and regulations, and interpretations and applications of such laws and regulations, enacted by national, regional and local governments. In particular, because we will be required to comply with certain SEC and other legal requirements, the Business Combination may be contingent on our ability to comply with certain laws, regulations, interpretations and applications and the Combined Company may be subject to additional laws, regulations, interpretations and applications. Compliance with, and monitoring of, applicable laws, regulations, interpretations and applications may be difficult, time consuming and costly. Those laws and regulations and their interpretation and application may also change from time to time, including as a result of changes in economic, political, social and governmental policies, and those changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, investments, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. In addition, a failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, as interpreted and applied, could have a material adverse effect on us, including our ability to complete the Business Combination. \n

\n Risks if the USFM Adjournment Proposal or the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal are Not Approved \n

\n If the USFM Adjournment Proposal is not approved, and, at a USFM Special Meeting at which a quorum is present, an insufficient number of votes have been obtained to approve the USFM Business Combination Proposal, the USFM board of directors will not have the ability to rely on stockholder approval of the USFM Adjournment Proposal to adjourn the USFM Special Meeting to a later date in order to solicit further votes on that proposal, and, therefore, the Business Combination may not be consummated. This is separate from, and does not affect, the USFM board of directors’ ability to adjourn the USFM Special Meeting if a quorum is not present, which the Merger Agreement permits irrespective of whether the USFM Adjournment Proposal is approved. \n

\n The USFM board of directors is seeking approval to adjourn the USFM Special Meeting to a later date or dates if, at the USFM Special Meeting, a quorum is present but, based upon the tabulated votes, \n

\n 62\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n there are insufficient votes to approve the USFM Business Combination Proposal. If the USFM Adjournment Proposal is not approved, the USFM board of directors will not have the ability to rely on stockholder approval of that proposal to adjourn the USFM Special Meeting to solicit more votes to approve the USFM Business Combination Proposal in that circumstance, and, in such event, the Business Combination would not be completed. This is a distinct question from whether a quorum is present at the USFM Special Meeting in the first instance: if a quorum is not present, the USFM board of directors retains the ability to adjourn the USFM Special Meeting for that reason regardless of whether the USFM Adjournment Proposal is approved. \n

\n If the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal is not approved, and, at a Twin Vee Special Meeting at which a quorum is present, an insufficient number of votes have been obtained to approve the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, the Twin Vee board of directors will not have the ability to rely on stockholder approval of the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal to adjourn the Twin Vee Special Meeting to a later date in order to solicit further votes, and, therefore, the Business Combination may not be consummated. This is separate from, and does not affect, the Twin Vee board of directors’ ability to adjourn the Twin Vee Special Meeting if a quorum is not present, which the Merger Agreement permits irrespective of whether the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal is approved. \n

\n The Twin Vee board of directors is seeking approval to adjourn the Twin Vee Special Meeting to a later date or dates if, at the Twin Vee Special Meeting, a quorum is present but, based upon the tabulated votes, there are insufficient votes to approve the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, the Share Issuance Proposal, and the Director Election Proposal. If the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal is not approved, the Twin Vee board of directors will not have the ability to rely on stockholder approval of that proposal to adjourn the Twin Vee Special Meeting to solicit more votes to approve the such proposals in that circumstance, and, in such event, the Business Combination would not be completed. This is a distinct question from whether a quorum is present at the Twin Vee Special Meeting in the first instance: if a quorum is not present, the Twin Vee board of directors retains the ability to adjourn the Twin Vee Special Meeting for that reason regardless of whether the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal is approved. \n

\n Risks Relating to the Combined Company Common Stock Following the Business Combination \n

\n The market price of the Combined Company Common Stock could be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment. \n

\n Upon consummation of the Business Combination, the market value of the Combined Company Common Stock may fluctuate due to a variety of factors, including: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n changes in the industries in which the Combined Company and its customers operate; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n developments involving the Combined Company’s competitors; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n changes in laws and regulations affecting the Combined Company’s business; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n variations in the Combined Company’s operating performance and the performance of its competitors in general; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n actual or anticipated fluctuations in the Combined Company’s quarterly or annual operating results or the quarterly or annual operating results of companies perceived to be similar to the Combined Company; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n changes in the market’s expectations about the Combined Company’s operating results; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n publication of research reports by securities analysts about the Combined Company or its competitors or its industry; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the public’s reaction to the Combined Company’s press releases, its other public announcements and its filings with the SEC; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n sales of substantial amounts of Combined Company Common Stock by the Combined Company’s directors, officers or significant stockholders or the perception that such sales could occur; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n actions by stockholders; \n

\n 63\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n additions and departures of key personnel or changes in the Combined Company’s board of directors; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the Combined Company’s ability to market new and enhanced products on a timely basis; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n commencement of, or involvement in, litigation involving the Combined Company; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n changes in the Combined Company’s capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of additional debt; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n failure to comply with the requirements of the Applicable Stock Exchange; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n failure to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or other laws or regulations; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n actual, potential or perceived control, accounting or reporting problems; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n changes in accounting principles, policies and guidelines; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the volume of shares of the Combined Company Common Stock available for public sale; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n general economic and political conditions, such as the effects of pandemics, recessions, interest rates, local and national elections, fuel prices, international currency fluctuations, corruption, political instability and acts of war or terrorism; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the realization of any of the risk factors presented in this joint proxy statement/prospectus; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n negative or unpredictable market reactions to the completion of the Business Combination, leading to significant price fluctuations. \n

\n These market and industry factors may materially reduce the market price of the Combined Company Common Stock regardless of its operating performance and you could lose all or part of your investment. \n

\n If the perceived benefits of the Business Combination do not meet the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the market price of the Twin Vee Common Stock prior to the closing of the Business Combination may decline. The market value of the Twin Vee Common Stock at the time of the Business Combination may vary significantly from its price on the date the Merger Agreement was executed, the date of this joint proxy statement/ prospectus or the date on which Twin Vee stockholders vote on the Business Combination. \n

\n In addition, following the Business Combination, fluctuations in the price of the Combined Company Common Stock could contribute to the loss of all or part of your investment. Any of the factors listed above could have a material adverse effect on your investment, and the Twin Vee Common Stock before the closing of the Business Combination (or the Combined Company Common Stock after the closing) may trade at a price significantly below the price you paid for it. In such circumstances, the trading price of the Twin Vee Common Stock before the closing (or the Combined Company Common Stock after the closing) may not recover and may experience a further decline. \n

\n Broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of the Combined Company Common Stock after the closing of the Business Combination, irrespective of the Combined Company’s operating performance. The stock market in general has experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the particular companies affected. The trading prices and valuations of these stocks, and of the Combined Company Common Stock, may not be predictable. A loss of investor confidence in the market for mineral exploration stocks or the stocks of other companies which investors perceive to be similar to the Combined Company could depress the Combined Company’s stock price regardless of its business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations. A decline in the market price for the Combined Company Common Stock also could adversely affect the Combined Company’s ability to issue additional securities and the Combined Company’s ability to obtain additional financing in the future. \n

\n 64\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Fluctuations in operating results, quarter-to-quarter earnings and other factors, including incidents involving customers and negative media coverage, may result in significant decreases in the price of the Combined Company Common Stock. \n

\n The stock markets experience volatility that is often unrelated to operating performance. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of the Combined Company Common Stock, and, as a result, there may be significant volatility in the market price of the Combined Company Common Stock. Separately, if we are unable to achieve profitability in line with investor expectations, the market price of the Combined Company Common Stock will likely decline when it becomes apparent that the market expectations may not be realized. In addition to operating results, many economic and seasonal factors outside of our control could have an adverse effect on the price of the Combined Company Common Stock and increase fluctuations in our results. These factors include certain of the risks discussed herein, operating results of other companies in the same industry, changes in financial estimates or recommendations of securities analysts, speculation in the press or investment community, negative media coverage or risk of proceedings or government investigation, change in government regulation, foreign currency fluctuations and uncertainty in tax policies, the possible effects of war, terrorist and other hostilities, other factors affecting general conditions in the economy or the financial markets or other developments affecting the mineral exploration industry. \n

\n The Combined Company does not intend to pay dividends on its common stock. \n

\n Following the Business Combination, the Combined Company currently intends to retain its future earnings, if any, to finance the further development and expansion of its business and does not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of the Combined Company’s board of directors and in accordance with its certificate of incorporation and applicable law, and will depend on its financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, restrictions contained in future agreements and financing instruments, business prospects and such other factors as its board of directors deems relevant. \n

\n If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about the Combined Company’s business, the Combined Company’s stock price and trading volume could decline. \n

\n The trading market for the Combined Company Common Stock will depend in part on the research and reports that analysts publish about the Combined Company’s business. The Combined Company will not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover the Combined Company downgrade its common stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about its business, the price of its common stock would likely decline. If few analysts cover the Combined Company, demand for its common stock could decrease and its common stock price and trading volume may decline. Similar results may occur if one or more of these analysts stop covering the Combined Company in the future or fail to publish reports on the Combined Company regularly. \n

\n USFM’s failure to consummate the PIPE could have a material adverse effect on the Combined Company’s operations and financial condition.\n

\n Under the Merger Agreement, USFM must use reasonable best efforts to complete a private placement of up to $5,000,000 (the “PIPE”). In the PIPE, USFM will issue up to 20,833 shares of its common stock at $240 per share, plus two warrants for each share purchased, each exercisable for one share at $280 per share. The PIPE is to be funded in installments, and we expect to close the PIPE before the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part becomes effective. As of October 26, 2026, investors had committed approximately $1,350,000, representing approximately 5,624 shares of USFM common stock at $240.00 per share and 11,248 PIPE Warrants. There can be no assurance that USFM will be able to consummate the entire PIPE which could have a material adverse effect on the Combined Company’s operations and financial condition. \n

\n The Combined Company will be deemed to be an “emerging growth company” and, as a result of the reduced disclosure and governance requirements applicable to emerging growth companies, the Combined Company’s Common Stock may be less attractive to investors. \n

\n The Combined Company will qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act, as of the consummation of the Business Combination. \n

\n 65\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n As such, the Combined Company will be eligible for and intends to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies for as long as it continues to be an emerging growth company, including, but not limited to, (a) not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (b) reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in the Combined Company’s periodic reports and proxy statements and (c) exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, the Combined Company’s stockholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. The Combined Company will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year in which the market value of shares of Combined Company Common Stock that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700.0 million as of June 30 of that fiscal year, (ii) the last day of the fiscal year in which it has total annual gross revenue of $1.235 billion or more during such fiscal year (as indexed for inflation), (iii) the date on which it has issued more than $1.0 billion in non- convertible debt in the prior three-year period or (iv) the fifth anniversary of the Closing. We cannot predict whether investors will find the Combined Company Common Stock less attractive because it will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find the Combined Company Common Stock less attractive as a result of its reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of the Combined Company Common Stock may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for the Combined Company Common Stock and the trading prices of the Combined Company Common Stock may be more volatile. \n

\n Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. The Combined Company does not intend to opt out of such extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, the Combined Company, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of the Combined Company’s financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used. \n

\n As an emerging growth company, the Combined Company may also take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to obtain an assessment of the effectiveness of the Combined Company’s internal controls over financial reporting from the Combined Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. The Combined Company cannot predict if investors will find shares of Combined Company Common Stock less attractive because the Combined Company will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find shares of Combined Company Common Stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active market for shares of Combined Company Common Stock and the share price may be more volatile. \n

\n An active market for the Combined Company Common Stock may not develop, which would adversely affect the liquidity and price of the Combined Company Common Stock. \n

\n The price of the Combined Company Common Stock may vary significantly due to factors specific to the Combined Company as well as to general market or economic conditions. Furthermore, an active trading market for the Combined Company Common Stock may never develop or, if developed, it may not be sustained. You may be unable to sell your securities unless a market can be established and sustained.\n

\n 66\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n There may be tax consequences of the Business Combination that may adversely affect holders of USFM Common Stock and USFM Warrants. \n

\n Although we intend for the Business Combination to qualify for nonrecognition treatment under Section 351 of the Code for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the requirements for nonrecognition treatment under Section 351 of the Code are complex and qualification for such treatment could be adversely affected by events or actions that occur following the Business Combination that are beyond the control of USFM or PubCo. To the extent the Business Combination does not so qualify (and does not qualify as a Reorganization, as discussed below), it could result in the imposition of substantial taxes on the holders of USFM Common Stock and USFM Warrants. \n

\n The U.S. federal income tax treatment of the USFM Warrants in connection with the Business Combination is uncertain and depends on whether the Second Merger, in addition to qualifying as an exchange described in Section 351(a) of the Code, will also qualify as a Reorganization. It is possible that a U.S. Holder of USFM Warrants could be treated as exchanging such USFM Warrants for PubCo Warrants pursuant to the Second Merger in a transaction that qualifies as a Reorganization. If the Second Merger qualifies as a Reorganization, a U.S. Holder of USFM Warrants generally should not recognize any gain or loss upon the exchange of the USFM Warrants for PubCo Warrants. Further, if the Second Merger qualifies as a Reorganization, a U.S. Holder exchanging USFM Common Stock for PubCo Common Stock is not expected to recognize gain or loss with respect to such exchange. \n

\n Alternatively, it is also possible that a U.S. Holder of USFM Warrants that also holds USFM Common Stock could be treated as transferring its USFM Warrants and USFM Common Stock to PubCo in an exchange qualifying only under Section 351 of the Code, in which case such U.S. Holder generally would recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of gain realized by such holder (generally, the excess of (x) the sum of the fair market values of the PubCo Warrants treated as received by such holder and the PubCo Common Stock received by such holder over (y) such holder’s aggregate adjusted tax basis in the USFM Warrants and USFM Common Stock exchanged therefor) and (ii) the fair market value of the PubCo Warrants received by such holder in such exchange. Because warrants are not treated as stock for purposes of Section 351 of the Code, if the Second Merger does not qualify as a Reorganization, a U.S. Holder that exchanges only USFM Warrants (and does not also exchange USFM Common Stock) generally would recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the fair market value of the PubCo Warrants received and such holder’s adjusted tax basis in the USFM Warrants exchanged therefor. \n

\n Lastly, it is possible that the Second Merger does not qualify for nonrecognition treatment under any provision of the Code with respect to the USFM Warrants. In such case, a U.S. Holder that exchanges its USFM securities for PubCo securities pursuant to the Business Combination generally will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) the fair market value of the PubCo securities received and (ii) the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the USFM securities exchanged therefor. \n

\n There are many requirements that must be satisfied for the Second Merger to qualify as a Reorganization, some of which are based upon factual determinations and others are fundamental to corporate reorganizations. However, due to the absence of guidance directly on point as to how certain requirements of Section 368 of the Code apply to USFM, the qualification of the Second Merger as a Reorganization is uncertain. For example, to qualify as a Reorganization, the Second Merger must satisfy the “continuity of business enterprise” requirement under Section 368 of the Code. Because USFM was formed in late 2025 and does not have a long-established business history prior to entering into negotiations with Twin Vee, it is unclear as a matter of law whether USFM’s business or assets would constitute a historic business or historic business assets for this purpose. In addition, Reorganization treatment could also be adversely affected by events or actions that occur prior to or at the time of the Second Merger, some of which are outside the control of USFM. \n

\n Accordingly, there are significant factual and legal uncertainties as to whether the Mergers will qualify as an exchange described in Section 351(a) of the Code and as to whether the Second Merger will qualify as a Reorganization, and any change that is made after the date hereof, including any inaccuracy of the facts or assumptions upon which such expectations were based, could adversely affect the intended tax treatment. Neither USFM nor PubCo intends to request a ruling from the IRS regarding the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the Business Combination, and no assurance can be given that the Business Combination will \n

\n 67\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n qualify for the intended tax treatment described above, or that the IRS will not challenge this position and that a court will not sustain such a challenge by the IRS. Further, the Closing is not conditioned upon the receipt of an opinion of counsel that the Second Merger will qualify for the intended tax treatment described above. \n

\n If the Mergers do not qualify as an exchange described in Section 351(a) of the Code, and unless the Second Merger qualifies for nonrecognition treatment under another provision of the Code (such as a Reorganization under Section 368 of the Code), then a U.S. Holder that exchanges its USFM Common Stock for PubCo Common Stock pursuant to the Business Combination generally will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) the fair market value of the PubCo Common Stock received and (ii) the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the USFM Common Stock exchanged therefor. \n

\n For a more complete discussion of the U.S. federal income tax considerations of the Business Combination, see the discussion herein under “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for holders of USFM securities.” If you are a U.S. Holder (as defined in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for holders of USFM securities — U.S. Holders”) exchanging USFM Common Stock or USFM Warrants in the Business Combination, you are urged to consult your tax advisor to determine the tax consequences thereof.\n

\n 68\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF USFM \n

\n USFM is furnishing this joint proxy statement/prospectus to USFM stockholders as part of the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors for use at the USFM Special Meeting, to be held on [ ], and at any adjournment thereof. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is first being furnished to USFM stockholders on or about [ ] in connection with the vote on the proposals described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This joint proxy statement/prospectus provides you with information you need to know to be able to vote or instruct your vote to be cast at the USFM Special Meeting. \n

\n Date, Time and Place of the USFM Special Meeting \n

\n The USFM Special Meeting is to be held on [ ] at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time virtually via live webcast at https://www.cstproxy.com/[ ], or at such other time, on such other date and at such other place to which the meeting may be adjourned or postponed. Only stockholders who hold USFM Common Stock at the close of business on the record date will be entitled to notice of or vote at the USFM Special Meeting. For purposes of attendance at the USFM Special Meeting, all references in this joint proxy statement/prospectus to “present in person” or “in person” shall mean virtually present at the USFM Special Meeting. \n

\n Stockholders who hold their investments through a bank or broker will need to contact Continental to receive a control number. If you plan to vote at the USFM Special Meeting you will need to have a legal proxy from your bank or broker or if you would like to join and not vote, Continental will issue you a guest control number with proof of ownership. Either way you must contact Continental for specific instructions on how to receive the control number. Continental can be contacted at (917) 262-2373, or via email at proxy@continentalstock.com. Please allow up to 72 hours prior to the meeting for processing your control number. \n

\n Purpose of the USFM Special Meeting \n

\n At the USFM Special Meeting, USFM is asking holders of USFM Common Stock to consider and vote on the following proposals: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1 — The USFM Business Combination Proposal — a proposal to approve and adopt the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 7, 2026, by and among USFM Corporation, a Colorado corporation (“USFM”), Twin Vee Holdco Inc., a Texas corporation (“PubCo”), Twin Vee Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of PubCo (“Merger Sub I”), USFM Merger Sub Inc., a Colorado corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of PubCo (“Merger Sub II” and, together with Merger Sub I, the “Merger Subs”), and Twin Vee PowerCats Co., a Delaware corporation (“Twin Vee”) (as it may be further amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub I will merge with and into Twin Vee, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the DGCL (the “First Merger”), with Twin Vee continuing as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of PubCo (the “Surviving Company”); and Merger Sub II will merge with and into USFM in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Colorado Act (the “Second Merger” and, together with the First Merger, the “Mergers” or the “Business Combination”), with USFM continuing as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of PubCo (the “Surviving Corporation”).(the “USFM Business Combination Proposal”); \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 2 — The USFM Adjournment Proposal — to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the adjournment of the USFM Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes for the approval of one or more proposals at the USFM Special Meeting (the “USFM Adjournment Proposal”). \n

\n See “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal” and “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The USFM Adjournment Proposal.” \n

\n 69\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Recommendation of USFM Board of Directors to USFM Stockholders \n

\n USFM’s board of directors believes that the USFM Business Combination Proposal and the USFM Adjournment Proposals are advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, USFM and its stockholders and unanimously recommends that its stockholders vote “FOR” the USFM Business Combination Proposal and “FOR” the USFM Adjournment Proposal. \n

\n The existence of financial and personal interests of USFM’s chief executive officer and sole director may result in a conflict of interest on the part of such director between what he may believe is in the best interests of USFM and its stockholders and what he may believe is best for himself in determining to recommend that stockholders vote for the proposals. In addition, USFM’s management has interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. When you consider the USFM board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that USFM’s management has interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. These interests may influence USFM’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of these proposals. These interests were considered by the USFM board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n USFM’s board of directors has unanimously approved each of the USFM Stockholder Proposals. \n

\n USFM’s board of directors unanimously recommends that stockholders: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Vote “FOR” the USFM Business Combination Proposal; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Vote “FOR” the USFM Adjournment Proposal. \n

\n Interests of USFM’s Management in the Business Combination \n

\n These interests may influence USFM’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of these proposals. These interests were considered by the USFM board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n Voting Power; Record Date; Outstanding Shares; Stockholders Entitled to Vote \n

\n Quorum and Required Vote for Proposals for the USFM Special Meeting \n

\n 70\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n USFM stockholders for action on the USFM Stockholder Proposals at the USFM Special Meeting. As of the record date for the USFM Special Meeting, [ ] shares of USFM Common Stock would be required to achieve a quorum. An abstention will be counted towards the quorum requirement. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal, but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting so long as a quorum is established. A broker non-vote, if one were to occur, would likewise be counted towards the quorum requirement and would have the same effect as a vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal, but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting, so long as a quorum is established. However, because none of the proposals at the USFM Special Meeting are routine matters, brokers, banks and other nominees will have no discretionary authority to vote uninstructed shares held in “street name” on any proposal, and we therefore do not expect there to be any “broker non-votes” at the USFM Special Meeting. Shares held in “street name” for which no voting instructions are received are instead expected to be treated the same as shares for which no proxy card is returned: such shares will not be counted towards the quorum requirement. \n

\n The proposals presented at the USFM Special Meeting require the following votes: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n Unless waived by the parties to the Merger Agreement, each of the USFM Business Combination Proposal, the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, and the Share Issuance Proposal is cross-conditioned on the approval of each other. The USFM Adjournment Proposal is not conditioned upon the approval of any other proposal. \n

\n At any time at or prior to the Business Combination, subject to applicable securities laws (including with respect to material nonpublic information), the existing stockholders of USFM, Twin Vee or our or their respective directors, officers, advisors or respective affiliates may (i) purchase USFM Common Stock from institutional and other investors who vote, or indicate an intention to vote, against the USFM Business Combination Proposal, (ii) execute agreements to purchase such shares from such investors in the future or (iii) enter into transactions with such investors and others to provide them with incentives to acquire USFM Common Stock or vote their USFM Common Stock in favor of the USFM Business Combination Proposal. The purpose of such share purchases and other transactions would be to increase the likelihood of (1) holders of USFM Common Stock voting in favor of the USFM Stockholder Proposals at the USFM Special Meeting and (2) the conditions to the consummation of the Business Combination being otherwise satisfied. \n

\n Entering into any such arrangements may have a depressive effect on the USFM Common Stock (e.g., by giving an investor or holder the ability to effectively purchase shares at a price lower than market, such investor or holder may therefore become more likely to sell the shares he or she owns, either at or prior to the Business Combination). If such transactions are effected, the consequence could be to cause the Business Combination to be consummated in circumstances where such consummation could not otherwise occur. Purchases of shares by the persons described above would allow them to exert more influence over the approval of the proposals to be presented at the USFM Special Meeting and would likely increase the chances that such proposals would be approved. USFM will disclose any material arrangements entered into or significant purchases made by any of the aforementioned persons that would affect the vote on the proposals to be put to the USFM Special Meeting. Any such report will include descriptions of any arrangements entered into or significant purchases by any of the aforementioned persons. \n

\n Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes \n

\n An abstention will be counted towards the quorum requirement. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal, but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting so long as a quorum is established. A broker non-vote, if one were to occur, would likewise be counted towards the quorum requirement and would have the same effect as a \n

\n 71\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal, but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting, so long as a quorum is established. However, because none of the proposals to be voted on at the USFM Special Meeting are routine matters under applicable stock exchange rules, brokers, banks and other nominees holding shares in “street name” will have no discretionary authority to vote those shares on any proposal absent instructions from the beneficial owner. As a result, we do not expect brokers, banks or other nominees to submit proxies with respect to uninstructed shares at all, and therefore do not expect any “broker non-votes” to occur at the USFM Special Meeting. Shares held in “street name” for which no voting instructions are provided are instead expected to be treated the same as shares for which no proxy is returned, and will not be counted towards the quorum requirement or voted on any proposal. \n

\n A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner submits a proxy but does not vote on a particular proposal because it lacks discretionary authority to vote on that proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. A broker non-vote, if one were to occur, would be counted towards the quorum requirement and would have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the USFM Business Combination Proposal, but no effect on any other proposal presented at the USFM Special Meeting, so long as a quorum is established. However, because none of the proposals at the USFM Special Meeting are routine matters, if your shares are held in “street name” and you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee on a timely basis on how to vote your shares, your broker, bank or other nominee will have no discretionary authority to vote your shares on any proposal to be voted on at the USFM Special Meeting. As a result, we do not expect your broker, bank or other nominee to submit a proxy card with respect to your shares at all, and we therefore do not expect there to be any “broker non-votes” at the USFM Special Meeting. Shares held in “street name” for which no voting instructions are provided are instead expected to be treated the same as shares for which no proxy card is returned: such shares will not be counted towards the quorum requirement and will not be voted. You should instruct your broker to vote your shares in accordance with directions you provide. A failure to vote will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the USFM Business Combination Proposal. \n

\n Voting Your Shares at the USFM Special Meeting \n

\n Each share of USFM Common Stock that you own in your name entitles you to one vote on the USFM Stockholder Proposals. Your proxy card shows the number of shares of USFM Common Stock that you own. If your shares are held in “street name” or are in a margin or similar account, you should contact your broker to ensure that votes related to the shares you beneficially own are properly counted. \n

\n There are two ways to vote your USFM Common Stock at the USFM Special Meeting: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n You can vote by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card. If you vote by proxy card, your “proxy,” whose name is listed on the proxy card, will vote your shares as you instruct on the proxy card. If you sign and return the proxy card but do not give instructions on how to vote your shares, your shares will be voted as recommended by USFM’s board of directors “FOR” the USFM Business Combination Proposal and “FOR” the USFM Adjournment Proposal. Votes received after a matter has been voted upon at the USFM Special Meeting will not be counted. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n You may attend, vote and examine the list of holders entitled to vote at the USFM Special Meeting by visiting https://www.cstproxy.com/[ ] and entering the control number found on your proxy card, voting instruction form or notice included in the proxy materials. However, if your shares are held in the name of your broker, bank or another nominee, you must get a valid legal proxy from the broker, bank or other nominee. That is the only way USFM can be sure that the broker, bank or nominee has not already voted your shares. \n

\n Revoking Your Proxy \n

\n If you are a USFM stockholder and you give a proxy, you may revoke it at any time before it is exercised by doing any one of the following: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n you may send another proxy card with a later date; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n you may send a notice of revocation to USFM at the address indicated on the accompanying proxy card, which must be received by USFM prior to the vote at the USFM Special Meeting; or \n

\n 72\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n you may attend the USFM Special Meeting, revoke your proxy and vote online, as indicated above. \n

\n Attendance at the USFM Special Meeting alone will not change your vote. If your shares are held in “street name” by your broker, bank or another nominee, you must contact your broker, bank or other nominee to change your vote. \n

\n Who Can Answer Your Questions About Voting Your Shares \n

\n If you are a stockholder and have any questions about how to vote or direct a vote in respect of your USFM Common Stock, you may contact USFM’s proxy solicitor as follows: \n

\n Advantage Proxy, Inc.
P.O. Box 10904 Yakima, WA 98909
Attn: Karen Smith
Toll Free Telephone: (877) 870-8565
Main Telephone: (206) 870-8565
E-mail: ksmith@advantageproxy.com

\n No Additional Matters May Be Presented at the USFM Special Meeting \n

\n The USFM Special Meeting has been called to consider only the approval of the USFM Stockholder Proposals. This joint proxy statement/prospectus, which serves as the notice of the USFM Special Meeting. \n

\n Dissenter’s Rights \n

\n 73\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n context of the transaction, and without discounting for lack of marketability or minority status. You should be aware that the fair value of your shares of USFM Common Stock as determined under Article 113 of the Colorado Act could be more than, the same as or less than the merger consideration you would have received in the Second Merger if you did not seek appraisal of your shares of USFM Common Stock. \n

\n Proxy Solicitation Costs \n

\n USFM is soliciting proxies on behalf of its board of directors. This solicitation is being made by mail but also may be made by telephone or in person. USFM and its directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other electronic means. USFM will bear the cost of the solicitation. \n

\n USFM has hired Advantage Proxy, Inc. to assist in the proxy solicitation process. USFM will pay that firm a fee of $[ ] plus disbursements. \n

\n USFM will ask banks, brokers and other institutions, nominees and fiduciaries to forward the proxy materials to their principals and to obtain their authority to execute proxies and voting instructions. USFM will reimburse them for their reasonable expenses. \n

\n 74\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF TWIN VEE \n

\n Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this subsection to the “Company,” “Twin Vee,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to Twin Vee. \n

\n Twin Vee is furnishing this joint proxy statement/prospectus to Twin Vee stockholders as part of the solicitation of proxies by the Twin Vee board of directors for use at the Twin Vee Special Meeting, to be held on [ ], and at any adjournment thereof. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is first being furnished to Twin Vee stockholders on or about [ ] in connection with the vote on the proposals described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This joint proxy statement/prospectus provides Twin Vee stockholders with the information they need to know to be able to vote or instruct their vote to be cast at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. \n

\n Date, Time and Place of the Twin Vee Special Meeting \n

\n The Twin Vee Special Meeting is to be held on [ ] at 10 a.m. Eastern Time virtually via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/[ ], or at such other time, on such other date and at such other place to which the meeting may be adjourned or postponed. Only stockholders who hold Twin Vee Common Stock at the close of business on the record date will be entitled to notice of or vote at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. For purposes of attendance at the Twin Vee Special Meeting, all references in this joint proxy statement/prospectus to “present in person” or “in person” shall mean virtually present at the Twin Vee Special Meeting. \n

\n If you are a registered Twin Vee stockholder, you will receive a proxy card from Twin Vee. The form contains instructions on how to attend the virtual Twin Vee Special Meeting, including the URL address, along with your control number. You will need your control number for access. If you do not have your control number, contact Twin Vee’s Investor Relations at (772) 429-2525. \n

\n Purpose of the Twin Vee Special Meeting \n

\n At the Twin Vee Special Meeting, Twin Vee is asking holders of Twin Vee Common Stock to consider and vote on the following proposals: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 3 — The Share Issuance Proposal — a proposal authorizing the issuance of the Company Consideration Shares in connection with the First Merger and PubCo Common Shares in connection with the Second Merger (the “Share Issuance Proposal”); and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n See the sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The Director Election Proposal,” “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal,” “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 3: The Share Issuance Proposal,” and “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 4: The Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal” for more information. \n

\n Recommendation of the Twin Vee Board of Directors to Twin Vee Stockholders \n

\n The Twin Vee board of directors believes that the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, the Share Issuance Proposal, the Director Election Proposal, and the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal are fair to and \n

\n 75\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n in the best interests of Twin Vee and its stockholders and recommends that its stockholders vote “FOR” the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, “FOR” the Share Issuance Proposal, “FOR” each of the director nominees in the Director Election Proposal, and “FOR” the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal. \n

\n The existence of financial and personal interests of one or more of Twin Vee’s directors may result in a conflict of interest on the part of such director(s) between what he, she or they may believe is in the best interests of Twin Vee, its stockholders and what he, she or they may believe is best for himself, herself or themselves in determining to recommend that Twin Vee stockholders vote for the proposals. In addition, Twin Vee’s officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a Twin Vee stockholder. When you consider the Twin Vee board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that Twin Vee’s directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a Twin Vee stockholder. These interests may influence Twin Vee’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of these proposals. These interests were considered by the Twin Vee board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n The Twin Vee board of directors has approved each of the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals. \n

\n The Twin Vee board of directors recommends that Twin Vee stockholders: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Vote “FOR” each of the director nominees in the Director Election Proposal \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Vote “FOR” the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal;\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Vote “FOR” the Share Issuance Proposal; and\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Vote “FOR” the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal. \n

\n Voting Power; Record Date; Outstanding Shares; Stockholders Entitled to Vote \n

\n Twin Vee stockholders will be entitled to vote or direct votes to be cast at the Twin Vee Special Meeting if they owned Twin Vee Common Stock at the close of business on [ ], which is the “record date” for the Twin Vee Special Meeting. Twin Vee common stockholders are entitled to one vote at the Twin Vee Special Meeting for each share of Twin Vee Common Stock owned at the close of business on the record date. If your shares are held in “street name” or are in a margin or similar account, you should contact your broker to ensure that votes related to the shares you beneficially own are properly counted. As of the close of business on the record date for the Twin Vee Special Meeting, there were [ ] shares of Twin Vee Common Stock issued and outstanding. \n

\n Quorum and Required Vote for Proposals for the Twin Vee Special Meeting \n

\n The proposals presented at the Twin Vee Special Meeting require the following votes: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Share Issuance Proposal: Approval of the Share Issuance Proposal requires an affirmative vote of the holders of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock having a majority of the voting power of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and \n

\n 76\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n entitled to vote on the matter. Accordingly, abstentions on the Share Issuance Proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Share Issuance Proposal. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Director Election Proposal: The five director nominees receiving the affirmative vote of a plurality of the voting power of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the Director Election Proposal shall be elected to the Combined Company’s board of directors. “Plurality” means that the individuals who receive the largest number of votes cast “FOR” are elected as directors. A Twin Vee stockholder’s failure to vote by proxy or to vote in person at the Twin Vee Special Meeting will have no effect on the Director Election Proposal. You may vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” authority to vote for each of the director nominees with respect to the Director Election Proposal. A “WITHHOLD” vote will have no effect on the outcome of the Director Election Proposal.\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal: For the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal to be approved, it must receive an affirmative vote of the holders of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock having a majority of the voting power of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by a proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. Accordingly, abstentions on the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal. \n

\n Because the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals are considered non-routine matters, brokers may not exercise their discretion to vote uninstructed shares on any of the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals. If the broker or nominee that holds your shares of Twin Vee Common Stock does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a non-routine matter, the organization that holds your shares will not be able to vote your shares. If you are a stockholder of record and you attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting and wish to vote in person, you may revoke your proxy by transmitting a revocation to Twin Vee or by attending the meeting and voting in person. \n

\n Concurrently with entering into the Initial Merger Agreement on July 12, 2026, a Twin Vee stockholder, in its capacity as holders of shares or other equity interests of Twin Vee, entered into a Company Support Agreement with USFM (the “Support Agreement”) pursuant to which such stockholder agreed, among other things, to vote its shares of Twin Vee Common Stock for the approval of the Merger Agreement and against any alternative proposal. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the Support Agreement terminates upon the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms. As of the record date for the Twin Vee Special Meeting, such Twin Vee stockholder accounted for approximately 5.47% of the number of then-outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock and approximately 5.47% of the voting power of the then-outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. \n

\n The Business Combination will be consummated only if the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and the Share Issuance Proposal is approved by the Twin Vee stockholders and the USFM Business Combination Proposal is approved by the USFM stockholders (unless waived by the parties). Accordingly, even if the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal is approved, the Business Combination will not be consummated unless the Share Issuance Proposal and the USFM Business Combination Proposal are also approved (unless waived by the parties to the Merger Agreement). The Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal and the Director Election Proposal is not conditioned upon the approval of any other proposal set forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n Voting Your Shares at the Twin Vee Special Meeting \n

\n Each holder of Twin Vee Common Stock is entitled to one vote for each share of Twin Vee Common Stock held as of the record date. Proxy cards or voting instruction forms are solicited on behalf of the Twin Vee board of directors. \n

\n There are two ways to vote your shares of Twin Vee Common Stock at the Twin Vee Special Meeting: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n You can vote by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card. If you vote by proxy card, your “proxyholder” (one of the individuals named on your proxy card) will vote your shares as you have instructed. If you sign and return the proxy card but do not give instructions on how to vote your shares, your shares will be voted as recommended by the Twin Vee board of directors “FOR” the \n

\n 77\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, “FOR” the Share Issuance Proposal, “FOR” each of the director nominees in the Director Election Proposal, and “FOR” the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal. Votes received after a matter has been voted upon at the Twin Vee Special Meeting will not be counted. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n You may attend, vote and examine the list of Twin Vee stockholders entitled to vote at the Twin Vee Special Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/[ ] and entering the control number found on your proxy card, voting instruction form or notice included in the proxy materials. \n

\n Revoking Your Proxy \n

\n If you are a Twin Vee stockholder and you give a proxy, you may revoke it at any time before it is exercised by doing any one of the following: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n you may send another proxy card with a later date; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n you may send a notice of revocation to Twin Vee at Twin Vee PowerCats Co., 3101 S US Hwy 1, Fort Pierce, Florida 34982, Attn: Corporate Secretary, which must be received by Twin Vee prior to the vote at the Twin Vee Special Meeting; or \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n you may attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting, and vote online, as indicated above. Attendance at the Twin Vee Special Meeting alone will not change your vote. \n

\n Who Can Answer Your Questions About Voting Your Shares of Twin Vee Common Stock \n

\n If you are a Twin Vee stockholder and have any questions about how to vote or direct a vote in respect of your Twin Vee Common Stock, please contact Twin Vee’s proxy solicitor, D.F. King & Co., Inc., 28 Liberty Street, 53rd Floor, New York, New York 10005, (800) 791-3320, or TwinVee@dfking.com. \n

\n Appraisal Rights \n

\n 78\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n (4) not withdraw their demands or otherwise lose their rights to appraisal, and (5) otherwise comply with the statutory requirements and satisfy certain ownership thresholds set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL, in which case, such Twin Vee stockholder may be entitled to have their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock appraised by the Delaware Court of Chancery and to receive payment in cash for the “fair value” of their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Mergers, together with (unless the Delaware Court of Chancery in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown) interest on the amount determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery to be fair value from the First Effective Time through the date of payment of the judgment. \n

\n See “Appraisal Rights and Dissenters’ Rights” elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus \n

\n Proxy Solicitation Costs \n

\n The Twin Vee Board is making this solicitation on behalf of Twin Vee. Certain of Twin Vee’s directors, officers, and employees, without any additional compensation, may also solicit your vote in person, virtually, by telephone or by email or other electronic communication. Twin Vee has also retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. to act as a proxy solicitor for a fee estimated to be $15,000, plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. On request, Twin Vee will reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to Twin Vee stockholders. In addition to the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited by personal interview, telephone, email, text messages, and advertisement in periodicals and postings. Brokerage houses, nominees, fiduciaries and other custodians will be requested to forward solicitation materials to beneficial owners and will be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses incurred in so doing. Twin Vee may request by telephone, text, mail, electronic mail or other means of communication the return of the proxy cards.\n

\n 79\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n USFM STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL NO. 1: THE USFM BUSINESS COMBINATION PROPOSAL \n

\n Overview \n

\n The USFM Business Combination Proposal — USFM is asking its stockholders to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement. USFM stockholders should read carefully this joint proxy statement/prospectus in its entirety for more detailed information concerning the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Please see the subsection entitled “— The Merger Agreement” below for additional information and a summary of certain terms of the Merger Agreement. You are urged to read carefully the Merger Agreement in its entirety before voting on this proposal. \n

\n Because USFM is holding a stockholder vote on the Merger Agreement, USFM may consummate the Business Combination only if, among other things, it is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of USFM Common Stock entitled to vote thereon. \n

\n The Merger Agreement \n

\n As discussed in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, USFM is asking its stockholders to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement. \n

\n (i)\n
\n

\n \n Merger Sub I will merge with and into Twin Vee, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the DGCL (the “First Merger”), with Twin Vee continuing as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of PubCo (the “Surviving Company”); and \n

\n (ii)\n
\n

\n In connection with the Business Combination, PubCo will be renamed “USFM Corporation.” The “Combined Company” shall refer to PubCo, as so renamed, immediately after the closing of the Business Combination (the “Closing”). \n

\n At the First Effective Time, by virtue of the First Merger, each share of Twin Vee Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the First Effective Time, including Twin Vee Common Stock held as a result of the termination of Company Convertible Securities (other than Twin Vee common stock warrants), but excluding shares held in treasury and Dissenting Shares (as defined in the Merger Agreement), will be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of PubCo (the “PubCo Common Stock”) equal to the Exchange Ratio (the “Company Merger Consideration”). The “Exchange Ratio” is the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the Company Consideration Shares by (ii) the total number of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock and shares of Twin Vee Common Stock subject to Twin Vee convertible securities outstanding immediately prior to the First Effective Time. The “Company Consideration Shares” means the number of shares of PubCo Common Stock that would result in the former holders of Twin Vee securities collectively holding 7% of the issued and outstanding shares of PubCo Common Stock immediately following the Second Effective Time, calculated on a fully diluted basis. \n

\n 80\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Outstanding Twin Vee equity awards and warrants will also be converted by reference to the Exchange Ratio. Each other Twin Vee convertible security (such as options and restricted stock units) (the “Company Convertible Securities”) remaining outstanding immediately prior to the First Effective Time will be accelerated, fully vested and converted into the right to receive the number of shares of PubCo Common Stock equal to the number of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock subject to the award multiplied by the Exchange Ratio, after which such convertible securities will automatically be cancelled (the “Company Convertible Security Termination”). Each outstanding Twin Vee common stock warrant will instead be assumed by PubCo and become a corresponding PubCo warrant to acquire the number of shares of PubCo Common Stock equal to the number of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock subject to the warrant multiplied by the Exchange Ratio, on the same terms and conditions (including vesting and exercisability) that applied to the warrant immediately before the First Effective Time. In no event will the aggregate shares of PubCo Common Stock issued in respect of Twin Vee securities exceed the Company Consideration Shares. \n

\n At the Second Effective Time, by virtue of the Second Merger, each share of common stock, no par value per share, of USFM (the “USFM Common Stock”), issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Second Effective Time (including any additional shares issued pursuant to the PIPE Investment, but excluding USFM Dissenting Shares (as each such term is defined in the Merger Agreement)) will be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of PubCo Common Stock such that the aggregate shares issued to former holders of USFM Common Stock will equal 93% of the issued and outstanding shares of PubCo Common Stock immediately following the Second Effective Time, calculated on a fully diluted basis. Each outstanding PIPE Warrant will be terminated in exchange for a PubCo Warrant to acquire one share of PubCo Common Stock for each share of USFM Common Stock subject to the PIPE Warrant, and that certain warrant, dated as of July 7, 2026, issued by USFM to FG Merchant Partners, LP (the “FG Warrant”) held by FG Merchant Partners, LP will be terminated in exchange for a PubCo Warrant to acquire one share of PubCo Common Stock for each share of USFM Common Stock underlying the USFM Warrant (the “FG Exchange Warrant”). \n

\n No fractional shares of PubCo Common Stock will be issued in the Mergers. Any fractional share that a Twin Vee stockholder or USFM stockholder would otherwise be entitled to receive will be rounded down to the nearest whole number, and such fractional interests will not entitle the holder to vote or to any other rights as a PubCo stockholder. \n

\n The Company Consideration Shares and the other shares of PubCo Common Stock issuable as merger consideration will be equitably adjusted to reflect any stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, extraordinary cash dividend, reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, combination, exchange of shares or similar change affecting PubCo Common Stock between signing and Closing, provided that after any such adjustment the aggregate Company Consideration Shares may not exceed 7% of the shares of PubCo Common Stock issued and outstanding on a fully diluted basis immediately after the Closing. \n

\n Prior to the First Effective Time, PubCo, USFM and Twin Vee will appoint an exchange agent (the “Exchange Agent”) to distribute the Company Merger Consideration to Twin Vee stockholders, shares of PubCo Common Stock to USFM stockholders, PubCo Warrants to holders of PIPE Warrants, and the FG Warrants. Promptly after the First Effective Time, the Exchange Agent will mail each holder of record of Twin Vee Common Stock a letter of transmittal and instructions for surrendering their certificates or book-entry shares in exchange for the applicable merger consideration. No interest will be paid or will accrue on the merger consideration payable upon surrender. Any portion of the merger consideration that remains undistributed twelve months after the Closing Date will be delivered to PubCo, and former securityholders may thereafter look only to PubCo to claim their applicable merger consideration, subject to applicable abandoned property and escheat laws. \n

\n Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring \n

\n 81\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n is Twin Vee’s sole operating business, in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Assetco; (iii) Twin Vee will form a Delaware statutory trust (the “CVR Trust”) and contribute all of the outstanding equity interests of Assetco to the CVR Trust in exchange for all of the CVR Trust’s contingent value rights interests; and (iv) Twin Vee will distribute those contingent value rights interests to each holder of Twin Vee Common Stock as of a record date to be determined, on a pro rata basis (each such interest, a “Contingent Value Right” or “CVR”), after which Twin Vee will retain no ownership or other interest, whether in the form of stock, trust interests or otherwise, in either Assetco or the CVR Trust and Twin Vee’s sole asset shall be $700,000 in cash and sole liabilities shall relate to the Delaware Matter (as defined in the Merger Agreement). Each CVR will represent such holder’s indirect beneficial interest in Assetco and the Company Assets and Liabilities held by it. Following the Closing, the CVR Trust is expected to seek to sell the Company Assets and Liabilities, with any net proceeds of such sales to be distributed to CVR holders in accordance with the terms of the CVR Trust agreement and the CVR Agreement, which have not yet been finalized. Neither Assetco nor the CVR Trust will be a subsidiary of PubCo, USFM or the Combined Company following the Closing. The CVRs will not be transferable except in limited circumstances, will not be listed for trading on any securities exchange and will not represent any right to receive shares of PubCo Common Stock or any other equity interest in the Combined Company. For more information, see “— Contingent Value Rights” and “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Twin Vee and the Business Combination.” \n

\n Contingent Value Rights \n

\n The following summary describes the anticipated material terms of the CVRs. The CVR Agreement and the CVR Trust agreement have not yet been finalized or entered into, and this summary is therefore qualified in its entirety by the actual terms of those agreements once available. Twin Vee stockholders are urged to read the final CVR Agreement and CVR Trust agreement in their entirety once they become available. \n

\n Each CVR will represent a beneficial interest in the CVR Trust and, indirectly, in Assetco and the Company Assets and Liabilities held by it. The CVRs will not represent, and will not be convertible into or exchangeable for, any equity interest in PubCo, USFM, Twin Vee or the Combined Company, and holders of CVRs will not become stockholders of PubCo, USFM, Twin Vee or the Combined Company as a result of holding CVRs. \n

\n Following the Closing, the CVR Trust is expected to seek to sell the Company Assets and Liabilities held through Assetco. Any net proceeds received from such a sale would be distributed to CVR holders in accordance with the terms of the CVR Trust agreement and the CVR Agreement, after payment of, or provision for, the liabilities assumed by Assetco and the fees and expenses of administering and winding down Assetco and the CVR Trust. The CVR Trust will be a Delaware statutory trust. The Delaware trustee of the CVR Trust has not yet been designated, however, such trustee will be a United States-based trust company with a national or regional presence. The agreements governing the CVR and the CVR Trust have not yet been put in place, however, generally speaking the CVRs will be non-voting economic interests entitling the holder thereof to cash distributions following the liquidation of the Company Assets and Liabilities. The Management Committee of the CVR Trust, once appointed, will manage the liquidation and monetization of the CVR Trust’s assets, whether such assets will be held directly by the CVR Trust or indirectly through Assetco. The CVR Trust, once formed, will be the sole stockholder of Assetco. Assetco is currently a wholly owned subsidiary of Twin Vee. The CVR Trust’s trust agreement is not expected to provide for the compensation of the Management Committee members, but to the extent the members of the Management Committee are directors or employees of PubCo, he or she will each continue to be compensated in their capacity as director or employees of PubCo. Accordingly, it is not expected that the Management Committee members’ compensation will impact the value of the assets in the CVR Trust available to Twin Vee pre-closing stockholders. \n

\n The value of the CVRs is inherently uncertain and cannot be determined as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The amount, if any, and timing of any payment in respect of the CVRs will depend on, among other things: (i) whether Assetco and the CVR Trust are able to sell the Company Assets and Liabilities, and the price, terms and timing of any such sale; (ii) the amount of liabilities retained by or allocated to Assetco or the CVR Trust; (iii) the fees, costs and expenses of operating, administering and winding down Assetco and the CVR Trust; and (iv) the terms of the CVR Trust agreement and CVR Agreement governing distributions, none of which have been finalized as of the date of this joint proxy \n

\n 82\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n statement/prospectus. Neither Twin Vee, USFM nor PubCo has obtained, or intends to obtain, an appraisal, fairness opinion or other third-party valuation of the CVRs, and no value has been or will be assigned to the CVRs in the Merger Agreement. Twin Vee stockholders are urged not to attribute any specific value to the CVRs when evaluating the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal. \n

\n There can be no assurance that the CVRs will have any value, and the CVRs may expire with no value. The reasons the CVRs may have no value include, but are not limited to: (i) Assetco or the CVR Trust may be unable to sell the Company Assets and Liabilities for any particular price or within any particular timeframe, or at all; (ii) the liabilities assumed by Assetco, including the costs of operating, maintaining and winding down the marine business pending sale, may exceed the proceeds ultimately realized; and (iii) the fees and expenses of administering Assetco and the CVR Trust may absorb some or all of any sale proceeds. \n

\n The CVRs are contractual and beneficial trust interests only. The CVRs are not expected to be registered under the Securities Act, the Exchange Act or any state securities laws, and will not be listed for trading on any securities exchange or other trading market. CVR holders should not expect periodic public reports regarding the CVRs, Assetco or the CVR Trust. \n

\n The CVRs will not be transferable, except in limited circumstances expected to be set forth in the CVR Agreement (such as transfers by will or intestacy, by operation of law, or certain other permitted transfers to be specified). As a result, there will be no public or other trading market for the CVRs. \n

\n The CVRs will not have any voting or dividend rights and will not represent any equity, ownership or other interest in PubCo, USFM, Twin Vee, Assetco, the CVR Trust or any of their respective affiliates. CVR holders will have no rights as stockholders, members, beneficiaries or other equityholders by virtue of holding CVRs, including no right to receive financial statements or other reports except as may be expressly provided in the CVR Agreement, no right to inspect books and records, no right to receive notice of or attend meetings, no right to vote on any matter, and no right to direct or participate in the management of Assetco or the CVR Trust. \n

\n Governance and Disposition of the Company Assets and Liabilities \n

\n The CVR Trust will be a Delaware statutory trust. The Delaware trustee of the CVR Trust has not yet been designated, however, such trustee will be a United States-based trust company with a national or regional presence. The agreements governing the CVR and the CVR Trust have not yet been put in place, however, generally speaking the CVRs will be non-voting economic interests entitling the holder thereof to cash distributions following the liquidation of the Company Assets and Liabilities. The Management Committee of the CVR Trust, once appointed, will manage the liquidation and monetization of the CVR Trust’s assets, whether such assets will be held directly by the CVR Trust or indirectly through Assetco. The CVR Trust, once formed, will be the sole stockholder of Assetco. Assetco is currently a wholly owned subsidiary of Twin Vee. The CVR Trust’s trust agreement is not expected to provide for the compensation of the Management Committee members, but to the extent the members of the Management Committee are directors or employees of PubCo, he or she will each continue to be compensated in their capacity as director or employees of PubCo. Accordingly, it is not expected that the Management Committee members’ compensation will impact the value of the assets in the CVR Trust available to Twin Vee pre-closing stockholders.\n

\n Payment of CVR Consideration \n

\n Any payments on the CVRs are expected to be made from the net proceeds, if any, realized from the sale or other disposition of the Company Assets and Liabilities, after payment of, or provision for, the liabilities assumed by Assetco and/or the CVR Trust and the fees, costs and expenses of administering and winding down Assetco and the CVR Trust. No interest is expected to accrue or be payable on any amounts that may become payable in respect of the CVRs. \n

\n Representations, Warranties, and Covenants \n

\n 83\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n its business in the ordinary course of its business during the interim period between the execution of the Merger Agreement and the Second Effective Time or earlier termination of the Merger Agreement, (b) each party will not engage in certain types of transactions or take certain actions outside the ordinary course during such period without the prior consent of the other party, and (c) USFM will use its reasonable best efforts to take all actions necessary, proper or advisable to consummate the transactions contemplated by the PIPE Investment (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement). The Merger Agreement also requires each of Twin Vee and USFM to call and hold a stockholder meeting and for Twin Vee’s board of directors to recommend that Twin Vee’s stockholders approve the Merger Agreement. The representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement will not survive the closing of the transaction. \n

\n Closing Conditions \n

\n Termination Provisions \n

\n The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights, and provides that, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, USFM may be required to pay Twin Vee a termination fee of $500,000 and Twin Vee may be required to pay USFM a termination fee of $800,000. Specifically, if the Merger Agreement is terminated (a) in connection with a failure of USFM to obtain its stockholders’ approval of the Mergers or (b) subject to certain conditions, in the event the Mergers are not consummated prior to the “Agreement End Date” of December 31, 2026, then, in either case, the $500,000 termination fee will be payable by USFM to Twin Vee upon termination of the Merger Agreement. In addition, if Twin Vee terminates the Merger Agreement (x) to accept a Superior Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement) in compliance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, (y) after Twin Vee shall have (i) within ten (10) Business Days of a tender or exchange offer relating to securities of Twin Vee having been commenced, failed to publicly recommend against such tender or exchange offer, (ii) Twin Vee shall have failed to publicly reaffirm its recommendation of the First Merger within 10 Business Days after the date any Acquisition Proposal (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement) shall have been announced, or (iii) a willful or material breach by Twin Vee of the exclusivity provisions of the Merger Agreement shall have occurred, or (z) following USFM’s determination that Twin Vee will likely fail to resolve the Reincorporation Matter (as defined in the Merger Agreement) (i) prior to December 31, 2026 or (ii) in a manner satisfactory to USFM in its sole discretion, then, in any such case, the $800,000 termination fee will be payable by Twin Vee to USFM upon termination of the Merger Agreement. \n

\n 84\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Upon termination, the Merger Agreement becomes void and has no further effect, except for certain provisions that expressly survive, and subject to liability for any willful and material breach or actual fraud occurring prior to termination. Each party is responsible for its own fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement and the contemplated transactions, except as otherwise provided. \n

\n Related Agreements \n

\n This section describes certain additional agreements entered into or to be entered into pursuant to the Merger Agreement, but does not purport to describe all of the terms thereof. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of each of the agreements. The full text of the Related Agreements, or forms thereof, are filed as annexes to this joint proxy statement/prospectus or as exhibits to the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, and the following descriptions are qualified in their entirety by the full text of such annexes and exhibits. Stockholders and other interested parties are urged to read such Related Agreements in their entirety prior to voting on the proposals presented at the USFM Special Meeting and the Twin Vee Special Meeting. \n

\n Support Agreement \n

\n PIPE Investment \n

\n Contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, USFM and PubCo entered into securities purchase agreements (the “Securities Purchase Agreements”) with certain investors pursuant to which such investors, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, will purchase up to 20,833 shares of USFM Common Stock at US$240 per share for an aggregate purchase price equal to US$5,000,000 and be issued up to 41,667 warrants to purchase shares of USFM Common Stock at an exercise price of $280 per share (the “PIPE Warrants”), with such shares and the PIPE Warrants collectively constituting the “PIPE Investment”, in a private placement to be consummated contemporaneously with \n

\n 85\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n the Closing. As of October 26, 2026, investors had committed approximately $1,350,000, representing approximately 5,624 shares of USFM common stock at $240.00 per share and 11,248 PIPE Warrants. \n

\n Registration Rights Agreement \n

\n At the Closing, USFM, PubCo, and the other parties thereto will enter into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), pursuant to which, among other things, the parties thereto will be granted certain registration rights with respect to the shares of Combined Company Common Stock underlying the FG Exchange Warrant and the PIPE Warrants. \n

\n Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences for holders of Twin Vee securities \n

\n Subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth herein, the following is a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of (a) the Business Combination, (b) the issuance of the CVRs in connection with the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring and payments (if any) thereon, and (c) the post-Closing ownership and disposition of PubCo Common Stock and PubCo warrants (collectively, “PubCo securities”) acquired pursuant to the Business Combination, in each case, to holders of Twin Vee Common Stock and Twin Vee warrants. This discussion applies only to holders that hold their Twin Vee Common Stock and Twin Vee warrants as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes (generally, property held for investment). This discussion does not purport to be a complete analysis of all potential tax consequences, is general in nature and does not constitute tax advice or a tax opinion. This discussion is based upon current provisions of the Code, existing Treasury regulations, judicial decisions and published rulings and administrative pronouncements of the IRS, all in effect as of the date hereof and all of which are subject to differing interpretations or change. Any such change or differing interpretation, which may be retroactive, could alter the tax consequences described in this summary. \n

\n This discussion does not address all U.S. federal income tax consequences relevant to holders of Twin Vee Common Stock and Twin Vee warrants in light of their particular circumstances. In addition, it does not address consequences relevant to holders subject to particular U.S. or non-U.S. tax rules, including, without limitation, holders that are: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n persons who do not hold their Twin Vee Common Stock as a “capital asset” within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n brokers, dealers or traders in securities, banks, insurance companies, other financial institutions or mutual funds; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n real estate investment trusts; regulated investment companies; tax-exempt organizations or governmental organizations; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n pass-through entities such as partnerships, S corporations, disregarded entities for federal income tax purposes and limited liability companies (and investors therein); \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n persons who hold their shares as part of a hedge, wash sale, synthetic security, conversion transaction or other integrated transaction; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n persons that have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n traders in securities who elect to apply a mark-to-market method of accounting; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n persons who hold shares of Twin Vee Common Stock that may constitute “qualified small business stock” under Section 1202 of the Code or as “Section 1244 stock” for purposes of Section 1244 of the Code; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n persons who acquired their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock in a transaction subject to the gain rollover provisions of Section 1045 of the Code; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n persons subject to special tax accounting rules as a result of any item of gross income with respect to Twin Vee Common Stock being taken into account in an “applicable financial statement” (as defined in the Code); \n

\n 86\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n persons deemed to sell Twin Vee Common Stock under the constructive sale provisions of the Code; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n persons who acquired their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock pursuant to the exercise of options or otherwise as compensation or through a tax-qualified retirement plan or through the exercise of a warrant or conversion rights under convertible instruments; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n expatriates or former citizens or long-term residents of the United States. \n

\n Holders of Twin Vee Common Stock and Twin Vee warrants subject to particular U.S. or non-U.S. tax rules, including those described in the preceding paragraph, are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the consequences to them of the Business Combination and the CVRs. \n

\n If a partnership (or any other entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds Twin Vee Common Stock or Twin Vee warrants, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in the partnership (or other entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) will generally depend upon the status of the partner, the activities of the partnership and certain determinations made at the partner level. Partnerships (or any other entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holding Twin Vee Common Stock or Twin Vee warrants, and partners therein, should consult their own tax advisors regarding the particular U.S. federal income tax consequences to them of the Mergers and the CVRs. \n

\n ALL HOLDERS OF TWIN VEE COMMON STOCK AND TWIN VEE WARRANTS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICATION OF THE INCOME TAX LAWS TO THEIR PARTICULAR SITUATIONS, INCLUDING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE BUSINESS COMBINATION AND THE CVRS, AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES ARISING UNDER THE U.S. FEDERAL ESTATE OR GIFT TAX LAWS OR UNDER THE LAWS OF ANY STATE, LOCAL OR NON-U.S. TAXING JURISDICTION OR UNDER ANY APPLICABLE INCOME TAX TREATY. \n

\n Definition of “U.S. Holder” \n

\n For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. holder” is a beneficial owner of Twin Vee Common Stock and/or Twin Vee warrants that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n a corporation or any other entity taxable as a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof, or the District of Columbia; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n a trust if either (i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of such trust, and one or more United States persons (within the meaning of Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code) is authorized or has the authority to control all substantial decisions of such trust, or (ii) the trust was in existence on August 20, 1996 and has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a United States person for U.S. federal income tax purposes; or \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source. \n

\n Tax Treatment of the CVRs \n

\n 87\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Twin Vee’s views and actions (and the fair market value ascribed to the CVRs) are not dispositive with respect to the tax treatment or fair market value of the CVRs and are not binding on the IRS as to a U.S. holder’s tax treatment of the receipt of CVRs or the fair market value of the CVRs. The IRS and Treasury Department have expressly stated in Treasury Regulations that only in “rare and extraordinary cases” is the value of property so uncertain that “open transaction” treatment is available. Here, Twin Vee has determined that the value of the CVRs as of the Closing can be reasonably ascertained. \n

\n The following sections discuss the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the CVRs if treated as a closed transaction or, alternatively, as an open transaction. It is also possible that the issuance of the CVRs could be treated as one or more “debt instruments” or as a distribution of equity. U.S. holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences to them of the receipt of CVRs and payments on the CVRs. \n

\n Closed Transaction Treatment. \n

\n If treated as a distribution of property with respect to Twin Vee Common Stock consistent with a closed transaction, each U.S. holder of Twin Vee Common Stock will be treated as receiving a distribution in an amount equal to the fair market value of the CVR issued to such U.S. holder on the date of the issuance. This distribution generally should be treated first as a taxable dividend to the extent of the U.S. holder’s pro rata share of Twin Vee’s current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes), then as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. holder’s basis in its Twin Vee Common Stock, and finally as capital gain from the sale or exchange of Twin Vee Common Stock with respect to any remaining value. The amount of the distribution treated as a taxable dividend may depend on the date on which the CVR is treated as distributed to Twin Vee stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which is not entirely certain. U.S. holders will receive a Form 1099-DIV notifying them of the portion of the CVR value that is reported by Twin Vee as a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Although Twin Vee will estimate the value of the CVRs for purposes of reporting on Form 1099-DIV to U.S. holders, the value of the CVRs is uncertain and the IRS or a court could determine that the value of the CVRs at the time of issuance was higher. In such case, the U.S. holders could be treated as having additional income or gain upon receipt of the CVRs as described above. A U.S. holder’s initial tax basis in such holder’s CVR should equal the fair market value of such CVR on the date of their issuance. The holding period of such CVR should begin on the date of issuance. It is also possible that the CVRs will be treated as aggregated with, and as part of, the Business Combination, in which case the fair market value of the CVRs may be treated as taxable boot received by Twin Vee Stockholders in connection with the First Merger. \n

\n The treatment of future payments received by a U.S. holder on a CVR is uncertain. It is possible that payments received with respect to a CVR up to the amount of the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the CVR, may be treated as a non-taxable return of a U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the CVR, with any amount received in excess of such basis treated as gain from the disposition of the CVR. The CVR Trust intends to treat any payment made in respect of a CVR in a manner consistent with the foregoing, but such position is not dispositive with respect to the tax treatment of such payments and is not binding on the IRS. Assuming that this method of reporting is correct, the gain will be long-term capital gain if the U.S. holder has held the CVR for more than one year at the time of such payment. Payments with respect to a CVR could alternatively be treated as ordinary income. U.S. holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the characterization of payments received with respect to the CVRs. \n

\n Open Transaction Treatment. \n

\n If the issuance of the CVRs is treated as an open transaction, (because, for example, the value of the CVRs as of the Closing cannot be “reasonably ascertained”), a U.S. holder should not immediately take the CVRs into account in determining whether such holder must recognize income, if any, on the receipt of the CVRs and such U.S. holder would take no tax basis in the CVRs. Rather, the U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax consequences would be determined at the time future payments, if any, with respect to the CVRs are received or deemed received, based on whether the CVRs are treated as a distribution of property or of equity, in accordance with the U.S. holder’s regular method of accounting. As discussed above, Twin Vee does \n

\n 88\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n not intend to report the issuance of the CVRs as an open transaction and the IRS may disagree with any U.S. holder reporting the CVR issuance as an open transaction. \n

\n U.S. Holders \n

\n The Receipt of PubCo Common Stock in the First Merger \n

\n Subject to the discussion below regarding the Twin Vee warrants, the surrender by a U.S. holder of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock in exchange for the shares of PubCo Common Stock pursuant to the First Merger, when taken together with the other steps of the Business Combination, are intended to qualify as a non-recognition transaction pursuant to Section 351(a) of the Code. However, it is possible that the CVRs may be treated as taxable boot received by Twin Vee stockholders in connection with the First Merger and , in such event, holders of Twin Vee Common Stock who participate in the First Merger would recognize gain for U.S. federal income tax purposes equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of taxable boot received (which would include the fair market value of the CVRs) or (ii) the gain realized by such holder in connection with the First Merger. No loss would be recognized. See “— Tax Treatment of the CVRs” above. The provisions of Section 351(a) of the Code are complex and qualification as a non-recognition transaction thereunder could be adversely affected by events or actions that occur following the Business Combination that are beyond our control. For example, if 20 percent or more of the PubCo Common stock were subject to an arrangement or agreement to be sold or disposed of at the time of its issuance in the Business Combination, one of the requirements for Section 351(a) treatment would be violated. We do not expect that any of the PubCo Common Stock issued in the Business Combination that will be subject to contractual restrictions on transfer will be subject to an arrangement or agreement by its owner to sell or dispose of such shares upon the issuance of those shares in the Business Combination. \n

\n In addition, the First Merger may qualify as a tax-deferred reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code. However, there are significant factual and legal uncertainties as to whether the First Merger will qualify as a tax-deferred reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code, including whether PubCo will continue a significant line of Twin Vee’s historic business or use a significant portion of Twin Vee’s historic business assets (which is unlikely due to the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring). Moreover, qualification of the First Merger as a tax-deferred reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code is based on facts which will not be known until or following the closing of the Business Combination. As a result, there is no assurance regarding whether the First Merger will constitute a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code. \n

\n If the Business Combination qualifies as an exchange pursuant to Section 351(a), the aggregate adjusted tax basis of the shares of PubCo Common Stock received by a U.S. holder of Twin Vee Common Stock in the First Merger should be equal to the aggregate adjusted tax basis of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock surrendered by such U.S. holder in the First Merger. In addition, the holding period of such PubCo Common Stock should include the period during which the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock, surrendered in the First Merger, were held by such U.S. holder, although the running of the holding period for the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock may be suspended as a result of any redemption rights with respect thereto. Every “significant transferor” pursuant to the exchange must include a statement on or with such transferor’s income tax return for the taxable year of the exchange. For this purpose, a significant transferor is generally a person that transferred property to a corporation and received stock of the transferee corporation if, immediately after the exchange, such person: (i) owns at least five percent (5%) (by vote or value) of the total outstanding stock of the transferee corporation if the stock owned by such person is publicly traded, or (ii) owned at least one percent (1%) (by vote or value) of the total outstanding stock of the transferee corporation if the stock owned by such person is not publicly traded. It is expected that the PubCo Common Stock will be publicly traded for this purpose. \n

\n In the event that the First Merger does not qualify as a non-recognition transaction pursuant to Section 351 of the Code or as a reorganization pursuant to Section 368 of the Code, generally, the First Merger will be treated as a taxable sale or exchange of Twin Vee Common Stock by U.S. holders in exchange for PubCo Common Stock. In such case, subject to the discussion of backup withholding below, a U.S. holder of Twin Vee Common Stock generally will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized and the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in its shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. Any such capital gain or loss generally will be long term capital gain or loss if the U.S. \n

\n 89\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n holder’s holding period in the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock exceeds one year. Long-term capital gains recognized by non-corporate U.S. holders will be eligible to be taxed at reduced rates. The deductibility of capital losses realized by a U.S. holder on a taxable sale or exchange of Twin Vee Common Stock is subject to certain limitations. \n

\n Generally the amount of gain or loss recognized by a U.S. holder on a taxable sale or exchange of Twin Vee Common Stock in connection with the First Merger will be an amount equal to the difference between (i) the fair market value of the PubCo Common Stock received by the U.S. holder in connection with the First Merger and (ii) the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in Twin Vee Common Stock surrendered therefor. A U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock generally will equal the U.S. holder’s acquisition cost of such shares, reduced by any prior distributions with respect to such shares treated as a return of basis. \n

\n We did not obtain a ruling from the IRS regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the First Merger, including the tax consequences described herein, and no assurance can be given that the IRS will agree with the views expressed herein, or that a court will not sustain any challenge by the IRS with respect to conclusions expressed herein in the event of litigation. \n

\n The Receipt of PubCo Warrants in the First Merger \n

\n The appropriate U.S. federal income tax treatment of Twin Vee warrants in connection with the First Merger depends on whether the First Merger qualifies as a reorganization pursuant to Section 368 of the Code. In such case, a U.S. holder of Twin Vee warrants will not recognize gain or loss with respect to such warrants as a result of the First Merger, and the aggregate adjusted tax basis and holding period of the PubCo warrants of such U.S. holder immediately after the First Merger will be equal to the adjusted tax basis and holding period of such U.S. holder’s Twin Vee warrants immediately prior to the First Merger. But if the First Merger qualifies only for non-recognition treatment under Section 351 of the Code and not as a reorganization pursuant to Section 368 of the Code, the warrant-for-warrant exchange would be a taxable exchange. \n

\n If so treated, a U.S. holder of only Twin Vee warrants would realize and recognize gain or loss in such exchange in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of PubCo warrants received by such U.S. holder in connection with the First Merger and the adjusted tax basis of Twin Vee warrants surrendered by such U.S. holder in connection with the First Merger. If such U.S. Holder surrenders both Twin Vee Common Stock and Twin Vee warrants in connection with the First Merger in exchange for both PubCo Common Stock and PubCo warrants, such U.S. holder of Twin Vee Common Stock and Twin Vee warrants should be required to recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of gain realized by such U.S. holder (generally, the excess of (x) the sum of the fair market value of the Twin Vee Common Stock and Twin Vee warrants over (y) such U.S. holder’s aggregate adjusted tax basis in the Twin Vee Common Stock and Twin Vee warrants) and (ii) the fair market value of the PubCo warrants received by such U.S. holder in connection with the First Merger. As a result of such exchange of securities in connection with the First Merger, such U.S. holder should have a tax basis in the PubCo Common Stock equal to the tax basis in the Twin Vee Common Stock and Twin Vee warrants surrendered, plus any gain recognized in the exchange, less the fair market value of the PubCo warrants received. In addition, such U.S. holder’s tax basis in the PubCo warrants should be fair market value determined on the date of the First Merger. And, the holding period for the PubCo Common Stock should include the period during which the U.S. holder held its Common Stock, and the holding period for the PubCo warrants should start on the day after the First Merger. \n

\n In the event that the First Merger does not qualify as a non-recognition transaction pursuant to Section 351 of the Code or as a reorganization pursuant to Section 368 of the Code, generally, the First Merger will be treated as a taxable sale or exchange of Twin Vee warrants or Twin Vee warrants and Twin Vee Common Stock, as may be applicable to any particular U.S. holder, by U.S. holders in exchange for PubCo warrants or PubCo warrants and PubCo Common Stock, as may be applicable. In such case, the same rules as described above in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “— U.S. Holders — The Receipt of PubCo Common Stock in the First Merger,” the paragraphs describing U.S. federal income \n

\n 90\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n tax consequences in the event that the First Merger does not qualify as a non-recognition transaction pursuant to Section 351 of the Code or as a reorganization pursuant to Section 368 of the Code, will apply to U.S. holders. \n

\n U.S. holders of Twin Vee warrants are urged to consult with their tax advisors regarding the treatment of their Twin Vee warrants in connection with the First Merger. \n

\n Taxation of Distributions on PubCo Common Stock \n

\n After the Mergers, PubCo may make dividend distributions with respect to its capital stock. Subject to the discussion of backup withholding below, a U.S. holder generally will be required to include in gross income as dividends the amount of any distribution paid on the PubCo Common Stock held by them. A distribution on such shares of PubCo Common Stock generally will be treated as a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent the distribution is paid out of PubCo’s current and/or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). A portion of any such dividends paid to corporate U.S. holders generally will qualify for the dividends received deduction if the requisite holding period is satisfied. Dividends paid to a non-corporate U.S. holder generally will constitute “qualified dividend income” within the meaning of Section 1(h)(11) of the Code, and provided certain requirements are met, such dividend will be subject to tax at the maximum tax rate accorded to long-term capital gains. \n

\n Non-corporate U.S. holders that do not meet a minimum holding period requirement or that elect to treat the dividend income as “investment income” (dealing with the deduction for investment interest expense) will not be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation applicable to qualified dividend income. In addition, the rate reduction will not apply to dividends if the recipient of a dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. This disallowance applies even if the minimum holding period has been met. \n

\n Distributions in excess of PubCo’s current and accumulated earnings and profits generally will be applied against and reduce the U.S. Holder’s basis in its shares of PubCo (but not below zero) and any excess, will be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of such shares as described below under “— U.S. Holders — Gain or Loss on Sale, Taxable Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of PubCo Securities.” \n

\n Gain or Loss on Sale, Taxable Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of PubCo Securities \n

\n After the Mergers, U.S. holders of PubCo securities may sell or dispose of their PubCo securities. Subject to the discussion of backup withholding below, upon a sale or other taxable disposition of PubCo securities, a U.S. holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized and the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the applicable securities. \n

\n Any such capital gain or loss generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. holder’s holding period in the PubCo securities exceeds one year. Long-term capital gains recognized by non-corporate U.S. holders will be eligible to be taxed at reduced rates. The deductibility of capital losses realized by a U.S. holder on a sale or other taxable disposition of PubCo securities is subject to certain limitations. \n

\n Generally, the amount of gain or loss recognized by a U.S. holder on a sale or other taxable disposition of the PubCo securities is an amount equal to the difference between (i) the sum of the amount of cash and the fair market value of any property received in such sale or disposition and (ii) the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the applicable PubCo securities so sold or disposed. A U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares of PubCo Common Stock or PubCo warrants generally will equal the U.S. holder’s acquisition cost of such shares or such warrants, subject to the discussion in “— U.S. Holders — The Receipt of PubCo Common Stock in the First Merger” above, or, as discussed below, the U.S. holder’s initial basis for PubCo Common Stock received upon exercise of PubCo warrants, less, in the case of PubCo Common Stock, any prior distributions treated as a return of basis. \n

\n Exercise or Lapse of a PubCo Warrant \n

\n Except as discussed below with respect to the cashless exercise of a PubCo warrant, a U.S. holder generally will not recognize gain or loss upon the acquisition of shares of PubCo Common Stock in \n

\n 91\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n connection with the exercise of PubCo warrants for cash. A U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in a PubCo Common Stock received upon exercise of the PubCo warrant generally will be an amount equal to the sum of the U.S. holder’s tax basis in the PubCo warrant exchanged therefor and the exercise price. The U.S. holder’s holding period for the shares of PubCo Common Stock received upon exercise of the PubCo warrant will begin on the date following the date of exercise (or possibly the date of exercise) of the PubCo warrant and will not include the period during which the U.S. Holder held the PubCo warrant. If a PubCo warrant is allowed to lapse unexercised, a U.S. holder generally will recognize a capital loss equal to such holder’s tax adjusted basis in the PubCo warrant. \n

\n The tax consequences of a cashless exercise of a PubCo warrant are not clear under current tax law. A cashless exercise may be tax-deferred, either because (i) the exercise is not a gain or loss realization event (a “non-realization event”) or (ii) the exercise is treated as a recapitalization for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In case of either a non-realization event or a recapitalization, a U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the PubCo Common Stock received would equal such holder’s adjusted tax basis in the PubCo warrants exercised therefore. If the cashless exercise were treated a non-realization event, a U.S. holder’s holding period in the shares of PubCo Common Stock would be treated as commencing on the date following the date of exercise (or possibly the date of exercise) of the PubCo warrants. If the cashless exercise were treated as a recapitalization, the holding period in the shares of PubCo Common Stock would include the holding period of the PubCo warrants exercised therefore. \n

\n It is also possible that a cashless exercise of a PubCo warrant could be treated in part as a taxable exchange in which gain or loss would be recognized. In such event, a U.S. holder would recognize gain or loss with respect to the portion of the exercised PubCo warrants treated as surrendered to pay the exercise price of the PubCo warrants (the “surrendered warrants”). The U.S. holder would recognize capital gain or loss with respect to the surrendered warrants in an amount generally equal to the difference between (i) the fair market value of the shares of PubCo Common Stock that would have been received with respect to the surrendered warrants in a regular exercise of the PubCo warrants and (ii) the sum of the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the surrendered warrants and the aggregate cash exercise price of such warrants (if they had been actually exercised for cash). In this case, a U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares of PubCo Common Stock received would equal the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the PubCo warrants exercised plus (or minus) the gain (or loss) recognized with respect to the surrendered warrants. A U.S. holder’s holding period for the shares of PubCo Common Stock would commence on the date following the date of exercise (or possibly the date of exercise) of the PubCo warrants. \n

\n Adjustment to Exercise Price \n

\n Under Section 305 of the Code, if certain adjustments are made (or not made) to the number of shares of PubCo Common Stock to be issued upon the exercise of a PubCo warrant or to the PubCo warrant’s exercise price, a U.S. holder may be deemed to have received a constructive distribution with respect to the PubCo warrant, which could result in adverse consequences for the U.S. holder, including the inclusion of dividend income. These rules governing constructive distributions are complex and U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors on the tax consequences of any such constructive distribution. \n

\n Due to the absence of authority on the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a cashless exercise of warrants, there can be no assurance which, if any, of the alternative tax consequences described above would be adopted by the IRS or a court of law. Accordingly, U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of a cashless exercise of the PubCo warrants. \n

\n Non-U.S. Holders \n

\n For purposes of this discussion, a “non-U.S. holder” means a beneficial owner of Twin Vee Common Stock and/or Twin Vee warrants that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, neither a U.S. holder nor an entity or arrangement classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. \n

\n The Receipt of PubCo Common Stock in the First Merger \n

\n As described above in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “— U.S. Holders — The Receipt of PubCo Common Stock in the First Merger,” the Mergers taken together are intended to qualify \n

\n 92\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n (in whole or in part) as a tax-deferred transaction under Section 351 of the Code. Potentially adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences will apply to the non-U.S. holders as a result of the First Merger if Twin Vee is a “United States real property holding corporation” within the meaning of Section 897(c)(2) (“USRPHC”) at any time during the lesser of (i) the five-year period ending on the date the First Merger occurs and (ii) the period during which the non-U.S. holders held the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock ending on the date the First Merger occurs. Generally, if Twin Vee is a USRPHC during the lesser of the two time periods described above, a non-U.S. holder’s gain (or loss) realized on its transfer of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock in exchange for the shares of PubCo Common Stock in connection with the First Merger would be subject to tax in the United States in the same manner as if such non-U.S. holder was engaged in a trade or business within the United States and such gain (or loss) was effectively connected with the conduct of such trade or business, unless certain exceptions apply. Twin Vee does not believe that it has been or will be a USRPHC, but there can be no assurance in this regard. Non-U.S. holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding Twin Vee’s status as a USRPHC and the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the First Merger to them if Twin Vee is a USRPHC. \n

\n In the event that the First Merger does not qualify as a non-recognition transaction pursuant to Section 351 of the Code or as a reorganization pursuant to Section 368 of the Code, generally, the First Merger will be treated as a taxable sale or exchange of Twin Vee Common Stock by non-U.S. holders in exchange for the PubCo Common Stock. In such case, subject to the discussion of backup withholding and FATCA below, any gain realized by a non-U.S. holder on the taxable exchange of its Twin Vee Common Stock for the PubCo Common Stock in the First Merger generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the gain is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business by the non-U.S. holder within the United States (or, under certain income tax treaties, is attributable to a United States permanent establishment or fixed base maintained by the non-U.S. holder), in which case the non-U.S. holder will generally be subject to U.S. federal income tax on that gain on a net income basis in the same manner as if the non-U.S. holder were a U.S. person as defined under the Code (see the discussion above entitled “— U.S. Holders — The Receipt of PubCo Common Stock in the First Merger” in the event the First Merger does not qualify as a non-recognition transaction pursuant to Section 351 of the Code or as a reorganization pursuant to Section 368 of the Code), and a corporate non-U.S. holder may be subject to the branch profits tax at a 30% rate (or lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty); \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the non-U.S. holder is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year in which the Twin Vee Merger occurs and certain other conditions are met, in which case the non-U.S. holder will be subject to a 30% tax on the amount by which its capital gains allocable to U.S. sources, including gain from the taxable sale or exchange of Twin Vee Common Stock pursuant to the First Merger, exceeds any capital losses allocable to U.S. sources, except as otherwise required by an applicable income tax treaty; or \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee is or has been a USRPHC at any time during the shorter of the five-year period ending on the date of the First Merger or the period that the non-U.S. holder held such securities disposed of, and, in the case where shares of Twin Vee Common Stock are regularly traded on an established securities market, the non-U.S. holder has owned, directly or constructively, more than 5% of Twin Vee Common Stock at any time within the shorter of the five-year period preceding the First Merger or such non-U.S. holder’s holding period for the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. \n

\n With respect to the third bullet point above (if applicable to a particular non-U.S. holder), gain recognized by such non-U.S. holder on the taxable sale or exchange of Twin Vee Common Stock pursuant to the First Merger will be subject to tax on net basis at generally applicable U.S. federal income tax rates. In addition, PubCo would be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 15% of the amount realized by such non-U.S. holder. There can be no assurance that Twin Vee Common Stock will be treated as regularly traded on an established securities market. \n

\n 93\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n The Receipt of PubCo Warrants in the First Merger \n

\n U.S. federal income tax consequences to non-U.S. holders as a result of the First Merger with respect to Twin Vee warrants will be the same as to the U.S. holders as described in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “— U.S. Holders — The Receipt of PubCo Warrants in the First Merger,” except, if any gain or loss is required to be recognized with respect to Twin Vee warrants, such gain or loss will be subject to the rules described above in the section entitled “— Non-U.S. Holders — The Receipt of PubCo Common Stock in the First Merger,” the paragraphs describing U.S. federal income tax consequences in the event that the First Merger does not qualify as a non-recognition transaction pursuant to Section 351 of the Code or as a reorganization pursuant to Section 368 of the Code. In addition, the rules described above regarding Twin Vee’s status as a USRPHC are equally applicable to non-U.S. holders of only Twin Vee warrants or Twin Vee warrants and Twin Vee Common Stock. \n

\n Gain or Loss on Sale, Taxable Exchange or Other Disposition of PubCo Securities \n

\n After the First Merger, non-U.S. holders of PubCo securities may sell or dispose of their PubCo securities. Subject to the discussion of backup withholding and FATCA below, any gain realized by a non-U.S. holder on the taxable disposition of the PubCo securities generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the gain is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business by the non-U.S. holder within the United States (or, under certain income tax treaties, is attributable to a United States permanent establishment or fixed base maintained by the non-U.S. holder), in which case the non-U.S. holder will generally be subject to U.S. federal income tax on that gain on a net income basis in the same manner as if the non-U.S. holder were a U.S. person as defined under the Code (see the discussion above entitled “— U.S. Holders — Gain or Loss on Sale, Taxable Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of PubCo Securities”), and a corporate non-U.S. Holder may be subject to the branch profits tax at a 30% rate (or lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty); \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the non-U.S. holder is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year in which the sale or other taxable disposition of the PubCo securities occurs and certain other conditions are met, in which case the non-U.S. holder will be subject to a 30% tax on the amount by which its capital gains allocable to U.S. sources, including gain from the sale or other taxable disposition of the PubCo securities, exceeds any capital losses allocable to U.S. sources, except as otherwise required by an applicable income tax treaty; or \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n PubCo is or has been a USRPHC at any time during the shorter of the five-year period ending on the date of sale or other disposition (whether taxable or not) or the period that the non-U.S. holder held such securities disposed of, and, in the case where shares of PubCo Common Stock are regularly traded on an established securities market, the non-U.S. holder has owned, directly or constructively, more than 5% of the common stock of PubCo at any time within the shorter of the five-year period preceding the sale or other disposition or such non-U.S. holder’s holding period for the shares of PubCo Common Stock. \n

\n With respect to the third bullet point above (if applicable to a particular non-U.S. holder), gain recognized by such non-U.S. holder on the sale or other taxable disposition of the PubCo securities will be subject to tax on net basis at generally applicable U.S. federal income tax rates. In addition, a purchaser of PubCo Common Stock from such non-U.S. holder would be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 15% of the amount realized by such non-U.S. holder. There can be no assurance that PubCo Common Stock will be treated as regularly traded on an established securities market. PubCo does not believe that it has been or will be a “United States real property holding corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes but there can be no assurance in this regard. \n

\n Taxation of Distributions on PubCo Common Stock \n

\n After the First Merger, PubCo may make dividend distributions with respect to its capital stock. Subject to the discussion of backup withholding and FATCA below, in general, any distributions we make, to the extent paid from PubCo’s current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles), will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, provided \n

\n 94\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n such dividends are not effectively connected with the non-U.S. holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States, the applicable withholding agent will be required to withhold tax from the gross amount of the dividend at a rate of 30%, unless such non-U.S. holder is eligible for a reduced rate of withholding tax under an applicable income tax treaty and provides proper certification of its eligibility for such reduced rate. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits will constitute a return of capital that will be applied against and reduce (but not below zero) the non-U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares of PubCo Common Stock (and, subject to the discussion below under “— Information Reporting Requirements and Backup Withholding,” “— Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act,” and the third bullet point above under “— Non-U.S. Holders — Gain or Loss on Sale, Taxable Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of PubCo Securities,” to the extent such distribution does not exceed the adjusted tax basis such amount will generally not be subject to withholding). To the extent the distribution exceeds the non-U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis, it will be treated as gain realized from the sale or exchange of PubCo Common Stock, which will be treated as described above under “— Non-U.S. Holders — Gain or Loss on Sale, Taxable Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of PubCo Securities.” Dividends paid to a non-U.S. holder that are effectively connected with such non-U.S. holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States generally will not be subject to U.S. withholding tax, provided such non-U.S. holder complies with certain certification and disclosure requirements. Instead, such dividends generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax, net of certain deductions, at the same graduated individual or corporate rates applicable to U.S. holders (subject to an exemption or reduction in such tax as may be provided by an applicable income tax treaty). If the non-U.S. holder is a corporation, dividends that are effectively connected income may also be subject to a “branch profits tax” at a rate of 30% (or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty). \n

\n Exercise or Lapse of PubCo Warrant \n

\n The U.S. federal income tax treatment of a non-U.S. holder’s exercise of a PubCo warrant, or the lapse of a PubCo warrant held by a non-U.S. holder, generally will correspond to the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the exercise or lapse of a warrant by a U.S. holder, as described under “— U.S. Holders — Exercise or Lapse of a PubCo Warrant,” above, although to the extent a cashless exercise results in a taxable exchange, the consequences would be similar to those described under “— Non-U.S. Holders — Gain or Loss on Sale, Taxable Exchange or Other Disposition of PubCo Securities” above. \n

\n Information Reporting Requirements and Backup Withholding \n

\n A non-U.S. holder may have to comply with certification procedures to establish that it is not a United States person for U.S. federal income tax purposes or otherwise establish an exemption in order to avoid information reporting and backup withholding requirements or to claim a reduced rate of withholding under an applicable income tax treaty. For example, a non-U.S. holder who is an individual may be required to provide a valid IRS Form W-8BEN, a non-U.S. holder that is an entity may be required to provide a valid IRS Form W-8BEN-E, and, in the event of income treated as effectively connected to a U.S. trade or business, a non-U.S. holder (whether an individual or an entity) may be required to provide a valid IRS Form W-8ECI. A U.S. holder may also be subject to backup withholding and may be required to provide certain certification that it is a United States person for U.S. federal income tax purposes in order to avoid such backup withholding. For example, a U.S. holder may be required to provide a valid IRS Form W-9. The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a U.S. holder will be allowed as a credit against such holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle such holder to a refund, provided that the required information is furnished by such holder to the IRS in a timely manner. \n

\n Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act \n

\n Sections 1471 through 1474 of the Code and the Treasury regulations and administrative guidance promulgated thereunder (commonly referred to as the “Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act” or “FATCA”) generally impose withholding at a rate of 30% in certain circumstances on certain “withholdable payments” in respect of securities which are held by or through certain foreign financial institutions (including investment funds), unless any such institution (i) enters into, and complies with, an agreement with the IRS to report, on an annual basis, information with respect to interests in, and accounts maintained by, the institution that are owned by certain U.S. persons and by certain non-U.S. entities that are wholly or partially owned by \n

\n 95\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n U.S. persons and to withhold on certain payments, or (ii) if required under an intergovernmental agreement between the United States and an applicable foreign country, reports such information to its local tax authority, which will exchange such information with the U.S. authorities. An intergovernmental agreement between the United States and an applicable foreign country may modify these requirements. For this purpose, withholdable payments generally include U.S.-source payments otherwise subject to nonresident withholding tax (e.g., a U.S. source dividend) and also include the entire gross proceeds from the sale or other disposition of stock of U.S. corporations, even if the payment would otherwise not be subject to U.S. nonresident withholding tax (e.g., because it is capital gain). The IRS issued proposed Treasury Regulations that would eliminate the application of this regime with respect to payments of gross proceeds from dispositions of stock (but not dividends). Pursuant to these proposed Treasury Regulations, the corporation and any other withholding agent may (but are not required to) rely on this proposed change to FATCA withholding until final regulations are issued or until such proposed regulations are rescinded. Accordingly, the entity through which shares of Twin Vee Common Stock are held will affect the determination of whether such withholding is required. Similarly, “withholdable payments” (e.g., dividends) in respect of, Twin Vee Common Stock held by an investor that is a non-financial non-U.S. entity that does not qualify under certain exceptions will generally be subject to withholding at a rate of 30%, unless such entity either (i) certifies to the applicable withholding agent that such entity does not have any “substantial United States owners” or (ii) provides certain information regarding the entity’s “substantial United States owners”, which will in turn be provided to the U.S. Department of Treasury. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the possible implications of FATCA on their investment in Twin Vee Common Stock. \n

\n Background of the Business Combination \n

\n The following chronology summarizes the material meetings and events that led to the execution of the Merger Agreement. This chronology does not purport to catalogue every conversation of, or among, the Twin Vee Board, the USFM Board, members of Twin Vee’s senior management, members of USFM’s senior management or Twin Vee’s or USFM’s advisors and other parties. \n

\n The Twin Vee Board, together with Twin Vee’s senior management, regularly reviews Twin Vee’s performance, growth prospects and overall strategic direction and evaluates potential opportunities to strengthen Twin Vee’s business and enhance value for its stockholders. From time to time, these reviews and evaluations have included consideration of potential strategic alternatives, including potential strategic acquisitions and divestitures and other strategic transactions. \n

\n On December 1, 2025, a privately held US-based marine company (“Bidder A”) contacted Twin Vee to discuss a potential strategic transaction. \n

\n Also on December 1, 2025, a publicly traded US-based marine company (“Bidder B”) and Twin Vee entered into a non-disclosure and confidentiality agreement. \n

\n On February 20, 2026, Bidder B submitted an unsolicited letter of intent to Twin Vee regarding a potential strategic transaction. \n

\n On February 26, 2026, Twin Vee and Bidder A entered into a non-disclosure and confidentiality agreement. \n

\n On March 25, 2026, the Twin Vee Board held a meeting by means of remote communication during which, among other things, the Twin Vee Board established an ad-hoc committee of the Twin Vee Board designated as the “Strategic Inquiry Advisory Committee” (referred to herein as the “Twin Vee Special Committee”), consisting of Larry Swets Jr. (Chairman), Carol Craig, and Kevin Schuyler, in light of the inquiries periodically received by Twin Vee regarding potential strategic transactions, specifically reverse mergers or those related to the capital markets. \n

\n In April 2026, Larry Swets, a member of the Twin Vee Board and Twin Vee Special Committee, introduced the Twin Vee Special Committee to Robert Price of USFM. \n

\n On April 2, 2026, Twin Vee received written notice from the staff of the Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC notifying Twin Vee that it no longer satisfied the $1.00 bid price requirement set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market. \n

\n 96\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n On April 7, 2026, Twin Vee received a formal notice indicating that the Nasdaq Hearings Panel will consider Twin Vee’s appeal at an oral hearing to be held on May 7, 2026 and stating that, to the extent permitted by Nasdaq Listing Rules, the delisting action referenced in the April 2, 2026 notice letter has been stayed, pending a final written decision by the Nasdaq Hearings Panel. \n

\n On April 17, 2026, Twin Vee submitted a plan of compliance to the Nasdaq Hearings Panel. Among other things, the plan of compliance referred to the (then unknown) defective reincorporation of Twin Vee from the State of Delaware to the State of Nevada and the planned reverse stock split that was designed to increase the trading price of the Twin Vee Common Stock above the $1.00 per share bid price requirement. \n

\n On April 23, 2026, USFM sent a letter of intent to Twin Vee regarding a potential strategic transaction (“Initial USFM LOI”). Pursuant to the Initial USFM LOI, USFM proposed that USFM and Twin Vee would enter into a business combination transaction, with the combined company being owned 93% by pre-closing USFM shareholders and 7% by pre-closing Twin Vee shareholders (in each case, determined on a fully diluted basis). The Initial USFM LOI contemplated the creation of a contingent value rights trust, which would be established for the benefit of pre-closing Twin Vee stockholders and, following an assignment and transfer from Twin Vee, would hold all assets and liabilities of Twin Vee, which would include at least $2,000,000 of Twin Vee’s then cash on hand. The Initial USFM LOI further contemplated that the board of directors of the combined entity would consist of Kevin Schuyler, Carol Craig, and three members appointed by USFM, each of whom would be an independent director. The Initial USFM LOI contemplated that USFM management would be appointed as the executive officers of the combined entity. The Initial USFM LOI included a 30-day exclusivity period and other customary terms. The Initial USFM LOI was never executed by the parties. Please see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a discussion of certain conflicts of interest related to the USFM transaction. \n

\n On April 29, 2026, USFM and Twin Vee entered into a non-disclosure agreement. \n

\n On April 30, 2026, Robert Price and Olga Solovieva, the Chief Operating Officer of 80 Mile plc, led an on-line investor presentation with Carol Craig and Kevin Schuyler, during which Mr. Price and Ms. Solovieva presented the USFM investor deck presentation and spoke about the mineral and mining opportunities in Greenland, specifically with respect to the Disko Island project. They discussed the stock purchase agreement entered into between USFM and 80 Mile, the capital that USFM had raised to date, and USFM’s drilling plans. \n

\n Also on April 30, 2026, Bidder A submitted an unsolicited letter of intent to Twin Vee regarding a potential strategic transaction (the “Bidder A LOI”). The Bidder A LOI included a purchase price to be in the range of $4,000,000 to $5,000,000, pending due diligence and good faith negotiations. The Bidder A LOI also reflected that Bidder A would not assume any liabilities of Twin Vee. The Bidder A LOI was signed by a Chinese affiliate of Bidder A. \n

\n In late April 2026 or early May 2026, a privately held mining business (“Bidder C”) contacted Twin Vee regarding a potential business combination. \n

\n In late April 2026 or early May 2026, a non-US publicly traded marine business (“Bidder D”) contacted Twin Vee regarding a potential business combination. \n

\n On May 7, 2026, Twin Vee met with the Nasdaq Hearings Panel to discuss its appeal of Nasdaq’s April 2, 2026 delisting notice. During that meeting, Twin Vee made various representations regarding its purported Nevada reincorporation and purported 1-for-37 reverse stock split. Following its meeting with the Nasdaq Hearings Panel, Twin Vee was informed that Nasdaq would not pursue the proposed delisting of Twin Vee’s common stock. \n

\n On May 15, 2026, the Twin Vee Board held a meeting by means of remote communication during which, among other things, the Twin Vee Special Committee provided an update on recent potential strategic transaction activity and the Twin Vee Board adopted resolutions granting the Twin Vee Special Committee authority to engage legal counsel and other advisors for purposes of any potential strategic transaction. \n

\n 97\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n On May 18, 2026, the Twin Vee management team (including Joseph C. Visconti, Preston Yarborough, and other unidentified employees of Twin Vee) (the “Management Team”), submitted a letter of intent to Twin Vee (the “Management LOI”). The Management LOI reflected no cash consideration but an agreement by the Management Team to assume all operational liabilities of Twin Vee. The Management LOI also contemplated a $1,000,000 working capital loan from Twin Vee to the Management Team. Under the Management LOI, Twin Vee would retain all cash and restricted cash, the North Carolina property note receivable (related to the October 2025 sale of certain real property in North Carolina previously owned by Twin Vee), the Twin Vee public shell entity, and the Forza class action litigation (referred to as the “Delaware Matter” in the Merger Agreement). Please see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a discussion of certain conflicts of interest related to the Management Team transaction. \n

\n On May 28, 2026, the Twin Vee Special Committee engaged Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP (“SMRH”) as outside legal counsel. \n

\n On June 2, 2026, USFM sent a revised letter of intent to Twin Vee (the “Second USFM LOI”). The Second USFM LOI continued to refer to a 93% (USFM) / 7% (Twin Vee) combined company equity split. The Second USFM LOI also reflected conveyance of 19.99% of the outstanding Twin Vee Common Stock to USFM in exchange for USFM’s agreement to reimburse Twin Vee for up to $250,000 of its legal expenses. The Second USFM LOI continued to contemplate a transfer of Twin Vee’s assets and liabilities to a contingent value rights trust, however, the amount of cash contributed to the contingent value rights trust was reduced from $2,000,000 in the Initial USFM LOI to $1,000,000 in the Second USFM LOI. The combined company board of directors and management were unchanged in the Second USFM LOI. The Second USFM LOI included a new 30 day exclusivity period and other customary terms. \n

\n On June 3, 2026, Mr. Schuyler informed Mr. Sajjad Baqar, the Chief Financial Officer of USFM, that he was in receipt of the Second USFM LOI and would revert with any questions. \n

\n On June 8, 2026, Mr. Schuyler sent comments to the Second USFM LOI to USFM, which included proposed changes to the post-merger company ownership split, a provision regarding the matter referred to as the Delaware Matter in the Merger Agreement to remain with the combined company post-closing, a 10-day exclusivity period and revised closing conditions, including a customary “fiduciary out” for Twin Vee, as well as a 30-day “go shop” provision, and an intervening event termination provision. Later that day, following further discussions amongst the parties, Sajjad Baqar sent an updated redline of the Second USFM LOI back to Mr. Schyler in which USFM rejected the go-shop provision, removed the requirement for Twin Vee to convey 19.9% of the Twin Vee Common Stock to USFM in exchange for an agreement by USFM to reimburse Twin Vee for up to $250,000 in legal expenses, added a fairness opinion condition, and updated the post-merger company ownership split from 93% (USFM) 7% (Twin Vee) to 91% (USFM) 9% (Twin Vee). \n

\n On June 12, 2026, following further discussion amongst the parties, Mr. Schuyler responded with a further revised version of the Second USFM LOI proposing an ownership split of 90% /10% and a 10-day exclusivity period. This final version of the Second USFM LOI (the “Final USFM LOI”) also reflected that a minimum of $1,000,000 in cash would be transferred to the contingent value rights trust but leaving no less than $1,500,000 in the remaining go forward public company and contemplated a break-up fee payable to Twin Vee by USFM in the amount of $500,000 if USFM breaches the definitive business combination agreement or if the parties fail to consummate the planned business combination agreement after the execution thereof solely due to reasons controlled by USFM. Mr. Schuyler indicated that the Twin Vee Special Committee was prepared to sign the Final USFM LOI if acceptable to USFM. \n

\n Later on June 12, 2026, the Twin Vee Special Committee held a meeting by means of remote communication to discuss the Final USFM LOI. During such meeting, the Twin Vee Special Committee approved the terms of the Final USFM LOI. \n

\n Later on June 12, 2026, the Final USFM LOI was executed and delivered by USFM and Twin Vee. \n

\n On June 15, 2026, the Twin Vee Board held a meeting by means of remote communication during which, among other things, the Twin Vee Board discussed the Final USFM LOI and the proposed next steps regarding the USFM transaction. \n

\n 98\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n On June 19, 2026, Twin Vee and Bidder D entered into a non-disclosure agreement. \n

\n On June 19, 2026, Twin Vee engaged SMRH as its outside legal counsel for purposes of the potential strategic transaction. \n

\n On June 19, 2026, USFM instructed Loeb & Loeb LLP, outside legal counsel to USFM (“Loeb”), to organize an initial call between Loeb and SMRH to discuss topics related to the potential business combination between USFM and Twin Vee such as structure, timing, necessary documentation, and listing requirements. \n

\n Loeb and SMRH continued to discuss the proposed structure of the potential business combination and, on June 23, 2026, USFM and Loeb and Twin Vee and SMRH agreed upon the proposed structure and began working towards drafting the definitive documentation. \n

\n On June 24, 2026, the Final USFM LOI was amended to extend the exclusivity period to July 5, 2026 to provide the parties more time to negotiate the terms of the definitive business combination agreement. \n

\n On June 25, 2026, Mr. Schuyler introduced Michael Moscarelli from Houlihan Capital to Sajjad Baqar and Glenn Sonoda (Twin Vee’s in house counsel) and Twin Vee engaged Houlihan Capital with respect to the fairness opinion. \n

\n Also on June 25, 2026, the Management Team delivered a revised letter of intent to Twin Vee (the “Revised Management LOI”). Pursuant to the Revised Management LOI, the Management Team would pay $2,000,000 in cash at closing and an additional $1,000,000 in cash 12 months after closing, for the purchase of 100% of the operating business of Twin Vee. \n

\n On June 28, 2026, Bidder D submitted an unsolicited letter of intent to Twin Vee regarding a potential business combination. \n

\n Also on June 28, 2026, Loeb delivered an initial draft of the Initial Merger Agreement, on behalf of USFM, to SMRH. \n

\n On June 30, 2026, Mr. Schuyler contacted Bidder D to inform it that Twin Vee was under an exclusivity agreement with another party and was unable to pursue discussions with Bidder D regarding a potential business combination at that time. \n

\n On July 1, 2026, SMRH, on behalf of Twin Vee, sent a revised draft of the Initial Merger Agreement to Loeb. \n

\n On July 2, 2026, Loeb, on behalf of USFM, sent a revised draft of the Initial Merger Agreement to SMRH. \n

\n On July 2, 2026, Loeb, on behalf of USFM, sent an initial draft of the confidential USFM disclosure letter and the initial draft of the Support Agreement to SMRH. \n

\n On July 5, 2026, after the exclusivity period in the Final USFM LOI had expired, Mr. Schuyler contacted Bidder D to inform it that its letter of intent was not competitive with other letters of intent which Twin Vee had recently received. \n

\n On July 6, 2026, SMRH, on behalf of Twin Vee, sent a revised draft of the Initial Merger Agreement to Loeb. \n

\n On July 6, 2026, SMRH, on behalf of Twin Vee, sent an initial draft of the Twin Vee confidential disclosure letter to Loeb. \n

\n On July 7, 2026, a representative of Bidder D contacted Mr. Schuyler by email to suggest certain improvements to Bidder D’s letter of intent. \n

\n On July 7, 2026, USFM and Twin Vee amended the Final USFM LOI a second time to extend the exclusivity period to July 12, 2026 to provide the parties more time to negotiate the terms of the definitive business combination agreement. \n

\n 99\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n On July 8, 2026, SMRH, on behalf of Twin Vee, sent a revised draft of the Support Agreement and the USFM disclosure letter to Loeb. \n

\n On July 9, 2026, Loeb, on behalf of USFM, sent a revised draft of the Initial Merger Agreement, confidential USFM disclosure letter and the Twin Vee confidential disclosure letter to SMRH. \n

\n On July 9, 2026, Twin Vee engaged Holland & Hart LLP (“HH”) as local Nevada counsel for purposes of the proposed business combination. \n

\n On July 10, 2026, following further correspondence between Loeb and SMRH regarding certain provisions of the Initial Merger Agreement, Loeb, on behalf of USFM, sent a further revised draft of the Initial Merger Agreement to SMRH. \n

\n Also on July 10, 2026, SMRH, on behalf of Twin Vee, sent a revised draft of the Twin Vee confidential disclosure letter to Loeb. \n

\n On July 12, 2026, the Twin Vee Board held a meeting by means of remote communication to discuss then current draft of the Initial Merger Agreement during which meeting, the Twin Vee Board received a presentation from Houlihan Capital regarding such firm’s fairness opinion, the Twin Vee Board received a presentation regarding Nevada fiduciary duties from its outside Nevada counsel, HH, and the Twin Vee Board delegated to the Twin Vee Special Committee authority to approve the final version of the Initial Merger Agreement. At the same meeting, following discussion among the Twin Vee Board, the Twin Vee Board, with Joseph C. Visconti and Preston Yarborough abstaining from the vote, (a) determined that the terms of the Initial Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger (as such term was defined in the Initial Merger Agreement), were fair to, and in the best interests of, Twin Vee and its stockholders; (b) determined that it was in the best interests of Twin Vee and its stockholders and declared it advisable to enter into the Initial Merger Agreement; (c) approved the execution and delivery by Twin Vee of the Initial Merger Agreement, the performance by Twin Vee of its covenants and agreements contained therein and the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Initial Merger Agreement, including the Merger, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein; (d) resolved to recommend that the stockholders of Twin Vee approve the Merger and adopt the Initial Merger Agreement; and (e) directed that the Initial Merger Agreement be submitted to the stockholders of Twin Vee for its adoption. Please see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a discussion of certain conflicts of interest related to the USFM transaction. The Twin Vee Board was aware of such conflicts of interest prior to voting on approval of the Initial Merger Agreement. \n

\n Later on July 12, 2026, Loeb, on behalf of USFM, sent a proposed execution copy of the Initial Merger Agreement to SMRH, which the Twin Vee Special Committee reviewed and approved. \n

\n Later on July 12, 2026, USFM and Twin Vee exchanged signature pages to the Initial Merger Agreement and Support Agreement, and each of the Initial Merger Agreement and Support Agreement became effective. \n

\n Also on July 12, 2026, Twin Vee sent to the Management Team a revised version of the Revised Management LOI which reflected that the Management Team’s acquisition of the Twin Vee marine business would be through the CVR following consummation of the USFM business combination transaction. \n

\n On July 13, 2026, Twin Vee publicly announced the execution of the Initial Merger Agreement. \n

\n Later on July 13, 2026, Bidder D contacted Mr. Schuyler by email to reiterate Bidder D’s interest in continuing conversations regarding a potential acquisition of Twin Vee’s marine business. \n

\n On July 14, 2026, Mr. Schuyler and a representative from Bidder D discussed arranging a conference call that week to discuss a potential strategic transaction involving Twin Vee’s marine business as part of the restructuring described in the Initial Merger Agreement. \n

\n On July 16, 2026, the Twin Vee Special Committee met with Bidder B and its financial advisors to further discuss a potential strategic transaction involving Twin Vee’s marine business. \n

\n 100\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Also on July 16, 2026, Twin Vee formed Twin Vee Bahama Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as the “Assetco” contemplated by the Initial Merger Agreement (“Assetco”). Following the formation of Assetco, Twin Vee began to transfer certain assets and liabilities of Twin Vee to Assetco. \n

\n On July 17, 2026, Bidder D submitted a revised letter of intent to Twin Vee. \n

\n On or about July 20, 206, Twin Vee discovered that its purported reincorporation from the State of Delaware to the State of Nevada on April 10, 2026, purportedly approved by Twin Vee’s stockholders at its annual meeting of stockholders held on December 4, 2025, may have been defective. Following such discovery, Twin Vee directed SMRH and HH to investigate the matter and propose a corrective plan of action. \n

\n On July 22, 2026, the Twin Vee Special Committee held a meeting by means of remote communication during which, among other things, the Twin Vee Special Committee established an ad-hoc subcommittee, consisting of Kevin Schuyler and Carol Craig (the “Twin Vee Special Subcommittee”), for purposes of negotiating any revisions to the Initial Merger Agreement. \n

\n On July 23, 2026, the Management Team delivered a further revised draft of a letter of intent (the “Second Revised Management LOI”) which reflected total consideration for the Twin Vee marine assets of $4,000,000 in cash, $2,000,000 in cash to be paid at closing, $1,000,000 in cash to be paid on the 12 month anniversary of closing, and another $1,000,000 in cash to be paid on the 24 month anniversary of closing. The Second Revised Management LOI also reflected that the transactions contemplated thereby would be consummated through the CVR following consummation of the USFM business combination. The Second Revised Management LOI contemplated a 30 to 45 day exclusivity period. \n

\n On July 24, 2024, the Twin Vee Board held a meeting by means of remote communication to discuss, among other thing, approval of Twin Vee’s engagement of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP (“PAC”) as local Delaware counsel for purposes of the Reincorporation Matter (as defined below). \n

\n Later on July 24, 2026, Twin Vee engaged PAC as local Delaware counsel for purposes of assisting with the investigation of the potentially defective reincorporation, reverse stock split and other related potential defective corporate acts. PAC was engaged by Twin Vee to, among other things, provide advice regarding ratification of the various defective corporate acts in compliance with Section 204 of the DGCL. Following the engagement of PAC and further investigation of the purported defective reincorporation and related matters by PAC, SMRH and HH, Twin Vee discovered that, in contravention of the requirement in DGCL Section 266, which requires approval by a majority of the outstanding shares, the purported reincorporation was approved by only a majority of the votes cast at the December 4, 2025 annual meeting of stockholders (which represented only 19.5% of the Twin Vee issued and outstanding stock then outstanding). Subsequent to the defective reincorporation, Twin Vee, acting by only Twin Vee Board action as permitted by applicable Nevada law, approved a 1-for-37 reverse stock split, effective May 4, 2026. In consultation with PAC, SMRH and HH, Twin Vee prepared a plan of action to rectify the defective reincorporation and other defective corporate acts. The matters described in this paragraph are referred to herein as the “Reincorporation Matter”. \n

\n On July 28, 2026, the Twin Vee Board held a meeting by means of remote communication to discuss, among other things, the Reincorporation Matter and the Second Revised Management LOI. During this meeting, PAC and SMRH provided an overview of the proposed course of action for Twin Vee to seek to rectify the Reincorporation Matter. \n

\n On July 31, 2026, the Twin Vee Board held a meeting by means of remote communication to discuss, among other things, an update on the USFM transaction and the Reincorporation Matter. \n

\n At the end of July 2026, Mr. Schuyler informed Bidder D’s financial advisors that Twin Vee had determined to pursue the sale of Twin Vee’s marine business with a different party. \n

\n On August 4, 2026, the Twin Vee Board, acting by unanimous written consent, adopted resolutions to, among other things, ratify the reverse stock split and other defective corporate acts as part of Twin Vee’s plan to seek to resolve the Reincorporation Matter. \n

\n Later on August 4, 2026, Twin Vee filed a Certificate of Correction to the Certificate of Conversion with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to reflect the removal of such certificate previously incorrectly filed in Delaware purporting to convert Twin Vee into a Nevada corporation. \n

\n 101\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n On August 5, 2026, Twin Vee filed a preliminary proxy statement with the SEC related to a proposed Twin Vee stockholder meeting to vote on ratification of the reverse stock split and related matters at a special meeting of Twin Vee stockholders. \n

\n Also on August 5, 2026, Twin Vee filed a Certificate of Correction and other documents with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada to reflect the correction of the corporate documents previously filed by Twin Vee related to the defective reincorporation in Nevada, the 1-for-37 reverse stock split, and related matters. \n

\n On August 12, 2026, the Twin Vee Board held a meeting by means of remote communication to discuss, among other things, the pending USFM business combination transaction. During this meeting, PAC provided the Twin Vee Board with an overview of the applicable fiduciary duties related to the pending USFM business combination under Delaware law. At the same meeting, the Twin Vee Board discussed a potential amendment to the Initial Merger Agreement in light of the discovery and pending resolution of the Reincorporation Matter. Furthermore, at the same meeting, the Twin Vee Board discussed the potential sale of the marine business to the Management Team. \n

\n On August 14, 2026, the Twin Vee Board held a meeting by means of remote communication to discuss, among other things, a proposal received from USFM management regarding proposed amendments to the Initial Merger Agreement. \n

\n On August 17, 2026, Twin Vee filed a definitive proxy statement related to a special meeting of Twin Vee stockholders to be held on September 8, 2026 for purposes of ratifying and approving, in accordance with Section 204 of the DGCL, the 1-for-37 reverse stock split and related defective corporate acts. \n

\n On September 2, 2026, USFM’s litigation counsel, Moirano Gorman Kenny, LLC, delivered to Twin Vee a notice of claim and demand for damages arising from Twin Vee’s defective reincorporation and resulting delay to the merger between Twin Vee and USFM. \n

\n On September 8, 2026, Twin Vee held the previously called special meeting of Twin Vee stockholders. At such meeting, a majority of the votes cast approved the ratification of the 1-for-37 reverse stock split in accordance with Section 204 of the DGCL and such proposal passed. Following such meeting, Twin Vee filed an amendment to its certificate of incorporation in the State of Delaware to reflect the ratification and approval of the reverse stock split. \n

\n Also on September 8, 2026, Twin Vee and USFM executed a consent, pursuant to which USFM consented to Twin Vee’s sale of certain operating assets and other certain monetization events in order to generate operating cash for Twin Vee pending consummation of the USFM business combination. \n

\n On September 14, 2026, the Twin Vee Board, acting by unanimous written consent, approved the filing of a legal complaint (the “SRFC Complaint”) against its former outside legal counsel, Sichenzia Ross Ference Carmel LLP (“SRFC”), in the United Stated District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “SDNY”) by Twin Vee’s outside litigation counsel, Ruberry Stalmack & Garvey, LLC (“Ruberry”) related to alleged malpractice committed by SRFC in connection with the Reincorporation Matter and related matters. \n

\n At various times following the execution of the Initial Merger Agreement on July 12, 2026, Twin Vee, USFM, and their respective legal and other advisors held various discussions and exchanged emails and other correspondence regarding potential changes to the terms of the Initial Merger Agreement to, among other things, reflect Twin Vee’s status as a Delaware corporation and to reflect a proposed “double dummy” transaction structure. \n

\n On September 16, 2026, following the discussions and correspondence referred to in the immediately preceding paragraph, Loeb, on behalf of USFM, delivered to SMRH an initial draft of an amended and restated merger agreement (which is referred to herein as the “Merger Agreement”). This draft of the Merger Agreement reflected, among other things, (a) USFM’s covenant to pursue the PIPE Investment, (b) a “double dummy” transaction structure contemplating the formation of PubCo and the Merger Subs, and (c) a reduction in the combined company share split to 8.391% (Twin Vee stockholders) / 91.609% (USFM \n

\n 102\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n stockholders). This draft of the Merger Agreement also required that $1,500,000 in cash remain with the combined company following closing. \n

\n On September 18, 2026, the SRFC Complaint was filed by Ruberry in the SDNY. \n

\n On September 23, 2026, SMRH, on behalf of Twin Vee, sent to Loeb a revised draft of the Merger Agreement. \n

\n On October 1, 2026, following further discussions and exchange of correspondence amongst the various transaction parties, Loeb, on behalf of USFM, sent to SMRH a revised draft of the Merger Agreement which, among other things, reflected a combined company stock split of 7% (Twin Vee) and 93% (USFM) and reduced the amount of cash that will be left with the combined company from $1,500,000 to $800,000. \n

\n On October 3, 2026, the Twin Vee Special Subcommittee held a meeting by means of remote communication to discuss the revised Merger Agreement. At that meeting, the Twin Vee Special Subcommittee resolved to recommend that the Twin Vee Board approve the revised Merger Agreement. \n

\n On October 4, 2026, following additional discussions and exchange of correspondence amongst the various transaction parties, Loeb, on behalf of USFM, sent to Twin Vee a further revised draft of the Merger Agreement which, among other things, reflected (a) a reduction in the amount of cash that will be left with the combined company from the original $1,500,000 to $700,000 and (b) a reduction in the break-up fee payable by Twin Vee to USFM in connection with certain terminations of the Merger Agreement from $1,500,000 to $800,000. \n

\n Later on October 4, 2026, the Twin Vee Board held a meeting by means of remote communication to discuss then proposed final version of the Merger Agreement during which meeting, the Twin Vee Board delegated to the Twin Vee Special Subcommittee authority to approve the final version of the Merger Agreement. At the same meeting, the Twin Vee Board, with Joseph C. Visconti and Preston Yarborough abstaining from the vote, (a) determined that the terms of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Mergers, are fair to, and in the best interests of, Twin Vee and its stockholders; (b) determined that it is in the best interests of Twin Vee and its stockholders and declared it advisable to enter into the Merger Agreement; (c) approved the execution and delivery by Twin Vee of the Merger Agreement, the performance by Twin Vee of its covenants and agreements contained therein and the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Mergers, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein; (d) resolved to recommend that the stockholders of Twin Vee approve the Mergers and adopt the Merger Agreement; and (e) directed that the Merger Agreement be submitted to the stockholders of Twin Vee for its adoption. Please see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a discussion of certain conflicts of interest related to the USFM transaction. The Twin Vee Board was aware of such conflicts of interest prior to voting on approval of the Merger Agreement. \n

\n On October 7, 2026, Loeb, on behalf of USFM, delivered to SMRH a revised draft of the Merger Agreement, reflecting (a) a requirement for USFM and PubCo to enter into a registration rights agreement, and (b) clarification on certain mechanics regarding the conversion of the USFM Common Stock into 93% of the fully diluted Combined Company Common Stock. \n

\n Later on October 7, 2026, the Twin Vee Special Subcommittee reviewed and approved the final proposed changes to the Merger Agreement. Subsequently on October 7, 2026, USFM and Twin Vee exchanged signature pages to the Merger Agreement, and the Merger Agreement became effective. \n

\n On October 8, 2026, Twin Vee filed a Form 8-K with the SEC and, in conjunction with the filing of such 8-K, USFM and Twin Vee issued a joint press release to announce the execution of the Merger Agreement. \n

\n Later on October 8, 2026, following publicly disclosure of the Merger Agreement, Bidder D’s financial advisor contacted Mr. Schuyler. Mr. Schuyler reiterated in that discussion that Twin Vee had determined to pursue the sale of Twin Vee’s marine business with a different party. \n

\n 103\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n USFM’s Board of Directors’ Reasons for the Business Combination \n

\n On October 7, 2026, the USFM board of directors (i) unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and related transaction agreements and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Business Combination), (ii) determined that the Business Combination is advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, USFM and its stockholders, and (iii) recommended that USFM’s stockholders approve and adopt the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Business Combination). In evaluating the Business Combination and making these determinations and this recommendation, the USFM board of directors consulted with USFM’s management and advisors and considered a number of factors. \n

\n USFM’s board of directors considered a wide variety of factors in connection with its evaluation of the Business Combination. In light of the complexity of those factors, USFM’s board of directors as a whole did not consider it practicable to, nor did it attempt to, quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors it took into account in reaching its decision. Individual members of USFM’s board of directors may have given different weight to different factors. \n

\n Twin Vee and the Business Combination. \n

\n The USFM board of directors considered the following factors related to Twin Vee and the Business Combination: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Strategic Opportunity in Critical Minerals. The USFM board of directors considered the growing demand for critical minerals, the focus of U.S. and allied governments on developing secure supply chains for those minerals outside of non-allied jurisdictions, and the potential of USFM’s projects in Greenland, including the Disko-Nuussuaq Project, and believes that becoming a publicly listed company will better position USFM to pursue that opportunity. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Separation of the Marine Business. Under the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring, before the Closing, Twin Vee will transfer substantially all of its assets and liabilities, including its recreational marine business, to the CVR Trust. Twin Vee will retain only $700,000 of cash and liabilities in connection with the Delaware Matter. The USFM board of directors considered that, as a result, the Combined Company will be focused solely on USFM’s business and will not assume the operating risks or the liabilities of the marine business, other than those retained by Twin Vee. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Access to the Public Capital Markets. The USFM board of directors believes that the Business Combination will provide USFM with access to the U.S. public capital markets more efficiently, and with greater certainty, than a traditional initial public offering. It also believes that a listing on NYSE American will improve USFM’s ability to raise the capital needed to fund its exploration and development programs, provide a publicly traded equity currency, and give USFM’s stockholders a means to obtain liquidity. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Continuity of USFM Management and Control. Following the Closing, USFM’s current executive officers will continue to manage the Combined Company, and USFM will designate all five members of the Pubco board of directors. Former USFM securityholders, including the PIPE investors, are expected to hold approximately 93% of Pubco on a fully diluted basis. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n PIPE Investment. Concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, USFM entered into securities purchase agreements for up to approximately $5,000,000 of USFM common stock and warrants, to be funded in installments before the Closing. As of October 26, 2026, investors had committed approximately $1,350,000, representing approximately 5,624 shares of USFM common stock at $240.00 per share and 11,248 PIPE Warrants. The USFM board of directors considered that these proceeds, together with the $700,000 of cash to be retained by Twin Vee, will help fund the Combined Company’s near-term exploration program and public company costs. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Valuation. The USFM board of directors considered that former Twin Vee securityholders will receive 7% of Pubco on a fully diluted basis. Because Twin Vee’s operating business will be transferred to the CVR Trust, the USFM board of directors viewed this consideration as the cost of becoming a publicly listed company, and believes it offers an attractive valuation for USFM’s stockholders. See “— Background of the Business Combination” for further information. \n

\n 104\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Results of Due Diligence. The USFM board of directors considered the scope of the financial, commercial and legal due diligence investigation conducted by USFM’s management and outside advisors, including: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n meetings and calls with Twin Vee’s management team regarding its capitalization, SEC reporting and Nasdaq listing history, pending litigation (including the Delaware Matter), the Reincorporation Matter, the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring and the proposed transaction; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n review of materials related to Twin Vee and its business made available by Twin Vee, including financial statements, corporate documents and other legal and business diligence. For more information, please see the section entitled “— Background of the Business Combination.” \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Terms of the Merger Agreement. The USFM board of directors reviewed and considered the terms of the Merger Agreement and the related agreements including the parties’ conditions to their respective obligations to complete the transactions contemplated therein and their ability to terminate such agreements under the circumstances described therein. See “— The Merger Agreement” and “— Related Agreements” for detailed descriptions of the terms and conditions of these agreements. \n

\n The USFM board of directors also identified and considered the following factors and risks weighing negatively against pursuing the Business Combination, although not weighted or in any order of significance: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Potential Inability to Complete the Merger. The USFM board of directors considered the possibility that the Business Combination may not be completed and the potential adverse consequences to USFM if the Business Combination is not completed, in particular the expenditure of time and resources in pursuit of the Business Combination and the loss of the opportunity to participate in the transaction. The directors considered the uncertainty related to the Closing, including due to conditions primarily outside of the control of the parties to the transaction, such as the need for USFM stockholder approval, Twin Vee stockholder approval, the expiration or termination of any applicable waiting period under the HSR Act and the ability of the Combined Company to satisfy the initial listing requirements of NYSE American. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Combined Company Business Risks. The USFM board of directors considered that there were risks associated with successful implementation of the Combined Company’s long-term business plan and strategy and the Combined Company realizing the anticipated benefits of the Business Combination on the timeline expected or at all, including due to factors outside of the parties’ control such as the risks inherent in mineral exploration, the need for substantial additional financing, fluctuations in critical mineral prices, permitting and regulatory requirements in Greenland, changes in the stock market or the market for critical minerals generally and the potential negative impact of macroeconomic uncertainty. The USFM board of directors considered that any of these risks, if materialized, may decrease the actual benefits of the Business Combination and that USFM stockholders may not fully realize these benefits following the completion of the Business Combination. For additional description of these risks, please see the section entitled “Risk Factors.” \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Limitations of Review. The USFM board of directors considered that the USFM management and reviewed only certain materials in connection with their due diligence and valuation review of Twin Vee. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n No Survival of Remedies for Breach of Representations, Warranties or Covenants of Twin Vee. The USFM board of directors considered that the terms of the Merger Agreement provide that USFM will not have any surviving remedies against Twin Vee or its equity holders after the Closing to recover for losses as a result of any inaccuracies or breaches of the Twin Vee representations, warranties or covenants set forth in the Merger Agreement. As a result, USFM stockholders could be adversely affected by, among other things, a decrease in the financial performance or worsening of financial condition of Twin Vee prior to the Closing, whether determined before or after the Closing, without any ability to reduce the number of shares to be issued in the Business Combination or recover for the amount of any damages. The Combined Company will also bear any liabilities that Twin Vee retains, including liabilities in connection with the Delaware Matter, without recourse against Twin Vee’s former equity holders or the CVR Trust. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Retained Liabilities and the Reincorporation Matter. The USFM board of directors considered that Twin Vee will retain the Delaware Matter and that the Closing is conditioned on resolving the \n

\n 105\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Reincorporation Matter. Following the Closing, any loss, settlement or defense costs related to either matter will be borne by the Combined Company. The USFM board of directors also considered that if the Reincorporation Matter is not resolved by December 31, 2026, or in a manner satisfactory to USFM, the Business Combination may not be completed. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Termination Fee and End Date. The USFM board of directors considered that USFM may be required to pay Twin Vee a termination fee of $500,000 in certain circumstances, including if the USFM shareholder approval is not obtained. It also considered that either party may terminate the Merger Agreement if the Closing has not occurred by December 31, 2026. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Litigation. The USFM board of directors considered the possibility of litigation challenging the Business Combination or that an adverse judgment granting permanent injunctive relief could enjoin consummation of the Business Combination. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Fees and Expenses. The USFM board of directors considered the fees and expenses associated with completing the Business Combination. \n

\n In addition to considering the factors described above, the USFM board of directors also considered other factors, including, without limitation: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Interests of USFM Directors and Executive Officers. USFM’s directors, executive officers and advisors may have interests in the Business Combination as individuals that are in addition to, and may be different from, the interests of USFM’s stockholders. However, USFM’s board of directors concluded that the potentially disparate interests would be mitigated because (i) these interests are disclosed in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and (ii) the value of the equity interests in USFM held, directly or indirectly, by USFM’s directors, executive officers and advisors would fluctuate based on the future performance of the Combined Company Common Stock. See “— Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for further information about the interests of the USFM directors and executive officers in the Business Combination. \n

\n Based on its review of the foregoing considerations, the USFM board of directors concluded that the potentially negative factors associated with the Business Combination were outweighed by the potential benefits that it expects USFM stockholders will receive as a result of the Business Combination. The USFM board of directors realized that there can be no assurance about future results, including results considered or expected as disclosed in the foregoing reasons. \n

\n The preceding discussion of the information and factors considered by the USFM board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive but includes the material factors considered by the USFM board of directors. In view of the complexity and wide variety of factors considered by the USFM board of directors in connection with its evaluation of the Business Combination, the USFM board of directors did not consider it practical to, nor did it attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the different factors that it considered in reaching its decision. In addition, in considering the factors described above, individual members of the USFM board of directors may have given different weight to different factors. The USFM board of directors considered this information as a whole and overall considered the information and factors to be favorable to, and in support of, its determinations and recommendations. \n

\n This explanation of reasons for the USFM board of directors’ approval of the Business Combination, and all other information presented in this section, is forward-looking in nature and therefore subject to a number of risks and uncertainties and should be read in light of the factors discussed under the sections entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors.” For information regarding the Twin Vee board of directors’ reasons for the Business Combination, see “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — The Twin Vee Board of Directors’ Reasons for the Business Combination.” \n

\n Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination \n

\n 106\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n USFM Common Stock, a conflict of interest may exist in determining whether the Business Combination with Twin Vee is appropriate. Such interests include that Mr. Robert Price, the Chief Executive Officer and sole member of the board of directors of USFM, beneficially owned approximately 15.26% of the outstanding USFM Common Stock as of October 26, 2026. When you consider the recommendation of the USFM board of directors in favor of approval of the USFM Business Combination Proposal and the other proposals, you should keep in mind that Mr. Price has interests in such proposals that are different from, or in addition to, your interests as a stockholder.\n

\n U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations \n

\n For a more detailed discussion of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Business Combination, see “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for holders of USFM securities.” \n

\n Expected Accounting Treatment of the Business Combination \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n former USFM securityholders will hold 93% of Pubco on a fully diluted basis, and Company securityholders 7%;\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM will designate all five members of the Pubco board of directors;\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM’s senior management will comprise the senior management of Pubco, and all Company directors and officers will resign at closing; and\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM’s operations will constitute the only ongoing operations of Pubco.\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the Company’s net assets are stated at historical cost, with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded;\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM is the predecessor, and its historical financial statements will become the historical financial statements of Pubco; and\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM’s equity will be retroactively restated to reflect the number of Pubco shares received by USFM stockholders.\n

\n PIPE Investment assumption. The proforma financial information accounts for only the committed PIPE Investments as of the date of joint proxy/prospectus filing. \n

\n Board of Directors of the Combined Company Following the Business Combination \n

\n The Combined Company board of directors will consist of five members upon the Closing, with each director serving a [one-year term until the next annual general meeting of stockholders and their successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal.] \n

\n 107\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n See the sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The Director Election Proposal” and “Management of the Combined Company Following the Business Combination” for additional information. \n

\n Corporate Name and Headquarters \n

\n The name of the Combined Company after the Business Combination will be USFM Corporation and its headquarters will be located at 1707 Cole Blvd Ste 200, Golden, CO, 80401. \n

\n Vote Required for Approval \n

\n An abstention will be counted towards the quorum requirement. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal. A broker non-vote will be counted towards the quorum requirement and will have the same effect as a vote against the USFM Business Combination Proposal. \n

\n Unless waived by the parties to the Merger Agreement, the USFM Business Combination Proposal is cross-conditioned on the approval of the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and the Share Issuance Proposal. Therefore, if either of such proposals is not approved, the USFM Business Combination Proposal will have no effect, even if approved by holders of USFM Common Stock. \n

\n Recommendation of USFM’s Board of Directors \n

\n THE USFM BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE USFM STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE USFM BUSINESS COMBINATION PROPOSAL. \n

\n The existence of financial and personal interests of USFM’s chief executive officer and sole director may result in a conflict of interest on the part of such director between what he may believe is in the best interests of USFM and its stockholders and what he may believe is best for himself in determining to recommend that stockholders vote for the proposals. In addition, USFM’s management has interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. When you consider the USFM board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that USFM’s management has interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. These interests may influence USFM’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of these proposals. These interests were considered by the USFM board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section entitled “— Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n 108\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n USFM STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL NO. 2: THE USFM ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL \n

\n Overview \n

\n The USFM Adjournment Proposal — The USFM Adjournment Proposal allows USFM’s board of directors to submit a proposal to approve the adjournment of the USFM Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event, based on the tabulated votes, there are not sufficient votes at the time of the USFM Special Meeting to approve one or more proposals at the USFM Special Meeting. The purpose of the USFM Adjournment Proposal is to permit further solicitation of proxies and votes and to provide additional time for USFM and Twin Vee and their respective stockholders to make purchases of USFM Common Stock or other arrangements that would increase the likelihood of obtaining a favorable vote on the proposals to be put to the USFM Special Meeting. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination.” \n

\n Consequences if the USFM Adjournment Proposal Is Not Approved \n

\n If the USFM Adjournment Proposal is presented to the USFM Special Meeting and is not approved by the USFM stockholders, USFM’s board of directors may not be able to adjourn the USFM Special Meeting to a later date in the event that, based on the tabulated votes, there are not sufficient votes at the time of the USFM Special Meeting to approve the USFM Business Combination Proposal. In such events, the Business Combination would not be completed. \n

\n Vote Required for Approval \n

\n The USFM Adjournment Proposal will be approved if the votes cast by holders of USFM Common Stock favoring the action exceed the votes cast by holders of USFM Common Stock opposing the action. \n

\n An abstention will be counted towards the quorum requirement. An abstention will have no effect on the USFM Adjournment Proposal. A broker non-vote will be counted towards the quorum requirement. A broker non-vote will have no effect on the USFM Adjournment Proposal so long as a quorum is established. The USFM Adjournment Proposal is not conditioned upon any other proposal. \n

\n Recommendation of the USFM Board of Directors \n

\n THE USFM BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT USFM STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL. \n

\n The existence of financial and personal interests of USFM’s chief executive officer and sole director may result in a conflict of interest on the part of such director between what he may believe is in the best interests of USFM and its stockholders and what he may believe is best for himself in determining to recommend that stockholders vote for the proposals. In addition, USFM’s management has interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. When you consider the USFM board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that USFM’s management has interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. These interests may influence USFM’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of these proposals. These interests were considered by the USFM board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Interests of USFM’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations.\n

\n 109\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n TWIN VEE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL NO. 1: THE DIRECTOR ELECTION PROPOSAL \n

\n Overview \n

\n The Director Election Proposal — the holders of Twin Vee Common Stock are being asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to elect five directors who, upon consummation of the Business Combination, will be the directors of the Combined Company. Each director shall hold office until the 2027 annual meeting of the Combined Company’s stockholders at which such director’s term expires and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until such director’s earlier death, disqualification, resignation, or removal. \n

\n Nominees \n

\n As contemplated by the Merger Agreement, following consummation of the Business Combination, the initial board of directors of the Combined Company will consist of five directors, all of whom were designated by USFM pursuant to the Merger Agreement, as follows: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n [ ]; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n [ ]; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n [ ]; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n [ ]; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n [ ]. \n

\n each of whom will thereafter be designated, nominated and elected as contemplated by the Merger Agreement. \n

\n Accordingly, Twin Vee’s board of directors has nominated each of the individuals above to serve as directors of the Combined Company upon the consummation of the Business Combination. For more information on the experience of each of these director nominees, please see the section entitled “Management of the Combined Company Following the Business Combination” of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n Vote Required for Approval \n

\n The five director nominees receiving the affirmative vote of a plurality of the voting power of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the Director Election Proposal shall be elected to the Combined Company’s board of directors. “Plurality” means that the individuals who receive the largest number of votes cast “FOR” are elected as directors. A Twin Vee stockholder’s failure to vote by proxy or to vote in person at the Twin Vee Special Meeting will have no effect on the Director Election Proposal. You may vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” authority to vote for each of the director nominees with respect to the Director Election Proposal. A “WITHHOLD” vote will have no effect on the outcome of the Director Election Proposal. Because the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals are considered non-routine matters, brokers may not exercise their discretion to vote uninstructed shares on any of the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals. If the broker or nominee that holds your shares of Twin Vee Common Stock does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a non-routine matter, the organization that holds your shares will not be able to vote your shares. If you are a stockholder of record and you attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting and wish to vote in person, you may revoke your proxy by transmitting a revocation to Twin Vee or by attending the meeting and voting in person. \n

\n The Director Election Proposal is not conditioned on any other proposal described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n Recommendation of the Twin Vee Board of Directors \n

\n THE TWIN VEE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT TWIN VEE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES IN THE DIRECTOR ELECTION PROPOSAL.\n

\n 110\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n The existence of financial and personal interests of one or more of Twin Vee’s directors may result in a conflict of interest on the part of such director(s) between what he, she or they may believe is in the best interests of Twin Vee and its stockholders and what he, she or they may believe is best for himself, herself or themselves in determining to recommend that stockholders vote for the proposals. In addition, Twin Vee’s directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. When you consider the Twin Vee board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that Twin Vee’s directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. These interests may influence Twin Vee’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of these proposals. These interests were considered by the Twin Vee board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n 111\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n TWIN VEE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL NO.2: THE TWIN VEE BUSINESS COMBINATION PROPOSAL \n

\n Overview \n

\n The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Twin Vee is asking its stockholders to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement. Twin Vee stockholders should read carefully this joint proxy statement/ prospectus in its entirety for more detailed information concerning the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Please see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — The Merger Agreement” for additional information and a summary of certain terms of the Merger Agreement. You are urged to read carefully the Merger Agreement in its entirety before voting on this proposal. \n

\n The Twin Vee Board of Directors’ Reasons for the Business Combination \n

\n On October 4, 2026, the Twin Vee board of directors (i) approved and adopted the Merger Agreement and related transaction agreements and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Business Combination), (ii) determined that the Business Combination is advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, Twin Vee and its stockholders and (iii) recommended that Twin Vee stockholders approve and adopt the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Business Combination). After weighing various considerations, the Twin Vee board of directors determined that the Business Combination was in the best interests of Twin Vee and its stockholders and approved the Business Combination. \n

\n In evaluating the Business Combination, the Twin Vee board of directors consulted with Twin Vee’s management, business advisors, stockholders and legal advisors and considered a range of factors, including, but not limited to, the factors discussed below. In light of the number and wide variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the Business Combination, the Twin Vee board of directors did not consider it practicable to, and did not attempt to, quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors that it considered in reaching its determination and supporting its decision. The Twin Vee board of directors viewed its decision as being based on all the information available and the factors presented to and considered by it. In addition, individual directors may have given different weight to different factors. \n

\n In particular, the Twin Vee board of directors considered, among other things, the following factors, although not weighted or in any order of significance: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee’s business, financial condition, results of operations, competitive position, business strategy, strategic options and prospects, as well as the risks involved in achieving these prospects, the nature of Twin Vee’s business and the industry in which it competes, and current industry, economic and market conditions, both on a historical and on a prospective basis; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n several potential alternatives to the Business Combination, including the possibility of continuing to operate Twin Vee as an independent entity and combinations with other merger partners, the possibility of issuing additional equity or debt in a public or private offering the possibility of certain asset sales and the desirability and perceived risks of these and other alternatives, as well as the range of potential benefits to Twin Vee’s stockholders of each of these alternatives and Twin Vee Board’s belief, after a review of potential strategic alternatives and based on, among other things, Twin Vee’s ability to execute its strategic plan, the potential for significant dilution to the stockholders in any equity offering, the uncertain debt and capital markets, the potential inability to fund Twin Vee’s capital expenditures and the value offered to stockholders in the Business Combination was more favorable to the Twin Vee stockholders than the potential value that might have resulted from other strategic opportunities reasonably available to Twin Vee, including remaining an independent company; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the opinion and financial presentation of Houlihan Capital, LLC to the Twin Vee Board as to the fairness, from a financial point of view and as of the date of the opinion, of the merger consideration to be received in the First Merger by Twin Vee’s stockholders; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the fact that Twin Vee’s stockholders will be entitled to receive an aggregate of 7% of the shares of the Combined Company upon closing of the Business Combination; \n

\n 112\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the fact that the Twin Vee stockholders will also be entitled to receive any net proceeds that may result from the continued operation and/or sale of Twin Vee’s legacy marine business through post-closing sale transactions involving the contingent value right trust that will be established prior to the Closing; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the termination fee that USFM must pay to Twin Vee under certain circumstances if the Merger Agreement is terminated in the amount of $500,000; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the fact that there is no financing condition under the Merger Agreement; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the fact that Twin Vee does not believe there will be a Hart-Scott Rodino anti-trust filing required in connection with the Merger Agreement; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the ability of Twin Vee to furnish information to and engage in discussions or negotiations with a third party under certain circumstances described in the Merger Agreement as well as the ability to withdraw or modify its recommendation regarding the Merger under certain circumstances; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n certain other provisions in the Merger Agreement, including the termination provisions. \n

\n The Twin Vee board of directors also identified and considered the following factors and risks weighing against pursuing the Business Combination, although not weighted or in any order of significance: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the fact that, subsequent to the completion of the Business Combination, Twin Vee would no longer exist as an independent public company; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the potential limitations on Twin Vee’s pursuit of business opportunities due to pre-Closing covenants in the Merger Agreement whereby Twin Vee agreed that it will carry on its business in the ordinary course in substantially the same manner as previously conducted and, subject to specified exceptions, will not take a number of actions related to certain assets or the conduct of its business without the prior written consent of USFM; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the gains, if any, from the contemplated transactions generally would be taxable to Twin Vee’s stockholders for federal income tax purposes; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the potential effect of a public announcement of the Merger Agreement on Twin Vee’s operations, stock price, customers and employees and its ability to attract and retain key management and employees; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Twin Vee would have to pay a termination fee of $800,000 if it terminated the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms in certain circumstances, including in order to enter into a Superior Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement) or in the event USFM unilaterally determines to terminate the Merger Agreement in connection with Twin Vee’s defective reincorporation; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the potential conflicts of interest between Twin Vee, on the one hand, and certain of Twin Vee’s executive officers and directors, on the other hand, as a result of the transactions contemplated by the Merger including, without limitation, the potential conflicts of interest described herein; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the effect of disruption that may be caused by unexpected bidders or the failure to complete the Merger; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n that the Merger is subject to certain conditions to closing that are beyond Twin Vee’s control; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the possibility that the Business Combination may not be completed and the potential adverse consequences to Twin Vee if the Business Combination is not completed, in particular the expenditure of time and resources in pursuit of the Business Combination and the loss of the opportunity to participate in the transaction. The Twin Vee board of directors considered the uncertainty related to the Closing, including due to conditions primarily outside of the control of the parties to the transaction, such as the need for USFM stockholder approval, Twin Vee stockholder approval, and the ability of the Combined Company to satisfy the initial listing requirements of the selected stock exchange. The Merger Agreement also includes provisions that prohibit Twin Vee from initiating or soliciting other business combination proposals on behalf of Twin Vee, which restricts Twin Vee’s ability to consider other potential business combinations or similar transactions until the earlier of the termination of the Merger Agreement or the consummation of the Business Combination; \n

\n 113\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the terms of the Merger Agreement provide that Twin Vee will not have any surviving remedies against USFM or its equityholders after the Closing to recover for losses as a result of any inaccuracies or breaches of USFM representations, warranties or covenants set forth in the Merger Agreement. As a result, Twin Vee stockholders could be adversely affected by, among other things, an inaccuracy in USFM’s disclosures. The Twin Vee board of directors determined that this structure was appropriate and customary in light of the fact that several similar transactions include similar terms; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the possibility of litigation challenging the Business Combination or that an adverse judgment granting permanent injunctive relief could enjoin consummation of the Business Combination; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the fees and expenses associated with completing the Business Combination, most of which will be due and payable whether or not the Business Combination is successfully consummated; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the potential for diversion of Twin Vee’s management and employee attention and resources during the period prior to the completion of the Business Combination and the potential negative effects thereof on Twin Vee’s business. \n

\n The Twin Vee board of directors concluded that the potential benefits that it expected Twin Vee and its stockholders to receive as a result of the Business Combination outweighed the potentially negative factors associated with the Business Combination. Accordingly, the Twin Vee board of directors determined that the Merger Agreement and Business Combination contemplated therein were advisable, fair to and in the best interests of Twin Vee and its stockholders. \n

\n The preceding discussion of the information and factors considered by the Twin Vee board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive but includes the material factors considered by the Twin Vee board of directors. In view of the complexity and wide variety of factors considered by the Twin Vee board of directors in connection with its evaluation of the Business Combination, the Twin Vee board of directors did not consider it practical to, nor did it attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the different factors that it considered in reaching its decision. In addition, in considering the factors described above, individual members of the Twin Vee board of directors may have given different weight to different factors. The Twin Vee board of directors considered this information as a whole and overall considered the information and factors to be favorable to, and in support of, its determinations and recommendations. \n

\n This explanation of reasons for the Twin Vee board of directors’ approval of the Business Combination, and all other information presented in this section, is forward-looking in nature and therefore subject to a number of risks and uncertainties and should be read in light of the factors discussed under the sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors.” For information regarding the USFM board of directors’ reasons for the Business Combination, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “USFM Stockholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — The USFM Board of Directors’ Reasons for the Business Combination.” \n

\n Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination \n

\n Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this subsection to “we,” “us” or “our” refer to the business of Twin Vee. \n

\n When you consider the recommendation of the Twin Vee board of directors in favor of approval of the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and the other Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals, you should keep in mind that Twin Vee’s directors and executive officers have interests in such proposals that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), those of Twin Vee stockholders. These interests include, among other things, the interests listed below: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n 114\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Michael P. Dickerson, Twin Vee’s Interim Chief Financial Officer, beneficially owns approximately 0.72% of the outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock as of October 26, 2026. \n

\n Vote Required for Approval \n

\n The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal requires approval by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Twin Vee Common Stock entitled to vote thereon. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal. Because the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals are considered non-routine matters, brokers may not exercise their discretion to vote uninstructed shares on any of the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals. If the broker or nominee that holds your shares of Twin Vee Common Stock does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a non-routine matter, the organization that holds your shares will not be able to vote your shares. If you are a stockholder of record and you attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting and wish to vote in person, you may revoke your proxy by transmitting a revocation to Twin Vee or by attending the meeting and voting in person. \n

\n The Business Combination will be consummated only if the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, the USFM Business Combination Proposal and the Share Issuance Proposal are approved. Accordingly, even if the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal is approved, the Business Combination will not be consummated unless the USFM Business Combination Proposal and the Share Issuance Proposal are also approved (unless waived by the parties to the Merger Agreement). \n

\n Recommendation of the Twin Vee Board of Directors \n

\n THE TWIN VEE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE TWIN VEE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE TWIN VEE BUSINESS COMBINATION PROPOSAL. \n

\n The existence of financial and personal interests of one or more of Twin Vee directors may result in a conflict of interest on the part of such director(s) between what he, she or they may believe is in the interests of Twin Vee and what he, she or they may believe is best for himself, herself or themselves in determining to recommend that Twin Vee stockholders vote for the proposals. In addition, Twin Vee officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a Twin Vee stockholder. When you consider the Twin Vee board of directors’ recommendation of \n

\n 115\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n these proposals, you should keep in mind that Twin Vee’s directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a Twin Vee stockholder. These interests may influence Twin Vee’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of this proposal. These interests were considered by the Twin Vee board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section entitled “— Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n 116\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n TWIN VEE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL NO. 3: THE SHARE ISSUANCE PROPOSAL \n

\n Overview \n

\n The Share Issuance Proposal — Twin Vee’s stockholders are also being asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the issuance by Pubco of the Company Consideration Shares in connection with the First Merger and PubCo Common Shares in connection with the Second Merger, in each case, pursuant to the Merger Agreement. \n

\n Twin Vee Common Stock is currently listed for trading on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “VEEE” and its shares are expected to be delisted from Nasdaq in connection with the Closing. PubCo will apply to have the Combined Company Common Stock listed on an Applicable Stock Exchange at the Closing. The Share Issuance Proposal is intended, among other things, to satisfy any requirement for Twin Vee stockholder approval under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635, including Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(b), which states that shareholder approval is required prior to the issuance of securities when the issuance or potential issuance will result in a change of control of the Nasdaq-listed company.\n

\n Stockholder approval of the Share Issuance Proposal is a condition to the Closing under the Merger Agreement. \n

\n Effect of Proposal on Current Stockholders \n

\n If the Share Issuance Proposal is adopted, and assuming the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and the USFM Business Combination Proposal are also approved and the Business Combination is consummated, Twin Vee currently expects that PubCo will issue up to [ ] shares of Combined Company Common Stock in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination. For further details, see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — The Merger Agreement.” The issuance of such shares would result in significant dilution to Twin Vee’s stockholders, and would afford Twin Vee’s stockholders a smaller percentage interest in the voting power, liquidation value and aggregate book value of the Combined Company. \n

\n In the event that this proposal is not approved by Twin Vee stockholders, the Business Combination cannot be consummated. In the event that this proposal is approved by the Twin Vee stockholders, but the Merger Agreement is terminated (without the Business Combination being consummated) prior to the issuance of shares of Combined Company Common Stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement, such shares of Combined Company Common Stock will not be issued. \n

\n Vote Required for Approval \n

\n Approval of the Share Issuance Proposal requires an affirmative vote of the holders of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock having a majority of the voting power of Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. Accordingly, abstentions on the Share Issuance Proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Share Issuance Proposal. Because the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals are considered non-routine matters, brokers may not exercise their discretion to vote uninstructed shares on any of the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals. If the broker or nominee that holds your shares of Twin Vee Common Stock does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a non-routine matter, the organization that holds your shares will not be able to vote your shares. If you are a stockholder of record and you attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting and wish to vote in person, you may revoke your proxy by transmitting a revocation to Twin Vee or by attending the meeting and voting in person. \n

\n The Share Issuance Proposal is conditioned on the approval of the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal and the USFM Business Combination Proposal. Therefore, if the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal or the USFM Business Combination Proposal is not approved, the Share Issuance Proposal will have no effect, even if approved by the holders of Twin Vee Common Stock. \n

\n 117\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Recommendation of the Twin Vee Board of Directors \n

\n THE TWIN VEE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT TWIN VEE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE SHARE ISSUANCE PROPOSAL. \n

\n The existence of financial and personal interests of one or more of Twin Vee’s directors may result in a conflict of interest on the part of such director(s) between what he, she or they may believe is in the best interests of Twin Vee and its stockholders and what he, she or they may believe is best for himself, herself or themselves in determining to recommend that stockholders vote for the proposals. In addition, Twin Vee’s directors, officers and advisors have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. When you consider the Twin Vee board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that Twin Vee’s directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a stockholder. These interests may influence Twin Vee’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of these proposals. These interests were considered by the Twin Vee board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations. \n

\n 118\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n TWIN VEE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL NO. 4: THE TWIN VEE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL \n

\n Overview \n

\n The Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal — The Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal allows the Twin Vee board of directors to submit a proposal to approve the adjournment of the Twin Vee Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event, based on the tabulated votes, there are not sufficient votes at the time of the Twin Vee Special Meeting to approve the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, the Share Issuance Proposal and/or the Director Election Proposal. \n

\n Consequences if the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal Is Not Approved \n

\n If the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal is presented to the Twin Vee Special Meeting and is not approved by the Twin Vee stockholders, the Twin Vee board of directors may not be able to rely on stockholder approval of that proposal to adjourn the Twin Vee Special Meeting to a later date in the event that, based on the tabulated votes, a quorum is present but there are not sufficient votes at the time of the Twin Vee Special Meeting to approve the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, the Share Issuance Proposal and/or the Director Election Proposal. In such events, the Business Combination would not be completed. This consequence is separate from, and does not affect, the Twin Vee board of directors’ ability to adjourn the Twin Vee Special Meeting if a quorum is not present, which does not depend on approval of the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal. \n

\n Vote Required for Approval \n

\n For the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal to be approved, it must receive the affirmative vote “FOR” the proposal from the holders of a majority of the voting power of the Twin Vee Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Twin Vee Special Meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal. Accordingly, abstentions on the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal. Because the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals are considered non-routine matters, brokers may not exercise their discretion to vote uninstructed shares on any of the Twin Vee Stockholder Proposals. If the broker or nominee that holds your shares of Twin Vee Common Stock does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a non-routine matter, the organization that holds your shares will not be able to vote your shares. If you are a stockholder of record and you attend the Twin Vee Special Meeting and wish to vote in person, you may revoke your proxy by transmitting a revocation to Twin Vee or by attending the meeting and voting in person. \n

\n The Twin Vee Adjournment Proposal is not conditioned upon any other proposal described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n Recommendation of the Twin Vee Board of Directors \n

\n THE TWIN VEE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT TWIN VEE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE TWIN VEE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL. \n

\n The existence of financial and personal interests of one or more of Twin Vee’s directors may result in a conflict of interest on the part of such director(s) between what he, she or they may believe is in the interests of Twin Vee and what he, she or they may believe is best for himself, herself or themselves in determining to recommend that Twin Vee stockholders vote for the proposals. In addition, Twin Vee’s officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a Twin Vee stockholder. When you consider the Twin Vee board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that Twin Vee’s directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to (and which may conflict with), your interests as a Twin Vee stockholder. These interests may influence Twin Vee’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of these proposals. These interests were considered by the Twin Vee board of directors when it approved the Business Combination. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination” for a further discussion of these considerations.\n

\n 119\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n APPRAISAL RIGHTS AND DISSENTERS’ RIGHTS \n

\n USFM Stockholders \n

\n Summarized below are the dissenters’ rights of the holders of USFM Common Stock and the statutory procedures required to be followed in order to perfect such rights. Article 113 of the Colorado Act governs dissenters’ rights under the Colorado Act. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to Article 113 of the Colorado Act, which should be reviewed carefully by holders of USFM Common Stock. Failure to comply strictly with all conditions for asserting rights as a dissenting shareholder, including the time limits, will result in loss of such dissenters’ rights by the dissenting shareholder. \n

\n Under Section 7-113-102(1)(a) of the Colorado Act, a shareholder is entitled to appraisal rights in the event of a merger to which the corporation is a party if shareholder approval of the merger is required and the shareholder is entitled to vote on the merger, except with respect to shares of any class or series that remain outstanding after the merger. Appraisal rights are not available, however, for shares of any class or series that is a covered security under Section 18(b)(1)(A) or 18(b)(1)(B) of the Securities Act or that, while not a covered security, is traded in an organized market and has a market value of at least $20 million, in each case determined as of the record date for the USFM Special Meeting. USFM Common Stock is not listed on a national securities exchange and is not traded in an organized market, and accordingly this limitation is not expected to apply to holders of USFM Common Stock in connection with the Second Merger. \n

\n The Merger Agreement provides that shares of USFM Common Stock that are outstanding immediately prior to the consummation of the Second Merger and have not been voted in favor of, or consented to, the Second Merger will not be entitled to receive shares of PubCo Common Stock if the holder of the shares of USFM Common Stock validly exercises and perfects statutory appraisal rights with respect to the shares. However, the shares of USFM Common Stock will be automatically converted into the right to receive the merger consideration on the same basis that all other shares of USFM Common Stock are converted in the Second Merger when and if the holder of those shares withdraws his, her or its demand for appraisal or otherwise becomes legally ineligible to exercise appraisal rights. \n

\n Under Article 113 of the Colorado Act, you must follow the procedures set forth in Section 7-113-204 of the Colorado Act to receive a cash payment of the fair value of those shares of USFM Common Stock, together with interest, at the rate specified in Section 7-113-101 of the Colorado Act. For this purpose, “fair value” means the value of the shares immediately before the effectuation of the Second Merger, using customary and current valuation concepts and techniques generally employed for similar businesses in the context of the transaction, and without discounting for lack of marketability or minority status. You should be aware that the fair value of your shares of USFM Common Stock as determined under Article 113 of the Colorado Act could be more than, the same as or less than the merger consideration you would have received in the Mergers if you did not seek appraisal of your shares of USFM Common Stock. \n

\n 120\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n If the Merger Agreement is approved by the USFM stockholders, USFM is obligated to deliver to all USFM stockholders that may be entitled to assert appraisal rights a written appraisal notice (the “Dissenters’ Notice”) and form within 10 days after the Mergers are effected. The Dissenters’ Notice must state (i) where the form must be sent, where certificates for certificated shares must be deposited, and the date by which those certificates must be deposited, which may not be fewer than 40 days and no more than 60 days after the appraisal notice and form must be sent; (ii) a date by which USFM must receive the form, which must not be fewer than 40 nor more than 60 days after the date the appraisal notice and form must be sent; (iii) USFM’s estimate of the fair value of the share; (iv) that, if requested in writing, USFM will provide to the USFM stockholder so requesting, within 10 days after the date required for receipt of the form by the USFM stockholder, a statement of the number of USFM stockholders that returned the forms by the specified date and the total number of shares owned by them; and (v) a date that the notice to withdraw must be received, which must be within 20 days from the date that the appraisal form must be sent by the USFM stockholder. \n

\n The form to be delivered with the Dissenters’ Notice (the “Demand Notice”) (i) must specify the first date of any announcement to shareholders that discusses the principal terms of the proposed action that was made before the date the mergers became effective; (ii) if such a statement was made, requires the shareholders asserting appraisal rights to certify whether they had beneficial ownership of their shares before the announcement; and (iii) requires those shareholders asserting appraisal rights to certify that they did not vote for or consent to the action. The Dissenter’s Notice must be accompanied by a copy of Article 113 of the Colorado Act. \n

\n A USFM stockholder asserting appraisal rights must, by the date set forth in the Dissenters’ Notice, return the Demand Notice to demand payment and send his, her or its stock certificates, if certificated, to the address provided in the Dissenters’ Notice. USFM may restrict the transfer of any shares not represented by a certificate from the date the demand for cash payment is received. The USFM stockholder demanding a cash payment in accordance with Section 7-113-204 of the Colorado Act shall retain all rights of a USFM stockholder, except the right to transfer shares, until the Second Effective Time. A USFM stockholder who does not provide demand for a cash payment by the dates set forth in the Dissenter’s Notice and in accordance with Section 7-113-204 of the Colorado Act will not be entitled to a cash payment for his, her or its shares of USFM Common Stock as provided in the Colorado Act. \n

\n Pursuant to Sections 7-113-205 of the Colorado Act, upon the Second Effective Time or upon receipt of a cash payment demand, whichever is later, USFM must pay each dissenter who complied with Section 7-113-204 of the Colorado Act the amount of cash that USFM estimates to be the fair value of the shares of USFM Common Stock, plus accrued interest. The cash payment must be accompanied by (i) certain financial information regarding USFM; (ii) a statement of USFM’s estimate of the fair value of the shares of USFM Common Stock; and (iii) a statement of the dissenter’s right to demand a cash payment under Section 7-113-207 of the Colorado Act and that if any USFM stockholder does not object within the specified period under Section 7-113-207(2) of the Colorado Act the USFM stockholder shall be deemed to have accepted the payment in full satisfaction. \n

\n Section 7-113-203 of the Colorado Act permits USFM to require each holder of USFM Common Stock to certify in writing, or in the dissenter’s cash payment demand, whether or not the dissenter acquired beneficial ownership of his, her or its shares of USFM Common Stock before July 13, 2026, when the Mergers were announced. If any dissenter does not so certify in writing, USFM may offer to make a cash payment if the dissenter agrees to accept such payment in full satisfaction of the demand for a cash payment. \n

\n Under Section 7-113-207 of the Colorado Act, if a dissenter believes that the amount paid by USFM is less than the “fair value” of his, her or its shares or that the interest due was incorrectly calculated, the USFM stockholder shall notify USFM in writing of the USFM stockholder’s estimate of the fair value and demand payment for that estimate, plus interest, less any payments made. Failure to notify USFM within 30 days after receiving the payment or offer of payment will waive any right to demand additional payment. \n

\n If a demand for a cash payment under Section 7-113-207 of the Colorado Act remains unresolved, USFM is required, within 60 days after receiving the cash payment demand, to petition the court to determine the fair value of the shares of USFM Common Stock and accrued interest. All dissenters whose demands remain unsettled would be made a party to such a proceeding. Each dissenter is entitled to judgment for the \n

\n 121\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n amount the court finds to be the fair value of the shares of USFM Common Stock, plus interest, less any amount paid by USFM. The costs associated with this proceeding shall be assessed against USFM, unless the court finds that all or some of the dissenters acted arbitrarily, vexatiously, or not in good faith in demanding cash payment under Section 7-113-207 of the Colorado Act, in which case the court may assess the costs in the amount the court finds equitable against some or all of the dissenters. The court may also assess the fees and expenses of counsel and experts for the respective parties in amounts the court finds equitable, against USFM or the dissenters. If USFM does not commence a proceeding within the 60-day period, USFM must pay each dissenter whose demand remains unsettled the amount of cash demanded. \n

\n Under Section 7-113-401 of the Colorado Act, after USFM stockholders have approved the Second Merger, the legality of the Second Merger may not be contested, and the Second Merger may not be enjoined, set aside or rescinded, in a legal or equitable proceeding by a USFM stockholder, except where the corporate action was not authorized and approved in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Colorado Act, the USFM Articles or the USFM Bylaws, was procured as a result of fraud, a material misrepresentation or an omission of a material fact necessary to make statements made not misleading, or is an interested transaction that was not approved in the manner required by the Colorado Act. \n

\n Twin Vee Stockholders \n

\n If the First Merger is consummated, holders of record and beneficial owners of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock who (1) do not vote in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement (whether by voting against the adoption of the Merger Agreement, abstaining or otherwise not voting with respect to the adoption of the Merger Agreement), (2) properly and validly demand an appraisal of their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock in writing, (3) continuously hold (in the case of holders of record) or continuously own (in the case of beneficial owners) their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock through the First Effective Time, (4) strictly comply with the statutory requirements of Section 262 of the DGCL and (5) do not withdraw their demands or otherwise lose their rights to appraisal, subject to the conditions thereof, will be entitled to seek appraisal of their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock in connection with the First Merger under Section 262 of the DGCL. Unless the context requires otherwise, all references in Section 262 of the DGCL and in this summary to a “stockholder” or to a “holder of shares” are to a record holder of Twin Vee Common Stock. Unless the context requires otherwise, all references in Section 262 of the DGCL and in this summary to a “beneficial owner” are to a person who is the beneficial owner of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock held either in voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such person. Unless the context requires otherwise, all references in Section 262 of the DGCL and in this summary to a “person” are to any individual, corporation, partnership, unincorporated association or other entity. \n

\n Persons who exercise appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL will not receive the pro rata portion of the Company Consideration Shares they would otherwise be entitled to receive pursuant to the Merger Agreement. They will receive an amount determined to be the “fair value” of their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock following petition to, and an appraisal by, the Delaware Court of Chancery. Persons considering seeking appraisal should recognize that the fair value of their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock determined under Section 262 of the DGCL could be more than, the same as or less than the merger consideration they would otherwise be entitled to receive pursuant to the Merger Agreement. Strict compliance with the procedures set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL is required. Failure to comply strictly with all of the procedures set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL will result in the withdrawal, loss or waiver of appraisal rights. Consequently, and in view of the complexity of the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL, persons wishing to exercise appraisal rights are urged to consult their legal and financial advisors before attempting to exercise such rights. \n

\n The following is a summary of the procedures to be followed by stockholders who wish to exercise their appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL. The full text of the version of Section 262 of the DGCL applicable to the Merger Agreement is attached as Annex C to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and may be accessed without subscription or cost at the following publicly available website: https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc09/index.html#262. The following summary does not constitute any legal or other advice and does not constitute a recommendation that the Twin Vee stockholders or beneficial owners exercise their appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL. Holders of record and beneficial owners of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock should carefully review the full text of Section 262 \n

\n 122\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n of the DGCL as well as the information discussed below. Failure to follow the steps required by Section 262 of the DGCL for demanding and perfecting appraisal rights will result in the loss of such rights. \n

\n Under Section 262 of the DGCL, if the First Merger is completed, holders of record or beneficial owners of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock who (1) properly demand appraisal of such holder’s or owner’s shares of Twin Vee Common Stock, (2) do not vote in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement (whether by voting against the Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal, abstaining or otherwise not voting with respect to the adoption of the Merger Agreement), (3) continuously hold (in the case of a holder of record) or own (in the case of a beneficial owner) such shares of Twin Vee Common Stock through the First Effective Time, (4) do not withdraw their demands or otherwise lose their rights to appraisal, and (5) strictly comply with the statutory requirements and satisfy certain ownership thresholds set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL, may be entitled to have their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock appraised by the Delaware Court of Chancery and to receive payment in cash for the “fair value” of their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Mergers, together with (unless the Delaware Court of Chancery in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown) interest on the amount determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery to be fair value from the First Effective Time through the date of payment of the judgment. Unless the Delaware Court of Chancery in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest on the amount determined to be fair value will accrue and compound quarterly from the First Effective Time through the date of payment of the judgment at five percent over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during such period (except that, if at any time before the entry of judgment in the proceeding, the Surviving Company makes a voluntary cash payment pursuant to subsection (h) of Section 262 of the DGCL to each person seeking appraisal, interest will accrue thereafter only upon the sum of (1) the difference, if any, between the amount so paid and the fair value of the shares of Company Common Stock as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, and (2) interest theretofore accrued, unless paid at that time). The Surviving Company is under no obligation to make such voluntary cash payment prior to such entry of judgment. \n

\n However, after an appraisal petition has been filed, the Delaware Court of Chancery, at a hearing to determine persons entitled to appraisal rights, will dismiss appraisal proceedings as to all persons who are otherwise entitled to appraisal rights unless (1) the total number of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock entitled to appraisal exceeds one percent of the outstanding shares of the class of Company Common Stock eligible for appraisal (as measured in accordance with subsection (g) of Section 262 of the DGCL), or (2) the aggregate merger consideration in respect of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock for which appraisal rights have been pursued and perfected exceeds $1,000,000. Twin Vee refers to these conditions as the “ownership thresholds.” \n

\n Under Section 262 of the DGCL, where the proposed merger for which appraisal rights are provided is to be submitted for approval at a meeting of the Twin Vee stockholders, the corporation, not less than twenty (20) days prior to the meeting, must notify each of its stockholders of record as of the close of business on the record date for notice of such meeting that appraisal rights are available and include in the notice a copy of Section 262 of the DGCL or information directing the Twin Vee stockholders to a publicly available electronic resource at which Section 262 of the DGCL may be accessed without subscription or cost. This joint proxy statement/prospectus constitutes Twin Vee’s notice to the Twin Vee stockholders that appraisal rights are available in connection with the First Merger, and the full text of Section 262 of the DGCL is attached hereto as Annex C and may be accessed without subscription or cost at the following publicly available website: https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc09/index.html#262. In connection with the First Merger, any holder of record or beneficial owner of Twin Vee Common Stock who wishes to exercise appraisal rights, or who wishes to preserve such holder’s or owner’s right to do so, should review Section 262 of the DGCL carefully. Failure to strictly comply with the requirements of Section 262 of the DGCL in a timely and proper manner will result in the loss of appraisal rights under the DGCL. A stockholder or beneficial owner who loses such holder’s or owner’s appraisal rights will be entitled to receive the merger consideration described in the Merger Agreement, without interest and less any required withholding tax. Because of the complexity of the procedures for exercising the right to seek appraisal of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock, Twin Vee believes that if a stockholder or a beneficial owner is considering exercising such rights, that stockholder or beneficial owner should seek the advice of legal counsel. \n

\n 123\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Twin Vee stockholders and beneficial owners wishing to exercise appraisal rights with respect to their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock must do ALL of the following: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the Twin Vee stockholder or beneficial owner must deliver to Twin Vee a written demand for appraisal of such holder’s or owner’s shares of Twin Vee Common Stock before the vote on the adoption of the Merger Agreement at the Twin Vee Special Meeting; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the Twin Vee stockholder or beneficial owner must not vote in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the Twin Vee stockholder must continuously hold or the beneficial owner must continuously own the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock from the date of making the demand through the First Effective Time (a stockholder will lose appraisal rights if the stockholder transfers the shares before the First Effective Time); and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n strictly comply with the procedures of Section 262 of the DGCL for perfecting appraisal rights thereafter. \n

\n Any holder of record or beneficial owner of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock who has complied with the applicable requirements of Section 262 of the DGCL and is otherwise entitled to appraisal rights or the Surviving Company may file a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such persons within one hundred twenty (120) days after the First Effective Time. The Surviving Company is under no obligation to file any petition and has no intention of doing so. \n

\n In addition, after an appraisal petition has been filed, the Delaware Court of Chancery, at a hearing to determine persons entitled to appraisal rights, will dismiss appraisal proceedings as to all persons who asserted appraisal rights unless one of the ownership thresholds is met. \n

\n For Twin Vee stockholders, because a proxy that does not contain voting instructions will, unless revoked, be voted in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement, each Twin Vee stockholder who votes by proxy and who wishes to exercise appraisal rights must vote against the adoption of the Merger Agreement, abstain or not vote his, her or its shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. \n

\n Written Demand \n

\n A Twin Vee stockholder or beneficial owner wishing to exercise appraisal rights must deliver to Twin Vee, before the vote on the adoption of the Merger Agreement at the Twin Vee Special Meeting, a written demand for the appraisal of such holder’s or beneficial owner’s shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. In addition, such stockholder or beneficial owner must not vote or submit a proxy in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement. A vote in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement, at the Twin Vee Special Meeting or by proxy (whether by mail or via the Internet or telephone), will result in loss of appraisal rights in respect of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock so voted and will nullify any previous written demands for appraisal with respect to such stockholder’s or beneficial owner’s shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. A stockholder exercising appraisal rights must hold of record the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock on the date the written demand for appraisal is made and must continue to hold the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock of record through the effective date of the Merger. A beneficial owner exercising appraisal rights must own the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock on the date the written demand for appraisal is made and must continue to own such shares of Twin Vee Common Stock through the effective date of the Merger. For a Twin Vee stockholder, a proxy that is submitted and does not contain voting instructions will, unless revoked, be voted in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement, and it will constitute a waiver of the stockholder’s right of appraisal and will nullify any previously delivered written demand for appraisal. A Twin Vee stockholder or beneficial owner who submits a proxy and who wishes to exercise appraisal rights must submit a proxy containing instructions to vote against the adoption of the Merger Agreement or abstain from voting on the adoption of the Merger Agreement. Neither voting against the adoption of the Merger Agreement nor abstaining from voting or failing to vote on the adoption of the Merger Agreement will, in and of itself, constitute a written demand for appraisal satisfying the requirements of Section 262 of the DGCL. The written demand for appraisal must be in addition to and separate from any proxy or vote on the adoption of the Merger Agreement. A Twin Vee stockholder’s or beneficial owner’s failure to make the \n

\n 124\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n written demand prior to the taking of the vote on the adoption of the Merger Agreement at the Twin Vee Special Meeting will constitute a waiver of appraisal rights. \n

\n A holder of record of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock is entitled to demand appraisal for the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock registered in that holder’s name. A demand for appraisal in respect of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock by a holder of record must reasonably inform Twin Vee of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to demand an appraisal of such stockholder’s shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. \n

\n A beneficial owner may, in such person’s name, demand in writing an appraisal of such beneficial owner’s shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. A demand for appraisal in respect of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock should be executed by or on behalf of the beneficial owner and must reasonably inform Twin Vee of the identity of the beneficial owner and that the beneficial owner intends thereby to demand an appraisal of such owner’s shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. The demand made by such beneficial owner must also (1) reasonably identify the holder of record of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock for which the demand is made, (2) be accompanied by documentary evidence of such beneficial owner’s continuous ownership of the stock and a statement that such documentary evidence is a true and correct copy of what it purports to be, and (3) provide an address at which such beneficial owner consents to receive notices given by the Surviving Company and to be set forth on the verified list required by subsection (f) of Section 262 of the DGCL. If the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock are owned of record or beneficially owned in a fiduciary or representative capacity, such as by a trustee, guardian or custodian, such demand must be executed by or on behalf of the record owner or beneficial owner, and if the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock are owned of record or beneficially owned by more than one (1) person, as in a joint tenancy and tenancy in common, the demand must be executed by or on behalf of all joint record holders or beneficial owners. An authorized agent, including an authorized agent for two (2) or more joint record holders or beneficial owners, may execute a demand for appraisal on behalf of a holder of record or beneficial owner; however, the agent must identify the record owner or owners or beneficial owner or owners, respectively, and expressly disclose that, in executing the demand, the agent is acting as agent for the record owner or owners or beneficial owner or owners, as applicable. All written demands for appraisal pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL must be mailed or delivered to: \n

\n Twin Vee PowerCats Co. \n
\n 3101 S. U.S. Highway 1 \n
\n Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 \n
\n Attention: Glenn Sonoda \n
\n (772) 429-2525 \n
\n investor@twinvee.com \n

\n At any time within sixty (60) days after the effective date of the Merger (or thereafter, with written approval from Twin Vee), any holder of record or beneficial owner of shares of the Twin Vee Common Stock who has submitted a demand for appraisal who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or otherwise joined such proceeding as a named party will have the right to withdraw such person’s demand for appraisal and to accept the merger consideration as provided in the Merger Agreement, without interest and less any required withholding tax, by delivering to Twin Vee, as the Surviving Company, a written withdrawal of the demand for appraisal. Once a petition for appraisal is filed, an appraisal proceeding may not be dismissed as to any person without the approval of the Delaware Court of Chancery, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems just, including without limitation, a reservation of jurisdiction for any application to the Delaware Court of Chancery made under subsection (j) of Section 262 of the DGCL (a “Reservation”); provided, however, that this will not affect the right of any such person who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party to withdraw such person’s demand for appraisal and to accept the merger consideration as provided in the Merger Agreement within sixty (60) days after the First Effective Time. Except with respect to any holder of record or beneficial owner of shares of the Twin Vee Common Stock who withdraws such person’s demand in accordance with the provision in the immediately preceding sentence, if the Delaware Court of Chancery does not approve the dismissal of an appraisal proceeding with respect to such person, the person will be entitled to receive only the appraised value determined in any such appraisal proceeding, which value could be less than, equal to or more than the merger consideration as provided in the Merger Agreement. \n

\n 125\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Notice by the Surviving Corporation \n

\n If the First Merger is completed, within ten (10) days after the First Effective Time, the Surviving Company will notify each record holder of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock who has properly and validly made a written demand for appraisal pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL, and who has not voted in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and any beneficial owner who has demanded appraisal in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL that the First Merger has become effective and the effective date thereof. \n

\n Filing a Petition for Appraisal \n

\n Within one hundred twenty (120) days after the First Merger Effective Time, but not thereafter, the Surviving Company or any holder of record or beneficial owner of shares of the Twin Vee Common Stock who has complied with Section 262 of the DGCL and who is entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL may commence an appraisal proceeding by filing a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery, with a copy served on the Surviving Company in the case of a petition filed by a person, demanding a determination of the fair value of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock held by all such persons entitled to appraisal. The Surviving Company is under no obligation, and has no present intention, to file a petition, and holders of record and beneficial owners of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock should not assume that the Surviving Company will file a petition or initiate any negotiations with respect to the fair value of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock. Accordingly, any such persons who desire to have their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock appraised should take all actions necessary to perfect their appraisal rights in respect of their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock within the time and in the manner prescribed in Section 262 of the DGCL. The failure to file such a petition within the period specified in Section 262 of the DGCL will nullify a previous written demand for appraisal. \n

\n Within one hundred twenty (120) days after the First Effective Time, any holder or beneficial owner of shares of the Twin Vee Common Stock who has complied with the requirements for an appraisal of such person’s shares of Twin Vee Common Stock pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL and who is entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL will be entitled, upon written request, to receive from the Surviving Company a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock not voted in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and with respect to which Twin Vee has received demands for appraisal, and the aggregate number of stockholders or beneficial owners holding or owning such shares of Twin Vee Common Stock (provided that, where a beneficial owner makes a demand pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL, the holder of record of such shares of Twin Vee Common Stock will not be considered a separate stockholder holding such shares of Twin Vee Common Stock for purposes of such aggregate number). The Surviving Company must send this statement to the requesting person within ten (10) days after receipt by the Surviving Company of the written request for such a statement or within ten (10) days after the expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal, whichever is later. \n

\n If a petition for an appraisal is duly filed by a holder or beneficial owner of shares of the Twin Vee Common Stock and a copy thereof is served upon the Surviving Company, the Surviving Company will then be obligated within twenty (20) days after such service to file with the office of the Register in Chancery in which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all such persons who have demanded appraisal for their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock have not been reached. The Register in Chancery, if so ordered by the Delaware Court of Chancery, will give notice of the time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by mail to the Surviving Company and to the persons shown on such list at the addresses stated therein. The forms of the notices by mail and by publication will be approved by the Delaware Court of Chancery and the costs of any such notice are borne by the Surviving Company. \n

\n After providing the foregoing notice, at the hearing on such petition, the Delaware Court of Chancery will determine the persons who have complied with Section 262 of the DGCL and who are entitled to appraisal rights thereunder. The Delaware Court of Chancery may require the persons who demanded appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to submit their stock certificates to the Delaware Register in Chancery for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings. If any person fails to comply with the direction, the Delaware Court of Chancery may dismiss the proceedings \n

\n 126\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n as to such person. Accordingly, persons seeking appraisal of their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock are cautioned to retain their Twin Vee Common Stock certificates pending resolution of the appraisal proceedings. \n

\n The Delaware Court of Chancery will dismiss appraisal proceedings as to all holders or beneficial owners of shares of the Twin Vee Common Stock who are otherwise entitled to appraisal rights unless (1) the total number of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock entitled to appraisal exceeds one percent of the outstanding shares of the class of Twin Vee Common Stock eligible for appraisal (as measured in accordance with subsection (g) of Section 262 of the DGCL) or (2) the value of the consideration provided in the Merger for such total number of shares of Twin Vee Common Stock entitled to appraisal exceeds $1,000,000. \n

\n Determination of Fair Value \n

\n After the Delaware Court of Chancery determines the persons entitled to appraisal, and that at least one (1) of the ownership thresholds above has been satisfied, then the appraisal proceeding will be conducted in accordance with the rules of the Delaware Court of Chancery, including any rules specifically governing appraisal proceedings. Through such proceeding, the Delaware Court of Chancery will determine the “fair value” of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Mergers, together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value (subject, in the case of interest payments, to any voluntary payments made by the Surviving Corporation pursuant to subsection (h) of Section 262 of the DGCL that have the effect of limiting the sum on which interest accrues as described below). In determining fair value, the Delaware Court of Chancery will take into account all relevant factors. Unless the Delaware Court of Chancery in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the First Effective Time through the date of payment of the judgment will be compounded quarterly and will accrue at five percent (5%) over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during the period between the First Effective Time and the date of payment of the judgment. However, the Surviving Company has the right, at any time prior to the Delaware Court of Chancery’s entry of judgment in the proceedings, to make a voluntary cash payment to each person seeking appraisal. If the Surviving Company makes a voluntary cash payment pursuant to subsection (h) of Section 262 of the DGCL to each person entitled to appraisal, interest will accrue thereafter only on the sum of (1) the difference, if any, between the amount paid by the Surviving Company in such voluntary cash payment and the fair value of the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, and (2) interest accrued before such voluntary cash payment, unless paid at that time. \n

\n In Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court discussed the factors that could be considered in determining fair value in an appraisal proceeding, stating that “proof of value by any techniques or methods which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise admissible in court” should be considered, and that “[f]air price obviously requires consideration of all relevant factors involving the value of a company.” The Delaware Supreme Court stated that, in making this determination of fair value, the court must consider market value, asset value, dividends, earnings prospects, the nature of the enterprise and any other facts that could be ascertained as of the date of the merger that throw any light on future prospects of the merged corporation. Section 262 of the DGCL provides that fair value is to be “exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger.” In Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court stated that such exclusion is a “narrow exclusion [that] does not encompass known elements of value,” but which rather applies only to the speculative elements of value arising from such accomplishment or expectation. In Weinberger, the Supreme Court of Delaware also stated that “elements of future value, including the nature of the enterprise, which are known or susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and not the product of speculation, may be considered.” \n

\n Persons considering seeking appraisal should be aware that the fair value of their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock as so determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery could be more than, the same as or less than the merger consideration they would receive pursuant to the Merger Agreement if they did not seek appraisal of their shares of Twin Vee Common Stock and that an opinion of an investment banking firm as to the fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration payable in a merger is not an opinion as to, and may not in any manner address, fair value under Section 262 of the DGCL. Although Twin Vee believes that the merger consideration as provided in the Merger Agreement is fair, no representation is made as to the outcome of the appraisal of fair value as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, and \n

\n 127\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n holders of record and beneficial owners of Twin Vee Common Stock should recognize that such an appraisal could result in a determination of a value higher or lower than, or the same as, the merger consideration as provided in the Merger Agreement. Neither Twin Vee, PubCo, nor USFM anticipates offering more than the merger consideration as provided in the Merger Agreement to any Twin Vee stockholder or beneficial owner exercising appraisal rights, and the Surviving Company reserves the rights to make a voluntary cash payment pursuant to subsection (h) of Section 262 of the DGCL and to assert, in any appraisal proceeding, that for purposes of Section 262 of the DGCL, the “fair value” of a share of Twin Vee Common Stock is less than the merger consideration as provided in the Merger Agreement. \n

\n The costs of the appraisal proceedings (which do not include attorneys’ fees or the fees and expenses of experts) may be determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and taxed upon the parties as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems equitable under the circumstances. Upon application of a person whose name appears on the list filed by the Surviving Company pursuant to Section 262(f) of the DGCL who participated in the proceeding and incurred expenses in connection therewith, the Delaware Court of Chancery may also order that all or a portion of such expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney’s fees and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all the shares of Twin Vee Common Stock entitled to an appraisal not dismissed pursuant to subsection (k) of Section 262 of the DGCL or subject to such an award pursuant to a Reservation. In the absence of such determination or assessment, each party bears its own expenses. \n

\n If any person who demands appraisal of his, her or its shares of Twin Vee Common Stock under Section 262 of the DGCL fails to perfect, or loses or validly withdraws, such person’s right to appraisal, such person’s shares of Twin Vee Common Stock will be deemed to have been converted at the First Effective Time into the right to receive the merger consideration as provided in the Merger Agreement, without interest and less any required withholding tax. A person will fail to perfect, or effectively lose, such person’s right to appraisal if no petition for appraisal is filed within one hundred twenty (120) days after the First Effective Time, if neither of the ownership thresholds above has been satisfied in respect of persons seeking appraisal rights or if the person delivers to the Surviving Company a written withdrawal of such person’s demand for appraisal and an acceptance of the merger consideration as provided in the Merger Agreement in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL. \n

\n From and after the First Effective Time, no person who has demanded appraisal rights with respect to some or all of such person’s shares of Twin Vee Common Stock in compliance with Section 262 of the DGCL will be entitled to vote such shares of Twin Vee Common Stock for any purpose or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of record at a date which is prior to the First Effective Time). If a person who has made a demand for an appraisal in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL delivers to the Surviving Company a written withdrawal of such person’s demand for an appraisal in respect of some or all of such person’s shares, either within sixty (60) days after the First Effective Time or thereafter with the Surviving Company’s written approval, then the right of such person to an appraisal of the shares subject to the withdrawal will cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Delaware Court of Chancery will be dismissed as to any person without the approval of the Delaware Court of Chancery, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems just, including, without limitation, a Reservation; provided, however, that the foregoing will not affect the right of any person who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party to withdraw such person’s demand for appraisal and to accept the merger consideration as provided in the Merger Agreement within sixty (60) days after the First Effective Time. If a petition for an appraisal is not filed within the time provided in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL, the right to appraisal with respect to all shares of Twin Vee Common Stock will cease. \n

\n Failure to comply strictly with all of the procedures set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL will result in the loss of a person’s appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL. In that event, such person will be entitled to receive the merger consideration as provided in the Merger Agreement for such person’s shares of Twin Vee Common Stock in accordance with the Merger Agreement, without interest and less any required withholding tax. Consequently, any holder of record or beneficial owner of shares of the Twin Vee Common Stock wishing to exercise appraisal rights is encouraged to consult legal counsel before attempting to exercise those rights. \n

\n 128\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n STOCKHOLDERS OR BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF SHARES OF TWIN VEE COMMON STOCK WHO VOTE SHARES OF TWIN VEE COMMON STOCK IN FAVOR OF THE ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE ENTITLED TO EXERCISE APPRAISAL RIGHTS WITH RESPECT THERETO BUT, RATHER, WILL RECEIVE THE MERGER CONSIDERATION.\n

\n 129\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR HOLDERS OF USFM SECURITIES \n

\n This section describes certain material U.S. federal income tax considerations generally applicable to (i) holders of USFM Common Stock who exchange their USFM Common Stock for PubCo Common Stock pursuant to the Business Combination, (ii) holders of USFM Warrants who exchange their USFM Warrants for PubCo Warrants pursuant to the Business Combination, and (iii) the ownership and disposition of PubCo Common Stock and PubCo Warrants (collectively, “PubCo securities”) acquired pursuant to the Business Combination. This discussion applies only to USFM Common Stock and USFM Warrants (collectively, “USFM securities”), and PubCo securities held as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes (generally, property held for investment) and does not discuss all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that might be relevant to holders in light of their particular circumstances or status, including alternative minimum tax and Medicare contribution tax consequences, or holders who are subject to special rules, including: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n brokers, dealers and other investors that do not own their USFM securities or PubCo securities as capital assets; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n government organizations; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n cooperatives; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n grantor trusts; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n persons that have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n personal holding companies; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n subchapter S corporations; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n taxpayers that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, individual retirement accounts or other tax deferred accounts; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n banks or other financial institutions, underwriters, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts or regulated investment companies; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n U.S. expatriates or former long-term residents of the United States; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n persons that own (directly, indirectly, or constructively) 5% or more (by vote or value) of the USFM Common Stock or PubCo Common Stock (except as specifically addressed herein); \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n partnerships (including any entities or arrangements treated as a partnership) for U.S. federal income tax purposes or beneficial owners of such partnerships; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n persons holding USFM securities or PubCo securities as part of a straddle, hedging or conversion transaction, constructive sale, or other arrangement involving more than one position; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n persons required to accelerate the recognition of any item of gross income with respect to USFM securities or PubCo securities as a result of such income being recognized on an applicable financial statement; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n persons that received USFM securities or PubCo securities as compensation for services; or \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n controlled foreign corporations or passive foreign investment companies. \n

\n If a partnership (including any entity or arrangement treated as a partnership) for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds USFM Common Stock or USFM Warrants, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in such a partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner, the activities of the partnership and certain determinations made at the partner level. Partnerships holding USFM Common Stock or USFM Warrants, and partners therein, should consult their own tax advisors regarding the particular U.S. federal income tax consequences to them of the Business Combination. \n

\n This discussion is based on the Code, its legislative history, final, temporary, and proposed Treasury regulations promulgated under the Code (the “Treasury Regulations”), published rulings by the IRS and \n

\n 130\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n court decisions, all as of the date hereof. These laws are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. This discussion is necessarily general and does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation, including the effect of the U.S. federal alternative minimum tax, or U.S. federal estate and gift tax, or any state, local or non-U.S. tax laws to a holder of USFM securities or PubCo securities. We have not and do not intend to seek any rulings from the IRS regarding the Business Combination. There is no assurance that the IRS will not take positions concerning the tax consequences of the Business Combination that are different from those discussed below, or that any such different positions would not be sustained by a court. \n

\n ALL HOLDERS OF USFM SECURITIES SHOULD CONSULT WITH THEIR TAX ADVISORS REGARDING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE BUSINESS COMBINATION AND CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO THE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF PUBCO SECURITIES, INCLUDING THE EFFECTS OF U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL AND NON-U.S. TAX LAWS. \n

\n U.S. Holders \n

\n This section applies to you if you are a U.S. Holder. For purposes of this discussion, a U.S. Holder means a beneficial owner of USFM securities or PubCo securities that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n a trust if (1) a U.S. court can exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more U.S. persons are authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust; or (2) the trust has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person. \n

\n The Business Combination — Consequences to U.S. Holders of USFM Common Stock and of USFM Warrants \n

\n The exchange of USFM Common Stock for PubCo Common Stock pursuant to the Second Merger, taken together with the First Merger as integrated transactions, is intended to qualify as an exchange described in Section 351(a) of the Code. However, the provisions of Section 351(a) of the Code are complex and qualification as a nonrecognition transaction thereunder could be adversely affected by events or actions that occur following the Business Combination that are beyond the control of USFM or PubCo. For example, if more than 20 percent of the PubCo Common Stock were subject to an arrangement or agreement to be sold or disposed of at the time of their issuance in the Business Combination, one of the requirements for Section 351(a) treatment would not be met. We do not expect that any of the PubCo Common Stock issued in the Business Combination will be subject to an arrangement or agreement by its owner to sell or dispose of such shares upon the issuance of those shares in the Business Combination, but there can be no assurance in this regard. \n

\n It is further intended that the Second Merger qualify as a “reorganization” under Section 368 of the Code (a “Reorganization”). However, it is unclear whether the requirements of Section 368 of the Code can be satisfied and such qualification is not a condition of the Business Combination. There are many requirements that must be satisfied for the Second Merger to qualify as a Reorganization, some of which are based upon factual determinations and others are fundamental to corporate reorganizations. However, due to the absence of guidance directly on point as to how certain requirements of Section 368 of the Code apply to USFM, the qualification of the Second Merger as a Reorganization is uncertain. For example, to qualify as a Reorganization, the Second Merger must satisfy the “continuity of business enterprise” requirement under Section 368 of the Code. Because USFM was formed in late 2025 and does not have a long-established business history prior to entering into negotiations with Twin Vee, it is unclear as a matter of law whether USFM’s business or assets would constitute a historic business or historic business assets for this purpose. In addition, Reorganization treatment could also be adversely affected by events or actions that occur prior to or at the time of the Second Merger, some of which are outside the control of USFM. \n

\n 131\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Second Merger Qualifies as a Reorganization \n

\n If the Second Merger qualifies as a Reorganization, whether or not the Mergers qualify as a transaction described in Section 351, a U.S. Holder that exchanges USFM Common Stock for PubCo Common Stock and/or USFM Warrants for PubCo Warrants is generally not expected to recognize any gain or loss upon such exchanges, the aggregate tax basis of such U.S. Holder’s PubCo Common Stock will be the same as the aggregate tax basis of such U.S. Holder’s USFM Common Stock immediately before the Second Merger, the aggregate tax basis of such U.S. Holder’s PubCo Warrants will be the same as the aggregate tax basis of such U.S. Holder’s USFM Warrants immediately before the Second Merger, and the holding periods for such PubCo Warrants and PubCo Common Stock will include the holding periods of the USFM Warrants and USFM Common Stock exchanged therefor, provided that the USFM Warrants or USFM Common Stock, as the case may be, are held as capital assets at the effective time of the Second Merger. \n

\n Mergers Qualify Under Section 351 and the Second Merger Does Not Qualify as a Reorganization \n

\n If the Mergers qualify as a transaction described in Section 351 but the Second Merger does not qualify as a Reorganization, the consequences are the same as described above in Second Merger Qualifies as a Reorganization for a U.S. Holder that does not exchange USFM Warrants for PubCo Warrants but solely exchanges USFM Common Stock. However, for a U.S. Holder that exchanges both USFM Common Stock and USFM Warrants, while the receipt of PubCo Common Stock in the Second Merger will be treated as tax-free consideration received in the exchange, the receipt of PubCo Warrants will be treated as taxable consideration received in the exchange. In such case, a U.S. Holder generally will be required to recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of gain realized by such holder (generally, the excess of (x) the sum of the fair market values of the PubCo Warrants treated as received by such holder and the PubCo Common Stock received by such holder, if any, over (y) such holder’s aggregate adjusted tax basis in the USFM Warrants and USFM Common Stock, if any, exchanged therefor) and (ii) the fair market value of the PubCo Warrants received by such holder in such exchange. To determine the amount of gain, if any, that such U.S. Holder must recognize, the holder must compute the amount of gain or loss realized as a result of the Second Merger on a share-by-share and warrant-by-warrant basis by allocating the aggregate fair market value of the PubCo Common Stock and the PubCo Warrants received by such U.S. Holder among the USFM Common Stock and the USFM Warrants owned by such U.S. Holder immediately prior to the Second Merger in proportion to their respective fair market values. Any loss realized by a U.S. Holder would not be recognized. In this case, the aggregate tax basis of the PubCo Common Stock received in the Second Merger generally will equal the aggregate adjusted tax basis of the USFM securities exchanged therefor, decreased by the fair market value of the PubCo Warrants received and increased by the amount of gain recognized, if any, and the tax basis of the PubCo Warrants received will equal their fair market value. The holding period of the PubCo Common Stock received in the Second Merger will include the holding period during which the USFM Common Stock exchanged therefor was held by such U.S. Holder, and the holding period of PubCo Warrants received in the Second Merger will begin on the day after the Second Merger. A U.S. Holder that exchanges only USFM Warrants for PubCo Warrants (and does not also exchange USFM Common Stock) generally would recognize gain or loss equal to the \n

\n 132\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n difference between the fair market value of the PubCo Warrants received and such holder’s adjusted tax basis in the USFM Warrants exchanged therefor. \n

\n Mergers Do Not Qualify Under Section 351 and the Second Merger Does Not Qualify as a Reorganization \n

\n If the Second Merger qualifies neither as a Reorganization nor as part of an exchange under Section 351, U.S. Holders generally would recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between the fair market value of PubCo Common Stock received by such U.S. Holders in the Second Merger and such U.S. Holders’ adjusted tax basis in the USFM Common Stock surrendered by such U.S. Holders in the Second Merger. Any gain or loss recognized would generally be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder had held the USFM Common Stock for more than one year (or short-term capital gain or loss otherwise). Long-term capital gains of non-corporate U.S. Holders (including individuals) are currently eligible for preferential U.S. federal income tax rates. However, the deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the PubCo Common Stock received in the Second Merger would equal the fair market value of such PubCo Common Stock on the Closing Date, and the U.S. Holder’s holding period in such PubCo Common Stock would not include the holding period for the USFM Common Stock surrendered in exchange therefor and would begin on the day following the Closing Date. The same general consequences would apply with respect to the exchange of the USFM Warrants for PubCo Warrants. \n

\n The rules governing the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the Business Combination are complex and will depend on a holder’s particular circumstances. All holders of USFM Common Stock and USFM Warrants are urged to consult with their tax advisors regarding the potential tax consequences to them of the Business Combination and the tax consequences if the Mergers were to fail to qualify as an exchange described in Section 351(a) of the Code or the Second Merger were to fail to qualify for Reorganization treatment as described above. \n

\n Ownership of PubCo Common Stock and PubCo Warrants \n

\n Distributions on PubCo Common Stock \n

\n The gross amount of any distribution on PubCo Common Stock that is made out of PubCo’s current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles) generally will be taxable to a U.S. Holder as dividend income on the date such distribution is directly or constructively received. To the extent that the amount of the distribution exceeds PubCo’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, such excess amount generally will be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its PubCo Common Stock, and thereafter as capital gain recognized on a sale or exchange as described under “Sale, Exchange, Redemption or Other Taxable Disposition of PubCo Common Stock and PubCo Warrants,” below. \n

\n Dividends paid by PubCo to a U.S. Holder that is a taxable corporation generally will qualify for the dividends received deduction if the requisite holding period is satisfied. With certain exceptions (including, but not limited to, dividends treated as investment income for purposes of investment interest deduction limitations), and provided certain holding period and other requirements are met, dividends paid by PubCo to a non-corporate U.S. Holder may constitute “qualified dividends” that will be subject to tax at the maximum tax rate accorded to long-term capital gains. Assuming the Business Combination qualifies for the intended nonrecognition tax treatment described above, a U.S. Holder’s holding period in its PubCo Common Stock received in the Business Combination should include such U.S. Holder’s holding period in its USFM Common Stock exchanged therefor. If the holding period requirements are not satisfied at the time PubCo pays a dividend, then a corporation will not qualify for the dividends received deduction and would have taxable income equal to the entire dividend amount, and non-corporate holders would be subject to tax on such dividend at regular ordinary income tax rates instead of the preferential rate that applies to qualified dividend income. \n

\n Sale, Exchange, Redemption or Other Taxable Disposition of PubCo Common Stock and PubCo Warrants \n

\n A U.S. Holder generally will recognize gain or loss on any sale, exchange, redemption or other taxable disposition of PubCo Common Stock or PubCo Warrants in an amount equal to the difference between (i) the amount realized on the disposition and (ii) such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in such shares or \n

\n 133\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n warrants, as the case may be. Any gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Holder on a taxable disposition of PubCo Common Stock or PubCo Warrants generally will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the holder’s holding period in such shares and/or warrants exceeds one year at the time of the disposition. Preferential tax rates may apply to long-term capital gains of non-corporate U.S. Holders (including individuals). The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. Any gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or exchange of PubCo Common Stock or PubCo Warrants generally will be treated as U.S. source gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes. \n

\n Exercise or Lapse of a PubCo Warrant \n

\n Except as discussed below with respect to the cashless exercise of a PubCo Warrant, a U.S. Holder generally will not recognize gain or loss upon the acquisition of PubCo Common Stock on the exercise of a PubCo Warrant for cash. A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in PubCo Common Stock received upon exercise of the PubCo Warrant generally should be an amount equal to the sum of the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the PubCo Warrant exchanged therefor and the exercise price. The U.S. Holder’s holding period for the PubCo Common Stock received upon exercise of the PubCo Warrant will begin on the date following the date of exercise (or possibly the date of exercise) of the PubCo Warrant and will not include the period during which the U.S. Holder held the PubCo Warrant. If a PubCo Warrant is allowed to lapse unexercised, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize a capital loss equal to such holder’s tax basis in the PubCo Warrant. \n

\n The tax consequences of a cashless exercise of a PubCo Warrant are not clear under current tax law. A cashless exercise may be tax-deferred, either because the exercise is not a gain realization event or because the exercise is treated as a recapitalization under Section 368(a) of the Code for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In either tax-deferred situation, a U.S. Holder’s basis in the PubCo Common Stock received would equal the holder’s basis in the PubCo Warrants exercised therefor. If the cashless exercise were treated as not being a gain realization event, a U.S. Holder’s holding period in the PubCo Common Stock would be treated as commencing on the date following the date of exercise (or possibly the date of exercise) of the PubCo Warrants. If the cashless exercise were treated as a recapitalization, the holding period of the PubCo Common Stock would include the holding period of the PubCo Warrants exercised therefor. \n

\n It is also possible that a cashless exercise of a PubCo Warrant could be treated in part as a taxable exchange in which gain or loss would be recognized. In such event, a U.S. Holder would recognize gain or loss with respect to the portion of the exercised PubCo Warrants treated as surrendered to pay the exercise price of the PubCo Warrants (the “surrendered warrants”). The U.S. Holder would recognize capital gain or loss with respect to the surrendered warrants in an amount generally equal to the difference between (i) the fair market value of the PubCo Common Stock that would have been received with respect to the surrendered warrants in a regular exercise of the PubCo Warrants and (ii) the sum of the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the surrendered warrants and the aggregate cash exercise price of such warrants (if they had been exercised in a regular exercise). In this case, a U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the PubCo Common Stock received would equal the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the PubCo Warrants exercised plus (or minus) the gain (or loss) recognized with respect to the surrendered warrants. A U.S. Holder’s holding period for the PubCo Common Stock would commence on the date following the date of exercise (or possibly the date of exercise) of the PubCo Warrants. \n

\n Due to the absence of authority on the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a cashless exercise of warrants, there can be no assurance which, if any, of the alternative tax consequences and holding periods described above would be adopted by the IRS or a court of law. Accordingly, U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of a cashless exercise of PubCo Warrants. \n

\n Possible Constructive Distributions \n

\n The terms of each PubCo Warrant provide for an adjustment to the number of shares of PubCo Common Stock for which the PubCo Warrant may be exercised or to the exercise price of the PubCo Warrant in certain events. An adjustment which has the effect of preventing dilution generally is not taxable. A U.S. Holder of a PubCo Warrant would, however, be treated as receiving a constructive distribution from PubCo under Section 305 of the Code if, for example, the adjustment increases the holder’s proportionate interest in PubCo’s assets or earnings and profits (e.g., through an increase in the number of shares of PubCo Common Stock that would be obtained upon exercise of such warrant) as a result of a distribution of cash to the holders of the PubCo Common Stock which is taxable to the U.S. Holders of such shares as \n

\n 134\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n described under “— Distributions on PubCo Common Stock” above. Such constructive distribution would be subject to tax as described under that section in the same manner as if the U.S. Holder of such warrant received a cash distribution from PubCo equal to the fair market value of such increased interest. \n

\n Non-U.S. Holders \n

\n This section applies to you if you are a Non-U.S. Holder. For purposes of this discussion, a Non-U.S. Holder means a beneficial owner (other than a partnership (including any entity or arrangement treated as a partnership) for U.S. federal income tax purposes) of USFM securities, Twin Vee Common Stock, or PubCo securities that is not a U.S. Holder, including: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n a nonresident alien individual, other than certain former citizens and residents of the United States; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n a non-U.S. corporation; or \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n a non-U.S. estate or trust; \n

\n but generally does not include an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of disposition. A holder that is such an individual should consult its tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the sale or other disposition of USFM securities, Twin Vee Common Stock, or PubCo securities. \n

\n The Business Combination \n

\n The characterization for U.S. federal income tax purposes of the Business Combination to a Non-U.S. Holder generally will correspond to the U.S. federal income tax characterization of the Business Combination to a U.S. Holder, as described above under “U.S. Holders — The Business Combination — Consequences to U.S. Holders of USFM Common Stock and of USFM Warrants,” and, to the extent that the Business Combination results in a taxable event, the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Business Combination to a Non-U.S. Holder with respect to the exchange of the USFM Common Stock or USFM Warrants in the Second Merger will generally be as described below under “Non-U.S. Holders — Ownership of PubCo Common Stock and PubCo Warrants — Sale, Exchange, Redemption or Other Taxable Disposition of PubCo Common Stock and PubCo Warrants.” \n

\n However, if USFM is or has been a “U.S. real property holding corporation” during the applicable testing period, a Non-U.S. Holder could be required to recognize gain on the exchange of USFM securities even if the Business Combination otherwise qualifies for nonrecognition treatment, unless certain exceptions apply. For this purpose, references to PubCo in the discussion of “U.S. real property holding corporations” below should be read as references to USFM. Because USFM Common Stock is not regularly traded on an established securities market, the exception for holders of 5% or less of a regularly traded class of stock would not be available with respect to USFM Common Stock. USFM does not believe that it is or has been a U.S. real property holding corporation, but there can be no assurance in this regard. \n

\n Ownership of PubCo Common Stock and PubCo Warrants \n

\n Distributions on PubCo Common Stock \n

\n In general, any distributions made by PubCo to a Non-U.S. Holder of PubCo Common Stock, to the extent paid out of current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles), generally will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, provided such dividends are not effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States, the applicable withholding agent generally will be required to withhold tax from the gross amount of the dividend at a rate of 30%, unless such Non-U.S. Holder is eligible for a reduced rate of withholding tax under an applicable income tax treaty and provides proper certification of its eligibility for such reduced rate (usually on an IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E). Because it may not be possible to determine at the time of a distribution whether such distribution will exceed PubCo’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, the applicable withholding agent may withhold on the entire amount of a distribution, in which case a Non-U.S. Holder may be entitled to a refund of any excess tax withheld by timely filing a claim with the IRS. Any distribution not constituting a dividend generally will be treated first \n

\n 135\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n as reducing (but not below zero) the Non-U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its PubCo Common Stock and, to the extent such distribution exceeds the Non-U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis, as gain realized from the sale or other disposition of its PubCo Common Stock, which will be treated as described under “Non-U.S. Holders — Sale, Exchange, Redemption or Other Taxable Disposition of PubCo Common Stock and PubCo Warrants” below. \n

\n Such withholding tax does not apply to dividends paid to a Non-U.S. Holder who provides a Form W-8ECI, certifying that the dividends are effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States. Instead, the effectively connected dividends will be subject to regular U.S. income tax as if the Non-U.S. Holder were a U.S. resident, subject to an applicable income tax treaty providing otherwise. A non-U.S. corporation receiving effectively connected dividends may also be subject to an additional “branch profits tax” imposed at a rate of 30% (or a lower treaty rate). \n

\n Sale, Exchange, Redemption or Other Taxable Disposition of PubCo Common Stock and PubCo Warrants \n

\n A Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax in respect of gain recognized on a sale, taxable exchange or other taxable disposition of PubCo securities, unless: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the gain is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business by the Non-U.S. Holder within the United States (and, under certain income tax treaties, is attributable to a United States permanent establishment or fixed base maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder); or \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n PubCo is or has been a “U.S. real property holding corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes at any time during the shorter of the five-year period ending on the date of disposition or the period that the Non-U.S. Holder held PubCo Common Stock, and, in the case where PubCo Common Stock is regularly traded on an established securities market, the Non-U.S. Holder has owned, directly or constructively, more than 5% of all outstanding PubCo Common Stock at any time within the shorter of the five-year period preceding the disposition or such Non-U.S. Holder’s holding period for the PubCo Common Stock. Special rules apply in determining whether this 5% threshold is satisfied with respect to PubCo Warrants. It is intended that the PubCo Common Stock will be treated as regularly traded on an established securities market for this purpose, but there can be no assurance in this regard. \n

\n Unless an applicable treaty provides otherwise, gain described in the first bullet point above will be subject to tax at generally applicable U.S. federal income tax rates as if the Non-U.S. Holder were a U.S. resident. Any gains described in the first bullet point above of a Non-U.S. Holder that is a non-U.S. corporation may also be subject to an additional “branch profits tax” at a 30% rate (or lower treaty rate). \n

\n If the second bullet point above applies to a Non-U.S. Holder, gain recognized by such holder on the sale, exchange or other disposition of PubCo securities will be subject to tax at generally applicable U.S. federal income tax rates. In addition, a buyer of PubCo securities from such Non-U.S. Holder may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 15% of the amount realized upon such disposition. It is not expected that PubCo will be treated as a U.S. real property holding corporation, but there can be no assurance in this regard. \n

\n Exercise or Lapse of a PubCo Warrant \n

\n The U.S. federal income tax treatment of a Non-U.S. Holder’s exercise of a PubCo Warrant, or the lapse of a PubCo Warrant held by a Non-U.S. Holder will correspond to the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a U.S. Holder, as described under “U.S. Holders — Exercise or Lapse of a PubCo Warrant” above, although to the extent a cashless exercise of a warrant results in a taxable exchange, the consequences would be similar to those described above in “Non-U.S. Holders — Sale, Exchange, Redemption or Other Taxable Disposition of PubCo Common Stock and PubCo Warrants.” \n

\n Possible Constructive Distributions\n

\n Any constructive distribution with respect to a PubCo Warrant held by a Non-U.S. Holder, as described above under “U.S. Holders — Possible Constructive Distributions,” generally would be treated as described above under “Non-U.S. Holders — Ownership of PubCo Common Stock and PubCo Warrants — \n

\n 136\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Distributions on PubCo Common Stock.” Because a constructive distribution does not give rise to any cash payment, the applicable withholding agent may withhold any U.S. federal tax required in respect of such constructive distribution from cash or other property (including shares of PubCo Common Stock or sales proceeds) subsequently paid or credited to such Non-U.S. Holder. \n

\n Information Reporting and Backup Withholding \n

\n Information reporting requirements may apply to dividends received by U.S. Holders of PubCo Common Stock, and the proceeds received on the disposition of PubCo securities effected within the United States (and, in certain cases, outside the United States), in each case other than U.S. Holders that are exempt recipients (such as corporations). Backup withholding (currently at a rate of 24%) may apply to such amounts if the U.S. Holder fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number (generally on an IRS Form W-9 provided to the paying agent of the U.S. Holder’s broker) or is otherwise subject to backup withholding. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the application of the U.S. information reporting and backup withholding rules. \n

\n Information returns may be filed with the IRS in connection with, and Non-U.S. Holders may be subject to backup withholding on amounts received in respect of their USFM securities or their PubCo securities, unless the Non-U.S. Holder furnishes to the applicable withholding agent the required certification as to its non-U.S. status, such as by providing a valid IRS Form W-8BEN, IRS Form W-8BEN-E or IRS Form W-8ECI, as applicable, or the Non-U.S. Holder otherwise establishes an exemption. Dividends paid with respect to PubCo Common Stock and proceeds from the sale or other disposition of PubCo Common Stock received in the United States by a Non-U.S. Holder through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding unless such Non-U.S. Holder provides proof of an applicable exemption or complies with certain certification procedures described above, and otherwise complies with the applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. \n

\n Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld as backup withholding may be credited against the holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, and a holder may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules by timely filing the appropriate claim for a refund with the IRS and furnishing any required information. \n

\n Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act \n

\n Sections 1471 through 1474 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations and administrative guidance promulgated thereunder (commonly referred to as “FATCA”) generally impose withholding at a rate of 30% on dividends paid on PubCo Common Stock to “foreign financial institutions” (as specially defined under these rules) and certain other non-U.S. entities unless various U.S. information reporting and due diligence requirements (generally relating to ownership by U.S. persons of interests in or accounts with those entities) have been satisfied or an exemption applies. An intergovernmental agreement between the United States and an applicable foreign country may modify these requirements. While withholding under FATCA would also have applied to payments of gross proceeds from the sale or other disposition of PubCo securities, proposed Treasury Regulations, on which taxpayers may rely until final Treasury Regulations are issued, eliminate FATCA withholding on payments of gross proceeds. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the possible implications of FATCA on their investment in PubCo securities.\n

\n 137\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION \n

\n Introduction \n

\n The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information has been prepared in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation S-X. \n

\n The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet is presented as of June 30, 2026, and the pro forma condensed combined statement of operations is presented for the six-month period ended June 30, 2026 and for the year ended December 31, 2025. \n

\n The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information of Twin Vee PowerCats Co. (the “Company” or “Twin Vee”), Twin Vee Holdco Inc. (“PubCo”), USFM Corporation (“USFM”), gives effect to the Business Combination described in the joint proxy statement/prospectus. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of June 30, 2026, gives pro forma effect to the Business Combination as if it was completed on June 30, 2026. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the six months ending June 30, 2026, gives effect to the Business Combination as if they had occurred on January 1, 2026. \n

\n This information should be read together with Company, USFM and Pubco historical audited financial statements and related notes, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and other financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus. \n

\n The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements were prepared in accordance with Article 11 of SEC Regulation S-X, as amended by the final rule, Release No. 33-10786, Amendments to Financial Disclosures about Acquired and Disposed Businesses. Release No. 33-10786 replaced the previous pro forma adjustment criteria with simplified requirements to depict the accounting for the Transactions (“Transaction Accounting Adjustments”) and present the reasonably estimable synergies and other transaction effects that have occurred or are reasonably expected to occur (“Management’s Adjustments”). Management has elected not to present Management’s Adjustments and will only be presenting Transaction Accounting Adjustments in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information. \n

\n The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information is for illustrative and informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have occurred if the Business Combination described in the prospectus had been completed as of the dates set forth above, nor is it indicative of the future consolidated results of operations of the Pubco. Further, pro forma adjustments represent management’s best estimates based on information available as of the date of this prospectus and are subject to change as additional information becomes available. \n

\n The unaudited proforma condensed combined balance sheet and statement of operations as of June 30, 2026 has been prepared using the following: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM’s unaudited balance sheet as of June 30, 2026; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2026; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Pubco’s audited balance sheet as of October 6, 2026. PubCo was formed on October 5, 2026. \n

\n The unaudited proforma condensed combined statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2026 combines the historical results of USFM, the Company and PubCo. It gives effect to the Transactions as if they had been consummated on January 1, 2026. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM’s unaudited statement of operation for six-month period as of June 30, 2026\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n PubCo’s unaudited statement of operation for the period October 5, 2026 (inception) to October 6, 2026\n

\n The unaudited proforma condensed combined statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 combines the historical results of USFM, the Company and PubCo. It gives effect to the Transactions as if they had been consummated on January 1, 2025.\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM’s audited statement of operation for the year ended December 31, 2025\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n PubCo’s audited statement of operation for the period October 5, 2026 (inception) to October 6, 2026\n

\n 138\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n TWIN VEE HOLDCO INC. \n
\n UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET \n
\n AS OF JUNE 30, 2026 \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n PubCo \n \n (Historical)\n \n			\n \n Twin Vee \n \n (Historical) \n \n	\n \n USFM \n \n (Historical) \n \n			\n \n CVR \n \n restructuring \n \n adjustments \n \n			\n \n Merger \n \n and PIPE \n \n transaction \n \n adjustments \n \n			\n \n Pro Forma \n \n Combined \n \n
	\n \n (Audited) \n \n			\n \n (Unaudited) \n \n	\n \n (Unaudited) \n \n
	\n \n As of October 6, 2026 \n \n
\n ASSETS\n
\n Current Assets:\n
\n \n Cash and cash equivalents \n			10				3,721,284		$	5,346,131			(1,438,771)		\n \n A\n \n		(1,632,000)	\n \n D\n \n	$	2,952,314
													(1,582,513)		\n \n B\n \n		1,350,000	\n \n E\n \n
																	(2,811,827)	\n \n I\n \n
\n \n Restricted cash \n			—				208,143			—			(208,143)		\n \n A\n \n		—			—
\n \n Accounts receivable \n			—				243,147			—			(243,147)		\n \n A\n \n		—			—
\n \n Inventories, net \n			—				3,168,767			—			(3,168,767)		\n \n A\n \n		—			—
\n \n Prepaid expenses and other current assets \n			—				263,080			932,911			(263,080)		\n \n A\n \n		(862,166)	\n \n I\n \n		70,745
\n \n Note receivable, current portion \n			—				971,725			—			(971,725)		\n \n A\n \n		0			—
\n \n Receivable from subsidiary \n			—				—			—							1,713	\n \n C\n \n		1,713
\n \n Total current assets \n			10				8,576,146			6,279,042			(7,876,146)				(3,954,280)			3,024,772
\n \n Property and equipment, net \n			—				6,952,481			—			(6,952,481)		\n \n A\n \n		—			—
\n \n Operating lease right of use asset, net \n			—				2,519,284			—			(2,519,284)		\n \n A\n \n		—			—
\n \n Note receivable less current portion, net of discount \n			—				2,577,684			—			(2,577,684)		\n \n A\n \n		—			—
\n \n Security deposit \n			—				26,193			—			(26,193)		\n \n A\n \n		—			—
\n \n Deposit on investment \n			—				—			500,000			—			\n \n	\n — \n			500,000
\n \n Total Assets \n		$	10			$	20,651,788		$	6,779,042		$	(19,951,788)			$	(3,954,280)		$	3,524,772
\n Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity\n
\n Current Liabilities:\n
\n \n Due to parent \n			1,713				—			—			—				—			1,713
\n \n Note payable – related party \n			—				—			300,000			—				—			300,000
\n \n Accrued interest \n			—				—			7,521			—				—			7,521
\n \n Accounts payable \n			—				1,225,431			162,011			(1,225,431)		\n \n A\n \n		1,143,641	\n \n I\n \n		1,305,652
\n \n Accrued liabilities \n			—				1,411,806			—			(1,411,806)		\n \n A\n \n		—			—
\n \n Contract liabilities \n			—				525,800			—			(525,800)		\n \n A\n \n		—			—
\n \n Finance lease liabilities \n			—				17,445			—			(17,445)		\n \n A\n \n		—			—
\n \n Operating lease liabilities \n			—				453,498			—			(453,498)		\n \n A\n \n		—			—
\n \n Total current liabilities \n			1,713				3,633,980			469,532			(3,633,980)				1,143,641			1,614,886
\n \n Economic Injury Disaster Loan \n			—				499,900			—			(499,900)		\n \n A\n \n		—			—
\n \n Finance lease liabilities – noncurrent \n			—				13,504			—			(13,504)		\n \n A\n \n		—			—
\n \n Operating lease liabilities – noncurrent \n			—				2,098,848			—			(2,098,848)		\n \n A\n \n		—			—
\n \n Total Liabilities \n			1,713				6,246,232			469,532			(6,246,232)				1,143,641			1,614,886

\n 139\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

	\n \n PubCo \n \n (Historical)\n \n			\n \n Twin Vee \n \n (Historical) \n \n	\n \n USFM \n \n (Historical) \n \n			\n \n CVR \n \n restructuring \n \n adjustments \n \n			\n \n Merger \n \n and PIPE \n \n transaction \n \n adjustments \n \n			\n \n Pro Forma \n \n Combined \n \n
	\n \n (Audited) \n \n			\n \n (Unaudited) \n \n	\n \n (Unaudited) \n \n
	\n \n As of October 6, 2026 \n \n
\n Stockholders’ equity:\n
\n \n Preferred stock \n			—				—			—			—							—
\n \n common stock \n			10				571			8,265,263			(571)		\n \n A\n \n		1,350,000	\n \n E\n \n		15,687
													—				1,181	\n \n F\n \n
													—				14,506	\n \n G\n \n
													—				(9,615,273)	\n \n H\n \n
\n \n Subscription receivable \n			—				—			(33)			—				—			(33)
\n \n Additional paid-in capital \n			—				53,397,503			—			(53,397,503)		\n \n A\n \n		1,713	\n \n C\n \n		10,301,299
													700,000		\n \n A\n \n
																	(1,181)	\n \n F\n \n
																	(14,506)	\n \n G\n \n
																	9,615,273	\n \n H\n \n
\n \n Accumulated deficit \n			(1,713)				(38,992,518)			(1,955,720)			38,992,518		\n \n A\n \n		(4,817,634)	\n \n I\n \n		(8,407,067)
													(1,582,513)		\n \n B\n \n		(1,632,000)	\n \n D\n \n
													1,582,513		\n \n A\n \n
\n \n Total stockholders’ equity \n			(1,703)				14,405,556			6,309,510			(13,705,556)				(5,097,921)			1,909,886
\n \n Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity \n		$	10			$	20,651,788		$	6,779,042		$	(19,951,788)			$	(3,954,280)		$	3,524,772

\n 140\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n TWIN VEE HOLDCO INC. \n
\n UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS \n
\n FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2026 \n

	\n \n PubCo \n \n (Historical) \n \n			\n \n Twin Vee \n \n (Historical) \n \n	\n \n USFM \n \n (Historical) \n \n			\n \n CVR \n \n restructuring \n \n adjustments \n \n			\n \n Merger \n \n and PIPE \n \n transaction \n \n adjustments \n \n			\n \n Pro Forma \n \n Combined \n \n
	\n \n For the period \n \n from \n \n October 5, 2026 \n \n (inception) \n \n through \n \n October 6, 2026 \n \n
	\n \n (Audited) \n \n			\n \n (Unaudited) \n \n	\n \n (Unaudited) \n \n
\n \n Net sales \n		$	—			$	7,093,080		$	—		$	(7,093,080)		\n \n	\n J \n	$	—			$	—
\n \n Cost of products sold (excluding depreciation & amortization) \n			—				7,079,411			—			(7,079,411)		\n \n	\n J \n	\n \n	\n — \n				—
\n \n Gross profit \n			—				13,669			—			(13,669)					—				—
\n Operating expenses:\n
\n \n Formation cost \n			1,713				—			—			—					—				1,713
\n \n Exploration and project cost \n			—				—			1,715,264			—					4,817,634	\n \n	\n K \n		6,532,898
\n \n Consulting and management fees \n			—				—			194,184			—					—				194,184
\n \n Operating expenses \n			—				—			36,295			—									36,295
\n \n Selling, general and administrative \n			—				1,460,657			—			(1,460,657)		\n \n	\n J \n		—				—
\n \n Salaries and wages \n			—				1,708,483			—			(1,708,483)		\n \n	\n J \n	\n \n	\n — \n				—
\n \n Professional fees \n			—				376,043			—			(376,043)		\n \n	\n J \n		—				—
\n \n Impairment of property & equipment \n			—				699,711			—			(699,711)		\n \n	\n J \n		—				—
\n \n Depreciation and amortization \n			—				926,246			—			(926,246)		\n \n	\n J \n		—				—
\n \n Total operating expenses \n			1,713				5,171,140			1,945,743			(5,171,140)					4,817,634				6,765,090
\n \n Loss from operations \n			(1,713)				(5,157,471)			(1,945,743)			5,157,471					(4,817,634)				(6,765,090)
\n Other income expense:\n
\n \n Other expense \n			—				—			(2,345)			—									(2,345)
\n \n Interest expense \n			—				(19,875)			(7,521)			19,875		\n \n	\n J \n		—				(7,521)
\n \n Interest income \n			—				185,056			—			(185,056)		\n \n	\n J \n		—				—
\n \n Total other income \n			—				165,181			(9,866)			(165,181)					—				(9,866)
\n \n Loss before income tax \n			(1,713)				(4,992,290)			(1,955,609)			4,992,290					(4,817,634)				(6,774,956)
\n \n Income tax provision \n			—				—			—			—					—
\n \n Net loss \n			(1,713)				(4,992,290)			(1,955,609)			4,992,290					(4,817,634)				(6,774,956)
\n \n Basic and diluted loss per share of common \n \n stock \n		$	(1.71)			$	(12.85)		$	(12.91)												(0.43)
\n \n Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding \n			1,000				388,473			151,490												15,687,207

\n 141\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n TWIN VEE HOLDCO INC. \n
\n UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS \n
\n FOR THE YEAR ENDED December 31, 2025 \n

	\n \n PubCo \n \n (Historical) \n \n			\n \n Twin Vee \n \n (Historical) \n \n	\n \n USFM \n \n (Historical) \n \n			\n \n CVR \n \n restructuring \n \n adjustments \n \n			\n \n Merger \n \n and PIPE \n \n transaction \n \n adjustments \n \n	\n \n Pro Forma \n \n Combined \n \n
	\n \n For the period \n \n from \n \n October 5, 2026 \n \n (inception) \n \n through \n \n October 6, 2026 \n \n
	\n \n (Audited) \n \n			\n \n (Audited) \n \n	\n \n (Audited) \n \n
\n \n Net sales \n		$	—			$	14,819,130		$	—			$	(14,819,130)	\n \n	\n J \n	—	$	—
\n \n Cost of products sold (excluding depreciation \n \n & amortization) \n			—				13,562,025			—				(13,562,025)	\n \n	\n J \n	—		—
\n \n Gross profit \n			—				1,257,105			—				(1,257,105)			—		—
\n Operating expenses:\n
\n \n Formation cost \n			1,713				—			—				—			—		1,713
\n \n Exploration and project cost \n			—				—			—				—			—		—
\n \n Consulting and management fees \n			—				—			—				—			—		—
\n \n operating expenses \n			—				—			111				—					111
\n \n Selling, general and administrative \n			—				2,502,402			—				(2,502,402)	\n \n	\n J \n	—		—
\n \n Salaries and wages \n			—				4,325,348			—				(4,325,348)	\n \n	\n J \n	—		—
\n \n Professional fees \n			—				867,090			—				(867,090)	\n \n	\n J \n	—		—
\n \n Impairment of property & equipment \n			—				418,416			—				(418,416)	\n \n	\n J \n	—		—
\n \n Loss on lease termination \n			—				57,903			—				(57,903)	\n \n	\n J \n	—		—
\n \n Loss on sale of property & equipment \n			—				133,015			—				(133,015)	\n \n	\n J \n	—		—
\n \n Depreciation and amortization \n			—				1,734,230			—				(1,734,230)	\n \n	\n J \n	—		—
\n \n Total operating expenses \n			1,713				10,038,404			111				(10,038,404.0)			—		1,824
\n \n Loss from operations \n			(1,713)				(8,781,299)			(111)				8,781,299			—		(1,824)
\n Other income expense:\n
\n \n Other income (expense) \n			—				56,612			—				(56,612)	\n \n	\n J \n	—		—
\n \n Interest expense \n			—				(81,229)			—				81,229	\n \n	\n J \n	—		—
\n \n Interest income \n			—				198,643			—				(198,643)	\n \n	\n J \n	—		—
\n \n Total other income \n			—				174,026			—				(174,026)			—		—
\n \n Loss before income tax \n			(1,713)				(8,607,273)			(111)				8,607,273			—		(1,824)
\n \n Income tax provision \n			—				—			—				—			—
\n \n Net loss \n			(1,713)				(8,607,273)			(111)				8,607,273			—		(1,824)
\n \n Basic and diluted loss per share of common stock \n		$	(1.71)			$	(4.37)		$	(0.01)								$	(0.00)
\n \n Weighted average number of shares of common \n \n stock outstanding \n			1,000				1,968,121			21,970									52,295,787

\n 142\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Note 1 — Description of the Business Combination Transactions \n

\n On July 12, 2026, Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with USFM. The agreement was amended and restated on October 7, 2026 (as amended and restated, the “Merger Agreement”). The other parties are Twin Vee Holdco Inc., a Texas corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Pubco”), and two wholly owned subsidiaries of Pubco, Twin Vee Merger Sub Inc. (“Merger Sub I”) and USFM Merger Sub In. (“Merger Sub II”). The Merger Agreement provides for the following transactions (collectively, the “Transactions”). \n

\n Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring. Before closing, the Company will contribute all of its assets and liabilities (the “Company Assets and Liabilities”) to a newly formed subsidiary (“Assetco”). It will then contribute the Assetco shares to a Delaware statutory trust (the “CVR Trust”) in exchange for contingent value rights (“CVRs”). Excluded from the contribution are: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n $700,000 of cash; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n any liabilities in connection with the legal proceeding Youseph, et al. v. Visconti, et al., Case No. 2025-026 (the “Delaware Matter”). \n

\n The Company will distribute the CVRs pro rata to its stockholders of record as a special distribution. Each CVR entitles its holder to future distributions from the CVR Trust generated by the Company’s recreational marine business (the “Marine Business”). After the distribution, neither the Company nor Pubco will hold any interest in the CVR Trust or Assetco. \n

\n The Mergers. Merger Sub I will merge with and into the Company (the “First Merger”), and Merger Sub II will merge with and into USFM (the “Second Merger” and, together with the First Merger, the “Mergers”). The Company and USFM will each survive as wholly owned subsidiaries of PubCo. At closing Pubco is expected to be renamed as USFM Corporation. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Company holders. Each share of Company common stock outstanding immediately before the First Merger converts into Pubco common stock ( “PubCo Common Stock”) at the exchange ratio of approximately two for 1, determined as described in the Merger Agreement. This includes shares issued on the acceleration and settlement of Company restricted stock units and options. Company warrants will be converted into Pubco warrants (“PubCo Warrant”). In total, former Company securityholders will hold 7% of fully diluted Pubco Common Stock, or [1,180,758] PubCo Common Stock and [15,452] PubCo Warrants. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM holders. Each share of USFM common stock, including shares issued in the PIPE Investment (defined below), converts into PubCo Common Stock. The outstanding warrant held by FG Merchant Partners, LP (the “FG Warrant” and the PIPE Warrants (defined below), are exchanged for PubCo Warrants at an exchange ratio of approximately [60.72]. In total, former USFM securityholders will hold 93% of fully diluted Pubco Common Stock, or [14,506,449] PubCo Common Stock and [1,386,055] PubCo Warrants. \n

\n PIPE Investment. Pursuant to securities purchase agreements entered into in connection with the Merger Agreement USFM will issue up to approximately 20,833 shares of USFM common stock (“PIPE Shares)” at $240 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of up to approximately $5,000,000 (the “PIPE Investment”). Investors will also receive warrants to purchase approximately 41,667 shares of USFM common stock at an exercise price of $280 per share (the “PIPE Warrants” and collectively with the FG Warrant, the “USFM Warrants”). The PIPE Investment will be funded in installments before closing. The pro forma financial information accounts for [$1,350,000] PIPE Investments committed as of the date of joint proxy/prospectus filing which includes 5,624 PIPE Shares and [11,248] PIPE Warrants.

\n 143\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Post-closing ownership. Upon consummation of the Transactions, PubCo’s capitalization is expected to be as follows (fully diluted basis): \n

\n \n Holders \n \n	\n \n Shares of\n \n PubCo\n \n common stock \n \n		\n \n Warrants \n \n of PubCo \n \n	\n \n Fully\n \n diluted total \n \n		\n \n Ownership \n \n % \n \n
\n \n USFM stockholders (including, USFM Warrants, PIPE \n \n shares and PIPE Warrants) \n		14,506,449			1,386,055		15,892,504	93%
\n \n Company stockholders (including settled RSUs and options) \n		1,180,758			15,452		1,196,210	7%
\n \n Total \n		15,687,207			1,401,507		17,088,714	100%

\n Termination provision \n

\n The Merger Agreement may be terminated before closing under specified circumstances, including by mutual consent, a final order prohibiting the Transactions, failure to obtain the required stockholder approvals, an uncured material breach, or failure to close by December 31, 2026. USFM must pay the Company a termination fee of $500,000 if the Company terminates because USFM’s shareholder approval is not obtained, because of an uncured breach by USFM, or because the end date passes solely due to USFM’s actions or inactions. The Company must pay USFM a termination fee of $800,000 if USFM terminates because (i) the Company fails to recommend against a tender or exchange offer within ten business days, fails to reaffirm its recommendation within ten business days after an Acquisition Proposal is announced, or willfully or materially breaches its exclusivity obligations; (ii) a Company Triggering Event occurs as defined in the Merger Agreement; or (iii) USFM determines that the Company will likely fail to resolve the Reincorporation Matter before December 31, 2026 or in a manner satisfactory to USFM. The unaudited proform condensed combined financial information assumes the Transactions are consummated and does not reflect any termination fee. \n

\n Note 2 — Accounting for the Transactions. \n

\n The Mergers will be accounted for as a reverse recapitalization in accordance with GAAP. PubCo. is a newly formed entity that does not meet the criteria to be the accounting acquirer under ASC 805-10-55-15. USFM has been determined to be the accounting acquirer based on the following factors: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n former USFM securityholders will hold 93% of PubCo on a fully diluted basis, and Company securityholders 7%; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM will designate all five members of the PubCo board of directors; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM’s senior management will comprise the senior management of Pubco, and all Company directors and officers will resign at closing; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM’s operations will constitute the only ongoing operations of PubCo. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the Company’s net assets are stated at historical cost, with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM is the predecessor, and its historical financial statements will become the historical financial statements of PubCo; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n USFM’s equity will be retroactively restated to reflect the number of PubCo shares received by USFM stockholders. \n

\n 144\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n recorded at carrying amount as a non-reciprocal, pro rata distribution to the Company’s stockholders under ASC 505-60 and ASC 845-10-30-10, with no gain or loss recognized. PubCo has no obligation to make any payment in respect of the CVRs and holds no interest in the CVR Trust. Accordingly, no CVR liability is reflected in the pro forma financial information. \n

\n PIPE Investment assumption. The pro forma financial information accounts for only the committed PIPE Investments as of the date of joint proxy/prospectus filing which includes [5,624] PIPE Shares and [11,248] PIPE Warrants. \n

\n Limitations. \n

\n The pro forma financial information: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n is presented for illustrative purposes only; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n is not necessarily indicative of the financial position or results of operations that would have been achieved had the Transactions occurred on the dates indicated; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n does not purport to project the future financial position or operating results of PubCo. \n

\n The proform adjustments are based on currently available information and on assumptions that management believes are reasonable. Actual results may differ materially. The pro-form financial information should be read together with the historical financial statements and related notes of USFM, the Company and PubCo included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus.\n

\n Note 3 — Adjustments to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2026 \n

\n A.\n
\n

\n \n Represents the contribution of Company’s assets and liabilities to the CVR Trust in exchange for contingent value rights (“CVRs”) and the distribution of the CVRs to the Company’s stockholders, excluding $700,000 of cash and any liabilities in connection with the Delaware Matter, pursuant to the Merger Agreement. \n

\n B.\n
\n

\n \n Represents the payment of Company transaction costs. \n

\n C.\n
\n

\n \n Represents the adjustment to show the formation cost of PubCo paid by the Company. \n

\n D.\n
\n

\n \n Represents the payment of USFM transaction costs. \n

\n E.\n
\n

\n \n Represents the [$1,350,000] out of up to $5,000,000 PIPE raise by USFM prior to merger closing. [$1,350,000] represents the amount committed thus far. It includes [5,624] PIPE common shares (no par value) issued at $240 per shares and [11,248] PIPE warrants. \n

\n F.\n
\n

\n \n Represents the issuance of [1,180,758] common share, par value $0.01 per common share of PubCo in exchange for all outstanding common shares and RSUs and Options) of the Company prior to the merge at an exchange ratio of two for 1. The exchange is such that the Company shareholder owns 7% of total outstanding shares of the PubCo at Merger closing. \n

\n G.\n
\n

\n \n Represents the issuance of [ 14,506,449] common share, par value $0.01 per common share of PubCo in exchange for the total outstanding common shares of USFM prior to merger at and exchange ratio of approximately 60.72. The exchange is such that the USFM shareholder owns 93% of the PubCo total outstanding common shares at Merger closing. \n

\n H.\n
\n

\n \n Represents the reclassification of pre-merger common share amount reporter by USFM into additional paid in capital \n

\n I.\n
\n

\n \n Represents the expenses paid by USFM since July 1, 2026 and amortization of prepaid expenses till the Merger closing. \n

\n 145\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Note 4 — Adjustments and Reclassifications to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and for the year ended December 31, 2025 \n

\n J.\n
\n

\n \n Reflects the elimination of Company revenue and expenses giving the effect that the Merger was completed as of January 1, 2026 and January 1, 2025 respectively. \n

\n K.\n
\n

\n \n Reflects the estimated expenses USFM incurred from July 1, 2026 till the Merger closing. \n

\n Note 5 — Net loss per share \n

\n Represents the earnings per share calculated using the historical weighted average shares outstanding, and the issuance of additional shares in connection with the Business Combination, assuming the shares were outstanding since January 1, 2026. As the Business Combination is being reflected as if it had occurred at the beginning of the period presented, the calculation of weighted average shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share assumes that the shares issued in connection with the Business Combination have been outstanding for the entire period presented. \n

\n \n Holders \n \n	\n \n Shares of\n \n PubCo\n \n common stock \n \n		\n \n Warrants of\n \n PubCo \n \n	\n \n Fully\n \n diluted total \n \n		\n \n Ownership \n \n % \n \n
\n \n Former USFM stockholders (including PIPE shares and PIPE Warrants) \n		14,506,449			1,386,055		15,892,504	93%
\n \n Former Company stockholders (including settled RSUs \n \n and options) \n		1,180,758			15,452		1,196,210	7%
\n \n Total \n		15,687,207			1,401,507		17,088,714	100%

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Proforma net loss \n	$	(6,774,956)
\n \n Proforma weighted PubCo common shares outstanding – basic and diluted \n		15,687,207
\n \n Net loss per share – basic and diluted \n	$	(0.43)

\n 146\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n THE BUSINESS OF USFM CORPORATION \n

\n Overview \n

\n USFM Corporation is a private, US-based mineral exploration and investment company based in Golden, Colorado, and was established to focus on advancing drilling to develop world class tier-1 assets and develop a Western-backed pipeline of magmatic Ni-Cu-Co-PGE resources. \n

\n The Disko-Nuussuaq Project comprises six mineral exploration licenses covering approximately 3,015 km2 on Disko Island and the Nuussuaq Peninsula in west-central Greenland. The licenses are held by Nikkeli Greenland A/S, a wholly owned subsidiary of 80 Mile PLC. Under a definitive share purchase agreement signed in May 2026, USFM may earn a 51% interest in the Project through exploration expenditures of up to US$30 million over three years, while 80 Mile PLC remains project operator and retains a 49% interest. The Project is located approximately 150 km northwest of the town of Ilulissat and is accessible by fixed-wing aircraft, helicopter, and seasonal maritime transport. \n

\n The Project lies within the Palaeogene West Greenland Flood basalt Province, part of the North Atlantic Igneous Province. Exploration is focused on magmatic Ni-Cu-Co-PGE sulphide mineralization associated with mantle-derived picritic magmas emplaced through feeder conduits, dykes, sills and intrusive complexes within the Cretaceous Nuussuaq sedimentary basin. \n

\n The exploration model is based on geological similarities with globally significant magmatic sulphide districts, particularly the Norilsk-Talnakh district in Russia. The two projects share key geological characteristics such as primitive metal-rich magmas, evidence of crustal contamination by sulphide-rich and carbonaceous sediments, major crustal scale corridors, and occurrences of nickel-bearing intrusions. Recent geochemical studies identified surface anomalies displaying indications of the existence of prospective systems, including elevated Ni-Cu-PGE signatures, indications of sulphide saturation and metal transport. \n

\n Exploration within the district has been undertaken intermittently since the late 19th century and includes modern exploration activities conducted for both hydrocarbon and metals exploration. These activities include mapping, surface geochemical sampling, multiple phases of airborne and ground geophysical surveys, as well as seismic and gravity modelling. To date, several early-stage targets have been identified with only limited preliminary follow-up drill testing. Historical drilling successfully intersected anomalous intrusive bodies but has not identified economic concentrations of Ni-Cu-Co-PGE sulphide mineralization. Recent exploration has worked to advance the understanding of the project through the acquisition of high-quality geophysical data, and application of modern re-processing techniques. This has resulted in delineation of targets which are planned for drill testing in the 2026 field season. \n

\n USFM considers the Disko-Nuussuaq Project to represent a geologically compelling and underexplored magmatic sulphide exploration opportunity. The Project contains many of the geological, geochemical, structural and geophysical characteristics associated with major conduit-hosted Ni-Cu-Co-PGE sulphide systems elsewhere in the world. \n

\n The Project remains at an early exploration stage with multiple prospective targets warranting drill testing with much ground that remains under- or unexplored. Historical exploration has demonstrated strong indications of the presence of a fertile magmatic system that has not been adequately tested. Several robust drill targets exist at Qullissat, the Aaffarsuaq Valley and the Kuugannguaq structural corridor, and in western Nuussuaq. \n

\n At the time of this report there is insufficient information to support the estimation of Mineral resources under the SEC Regulation S-K 1300. However, the absence of economic mineralization identified reflects the limited extent of deep drilling, rather than a lack of mineral potential. \n

\n During the 2026 field season, USFM funded a diamond drilling program across the Disko-Nuussuaq Project as part of its earn-in commitment. The program tested priority targets across Disko Island and the \n

\n 147\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Nuussuaq Peninsula and represents an important step in evaluating the mineral potential of the Project. Information generated from the program is being integrated with the existing geological, geochemical and geophysical datasets to guide follow-up work and future exploration. \n

\n History of the Project \n

\n The area has been explored since the late 1800s, and early exploration activities are well summarized in Larsen and Pedersen1 (2009). Various onshore and offshore surveys were undertaken following this during several phases of hydrocarbon exploration dating from the 1980s to modern times. \n

\n In September 2016, the project was purchased by Bluejay Mining (then FinnAust Mining), from Cairn Energy and Bluejay carried out exploration under its wholly-owned subsidiary, Disko Exploration Ltd. Licenses were also acquired from Coastal Ventures A/S in 2017. \n

\n In August 2021, Bluejay entered into a joint venture agreement with KoBold Metals through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Disko Exploration Ltd. Under the terms of the agreement, KoBold could earn 51% operating interest through a $15 million investment in exploration. \n

\n In February 2022, Bluejay formally incorporated Nikkeli Greenland A/S as the Greenlandic operating entity and legal holder of the exploration licenses. Furthermore, Bluejay rebranded as 80 Mile PLC in July 2024. \n

\n During the Joint Venture with KoBold, roughly $13.4 million was spent on geophysical surveys, data processing, artificial intelligence and exploration tools but exploration failed to progress to drilling. In May 2025, the agreement was terminated early, returning full project interests to 80 Mile PLC while KoBold went on to focus on copper assets in Zambia. Under the terms of this agreement, KoBold retains a net smelter return royalty on future production. \n

\n After regaining full control, 80 Mile PLC restructured its asset ownership to fund further exploration and entered a joint venture agreement with USFM Corporation in late 2025. Under the terms of the agreement, USFM commits to raise US$30 million to earn a 51% interest in the project while 80 Mile maintains operator status and a 49% free-carried stake. Under the terms of the agreement, USFM bears 100% of site restoration and rehabilitation costs. \n

\n 80 Mile Plc is an exploration and development company listed on the London AIM, Frankfurt and US OTC stock markets. The company holds a portfolio of nickel, copper, cobalt and PGM projects across Greenland, Finland, and Italy. 80 Mile wholly owns local subsidiary Nikkeli Greenland A/S. \n

\n During the dissolution of the 80 Mile — Kobold joint venture in 2025, KoBold has retained a net smelter return royalty on future production however the details of this are unknown. \n

\n Mineral Tenure \n

\n Between 2011 and 2022, 80 Mile acquired mineral exploration licenses under its Greenlandic-based, wholly-owned subsidiary Nikkeli Greenland A/S to explore for Ni-Cu-PGE-Au deposits in West Greenland. There are six licenses, totaling a combined area of 3,015 square kilometers (approximately 1,164 square miles). Three of the licenses comprise two separate areas. \n

\n Mineral exploration licenses are issued for a period of five years and are renewable up to a total duration of 22 years. The project license areas will be renewable until the earliest reaches expiry in 2036, posing little risk to exploration activity. \n

\n Permits and Authorizations \n

\n The Ministry of Mineral Resources (“MMR”) is responsible for mineral resources policy and the administration of mineral exploration and mining activities in Greenland. \n

\n 1\n
\n

\n \n Dam, G., Pedersen, G.K., Sønderholm, M., Midtgaard, H.H., Larsen, L.M., Nøhr-Hansen, H. and Pedersen, A.K. (2009) Lithostratigraphy of the Cretaceous-Paleocene Nuussuaq Group, Nuussuaq Basin, West Greenland. Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin 19. Copenhagen: Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland.\n

\n 148\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Prospecting, exploration and mining licenses are administered by the Mineral License and Safety Authority (“MLSA”), which sits within the MMR. The MLSA is also responsible for technical and safety oversight and may conduct inspections of activities carried out under mineral licenses. \n

\n There is no private ownership of land in Greenland, and rights to use land are administered by the Government of Greenland. Mineral rights are similarly administered by the Government of Greenland under the Mining Act. \n

\n Exploration license holders are required to obtain approval for applicable field activities and to submit reports and associated geological, geochemical, geophysical and other exploration data in accordance with the terms of their licenses and applicable regulations. \n

\n Environmental Considerations \n

\n Environmental matters related to mining and mineral exploration are administered by the Environmental Agency for the Mineral Resources Area (“EAMRA”). The body sits with the Ministry for Environment and Nature and monitors activities related to environmental liability and environmental impact assessments. \n

\n Mining Rights in Greenland \n

\n Mineral resources in Greenland are administered by the Government of Greenland. There is no private ownership of land in Greenland, and rights to use land and explore for and exploit mineral resources are granted by the Government. \n

\n Since January 1, 2024, mineral exploration and exploitation activities in Greenland have principally been governed by the Greenland Parliament Act on Mineral Activities (the “Mining Act”). The Mining Act establishes the framework for the granting and administration of mineral licenses and regulates matters including exploration, exploitation, safety, environmental protection and social sustainability. \n

\n Commercial mineral licenses include prospecting licenses, exploration licenses, special exploration licenses and exploitation licenses. Exploration licenses grant exclusive exploration rights over defined areas, are generally granted for an initial five-year period and may be renewed up to a total period of twenty-two years. \n

\n Exploration and prospecting licenses are also subject to applicable license terms, including the Government of Greenland’s Application Procedures and Standard Terms for Mineral Exploration and Prospecting Licenses and subsequent addenda, as well as the specific terms of each license. \n

\n Greenland prohibits the prospecting, exploration and exploitation of uranium as a target mineral. Exploration and exploitation of other mineral resources is also restricted where the average uranium content of the total mineral resource is 100 ppm by weight or greater. \n

\n Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure And Physiography. \n

\n The Disko-Nuussuaq Project is on the central west coast of Greenland, within the administrative regions of Qeqertalik and Avannaata. It comprises ten areas held under six mineral exploration licenses, (MEL 2018-16; MEL 2012-29; MEL 2020-10; MEL 2024-30; MEL 2017-01, MEL 2019-116) on both Disko Island and the Nuussuaq Peninsula. \n

\n Regional Access \n

\n International access to West Greenland is typically via scheduled commercial flights to Nuuk or Ilulissat. From these hubs, fixed-wing domestic flights connect to Qaarsut (70 km northeast) or Aasiaat (170 km south) airports, depending on service schedule. \n

\n Access by boat via the Vaigat Strait is permissible for nine months of the year and requires an ice-strengthened vessel. There is a ferry to Disko Island which operates during summer requiring advance booking, and Air Greenland operates commercial helicopter flights between Ilulissat/Aasiaat and Qeqertarsuaq on the south side of the island. \n

\n 149\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Local Access \n

\n Local access to the license areas is by Air Greenland helicopter from various heliports in the vicinity including Qaarsut, Uummannaq (75 km northeast), Sarqaq (70 km east), Qeqertarsuaq (100 km south) and Ilulissat (120 km southeast). There are no roads to or within the project area. \n

\n Inside the license areas, movement is constrained due to the absence of developed tracks/roads and by severe topography. \n

\n Climate \n

\n The Project lies in an Arctic maritime climate typical of west Greenland. An ice cap climate is present in the center of Disko Island. Winters are long and cold, with mean monthly temperatures well below 0 °C and minimum temperatures commonly falling below -20 °C. Summers are short and cool; average temperatures in July can reach over 5°C. Climate data are available for the regional hub Ilulissat. \n

\n Precipitation occurs throughout the year, mostly falling as snow from late autumn through to spring, while rain and mixed precipitation are more common during the summer months. Fog, low cloud and blowing snow are frequent, and these conditions can significantly affect both aviation and marine operations. The area is sea ice free for 9 months of the year, with sea ice being more common in late winter and early spring, which may restrict marine access. \n

\n Daylight conditions are highly seasonal, ranging from very short days in mid-winter to continuous daylight in mid-summer, and this must be taken into account in planning and scheduling exploration activities. \n

\n Local Resources and Infrastructure \n

\n There is little infrastructure available to the project and all materials need to be transported in. The abandoned town of Qullissat on the northeast coast of Disko Island is the site of 80 Mile’s exploration camp during field campaigns, and remote field work is often either helicopter-based or uses short-term fly camps. \n

\n Settlements and Workforce \n

\n The nearest population and service centers are coastal towns and settlements along the west coast of Greenland, particularly Qeqertarsuaq (on Disko Island itself; pop. 800), Ilulissat (pop. 5,150), and Uummannaq (pop. 1,380), which can provide local labor, boat services and limited supplies. There are no permanent settlements within any of the license areas. The history of coal mining in the area has left several previous settlements, particularly at Qullissat, on the island. \n

\n Goods and provisions can be sourced from the main towns Ilulissat, Aasiaat, and Uummannaq. Technical supplies require import via air or sea, and container vessels can dock these towns. These towns include shops, guesthouses, and small hospitals/health clinics. \n

\n Power and Water \n

\n There is no grid power in the area. Exploration at this stage requires off-grid power sources, likely diesel generators. \n

\n Water for the area and drilling would likely be obtained from local stream sources, snow melt and ice cap runoff within the license areas, subject to appropriate treatment and permitting. \n

\n Physiography \n

\n The physiography of Disko Island and the Nuussuaq Peninsula comprises basalt plateaus incised by U-shaped glacial valleys, fjords and narrow coastal plains. Peaks rise to over 1,500 m and remain covered by snow, ice and glaciers throughout the year. \n

\n 150\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n There has been no systematic mapping of the permafrost or permafrost-related terrain features in this part of West Greenland, although Disko Island has been placed in a zone of continuous permafrost as supported by the open system pingos and numerous rock glaciers. \n

\n Exploration History \n

\n Modern mineral exploration at Disko-Nuussuaq began in the 1980s, building on more than a century of geological investigation in the region. Successive exploration programs have progressively developed the geological model and generated an extensive geological, geochemical and geophysical dataset. \n

\n Cominco conducted regional exploration between 1985 and 1990 and recognized the geological similarities between Disko-Nuussuaq and the Norilsk-Talnakh nickel-copper sulfide district. Falconbridge and Platinova subsequently undertook extensive exploration between 1991 and 1998, focused on volcanic stratigraphy and exposed intrusive systems. This work included detailed geophysical surveys and 17 shallow drill holes. While the program significantly advanced understanding of the geology, a number of drill holes encountered technical difficulties and the deeper exploration model remained largely untested. \n

\n Exploration by Vismand between 2003 and 2007 focused increasingly on deeper targets associated with major fault and volcanic feeder systems. Titan24 geophysical surveys were used to define targets and three holes were subsequently drilled; however, technical drilling difficulties prevented the intended target depths from being reached. Avannaa Resources, with funding from Cairn Energy, continued exploration between 2012 and 2015, undertaking ZTEM and vibroseismic surveys and reprocessing earlier geophysical datasets to further refine the geological and targeting model. \n

\n Since acquiring the Project, 80 Mile has undertaken a systematic reassessment and reprocessing of the historical dataset together with new geological mapping, geochemical sampling and geophysical surveys. This work was substantially expanded during the 2022 exploration program, which included airborne gravity, electromagnetic and magnetic surveys together with geological mapping and extensive surface geochemical sampling. The combined historical and modern datasets have resulted in the identification and refinement of multiple exploration targets across Disko Island and the Nuussuaq Peninsula. \n

\n USFM believes that historical exploration on Disko Island and the Nuussuaq Peninsula has been of value in increasing the geological understanding of this area and generated targets that are worth further investigation. Although none of the work identified direct evidence of magmatic nickel sulphide mineralization, USFM believes this is not a reflection of the area’s prospectivity; many targets were not tested properly due to a high rate of drillhole abandonment related to difficult ground conditions, loss of equipment in the holes, and the presence of over-pressured gas-cut water impacting the circulating drill fluids. Approximately 60% of all drillholes were either abandoned or terminated before the target depth. \n

\n In 2026, USFM funded a diamond drilling program to test priority geological and geophysical targets across the Project. Data generated from the program are being incorporated into the broader Project dataset to further refine the geological model and guide future exploration. \n

\n Disko Share Purchase Agreement \n

\n On May 8, 2026, USFM executed a definitive share purchase agreement (the “Disko SPA”) with 80 Mile PLC and Disko Exploration Limited (a wholly-owned subsidiary of 80 Mile). Under the Disko SPA, USFM will acquire 51% of the issued share capital of Nikkeli Project Company Ltd (a Cayman Islands entity that indirectly holds six mineral exploration licenses in the Disko Nuussuaq Basin of Greenland through a Greenland subsidiary) in exchange for: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n A funding commitment of $30,000,000 over a three-year period ($7,500,000 in Year 1, $12,500,000 in Year 2, and $10,000,000 in Year 3) toward the exploration and development of the licenses, which cover approximately 3,015 square kilometers; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n A cash payment of $500,000 to 80 Mile ($250,000 within ten business days of execution and $250,000 within two months); and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n A 10% management fee payable to 80 Mile as operator of the project, which is applied as a deduction from the funding commitment. \n

\n 151\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n The Disko SPA is subject to certain conditions precedent, including government consents from the Government of Greenland. 80 Mile is appointed as technical and operational manager of the Project during the three-year funding commitment period. USFM’s chair will hold a casting vote on the boards of both Nikkeli Project Company and Nikkeli Greenland A/S. Additionally, 80 Mile has the right to appoint two directors to the USFM board until USFM becomes a public company, with such 80 Mile-appointed directors required for quorum. The long stop date for closing is four months from execution of the Disko SPA. If USFM defaults on its funding commitment and the default is not cured within twenty business days, it must transfer an 11% interest in Nikkeli Project Company back to Disko Exploration Limited, reducing USFM’s interest from 51% to 40%. USFM’s interest cannot fall below 40% under any circumstances. \n

\n Vessel Charter Contract \n

\n On March 18, 2026, USFM entered into a charter contract with KJ Greenland Construction A/S for the use of the vessel KJ Endeavour and a 600-tonne barge to provide maritime mobilization, transport, standby, and demobilization services in support of the Greenland field program. The charter period runs from June 19, 2026 through September 20, 2026, with a minimum of 7.5 chargeable days. The contract provides for a non-refundable deposit of DKK 430,000 payable on signing, with the balance payable within 14 days of a concluding invoice following completion of the charter. The contract is governed by Greenlandic law. \n

\n USFM may be subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. As of June 30, 2026, there were no pending or threatened legal proceedings against USFM. \n

\n Technical Report Summary \n

\n On April 28, 2026, USFM engaged SRK Exploration Limited (“SRK EX”), a Cardiff, United Kingdom-based independent mineral exploration consultancy, to prepare a Technical Report Summary (“TRS”) for the Project. The TRS is to be prepared in accordance with SEC Regulation S-K 1300 for potential use in connection with a listing on a U.S. securities exchange. The mineral licenses covering the project are held by Nikkeli Greenland A/S which is a wholly owned subsidiary of 80 Mile PLC, which owns and operates the Project. USFM agreed to a target price of GBP 60,600 for the commission. The engagement was accepted by USFM on May 12, 2026 and the TRS was delivered to USFM on June 30, 2026.\n

\n 152\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF USFM \n

\n The following discussion and analysis should be read together with USFM’s audited financial statements for the period from October 27, 2025 (inception) through December 31, 2025, its unaudited interim financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, and the related notes included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially because of the factors described under “Risk Factors” and “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” \n

\n Overview \n

\n USFM Corporation (“USFM,” “we,” “our” or “us”) is an exploration-stage mineral company incorporated in Colorado on October 27, 2025. We were formed to participate in the exploration and development of mineral concessions in the Disko-Nuussuaq region of Greenland, an area with copper, nickel, platinum group element and cobalt occurrences. \n

\n On May 8, 2026, we signed a share purchase agreement (the “Disko SPA”) with 80 Mile PLC (“80 Mile”) and its wholly owned subsidiary Disko Exploration Limited (“Disko Exploration”) to acquire 51% of Nikkeli Project Company Ltd (“Nikkeli Project Company”) in exchange for a commitment to fund $30,000,000 of project costs over three years and a $500,000 cash payment to 80 Mile. Nikkeli Project Company indirectly holds six mineral exploration licences covering approximately 3,015 square kilometres in the Disko-Nuussuaq Basin through a Greenland subsidiary. Closing is conditioned on consents from the Government of Greenland. Our application is under review, and we expect the Disko SPA to close by the end of 2026. \n

\n We have not generated revenue and do not expect to for the foreseeable future. No mineral reserves or resources have been established on the project. Our activities to date have consisted of raising capital, negotiating the Disko SPA, and funding the 2026 field program, which began during the three months ended June 30, 2026. Drilling commenced on July 1, 2026 with two diamond drill rigs from Forage Fusion Drilling. 80 Mile is the technical and operational manager of the project during the three-year funding commitment period. \n

\n SRK Exploration Limited (“SRK”) prepared a technical report summary on the project under Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K, effective June 30, 2026. SRK classifies the project as an early-stage exploration property with no mineral resources or mineral reserves. Exploration in the district dates to the late 1800s; historical drilling was largely shallow and did not identify economic concentrations of nickel-copper-cobalt-PGE sulphide mineralization. SRK identified drill targets in five areas: Qullissat, Kuugannguaq North, Kuugannguaq Southeast, the Aaffarsuaq Valley and the Nuussuaq Peninsula. \n

\n Basis of Presentation \n

\n Because we were incorporated on October 27, 2025, there is no comparable prior-year period. This discussion covers the period from October 27, 2025 (inception) through December 31, 2025, a period of about two months with minimal activity, and the three and six months ended June 30, 2026. Most of our spending to date occurred in the three months ended June 30, 2026. The periods are not of equal length, and the inception period is not a meaningful basis for comparison. \n

\n Recent Developments \n

\n Disko Share Purchase Agreement \n

\n Under the Disko SPA we will acquire 51% of Nikkeli Project Company at closing, with Disko Exploration holding the remaining 49%. The consideration is: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n a commitment to fund $30,000,000 of project costs over three years: $7,500,000 in Funding Year 1, $12,500,000 in Funding Year 2 and $10,000,000 in Funding Year 3. Funding Year 1 began November 1, 2025 and ends October 31, 2026; \n

\n 153\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n a cash payment of $500,000 to 80 Mile, paid in two $250,000 installments, both paid as of June 30, 2026; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n a management fee to 80 Mile, as operator, equal to 10% of the costs it incurs on the project, which counts toward the funding commitment. \n

\n If we fail to pay any amount of the funding commitment, the unpaid amount accrues interest at 5% per year. If we do not cure the default within 20 business days after 80 Mile delivers a default notice, we must transfer an 11% interest in Nikkeli Project Company to Disko Exploration, reducing our interest to 40%. Our interest cannot fall below 40% under the agreement. \n

\n 2026 Field Program \n

\n The 2026 exploration program at the Disko — Nuussuaq Project commenced during the three months ended June 30, 2026, with the mobilization of drilling equipment, personnel and associated supplies to Disko Island. Diamond drilling commenced on July 1, 2026, utilizing two drill rigs, with exploration activities conducted across the Qullissat, Aaffarsuaq Valley, Kuugannguaq, Igdlukunguaq and western Nuussuaq target areas on Disko Island and the Nuussuaq Peninsula. \n

\n The 2026 drilling program has concluded, with a total of ten diamond drill holes completed, totaling 3,926 meters. Demobilization activities have been substantially completed, with the exception of the two Forage Fusion drill rigs, which will remain on site in preparation for the planned 2027 drilling program. Core samples collected during the program are currently in transit to ALS laboratories, with delivery anticipated within approximately two weeks of the filing date. Analytical results are expected within four to six weeks following receipt of the samples by the laboratory. \n

\n The drilling program was undertaken with technical support from SRK. Follow-up drilling is planned for the 2027 field season, with the scope and selection of targets to be informed by the analytical results and geological interpretation of the 2026 drilling program. The 2027 exploration program and associated budget remain subject to further technical evaluation and the funding arrangements established under the Disko SPA. \n

\n Equity Financings \n

\n During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we issued 183,252 shares of common stock for $8,265,113, of which $8,265,080 was received in cash by June 30, 2026 and $33 was a subscription receivable. \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Period\n \n	\n \n Shares issued\n \n		\n \n Consideration\n \n
\n \n Three months ended March 31, 2026 \n		130,000		$	1,050,080
\n \n Three months ended June 30, 2026 \n		53,252			7,215,033
\n \n Six months ended June 30, 2026 \n		183,252		$	8,265,113

\n Issuances in the three months ended March 31, 2026 consisted principally of a $1,000,000 round closed March 19, 2026. The second-quarter issuances consisted principally of a round of $7,215,000 that closed in tranches between May 12 and June 5, 2026. Our director received 50,000 shares in 2025. \n

\n FG Nexus Promissory Note \n

\n On May 1, 2026 we issued a $300,000 promissory note to FG Nexus Inc. (“FG Nexus”), which together with an affiliate held approximately 6.2% of our common stock at June 30, 2026. The note bears simple interest at 15% per year. The full balance becomes due at the earlier of the closing of our next priced equity financing or November 1, 2026. The minimum cash repayment is $330,000. At the next priced equity financing we must also issue FG Nexus shares with a value of $300,000 at that round’s price, in addition to the cash repayment. We recorded interest expense of $7,521 on the note through June 30, 2026. \n

\n Warrants Issued to FG Merchant Partners, LP \n

\n On July 7, 2026, we issued to FG Merchant Partners, LP, for $23.15, warrants to purchase 11,576 shares of common stock at $128.62 per share. The warrants become exercisable 30 days after we complete a \n

\n 154\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n business combination, subject to an effective registration statement for the underlying shares, and expire ten years after the business combination. Full exercise would provide gross proceeds of approximately $1,488,905. \n

\n Proposed Business Combination with Twin Vee PowerCats Co. \n

\n On July 12, 2026, we entered into a merger agreement with Twin Vee PowerCats Co. (“Twin Vee”). On October 7, 2026, the parties entered into an amended and restated merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”). Under the Merger Agreement, Twin Vee Holdco Inc. (“Pubco”) will own USFM and Twin Vee as separate wholly owned subsidiaries. Pre-closing USFM stockholders will own 93% of Pubco and pre-closing Twin Vee stockholders will own 7%. Before closing, Twin Vee will transfer its marine business to a contingent value rights trust for its pre-closing stockholders. Under the Merger Agreement, we must use reasonable best efforts to complete a private placement of up to $5,000,000 (the “PIPE”). In the PIPE, we will issue up to 20,833 shares of our common stock at $240 per share, plus two warrants for each share purchased, each exercisable for one share at $280 per share. The PIPE is to be funded in installments, and we expect to close the PIPE before the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part becomes effective. \n

\n The parties expect the Business Combination to close in the fourth quarter of 2026 or the first quarter of 2027, subject to stockholder approval, effectiveness of the registration statement, listing approval and other conditions. \n

\n The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights and provides that, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, USFM may be required to pay Twin Vee a termination fee of $500,000 and Twin Vee may be required to pay USFM a termination fee of $800,000. Specifically, if the Merger Agreement is terminated (a) in connection with a failure of USFM to obtain its stockholders’ approval of the business combination or (b) subject to certain conditions, because the business combination has not been consummated before the “Agreement End Date” of December 31, 2026, then, in either case, USFM will pay the $500,000 termination fee to Twin Vee upon termination of the Merger Agreement. In addition, if Twin Vee terminates the Merger Agreement (x) to accept a Superior Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement) in compliance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, (y) after Twin Vee has (i) failed to publicly recommend against a tender or exchange offer relating to Twin Vee securities within ten business days after the offer is commenced, (ii) failed to publicly reaffirm its recommendation of the business combination within ten business days after any Acquisition Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement) is announced, or (iii) committed a willful or material breach of the exclusivity provisions of the Merger Agreement, or (z) following USFM’s determination that Twin Vee will likely fail to resolve the Reincorporation Matter (as defined in the Merger Agreement) (i) before December 31, 2026 or (ii) in a manner satisfactory to USFM in its sole discretion, then, in any such case, Twin Vee will pay the $800,000 termination fee to USFM upon termination of the Merger Agreement. \n

\n Results of Operations \n

\n Our net loss was $1,677,366 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, $1,955,609 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and $111 for the period from inception through December 31, 2025. The 2026 loss reflects the start of the field program; the 2025 period had almost no activity. \n

	\n \n Three months ended\n \n June 30, 2026\n \n			\n \n Six months ended\n \n June 30, 2026\n \n	\n \n Period from\n \n inception through\n \n December 31, 2025\n \n
	\n \n (unaudited)\n \n			\n \n (unaudited) \n \n	\n \n (audited) \n \n
\n \n Revenue \n		$	—			$	—	$	—
\n \n Exploration and project expenses \n			1,544,805				1,715,264		—
\n \n Consulting and management fees \n			95,500				194,184		—
\n \n Operating expenses \n			27,195				36,295		111
\n \n Loss from operations \n			1,667,500				1,945,743		111
\n \n Interest expense \n			7,521				7,521		—

\n 155\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

	\n \n Three months ended\n \n June 30, 2026\n \n			\n \n Six months ended\n \n June 30, 2026\n \n	\n \n Period from\n \n inception through\n \n December 31, 2025\n \n
	\n \n (unaudited)\n \n			\n \n (unaudited) \n \n	\n \n (audited) \n \n
\n \n Other expense \n			2,345				2,345		—
\n \n Total other expense \n			9,866				9,866		—
\n \n Provision for income taxes \n			—				—		—
\n \n Net loss \n		$	1,677,366			$	1,955,609	$	111

\n Revenue \n

\n We had no revenue in either period. We do not expect revenue until a mineral deposit is developed and placed into production. A successful mineral discovery may also provide an opportunity to realize significant value through the sale of our interest in the project. \n

\n Exploration and Project Expenses \n

\n Exploration and project expenses were $1,715,264 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, of which $1,544,805 was incurred in the three months ended June 30, 2026 as crews, camps and drilling equipment were mobilized to Greenland ahead of the July 1, 2026 drilling start. We had no exploration expenses in the 2025 period. We expense all exploration costs and work program costs as incurred, including drilling, logistics, camp infrastructure, geological services, mobilization and equipment. We do not own the camp or drilling equipment we fund; it is held at the project level, and if the acquisition does not close we do not retain it. \n

\n By category, exploration and project expenses consisted of: \n

	\n \n Three months ended\n \n June 30, 2026\n \n			\n \n Six months ended\n \n June 30, 2026\n \n
\n \n Transportation \n		$	608,212		$	617,639
\n \n Camp infrastructure and provisions \n			283,339			440,154
\n \n Drilling operations and contractors \n			293,847			293,847
\n \n Freight and shipping \n			203,768			203,768
\n \n Other general expenses \n			155,639			159,856
\n \n Total exploration and project expenses \n		$	1,544,805		$	1,715,264

\n Transportation consisted mainly of the first installment of aircraft and helicopter charter costs for the Qullissat camp ($525,015) and crew travel and accommodation. Camp costs covered containers, generators, kitchen equipment, water systems and food provisions for the field camps. Drilling costs were mainly the drilling contractor’s mobilization, equipment, training and flights. Freight covered shipping of containers and drilling equipment from Denmark to Greenland. Other general expenses included medical and safety services and supplies, geological consulting and mobilization fees, and field personnel costs. \n

\n At June 30, 2026 we also held $932,911 of prepaid expenses, consisting of a prepaid drilling contract ($589,740), fuel inventory ($264,245) and other prepaid expenses ($78,926). Under our policy, these amounts will be expensed as the related services are received and the fuel is used, so exploration expense in the second half of 2026 will include them. \n

\n Consulting and Management Fees \n

\n Consulting and management fees for the three months ended June 30, 2026 consisted of consulting fees of $50,500 and Chief Executive Officer fees of $45,000. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, they consisted of consulting fees of $134,184 and fees of $60,000 paid to our Chief Executive Officer under a contractor agreement at $15,000 per month beginning March 2026. The consulting fees were for technical advisory and fundraising advisory services. There were no such fees in the 2025 period. \n

\n 156\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Operating Expenses \n

\n Operating expenses were $36,295 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared with $111 for the 2025 period. The 2026 amount consisted mainly of accounting, audit and tax fees of $24,938 and investor relations costs of $9,690. Operating expenses were $27,195 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, consisting mainly of the $24,938 of accounting, audit and tax fees. Operating expenses of $111 for the 2025 period were filing fees. \n

\n Interest Expense \n

\n Interest expense of $7,521 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 was accrued on the $300,000 FG Nexus note from its May 1, 2026 issue date at 15% per year. It was unpaid at June 30, 2026. The note’s $330,000 minimum cash repayment exceeds principal plus interest accrued at June 30, 2026. \n

\n Income Taxes \n

\n We recorded no income tax benefit in either period. We have recorded a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax asset of $478,682 at June 30, 2026, which arises from net operating losses, because we have no history of taxable income. \n

\n Liquidity and Capital Resources \n

\n At June 30, 2026, we had cash of $5,346,131 and a working capital surplus of $5,809,510, compared with cash of $39 at December 31, 2025. Our existing cash is not sufficient to fund our obligations under the Disko SPA beyond Funding Year 1, and we will need to raise substantial additional capital. \n

\n Sources of Liquidity \n

\n Since inception we have funded operations through sales of common stock and one related-party loan. Through June 30, 2026 we received $8,265,230 in cash from common stock issuances ($150 in 2025 and $8,265,080 in 2026) and $300,000 from the FG Nexus note. We have no revenue and no credit facility. Our cash is held in business checking accounts at two U.S. banks; at June 30, 2026 balances exceeded federally insured limits by approximately $5,096,000. \n

\n Current liabilities at June 30, 2026 were $469,532, consisting of accounts payable of $162,011, the $300,000 FG Nexus note and $7,521 of accrued interest on it. \n

\n Cash Flows \n

	\n \n Six months ended\n \n June 30, 2026\n \n			\n \n Period from inception\n \n through December 31,\n \n 2025\n \n
\n \n Net cash used in operating activities \n		$	(2,718,988)		$	(111)
\n \n Net cash used in investing activities \n			(500,000)			—
\n \n Net cash provided by financing activities \n			8,565,080			150
\n \n Net increase in cash \n		$	5,346,092		$	39

\n Operating activities. Net cash used in operating activities was $2,718,988 for the six months ended June 30, 2026. It reflects our net loss of $1,955,609 and $932,911 of cash paid for prepaid drilling costs, fuel and other prepaid items that will be expensed in later periods, partly offset by a $162,011 increase in accounts payable and $7,521 of unpaid interest. Cash used in the 2025 period was $111. \n

\n Investing activities. Net cash used in investing activities of $500,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was the cash payment to 80 Mile under the Disko SPA, which we carry as a deposit on investment. There was no investing activity in the 2025 period. \n

\n Financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities of $8,565,080 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 consisted of $8,265,080 from common stock issuances and $300,000 from the FG Nexus note. Financing activities in the 2025 period were the founder’s $150 share purchase. \n

\n 157\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Funding Requirements \n

\n Our principal cash requirements over the next 12 months are: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Disko SPA funding. We must fund $7,500,000 of project costs by, October 31, 2026 (Funding Year 1), of which $4,862,755 remained unfunded at June 30, 2026. We must also fund $12,500,000 during the year beginning November 1, 2026 (Funding Year 2). We have raised $8,265,113 as of June 30, 2026, which covered all the spending under Fund Year 1 commitments. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Operator management fee. 10% of 80 Mile’s project costs, payable quarterly. We paid $264,881 in July 2026 and were invoiced a further $318,399 in September 2026. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n FG Nexus note. At least $330,000 in cash due by November 1, 2026, plus $300,000 of shares at our next priced equity financing. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Merger-related costs. We estimate approximately $1.6 million of legal, accounting, filing, listing and printing costs, which we bear under the Merger Agreement. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Corporate costs. Approximately $54,000 per month, including Chief Executive Officer fees of $15,000 per month. \n

\n Our funding obligations are governed by the Disko SPA. The approximately $10 million estimated cost of the 2026 exploration program does not alter these obligations. Any expenditure beyond the agreed funding commitments requires approval by the Nikkeli Project Company board. After closing, if we fail to meet a funding obligation and do not cure the failure within the notice periods in the agreement, our interest in Nikkeli Project Company would be reduced from 51% to 40%. \n

\n We expect to fund these requirements through private placements of equity and, once the proposed business combination with Twin Vee is consummated and USFM becomes part of a publicly listed company, public capital raises. Under the Merger Agreement, we have committed to use reasonable best efforts to raise up to $5,000,000 in the PIPE. \n

\n Commitments and Contractual Obligations \n

\n Our largest commitment is the $30,000,000 Disko SPA funding obligation; our other commitments are the operator management fee and the FG Nexus note. Although, as a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide a contractual obligations table, we have summarized these obligations below. \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Obligation\n \n	\n \n Amount\n \n	\n \n Timing \n \n
\n Disko SPA funding commitment, Funding Year 1\n	\n $7,500,000, of which $2,637,245 credited at June 30, 2026\n	\n By October 31, 2026\n
\n Disko SPA funding commitment, Funding Year 2\n	\n $12,500,000\n	\n November 1, 2026 to October 31, 2027\n
\n Disko SPA funding commitment, Funding Year 3\n	\n $10,000,000\n	\n November 1, 2027 to October 31, 2028\n
\n \n 80 Mile operator management fee\n \n	\n 10% of 80 Mile’s project costs\n	\n Quarterly\n
\n FG Nexus note\n	\n At least $330,000 cash, plus $300,000 of shares at next priced equity financing\n	\n No later than November 1, 2026\n

\n There were no pending or threatened legal proceedings against us as of June 30, 2026. \n

\n Critical Accounting Estimates \n

\n Our most significant judgments are whether closing under the Disko SPA is probable, whether the $500,000 deposit on investment is recoverable, and how we will account for Nikkeli Project Company after closing. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the financial statements. \n

\n 158\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Deposit on Investment \n

\n We capitalize only cash paid directly to 80 Mile toward the 51% interest. At June 30, 2026 this was $500,000. Work program funding is expensed as incurred, even though it counts toward our funding commitment. On closing, the deposit will become part of our initial cost basis in the acquired interest under ASC 805-50. \n

\n We review the deposit for recoverability when events suggest it may not be recoverable, including a change in our assessment that closing is probable. Recoverability depends on the 51% interest having a value at closing at least equal to the deposit, not on the project reaching production. If we conclude closing is no longer probable, or the interest is worth less than the deposit, we would write it down and record a loss. Closing depends on consents from the Government of Greenland, which remain under review, and on our continuing to meet the funding commitment. \n

\n Following closing, we must determine whether to consolidate Nikkeli Project Company as a majority-owned subsidiary or as a variable interest entity of which we are the primary beneficiary. Central to that assessment are our 51% interest, which under the Disko SPA cannot fall below 40% and may change after the funding period based on each party’s contributions, and the casting vote that the chairman we appoint will hold on the Nikkeli boards after closing. Under either model, Disko Exploration’s interest would be presented as a noncontrolling interest. \n

\n Exploration and Project Costs \n

\n We expense exploration costs as incurred, including geological work, drilling, sampling, logistics, camp costs and general and administrative costs, and capitalize only the cost of acquiring mineral property rights. We will begin capitalizing development costs only if technical feasibility and commercial viability are demonstrated. Because we expense work program funding, our reported losses will rise with field activity and our balance sheet will not reflect the $2,637,245 we had funded toward Funding Year 1 at June 30, 2026, other than prepaid amounts not yet consumed. \n

\n Under the Disko SPA we are responsible, at our sole cost, for environmental liabilities on the licences during the funding commitment period. We had not recorded any liability for site restoration or rehabilitation at June 30, 2026. Management has concluded that no such liability existed at that date. \n

\n Income Taxes \n

\n We have recorded a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets because, given our exploration stage and history of losses, it is more likely than not that they will not be realized. \n

\n Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements \n

\n We had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of June 30, 2026 or December 31, 2025. \n

\n Foreign Currency \n

\n Our functional and reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, but a substantial portion of our vendor obligations are in Danish kroner, Canadian dollars and British pounds. Exchange rate changes affect the U.S. dollar cost of our field program. We do not hedge currency exposure. \n

\n Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk \n

\n As a smaller reporting company we are not required to provide this information. \n

\n Recent Accounting Pronouncements \n

\n We do not expect recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a material effect on our financial statements.\n

\n 159\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n MANAGEMENT OF USFM \n

\n The following table provides information regarding our executive officers and members of the USFM board of directors: \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Name \n \n	\n \n Age \n \n	\n \n Position(s) \n \n
\n Robert Price \n	\n \n 65 \n \n	\n Chief Executive Officer and Sole Director \n
\n Sajjad Baqar\n	\n \n 40\n \n	\n Chief Financial Officer\n

\n Executive Officers \n

\n Robert Price \n

\n Robert B. Price, our Chief Executive Officer and sole director, is a seasoned energy executive and entrepreneur with more than three decades of experience developing exploration and production ventures, manufacturing operations, and strategic acquisitions. He has led multiple companies across the energy, real estate, and industrial sectors. Since 1991, Mr. Price has also been the founder and president of Brooks Energy Company, an oil and natural gas exploration and production company in the mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions in the U.S. Mr. Price was previously a founding member and majority owner of Escalante H2 Power, a hydrogen electrical generation business in New Mexico, which sold to Tallgrass Energy. From 2022 to 2025, Mr. Price served as managing partner of LN Energy, which owns a proven 68 BCF natural gas field in Italy. From 2021 to 2023, Mr. Price served as Chief Executive Officer of Total Helium (now Altura Energy Corp), a company engaged in helium exploration, production, and storage, serving as a domestic supplier of helium which was funded in part by The Linde Group. From 2015 to 2020, Mr. Price served as Chief Executive Officer of Highlands Natural Resources, which focused on developing horizontal oil and gas wells in the DJ Basin of Colorado through a development agreement with ConocoPhillips and funding from private equity groups including Siguler Guff and Halliburton. Highlands Natural Resources subsequently sold to the True Companies in Casper, Wyoming. From 2007 to 2013, Mr. Price served as founder and chairman of Zeledyne, which acquired and operated Ford Motor Company’s glass division. From 2005 to 2008, Mr. Price also served as the owner and manager of S&R Compression, a natural gas compressor manufacturing and rental business. From 1989 to 2001, Mr. Price served as Vice President, Trust Officer, and Oil & Gas Trust Energy Department Manager at First National Bank & Trust Company in Tulsa (now JPMorgan Chase). In addition to his corporate roles, Mr. Price has served in public service and regulatory capacities. He has served on the U.S. Department of Interior’s Royalty Policy Committee (formerly Mineral Management Service) and on the Tulsa Technology Center governing board. He also served as a Commissioner of the State of Colorado Economic Development Commission. Mr. Price holds a B.A. from the University of Colorado at Denver and a J.D. from the University of Tulsa. \n

\n Hassan Sajjad Baqar\n

\n Hassan Sajjad Baqar has served as Chief Financial Officer of USFM since May 2026. Since February 2026, Mr. Baqar has served as Chief Financial Officer of B-Scada Inc (OTC: SCDA). Since January 2021, Mr. Baqar has served as senior analyst in the merchant banking division at FG Nexus Inc. (NASDAQ: FGNX) (formerly known as Fundamental Global Inc., FG Financial Group, Inc. and as 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc.), which operates as an Ethereum Treasury Company and previously as a reinsurance and asset management company. Since February 2026, Mr. Baqar serves as Chief Financial Officer of Innovative Digital Investors Acquisition Corp., a special purpose acquisition company in process of completing its IPO. Previously, from September 2013 until December 2020, Mr. Baqar served as a senior analyst at Kingsway Financial Services Inc. ( NYSE: KFS). From September 2009 until September 2013, Mr. Baqar served as a fund analyst at Citco Fund Services. Mr. Baqar earned a bachelor’s degree in economics and business administration from Monmouth College in 2008.\n

\n 160\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Directors \n

\n Robert Price is the sole director of USFM. He is also the Chief Executive Officer. There are no committees of the board of directors of USFM. Mr. Price is not compensated as a director of USFM. On March 1, 2026, USFM entered into a contractor agreement (“Contractor Agreement”) with Robert Price to provide chief executive officer services. USFM pays $180,000 per year to Robert Price for such services. \n

\n 161\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n INFORMATION ABOUT TWIN VEE \n

\n General \n

\n Twin Vee PowerCats Co. (“Twin Vee,” “we,” “us” or the “Company”) designs, manufactures and markets recreational and commercial powerboats. We are incorporated in Delaware and headquartered in Fort Pierce, Florida. Our common stock is listed for trading on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “VEEE”. \n

\n Twin Vee products are marketed under two brands: Twin Vee and Bahama Boat Works. We currently have over a dozen gas-powered models in production, ranging in size from our 22-foot single engine BayCat center console to our flagship 40-foot offshore 400 GFX2. \n

\n Revenue from the sale of our boats accounted for 100% of our net revenue for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. \n

\n During the 2023 and 2024 fiscal years, we focused our efforts on our gas-powered boat business following the November 2024 merger of Forza X1, Inc. (“Forza”) into Twin Vee, as more fully described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, which is incorporated herein by reference, under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions — Twin Vee — Merger with Forza.” We are no longer developing electric-powered boats. \n

\n During the year ended December 31, 2024, three individual dealers represented approximately 40% of our consolidated revenues on a combined basis, and each of those three dealers individually accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenues. \n

\n Wizz Banger \n

\n We are developing Wizz Banger, a technology-enabled marine retail and valuation platform intended to modernize and streamline the process of buying, selling, trading, and financing recreational boats. This initiative represents the evolution of our prior Pro Direct platform concept and consists of two primary components: (i) the Wizz Banger Value App, which utilizes artificial intelligence (“AI”) and multi-source data inputs to generate independent, condition-specific valuation assessments of new and used boats, and (ii) Wizz Banger Boats, a related physical retail location intended to be established at our Fort Pierce, Florida headquarters. \n

\n The Wizz Banger Value App is designed to incorporate: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Current listings across national and regional marketplaces; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n AI-based visual assessments, including of hull surfaces, gelcoat oxidation, cushions and upholstery, hardtops and T-tops, trailer condition, and visible aftermarket components such as radar, sonar, GPS, cameras, power poles, and battery systems; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Comparative equipment and configuration adjustments based on historical market behavior. \n

\n The AI component utilizes image-recognition models to evaluate visual condition factors with greater consistency than traditional manual inspections. While the system does not measure engine hours or identify internal mechanical issues, it is designed to significantly narrow valuation ranges by eliminating subjective variability and inconsistent dealer or third-party assessments. By standardizing the valuation input process, the Wizz Banger Value App seeks to provide lenders, insurers, dealers, and customers with a more reliable, condition-specific, and data-supported valuation reference point. \n

\n As part of the Wizz Banger initiative, we plan to launch Wizz Banger Boats, a physical retail location situated directly on our U.S. Highway 1 frontage at our Fort Pierce, Florida headquarters. This site is expected to function as the initial operational deployment location for the Wizz Banger Value App, where we will integrate the valuation system into live retail, trade-in, and resale activities. \n

\n Our Strategy \n

\n We intend to capitalize on the thriving broader marine industry through the following strategies: \n

\n Develop New and Innovative Products in Our Core Market. As an innovator, designer, manufacturer, and marketer of catamaran powerboats, we strive to design new and inventive products that appeal to a \n

\n 162\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n broad customer base. We currently have over a dozen gas-powered models in production ranging in size from our 22-foot single engine BayCat center console to our flagship 40-foot offshore 400 GFX2. \n

\n Increase the Power Boat Category Segment. Our near-term product development strategy is to develop a new product line to reach underserved segments of the catamaran and monohull powerboat category that are distinct from our traditional customer base. \n

\n Capture Additional Market Share from Adjacent Boating Categories. Another strategy for growing our market share is to introduce new products with increased versatility, functionality, and performance that can appeal to a more expansive customer base. \n

\n Effectively Manage Dealer Inventory and Further Strengthen Our Dealer Network. We currently have a network of 17 independent boat dealer locations across North America, Hawaii, and Australia. \n

\n Design and Introduce a First of a Kind in the Marine Market Pro-Direct Platform. We hope to revolutionize the marine industry with Wizz Banger, a technology-enabled marine retail and valuation platform intended to modernize and streamline the process of buying, selling, trading, and financing recreational boats. \n

\n Increase Our Sales in International Markets. We believe we have a brand that will have natural growth in international markets, including Australia, Europe, Israel, Dubai and Brazil. \n

\n Our Strengths and Competitive Advantages \n

\n We believe that the following are the key investment attributes of our company: \n

\n Recognized Brands. We believe the Twin Vee and Bahama Boat Works brands are well-known among boating enthusiasts for performance, quality, and value. \n

\n Diverse Product Offering. We currently have over a dozen models in production that range from our 22-foot single engine BayCat to our flagship 40-foot offshore 400GFX, offered at retail prices that start at approximately $90,000 and go up to $900,000. \n

\n Focus on Innovative Product Offerings. We are currently designing numerous new boat models to meet market demand and grow our business, with a current focus on bringing a full line of monohull boats to market under the Bahama Boat Works brand. \n

\n Price Point. Twin Vee has made investments in infrastructure and engineering that have resulted in lower material waste, reduced labor hours per boat, reduced re-work, and increased production efficiencies, allowing us to offer favorable pricing while increasing margins. \n

\n Our Markets \n

\n According to SSI data (Statistical Surveys Incorporated), 179,168 new watercraft were sold in the U.S. in 2024, a decline of 9.59% across the entire industry compared to 2023. Our core market corresponds most directly with the saltwater outboard market defined by SSI and is further categorized by the power catamaran segment. The saltwater outboard market experienced a decline of 9.26% in 2024 compared to 2023, with a total of 18,684 new units sold in the United States during 2024. \n

\n Our Dealer Network \n

\n We primarily sell our gas-powered boats through a network of 17 independent boat dealer locations across North America, Hawaii, and Australia. For the year ended December 31, 2024, our top three dealers on a consolidated basis accounted for approximately 40% of our consolidated revenues, with each dealer individually accounting for more than 10% of our consolidated revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2023, our top five dealers on a consolidated basis accounted for approximately 35% of our consolidated revenues, with one individual dealer representing 10% of our total sales. \n

\n We do not have written agreements with our dealers generally. Beginning in early 2025, as a condition to participate in various programs, we are requiring new dealers to sign a dealer agreement, provide a non-binding Annual Purchase Target, register new boat owners’ warranty information and meet various other requirements. \n

\n 163\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Floor Plan Financing \n

\n Our North American dealers often purchase boats through floor plan financing programs with third-party floor plan financing providers. As is typical in our industry, we have entered into repurchase agreements with certain floor plan financing providers to our dealers, under which we are obligated to repurchase a repossessed boat from the lender in certain circumstances, subject to reduction or limitation based on the age and condition of the boat and, in certain cases, an aggregate cap on repurchase obligations. To date, we have not been required to repurchase any boats under repurchase agreements. \n

\n Competition \n

\n The powerboat industry, including the performance sport boat category, is highly competitive for consumers and dealers. We compete with several large manufacturers that may have greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do, as well as with a wide variety of small, independent manufacturers. Competition in our industry is based primarily on brand name, price and product performance. We also face competition for employees with experience designing, manufacturing and servicing boats. \n

\n Raw Materials, Principal Suppliers, and Customers \n

\n We purchase a number of our product parts and components from third-party suppliers, including fiberglass, hydrocarbon feedstocks and steel, as well as engines and electronic controls. The most significant component used in manufacturing a gas-powered boat, based on cost, is the engine. We maintain a strong and long-standing relationship with our main supplier of engines, Suzuki Motor of America, Inc. We do not maintain long-term contracts with preferred suppliers and have not experienced any material shortages in product parts or components. \n

\n A few customers have in the past, and may in the future, account for a significant portion of our revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2024, three dealers represented 40% of our sales, while for the year ended December 31, 2023, five dealers represented 35% of our sales. \n

\n Intellectual Property \n

\n We have not protected our intellectual property rights for our gas-powered motor products through patents or formal copyright registration. Instead, we rely on trade secrets, know-how, technology and confidentiality agreements to protect our proprietary technology and processes. Although we do have patents to protect our intellectual property rights for electric-powered motor products, we are no longer developing electric-powered boats. \n

\n Insurance and Product Warranties \n

\n We carry various insurance policies, including policies to cover general products liability, directors and officers, workers’ compensation and other casualty and property risks. We provide limited product warranties, generally covering periods of ten years for the hull, with motors covered under warranty by their manufacturer. In addition, we provide a three-year limited fiberglass small parts warranty on some parts and components, and gelcoat is covered for up to one year. \n

\n Environmental, Safety and Regulatory Matters \n

\n Certain materials used in our manufacturing, including resins, are classified by federal and state governments as “hazardous materials” and are regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency and state pollution control agencies, as well as under the Clean Air Act and OSHA standards. Powerboats sold in the United States must be manufactured to meet the standards of certification required by the United States Coast Guard, and boats manufactured for sale in the European Community must be certified to meet applicable European Community standards. We believe our facility and products comply in all material respects with applicable regulations. \n

\n Employees/Human Capital \n

\n We currently employ approximately 70 employees, all of whom are full-time employees. None of our employees are represented by a labor union. \n

\n 164\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Legal Proceedings \n

\n From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings or be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. Except as disclosed below, we are not presently a party to any legal proceedings that, if determined adversely to us, would individually or taken together have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition or cash flows. \n

\n On March 10, 2025, shareholders Nabeel Youseph and Marisa Hardyal-Youseph (“Plaintiffs”), who are former holders of common stock of Forza, commenced an action in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware, captioned Youseph, et al. v. Visconti, et al., Case No. 2025-0262, by filing a putative class action complaint against Joseph Visconti, Kevin Schuyler, Neil Ross, Twin Vee PowerCats Co. and Twin Vee PowerCats, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”), related to Forza’s merger with Twin Vee, seeking an unspecified award of damages, plus interest, costs, and attorneys’ fees. Plaintiffs’ complaint asserts claims (1) against Defendants for breach of fiduciary duty in their capacities as controlling shareholders of Forza, (2) against Messrs. Visconti, Schuyler, and Ross for breach of fiduciary duty in their capacities as directors of Forza, and (3) against Mr. Visconti for breach of fiduciary duty in his capacity as an officer of Forza. Defendants deny the allegations and intend to vigorously defend against the claims. As the matter is in its early stages, Twin Vee is unable to estimate or project the ultimate outcome of this matter. This matter is the “Delaware Matter” described in the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the liabilities associated with this matter will remain with Twin Vee following the Closing and will not be transferred to the CVR Trust or Assetco. \n

\n Corporate Information \n

\n Our principal executive office is located at 3101 S. US-1, Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 and our telephone number is (772) 429-2525. We maintain our corporate website at www.twinvee.com. The reference to our website is an inactive textual reference only and none of the information on or accessible through our website is incorporated by reference herein. \n

\n We were incorporated in the State of Florida as Twin Vee Catamarans, Inc. on December 1, 2009 and reincorporated in Delaware on April 7, 2021 under the name Twin Vee PowerCats Co. Forza X1, Inc. was initially incorporated as Electra Power Sports, Inc. on October 15, 2021, and its name was subsequently changed to Forza X1, Inc. on October 29, 2021. On November 26, 2024, Forza was merged into Twin Vee PowerCats Co. and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Twin Vee. In April 2026, Twin Vee purported to reincorporate from Delaware to Nevada, and the Company’s board of directors subsequently approved a 1-for-37 reverse stock split of Twin Vee’s Common Stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”), purportedly effective as of 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time on May 4, 2026, based on Nevada law standards that would not have required a stockholder vote. Twin Vee subsequently discovered that the Nevada reincorporation had not received the stockholder approval required under the DGCL and was therefore invalid, with the result that Twin Vee had remained a Delaware corporation at all relevant times and the Reverse Stock Split, which had been approved only by the Twin Vee board of directors in purported reliance on Nevada law, had not been validly authorized under the DGCL. Twin Vee filed corrective filings with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada to revoke the defective reincorporation filings and confirm that Twin Vee remained a Delaware corporation throughout. At a Special Meeting of Stockholders held on September 8, 2026, Twin Vee stockholders ratified and approved the Reverse Stock Split pursuant to Section 204 of the DGCL, together with a corresponding Certificate of Validation, with the result that the Reverse Stock Split is deemed to have been effective under Delaware law as of 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time on May 4, 2026. For more information, see “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Twin Vee and the Business Combination” elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company \n

\n We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and therefore we intend to take advantage of certain exemptions from various public company reporting requirements, including not being required to have our internal controls over financial reporting audited by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory \n

\n 165\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n vote on executive compensation and any golden parachute payments. We have elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards under the JOBS Act. We will remain an “emerging growth company” until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our initial public offering, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.235 billion, or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period. Twin Vee is expected to cease to qualify as an emerging growth company as of December 31, 2026.\n

\n 166\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n TWIN VEE’S MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS \n

\n You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and related notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See “Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those discussed below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. You should also review the disclosure under the heading “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and under Part 1, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 for a discussion of important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. \n

\n All share amounts and exercise or conversion prices in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have been adjusted retrospectively for our 1-for-10 reverse stock split (the “2025 Reverse Stock Split”), which was effective on April 7, 2025 and our 1-for-37 reverse stock split (the “2026 Reverse Stock Split” and together with the 2025 Reverse Stock Split, the “Reverse Stock Split”), which was effective on May 4, 2026. \n

\n OVERVIEW \n

\n Twin Vee PowerCats Co. (“Twin Vee”, “we”, “us” or the “Company”) is a designer, manufacturer and marketer of recreational and commercial power boats. We believe our company, founded in 1996, has been an innovator in the recreational and commercial power catamaran industry. Our twin-hull catamaran running surface, known as a symmetrical catamaran hull design, adds to the Twin Vee ride quality by reducing drag, increasing fuel efficiency and offering users a stable riding boat. Our home base operations in Fort Pierce, Florida is a 7.5-acre facility with several buildings totaling approximately 100,000 square feet, including a recently completed 30,000 square foot expansion which began in mid-2024. We currently employ approximately 80 people. \n

\n Our products are marketed under two brands: Twin Vee for our catamarans, or dual hull vessels, and Bahama Boats and Bimini for our “V”-hull boats. Consumers can use our boats for a wide range of recreational activities including fishing, diving and water skiing and commercial activities including transportation, eco tours, fishing and diving expeditions. We believe that the performance, quality and value of our boats position us to achieve our goal of increasing our market share and expanding the power-boat market. We currently primarily sell our boats through a network of 22 independent boat dealers across North America, the Caribbean and Central America who resell our boats to the end user Twin Vee customers. We continue efforts to recruit high quality boat dealers to join our network and seek to establish new dealers and distributors domestically and internationally to distribute our boats as we grow our production and introduce new models. Our boats are currently outfitted with gas-powered outboard combustion engines. During 2024, Forza X1, Inc. (“Forza”), our then minority owned electric boat subsidiary, determined to cease production of electric boats, and on November 26, 2024, Forza was merged into Twin Vee Merger Sub, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary, and became a wholly owned subsidiary. \n

\n Revenue from the sale of our boats accounted for nearly 100% of our net revenue in the second quarter of 2026 and 2025. Our boats are manufactured in Fort Pierce, Florida. We believe our company has been an innovator in the recreational and commercial power boat industry. We currently have 11 Twin Vee models in production ranging in size from 22-foot to 40-foot, and 6 monohull Bahama models in or nearing production ranging in size from 31-foot to 41-foot, and three Bimini monohull models ranging in size from 21-foot to 29-foot. \n

\n During the quarter ended June 30, 2026, four individual dealers each represented over 10% of our total sales and together represented 88% of total sales. During the quarter ended June 30, 2025, three individual dealers each represented over 10% of our total sales and together represented 70% of total sales. \n

\n Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 were prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern; however, we have incurred significant losses from operations to date and we expect our expenses to increase in connection with our \n

\n 167\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n ongoing activities. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for one year after the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report are issued. \n

\n Recent Developments \n

\n Nasdaq Compliance \n

\n As previously disclosed, on April 2, 2026, the Company received written notice (the “Notification Letter”) from the staff of the Listing Qualifications Department (the “Staff”) of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) notifying the Company that it no longer satisfies the $1.00 bid price requirement set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market. Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) requires listed securities to maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share, and Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A) provides that a failure to meet the minimum bid price requirement exists if the deficiency continues for a period of thirty (30) consecutive business days (collectively, the “Bid Price Rule”). Based on the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock for the thirty (30) consecutive business days from February 18, 2026 to March 31, 2026, the Company no longer satisfied the Bid Price Rule. While companies are typically afforded a 180-calendar day compliance period to comply with the Bid Price Rule, the Notification Letter stated that, pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(iv), the Company was not eligible for any compliance period specified in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A) due to the fact that the Company effected a reverse stock split over the prior one-year period. The Company effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split on April 7, 2025. The Notification Letter stated that the Company’s securities will be subject to delisting from Nasdaq unless the Company timely requested a hearing before the Nasdaq Hearings Panel (the “Panel”), which was timely requested and subsequently scheduled for May 7, 2026. \n

\n To that end, on April 30, 2026, the Company filed a Certificate of Change with the Nevada Secretary of State (the “Certificate of Change”) to amend its Nevada Articles of Incorporation to effect a 1-for-37 reverse stock split of the Company’s authorized shares of common stock, accompanied by a corresponding decrease in the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”), effective as of 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time on May 4, 2026, purportedly pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes (“NRS”) 78.207. On June 17, 2026, the Panel found that Twin Vee is in compliance with the Listing Rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market. \n

\n In light of the Company’s defective reincorporation from Delaware to Nevada (see “Defective State of Nevada Reincorporation” below) the Company is in process of seeking stockholder approval for ratification of the Reverse Stock Split in the State of Delaware, which Reverse Stock Split is expected to remain effective as of 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time on May 4, 2026 following such ratification. The ratification of the defective corporate acts is being pursued pursuant to Section 204 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and will not be effective unless and until the Company’s stockholders approve such ratification. See “Defective Reverse Stock Split” below and “PART II. OTHER INFORMATION — ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS — We are seeking stockholder approval to ratify certain actions pursuant to Section 204 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and expect to file a Certificate of Validation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in the event stockholders provide such approval” in Twin Vee’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2026, which was filed with the SEC on August 6, 2026 and is incorporated herein by reference. \n

\n Defective State of Nevada Reincorporation \n

\n On April 10, 2026, the Company purported to complete its reincorporation from the State of Delaware to the State of Nevada. On August 4, 2026, after discovering that the reincorporation was not approved by a sufficient vote of shares of the Company’s common stock, the Company filed Certificates of Correction (a) in the State of Nevada to revoke the previously filed Nevada Articles of Conversion/Exchange/Merger and Nevada Articles of Incorporation and (b) in the State of Delaware to revoke the previously filed Delaware Certificate of Conversion. Separately, the Company is seeking stockholder approval to ratify the articles of incorporation amendment, which were filed with the State of Nevada on April 30, 2026 with an effective date of May 4, 2026, to effect the reverse stock split referred to elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. In light of the defective corporate acts referred to above, the Company did not effectively reincorporate to Nevada. See “PART II. OTHER INFORMATION — ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS — We are seeking stockholder \n

\n 168\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n approval to ratify certain actions pursuant to Section 204 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and expect to file a Certificate of Validation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in the event stockholders provide such approval” in Twin Vee’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2026, which was filed with the SEC on August 6, 2026 and is incorporated herein by reference. \n

\n Executive Compensation \n

\n On April 21, 2026, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) of the Company approved an increase in the base salary of Preston Yarborough, the Company’s Vice President, to $250,000 per annum, and on April 22, 2026, the Company entered into an amendment (the “Yarborough Amendment”) to the employment agreement, effective as of July 23, 2021, by and between the Company and Preston Yarborough, reflecting such increase in base salary. \n

\n On May 17, 2026, the Company delivered a notice of non-renewal pursuant to the terms of the Employment Agreement, effective as of July 23, 2021, with Joseph Visconti. The non-renewal was not due to any disagreement between Mr. Visconti and the Company on any matter. Following July 23, 2026, Mr. Visconti will continue to serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President on an at-will basis. \n

\n Defective Reverse Stock Split \n

\n On April 30, 2026, the Company filed a Certificate of Change with the Nevada Secretary of State (the “Certificate of Change”) to amend its invalidly filed Nevada Articles of Incorporation to effect a 1-for-37 reverse stock split of the Company’s authorized shares of common stock, accompanied by a corresponding decrease in the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”), effective as of 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time on May 4, 2026, purportedly pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes (“NRS”) 78.207. Because the Nevada reincorporation was not validly approved by the requisite vote of Company stockholders, as described more fully elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, the Company never legally became a Nevada corporation. The Company is in process of seeking stockholder approval of the ratification of the Reverse Stock Split and the Reverse Stock Split is expected to remain effective as of 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time on May 4, 2026 under applicable Delaware law. The ratification of the defective corporate act is being pursued pursuant to Section 204 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and will not be effective unless and until the Company’s stockholders approve such ratification. See “PART II. OTHER INFORMATION — ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS — We are seeking stockholder approval to ratify certain actions pursuant to Section 204 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and expect to file a Certificate of Validation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in the event stockholders provide such approval” in Twin Vee’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2026, which was filed with the SEC on August 6, 2026 and is incorporated herein by reference. \n

\n On April 10, 2026, the board of directors of the Company approved the Reverse Stock Split by unanimous written consent. Since the Reverse Stock Split was purportedly effectuated pursuant to NRS 78.207 by a proportionate decrease in both the authorized and issued and outstanding shares of the entire class, no stockholder approval of the Reverse Stock Split was required under the NRS. After the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split, the Company’s common stock began trading under the existing trading symbol “VEEE” on the Nasdaq Capital Market on a reverse split-adjusted basis when the market opened on May 4, 2026. At the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split, every 37 shares of common stock issued and outstanding automatically converted into one issued and outstanding share of common stock and the total number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the Articles of Incorporation was reduced by a corresponding proportion from approximately 19.6 million shares to approximately 0.5 million shares. \n

\n In addition, as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, proportionate adjustments were made to the number of shares of common stock underlying the Company’s outstanding equity awards and warrants. The total number of shares of the Company’s preferred stock authorized for issuance under the Articles of Incorporation remained at 10,000,000. \n

\n Results of Operations \n

\n Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025. \n

\n 169\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n The following table provides certain selected financial information for the periods presented: \n

	\n \n Three Months Ended June 30, \n \n
	\n \n 2026\n \n			\n \n 2025\n \n	\n \n $ Change\n \n			\n \n % Change\n \n
\n \n Net sales \n		$	3,128,374			$	4,755,618		$	(1,627,244)	(34)%
\n \n Cost of products sold (excluding depreciation & amortization) \n		$	3,311,042			$	4,101,565		$	(790,523)	(19)%
\n \n Gross (loss) profit \n		$	(182,668)			$	654,053		$	(836,721)	(128)%
\n \n Operating expenses \n		$	2,838,869			$	2,329,859		$	509,010	22%
\n \n Loss from operations \n		$	(3,021,537)			$	(1,675,806)		$	(1,345,731)	80%
\n \n Other income \n		$	123,525			$	21,735		$	101,790	468%
\n \n Net loss \n		$	(2,898,012)			$	(1,654,071)		$	(1,243,941)	75%
\n \n Basic and dilutive loss per share of common stock \n		$	(5.07)			$	(32.22)		$	27.14	(84)%
\n \n Weighted average number of shares of common stock \n \n outstanding \n			571,161				51,339

\n Net Sales and Cost of Sales \n

\n Our net sales decreased by $1,627,244, or 34%, to $3,128,374 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, from $4,755,618 for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This decrease was due primarily to market conditions of elevated interest rates and higher gas prices impacting consumer behavior and demand. During the second quarter of 2026, we sold 15 boats at an average selling price of approximately $209,000 per unit, compared to 31 units in the second quarter of 2025 with an average selling price of approximately $153,000. The increase in the average sales price is primarily due to a change in the product mix of boats sold, specifically, in the second quarter of 2025, 18 boats of 24 feet or less were sold versus in the second quarter of 2026 8 boats of 24 feet or less were sold. \n

\n Gross profit \n

\n Gross profit declined by $836,721, or 128%, to a negative $182,668 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, from $654,053 for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Gross (loss) profit as a percentage of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was -5.8% compared to 13.8% in the second quarter of 2025. The decline in gross profit of 19.6 percentage points, is primarily due to an increase in labor related to the completion and re-launch of the new Bahama Boat line of boats at the Palm Beach International Boat Show and the unfavorable leverage effect of lower boat sales on fixed overhead costs. \n

\n During the second quarter of 2026, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of approximately $701,223 related to capitalized software development costs. The software platform was developed and commercialized during 2025 with the expectation of generating future revenues through licensing, subscription arrangements, customer access fees, and other commercialization opportunities. Following commercialization, management actively pursued customer adoption, strategic partnerships, and other monetization initiatives. After evaluating market demand, expected future investment requirements, strategic priorities, and the absence of supportable future revenue opportunities, management determined during the second quarter of 2026 to discontinue commercialization efforts and abandon the software as a revenue-generating initiative. As a result, the Company concluded that the carrying value of the software was no longer recoverable and recorded a full impairment charge of approximately $701,223, representing the remaining net book value of the asset. \n

\n Operating Expenses \n

\n During the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, total operating expenses were $2,838,869 and $2,329,859, respectively, an increase of $509,010, or 22%. Second quarter of 2026 includes an impairment charge related to capitalized software of $701,223. Before the impact of this charge, operating expenses would be down $192,213 or 8.2% Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased by approximately 1%, or $5,167, to $600,106 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $605,273 for the three months ended June 30, 2025. \n

\n 170\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Salaries and wage related expenses decreased 22%, or $232,125, to $822,978 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $1,055,103 for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease in salaries and wages is across the board, including salaries, director expenses, and benefits due to ongoing resource management, in addition, the retirement of our prior CFO resulted in a reduction in salaries, bonus accruals as well as stock based compensation expenses. \n

\n Professional fees increased by 35%, or $66,482, to $256,989 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $190,507 for the three months ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to expenses related to the proposed merger with USFM. \n

\n Depreciation and amortization expense increased by 8%, or $33,534 to $459,085 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to $425,551 for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This increase is due to the capitalization of Ft. Pierce building expansion and the 5-axis C&C machine installed in late 2025. \n

\n Other income increased by $101,789 to $123,524 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to $21,735 for the three months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was due primarily to an increase in dividend and interest income from higher cash and cash equivalent balances, following the three equity sale transactions in the first quarter of 2026 and interest income related to the Company’s note receivable on the former building in North Carolina. \n

\n Net Loss \n

\n Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was $2,898,012, as compared to $1,654,071 for the three months ended June 30, 2025, a reduction of $1,243,941 or 75%. The overall year-over-year increase in the reported loss for the period was primarily due to the reduction in gross margin and an increase in SG&A as described above, which included the write off of capitalized software of $701,223. Basic and dilutive loss per share of Common Stock for the three months ended June 30, 2026, adjusted for the May 4, 2026 1 for 37 reverse stock split, was ($5.07), as compared to ($32.22) for the three months ended June 30, 2025, an improvement of 84%. \n

\n Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 \n

\n The following table provides certain selected financial information for the periods presented: \n

	\n \n Six Months Ended June 30, \n \n
	\n \n 2026\n \n			\n \n 2025\n \n	\n \n $ Change\n \n			\n \n % Change\n \n
\n \n Net sales \n		$	7,093,080			$	8,367,909		$	(1,274,829)	(15)%
\n \n Cost of products sold (excluding depreciation & amortization) \n		$	7,079,411			$	7,176,742		$	(97,331)	(1)%
\n \n Gross profit \n		$	13,669			$	1,191,167		$	(1,177,498)	(99)%
\n \n Operating expenses \n		$	5,171,140			$	4,546,067		$	625,073	14%
\n \n Loss from operations \n		$	(5,157,471)			$	(3,354,900)		$	(1,802,571)	54%
\n \n Other income \n		$	165,181			$	90,589		$	74,592	82%
\n \n Net loss \n		$	(4,992,290)			$	(3,264,311)		$	(1,727,979)	53%
\n \n Basic and dilutive loss per share of common stock \n		$	(12.85)			$	(71.27)		$	58.42	(82)%
\n \n Weighted average number of shares of common stock \n \n outstanding \n			388,473				45,801

\n Net Sales and Cost of Sales \n

\n Our net sales decreased by $1,274,829, or 15% to $7,093,080 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $8,367,909 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. This decrease was due primarily to market conditions of elevated interest rates and higher gas prices impacting consumer behavior and demand. We sold 36 and 45 boats during the first six months of 2026 and 2025, respectively. The average unit price per boat was approximately $197,000 in the first six months of 2026 compared to $186,000 in the first six months of 2025. This increase is due primarily to the sale of a 35’ and a 37’ Bahama in 2026 versus none in 2025. \n

\n 171\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Gross Profit \n

\n Gross profits decreased by $1,177,498 or 99%, to $13,669 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, from $1,191,167 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. Gross profit as a percentage of sales, for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, was 0.2% and 14.2% respectively. The decline in gross profit of 14 percentage points, is primarily due to an increase in labor related to the completion and re-launch of the new Bahama Boat line of boats at the Palm Beach International Boat Show and the unfavorable leverage effect of lower boat sales on fixed overhead costs. \n

\n Operating Expenses \n

\n During the six months ended June 30, 2026, operating expenses were $5,171,140 compared to $4,546,067 in the same period in 2025, an increase of $625,073 or 14%. The six month period ended June 30, 2026 includes an impairment charge related to capitalized software of $701,223. Before the impact of this charge, operating expenses would be down $76,150 or 2.0% \n

\n Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased by approximately 21%, or $256,832, to $1,460,657 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $1,203,825 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was driven by both property taxes and Delaware franchise taxes as well as approximately $168,000 of penalties assessed by the Internal Revenue Service related to section 6721 and 6722 for the tax year 2022. The Company is actively seeking to resolve this disagreement with the IRS. Included in salaries and wage related expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 was stock-based compensation expense of $130,010 and $115,597, respectively. \n

\n Salaries and wage related expenses decreased 15%, or $313,582, to $1,708.483 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $2,022,065 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease in salaries and wages is across the board, including salaries, director expenses, and benefits due to ongoing resource management, in addition, the retirement of our prior CFO resulted in a reduction in salaries and bonus accruals. \n

\n Professional fees increased by 12% or $39,525, to $376,043 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $336,518 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. This increase is primarily due to expenses related to the proposed merger with USFM. \n

\n Depreciation and amortization expense increased by 7%, or $59,023, to $926,246 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to $867,223 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. This increase is due to the capitalization of Ft. Pierce building expansion and the 5-axis C&C machine installed in late 2025. \n

\n Other income increased by $74,591 to $165,180 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to $90,589 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was due primarily to an increase in dividend and interest income from higher cash and cash equivalent balances, following the three equity sale transactions in the first quarter of 2026 and interest income related to the Company’s note receivable on the former building in North Carolina. \n

\n Net Loss \n

\n Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was $4,992,290, as compared to $3,264,311 for the six months ended June 30, 2025, a reduction of $1,727,979 or 53%. The overall year-over-year increase in \n

\n 172\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n the reported loss for the period was primarily due to the reduction in gross margin and an increase in SG&A as described above, which included the write off of capitalized software of $701,223. Basic and dilutive loss per share of Common Stock for the six months ended June 30, 2026, adjusted for the May 4, 2026 1 for 37 reverse stock split, was ($12.85), as compared to ($71.27) for the six months ended June 30, 2025, an improvement of 82%. \n

\n Liquidity \n

\n Going Concern \n

\n For the year ended December 31, 2025, we incurred a loss from operations of $8,781,299 and a net loss of $8,607,273. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, we incurred a loss from operations of $5,157,471 and a net loss of $4,992,290. As of June 30, 2026, we had accumulated deficits of $38,992,518. To address these conditions: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n We closed three equity offerings during the first quarter of 2026 totaling 468,863 shares of common stock for total net proceeds of $5,800,025. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n As of June 30, 2026, we maintain a cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash balance of $3,929,427. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n During the fourth quarter of 2025, we completed the sale of our Marion, North Carolina facility, generating $500,000 in cash in the fourth quarter of 2025, and expected cash payments of $500,000 in 2026 and $3,250,000 in 2027, plus interest at 5%. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Management continues to implement cost controls, operational improvements, and revenue initiatives to further strengthen our financial position. \n

\n Despite our ongoing efforts to mitigate these conditions, there can be no assurance that our expenses will not increase in future periods or that the cash generated from operations in future periods will be sufficient to satisfy our operating needs. If we need to raise additional capital to fund our continued operations, there can be no assurance that funding will be available on acceptable terms on a timely basis, or at all. The various ways that we could raise capital carry potential risks. Any additional sources of financing will likely involve the issuance of our equity securities, which will have a dilutive effect on our stockholders. Any debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants that may impact our ability to conduct our business. If we do not succeed in raising additional funds on acceptable terms or at all, we may be unable to fill new orders and develop new products. As such, we cannot conclude that such plans will be effectively implemented within one year after the date that the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report are filed with the SEC, and there is uncertainty regarding our ability to maintain liquidity sufficient to operate our business effectively, which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. If we are unable to generate sufficient revenue from operations and/or raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we may be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate efforts to expand our dealer network or develop new models and may be forced to cease operations or liquidate assets. \n

\n A primary source of funds for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 was net cash received from our three follow-on equity offerings closed during the first quarter of 2026, and revenue generated from operations. Our primary use of cash was related to funding our operations including capital improvements, and development of the Bahama Boat lineup. \n

\n During the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company completed multiple equity offerings resulting in aggregate gross proceeds of $7,192,640 and aggregate net proceeds of $5,800,025, after deducting placement agent fees and expenses and the Company’s offering expenses. \n

\n In connection with these offerings, the Company issued as compensation to the placement agent warrants to purchase shares of its common stock. The warrants are exercisable immediately and are classified as equity instruments. As a result, the issuance of these warrants did not result in any remeasurement adjustments or impact to the Company’s statements of operations. \n

\n The Company intends to use the net proceeds from these offerings for working capital and general corporate purposes. \n

\n 173\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Selected Balance Sheet Information \n

\n The following table provides selected financial data about us as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. \n

	\n \n June 30,\n \n 2026\n \n			\n \n December 31,\n \n 2025\n \n	\n \n Change\n \n			\n \n % Change\n \n
\n \n Cash and cash equivalents \n		$	3,721,284			$	1,431,578		$	2,289,706	159.9%
\n \n Restricted cash \n		$	208,143			$	215,117		$	(6,974)	(3.2)%
\n \n Current assets \n		$	8,576,146			$	4,897,217		$	3,678,929	75.1%
\n \n Current liabilities \n		$	3,633,980			$	2,244,513		$	1,389,467	61.9%
\n \n Working capital \n		$	4,942,166			$	2,652,704		$	2,289,462	86.3%

\n As of June 30, 2026, we had $3,929,427 of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, total current assets of $8,576,146 and total assets of $20,651,788. Our total liabilities were $6,246,232. Our total liabilities were comprised of current liabilities of $3,633,980, which included accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $2,637,237, lease liabilities of $470,943 and contract liability of $525,800. Long term liabilities were $2,612,252. As of December 31, 2025, we had $1,646,695 of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, total current assets of $4,897,217 and total assets of $16,234,369. Our total current liabilities were $2,244,513 and total liabilities were $2,766,558. \n

\n The accumulated deficit was $38,992,518 as of June 30, 2026 compared to accumulated deficit of $34,000,228 as of December 31, 2025. \n

\n Our working capital increased by $2,289,462 to $4,942,166 as of June 30, 2026, compared to $2,652,704 on December 31, 2025 primarily due to the three first quarter 2026 equity offerings totaling 468,863 shares, netting approximately $5,800,025 after fees and expenses, partially offset by continued operating losses incurred in the period. \n

\n Cash Flow \n

	\n \n Six Months Ended June 30, \n \n
	\n \n 2026\n \n			\n \n 2025\n \n	\n \n Change\n \n			\n \n % Change\n \n
\n \n Cash used in operating activities \n		$	(3,271,122)			$	(2,481,889)		$	(789,233)	32%
\n \n Cash used in investing activities \n		$	(235,477)			$	(1,497,435)		$	1,261,958	(84)%
\n \n Cash provided by financing activities \n		$	5,789,331			$	2,449,992		$	3,339,339	136%

\n Cash Flow from Operating Activities \n

\n For the six months ended June 30, 2026 net cash used in operating activities was $3,271,122, compared to $2,481,889 during the six months ended June 30, 2025. The use of cash in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was due primarily to a $5,157,471 operating loss adjusted for non-cash depreciation and amortization of $926,246, stock-based compensation of $130,010, and asset impairment losses of $699,711. \n

\n Cash Flow from Investing Activities \n

\n During the six months ended June 30, 2026, cash used in investing activities was $235,477, due to investments in property, plant and equipment, primarily related to contingent consideration capitalized as Bahama Boat Works boat hulls. This compares to use of cash in investing activities of $1,497,435 in the six months ended June 30, 2025 resulting from purchase of property and equipment. \n

\n Cash Flows from Financing Activities \n

\n For the six months ended June 30, 2026, net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $5,789,331 due primarily to the three first quarter 2026 equity offerings totaling 468,863 shares, netting approximately $5,800,025 after fees and expenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2025, net cash used in financing activities was approximately $2,449,992. \n

\n 174\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n USFM Merger Impact to Our Liquidity \n

\n As described in note 15 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company entered into the USFM Merger Agreement on July 12, 2026, which sets forth the terms associated with the USFM Merger. Among other things, pursuant to the USFM Merger Agreement, the Company must consummate the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring, pursuant to which the Company must to transfer all of the Company Assets and Liabilities (which includes all of the Company’s cash in excess of $700,000) to Assetco. \n

\n CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES \n

\n We believe that several accounting policies are important to understanding our historical and future performance. We refer to these policies as “critical” because these specific areas generally require us to make judgments and estimates about matters that are uncertain at the time we make the estimate, and different estimates — which also would have been reasonable — could have been used, which would have resulted in different financial results. \n

\n Our management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates based on historical experience and make various assumptions, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, which form the basis for judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. \n

\n The notes to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained herein contain a summary of our significant accounting policies. We consider the following accounting policies critical to the understanding of the results of our operations: \n

\n Revenue Recognition \n

\n The Company accounts for revenue in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606 which was adopted at the beginning of fiscal year 2018 using the modified retrospective method. The Company did not recognize any cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings upon adoption as the effect was immaterial. \n

\n Payment received for the future sale of a boat to a customer is recognized as a customer deposit, which is included in contract liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Customer deposits are recognized as revenue when control over promised goods is transferred to the customer. \n

\n Use of Estimates \n

\n The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Included in those estimates are assumptions about allowances for inventory obsolescence, useful life of fixed assets, and warranty reserves. \n

\n Inventories \n

\n Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value, with cost determined using the weighted average cost method on a first-in first-out basis. Net realizable value is defined as sales price less cost of completion, disposable and transportation and a normal profit margin. Production costs, consisting of labor and overhead, are applied to ending finished goods inventories at a rate based on estimated production capacity. Excess production costs are charged to cost of products sold. Provisions have been made to reduce excess or obsolete inventories to their net realizable value. \n

\n 175\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Product Warranty Costs \n

\n As required by FASB ASC Topic 460, Guarantees, the Company is including the following disclosure applicable to its product warranties. \n

\n The Company accrues for warranty costs based on the expected material and labor costs to provide warranty replacement products. The methodology used in determining the liability for warranty cost is based upon historical information and experience. The Company’s warranty reserve is calculated as the gross sales multiplied by the historical warranty expense return rate. \n

\n OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS \n

\n We did not have during the periods presented, and we do not currently have, any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined under SEC rules.\n

\n 176\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n MANAGEMENT OF THE COMBINED COMPANY FOLLOWING THE BUSINESS COMBINATION \n

\n Directors and Executive Officers \n

\n The following table sets forth certain information concerning the individuals who are anticipated, as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, to be the directors and executive officers of the Combined Company following the Closing: \n

\n Directors \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Name \n \n	\n \n Position \n \n	\n \n Age \n \n

\n Executive Officers \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Name \n \n	\n \n Position \n \n	\n \n Age \n \n

\n Biographical Information \n

\n Biographical information regarding the expected directors and executive officers of the Combined Company is set forth below. \n

\n Directors \n

\n Committees of the Board of Directors \n

\n The Combined Company’s board of directors will establish two standing committees: an audit committee and a compensation committee. Subject to phase-in rules, the rules of NYSE and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act require that the audit committee of a listed company be comprised solely of independent directors. Each committee will operate under a charter approved by the board and have the composition and responsibilities described below. \n

\n Audit Committee \n

\n The Combined Company’s board of directors will establish an audit committee of the board of directors. [ ], [ ] and [ ] will serve as the members of the audit committee. Under the NYSE listing standards and applicable SEC rules, the Combined Company is required to have three members of the audit committee, all of whom must be independent. [ ], [ ] and [ ] are each independent. \n

\n [ ] will serve as the chair of the audit committee. Each member of the audit committee will be financially literate and the board of directors is expected to determine that [ ] qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in applicable SEC rules. \n

\n The Combined Company’s board of directors will adoptan audit committee charter, which details the principal functions of the audit committee, including: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n assisting board oversight of (1) the integrity of financial statements, (2) compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) our independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, and (4) the performance of internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm; the appointment, compensation, retention, replacement, and oversight of the work of the independent registered public accounting firm and any other independent registered public accounting firm engaged by the Combined Company; \n

\n 177\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n pre-approving all audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm or any other registered public accounting firm engaged by us, and establishing pre-approval policies and procedures; reviewing and discussing with the independent registered public accounting firm all relationships the independent registered public accounting firm have with us in order to evaluate their continued independence; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n setting clear policies for audit partner rotation in compliance with applicable laws and regulations; obtaining and reviewing a report, at least annually, from the independent registered public accounting firm describing (1) the independent registered public accounting firm’s internal quality-control procedures and (2) any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review, or peer review, of the independent registered public accounting firm, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities, within the preceding five years respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the firm and any steps taken to deal with such issues; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n meeting to review and discuss the annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, including reviewing our specific disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”; reviewing and approving any related party transaction required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC prior to the Combined Company entering into such transaction; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n reviewing with management, the independent registered public accounting firm, and the Combined Company’s legal advisors, as appropriate, any legal, regulatory or compliance matters, including any correspondence with regulators or government agencies and any employee complaints or published reports that raise material issues regarding our financial statements or accounting policies and any significant changes in accounting standards or rules promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC or other regulatory authorities. \n

\n Compensation Committee \n

\n The Combined Company’s board of directors will establish a compensation committee of the board of directors. The members of the compensation committee are expected to be [ ], [ ] and [ ]. [ ] will serve as chair of the compensation committee. Under the NYSE listing standards and applicable SEC rules, the Combined Company is required to have a compensation committee of at least two members, all of whom must be independent. [ ] and [ ] are each independent. The Combined Company will adopta compensation committee charter, which will detail the principal functions of the compensation committee, including: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n reviewing and approving on an annual basis the corporate goals and objectives relevant to the chief executive officer’s compensation, evaluating our chief executive officer’s performance in light of such goals and objectives and determining and approving the remuneration (if any) of the chief executive officer’s based on such evaluation; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n reviewing and making recommendations to the board of directors with respect to the compensation, and any incentive compensation and equity based plans that are subject to board approval of all of our other officers; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n reviewing executive compensation policies and plans; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n implementing and administering any incentive compensation equity-based remuneration plans; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n assisting management in complying with proxy statement and annual report disclosure requirements; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n approving all special perquisites, special cash payments and other special compensation and benefit arrangements for the executive officers and employees; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n producing a report on executive compensation to be included in the annual proxy statement; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n reviewing, evaluating and recommending changes, if appropriate, to the remuneration for directors. \n

\n The charter will also provide that the compensation committee may, in its sole discretion, retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser and will be directly responsible for \n

\n 178\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of any such adviser. However, before engaging or receiving advice from a compensation consultant, external legal counsel or any other adviser, the compensation committee will consider the independence of each such adviser, including the factors required by NYSE and the SEC. \n

\n Director Nominations \n

\n The Combined Company does not expect to have a standing nominating committee though it intends to form a nominating/corporate governance committee as and when required to do so by law or NYSE rules. In accordance with Rule 303A.04 of the NYSE rules, a nominating/corporate governance committee must be composed entirely of independent directors. The Combined Company expects the members of the nominating/corporate governance committee will be [ ] and [ ]. In accordance with Rule 303A.04 of the NYSE rules, all such directors will be independent. As there is no standing nominating committee, the Combined Company will not have a nominating committee charter in place. \n

\n The board of directors will also consider director candidates recommended for nomination by the shareholders during such times as they are seeking proposed nominees to stand for appointment at the next annual general meeting (or, if applicable, an extraordinary general meeting). Shareholders that wish to nominate a director for appointment to the board of directors should follow the procedures set forth in the amended and restated memorandum and articles of association. \n

\n The Combined Company has not formally established any specific, minimum qualifications that must be met or skills that are necessary for directors to possess. In general, in identifying and evaluating nominees for director, the board of directors is expected to consider educational background, diversity of professional experience, knowledge of the company’s business, integrity, professional reputation, independence, wisdom, and the ability to represent the best interests of the shareholders. Holders of Combined Company common stock will have the right to recommend director candidates for nomination to the board of directors. \n

\n Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation \n

\n None of the expected members of the Compensation Committee has ever been an officer or employee of USFM. None of the expected executive officers of the Combined Company serve, or have served during the last year, as a member of the board of directors, compensation committee, or other board committee performing equivalent functions of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as one of the directors of the Combined Company. \n

\n Clawback Policy \n

\n The Combined Company will adopt a compensation recovery policy that is compliant with NYSE listing rules as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. \n

\n Code of Conduct \n

\n The Combined Company will adopt a Code of Ethics that applies to all of its employees, officers and directors, including those officers responsible for financial reporting. Following the Closing, the Code of Ethics will be available on the website of the Combined Company at https://www.[ ]. Information contained on or accessible through such website is not a part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and the inclusion of the website address in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is an inactive textual reference only. The Combined Company intends to disclose any amendments to the Code of Ethics, or any waivers of its requirements, on its website to the extent required by the applicable rules and exchange requirements. \n

\n Limitation on Liability and Indemnification of Officer and Directors \n

\n 179\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the individual’s conduct was unlawful. Such determination will be made, in the case of an individual who is a director or officer at the time of such determination: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n by a majority of the disinterested and independent directors, even though less than a quorum; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n by a majority vote of a committee of the directors if the committee is designated by a majority vote of the directors, who at the time of the vote are disinterested and independent, even though less than a quorum, and is composed solely of one or more directors who are disinterested and independent; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n by special legal counsel selected by the directors, or selected by a committee of the directors as described in the preceding two subparts above; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n by the owners or members of the corporation in a vote that excludes the ownership or membership interests held by each director who is not disinterested and independent; or \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n by a unanimous vote of the owners or members of the corporation. \n

\n The TBOC requires indemnification of directors and officers for reasonable expenses actually incurred relating to a wholly successful defense on the merits or otherwise in defense of a proceeding. The TBOC permits a corporation to advance expenses relating to the defense of any proceeding to directors and officers, contingent upon, among other things, such individuals’ commitment to repay any advances unless it is determined ultimately that such individuals are entitled to be indemnified. No indemnification may be made in respect of any proceeding in which such individual is liable to the corporation or improperly received a personal benefit and is found liable for willful misconduct, breach of the duty of loyalty owed to the corporation, or an act or omission deemed not to be committed in good faith. \n

\n The Proposed Charter and Proposed Bylaws will provide for indemnification by the Combined Company of its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Texas law. \n

\n Indemnification Agreements \n

\n The Combined Company intends to enter into an indemnification agreement with each of its directors and executive officers. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the Combined Company, the Combined Company has been informed that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable. \n

\n Limitations on Liability of Officers and Directors \n

\n The TBOC provides that a corporation’s certificate of formation may include a provision limiting the personal liability of a director or officer to the corporation or its shareholders for monetary damages for an act or omission as a director or officer. However, no such provision can eliminate or limit the liability of a director or officer for: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n any breach of the director’s or officer’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its shareholders; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n acts or omissions not in good faith (i) that constitute a breach of a duty owed to the corporation or (ii) involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of the law; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n violation of certain provisions of Texas law; or \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n any transaction from which the director or officer received an improper benefit. \n

\n The Proposed Charter will provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by the TBOC, a director or officer of the Combined Company will not be personally liable to the Combined Company or its shareholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer, and that, unless otherwise required by the TBOC, any repeal or amendment of this provision will be prospective only (except to the extent such amendment or change in law permits the Combined Company to further limit or eliminate the liability of directors or officers). The Combined Company believes that these limitation of liability, indemnification and advancement provisions and insurance will be useful to attract and retain qualified directors and executive officers. \n

\n 180\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n The limitation of liability, indemnification and advancement provisions in the Proposed Charter and the Proposed Bylaws may discourage shareholders from bringing a lawsuit against directors or officers for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions also may have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against directors and officers, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit the Combined Company and its shareholders. In addition, a shareholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent the Combined Company pays the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers pursuant to these indemnification provisions.\n

\n 181\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION \n

\n USFM \n

\n On March 1, 2026, USFM entered into a contractor agreement (“Contractor Agreement”) with Robert Price to provide chief executive officer services. USFM pays $180,000 per year to Robert Price for such services. No other person is compensated by USFM in their capacities as a director or officer. \n

\n Twin Vee \n

\n Information regarding the Twin Vee executive officer and director compensation is set forth in Item 11 “Executive Compensation” in Twin Vee’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, which is incorporated herein by reference \n

\n 182\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES \n

\n Pre-Business Combination. \n

\n USFM. The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of USFM Common Stock as of October 26, 2026 which is prior to the consummation of the Business Combination (pre- Business Combination), by: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n each person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of any class of USFM Common Stock; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n each of USFM’s current executive officers and directors; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n all executive officers and directors of USFM as a group pre-Business Combination. \n

\n Beneficial ownership is determined according to the rules of the SEC, which generally provide that a person has beneficial ownership of a security if he, she or it possesses sole or shared voting or investment power over that security, including options and warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days. \n

\n The beneficial ownership of USFM Common Stock pre-Business Combination is based on 238,876 shares of USFM Common Stock issued and outstanding as of October 26, 2026. \n

\n Unless otherwise indicated, USFM believes that all persons named in the table below have, or may be deemed to have, sole voting and investment power with respect to the voting securities beneficially owned by them. \n

\n \n Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)\n \n	\n \n Number of \n \n Shares of \n \n Common Stock \n \n Beneficially \n \n Owned \n \n		\n \n Approximate \n \n Percentage of \n \n Outstanding \n \n Shares of \n \n Common Stock \n \n
\n Executive Officers and Directors of USFM\n
\n \n Robert Price \n \n		36,441		15.26%
\n \n Hassan Sajjad Baqar \n \n		1,000		*
\n \n All USFM directors and executive officers as a group (2 individuals) \n \n		37,441		15.67%
\n 5% Holders of USFM Common Stock\n
\n \n Eric Sondergaard \n \n		18,000		7.54%
\n \n Robert McIllree \n \n		15,000		6.28%
\n \n Larry G. Swets, Jr. \n \n		25,000		10.47%
\n \n Hassan Raza Baqar \n \n		25,000		10.47%
\n \n Eagle Ridge West, LLC(2)\n \n		15,000		6.28%
\n \n DJ&D Investments, LLC(3)\n \n		27,693		11.59%
\n \n FG Nexus Inc. \n		14,423		6.04%

\n *\n
\n

\n \n Less than 1.0%. \n

\n (1)\n
\n

\n \n Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each of the following is 1707 Cole Blvd., Suite 200, Golden, CO 80401. \n

\n (2)\n
\n

\n \n Eagle Ridge West, LLC is the record holder of such shares. Charles McDowell, the manager, holds voting and investment discretion with respect to the common stock held of record by Eagle Ridge West, LLC. Mr. McDowell disclaims any beneficial ownership of the securities held by Eagle Ridge West, LLC other than to the extent of any pecuniary interest they may individually have therein, directly or indirectly. \n

\n (3)\n
\n

\n \n DJ&D Investments, LLC is the record holder of such shares. Don Pickering holds voting and investment discretion with respect to the common stock held of record by DJ&D Investments, LLC. Mr. Pickering \n

\n 183\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n disclaims any beneficial ownership of the securities held by DJ&D Investments, LLC other than to the extent of any pecuniary interest they may individually have therein, directly or indirectly. \n

\n Twin Vee. The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of Twin Vee Common Stock as of [ ], which is prior to the consummation of the Business Combination (pre-Business Combination), by: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n each person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of any class of Twin Vee Common Stock; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n each of Twin Vee’s executive officers and directors; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n all executive officers and directors of Twin Vee as a group pre-Business Combination. \n

\n The beneficial ownership of Twin Vee Common Stock pre-Business Combination is based on [ ] shares of Twin Vee Common Stock issued and outstanding as of [ ], which consists of an aggregate of [ ] outstanding as of such date. \n

\n Unless otherwise indicated, Twin Vee believes that all persons named in the table below have, or may be deemed to have, sole voting and investment power with respect to the voting securities beneficially owned by them. \n

\n \n Name and Address of Beneficial Owner \n \n	\n \n Shares of Twin Vee \n \n Common Stock \n \n		\n \n % of Twin Vee \n \n Common Stock \n \n	\n \n % of Voting \n \n Power \n \n
\n Directors and Executive Officers of Twin Vee \n
\n \n Joseph C. Visconti(1)\n \n		10,916			1.9%	1.9%
\n \n Preston Yarborough(2)\n \n		1,026			*	*
\n \n Michael P. Dickerson \n \n		4,188			*	*
\n \n Kevin W. Schuyler(3)\n \n		963			*	*
\n \n Larry Swets, Jr. \n \n		6,757			1.2%	1.2%
\n \n Carol Craig \n \n		0			0%	0%
\n \n All Twin Vee directors and executive officers as a group (6 individuals) \n \n		23,850			4.1%	4.1%
\n 5% Holders of Twin Vee Common Stock \n
\n \n Lincoln Alternative Strategies LLC 404 Washington Ave., Suite 650 Miami Beach, FL 33139(4)\n \n		37,606			6.5%	6.5%
\n \n Clamantis Holdings LLC 270 Taconic Rd\n \n Greenwich, CT 06831(5)\n \n		31,937			5.6%	5.6%

\n *\n
\n

\n \n Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1.0%. \n

\n (1)\n
\n

\n \n Mr. Visconti owns an aggregate of 7,106 shares of common stock and options to purchase an aggregate of 4,471 shares of common stock, of which options to purchase an aggregate of 3,810 shares of common stock will vest and be exercisable within 60 days of August 10, 2026. \n

\n (2)\n
\n

\n \n Mr. Yarborough owns an aggregate of 104 shares of common stock and options to purchase an aggregate of 1,042 shares of common stock, of which options to purchase an aggregate of 922 shares of common stock will vest and be exercisable within 60 days of August 10, 2026. \n

\n (3)\n
\n

\n \n Mr. Schuyler owns an aggregate of 845 shares of common stock and options to purchase an aggregate of 118 shares of common stock, all of which will vest and be exercisable within 60 days of August 10, 2026. \n

\n (4)\n
\n

\n \n Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by Lincoln Alternative Strategies \n

\n 184\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n LLC on March 25, 2026 with respect to holdings of Twin Vee Common Stock as of March 23, 2026, Lincoln Alternative Strategies LLC had sole voting and sole dispositive power over 1,391,430 shares (or 37,606 shares after reflecting the 1-for-37 reverse stock split) and shared voting and shared dispositive power over 0 shares. \n

\n (5)\n
\n

\n \n Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by Clamantis Holdings LLC on March 24, 2026 with respect to holdings of Twin Vee Common Stock as of March 2, 2026, Clamantis Holdings LLC had sole voting and sole dispositive power over 0 shares and shared voting and shared dispositive power over 1,181,674 shares (or 31,937 after reflecting the 1-for-37 reverse stock split). \n

\n Post-Business Combination \n

\n The following tables set forth information regarding the expected beneficial ownership of shares of the Combined Company Common Stock immediately following consummation of the Business Combination by: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n each person who is expected to be the beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of shares of the Combined Company Common Stock post-Business Combination; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n each person who is expected to become an executive officer or director of the Combined Company post-Business Combination; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n all executive officers and directors of the Combined Company as a group post-Business Combination. \n

\n The expected beneficial ownership of shares of Combined Company Common Stock assumes certain exchange ratios in the Business Combination. The final exchange ratios, which may be different from the assumed exchange ratios, will be determined at the Closing pursuant to the formula and terms set forth in the Merger Agreement. If the actual facts are different from the foregoing assumptions, ownership figures in the Combined Company and the tables that follows could differ. \n

\n Unless otherwise indicated, USFM and Twin Vee believe that all persons named in the table below have, or may be deemed to have, sole voting and investment power with respect to the voting securities beneficially owned by them. \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)\n \n
	\n \n All directors and executive officers as a group ([X] individuals) \n \n
	\n \n 5% Holders of Combined Company Common Stock\n \n

\n *\n
\n

\n \n Less than 1.0%. \n

\n (1)\n
\n

\n \n Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each of the following is 1707 Cole Blvd., Suite 200, Golden, CO 80401. \n

\n 185\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS \n

\n Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions-USFM \n

\n Related Party Promissory Note \n

\n On January 16, 2026, USFM issued a promissory note in the principal amount of $11,000 to Robert B. Price, USFM’s President and sole director. The note bears no interest and is payable on demand. \n

\n On May 1 2026, USFM issued a promissory note in the principal amount of $300,000 to FG Nexus Inc., a stockholder of the Company. The note bears interest at 15% per annum. The promissory note holds the obligation to issue $300,000 worth of USFM shares in the next equity raise by USFM.\n

\n Contractor Agreement \n

\n On March 1, 2026, USFM entered into a contractor agreement (“Contractor Agreement”) with Robert Price to provide chief executive officer services. USFM shall pay $180,000 per year to Robert Price for such services. \n

\n Disko SPA \n

\n During the six months ended June 30, 2026, USFM incurred a management fee of $264,000 in connection with the Greenland project. Certain of USFM’s investors are affiliated with 80 Mile, USFM’s counterparty under the Disko SPA. \n

\n Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions-Twin Vee \n

\n Each of the related party transactions described below was negotiated on an arm’s length basis. Twin Vee believes that the terms of such agreements are as favorable as those it could have obtained from parties not related to it. The following are summaries of certain provisions of Twin Vee’s related party agreements and are qualified in their entirety by reference to all of the provisions of such agreements. \n

\n The following is a description of each transaction since January 1, 2024 or any currently proposed transaction in which (i) Twin Vee has been or is to be a party, (ii) the amount involved exceeded or exceeds $120,000 or 1% of the average of Twin Vee’s total assets as of the end of the last two completed fiscal years, and (iii) any of Twin Vee’s directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of its outstanding capital stock, or any immediate family member of, or person sharing the household with, any of these individuals or entities, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. \n

\n Lease Agreement with Visconti Holdings \n

\n Twin Vee leases its facility from Visconti Holdings, LLC (“Visconti Holdings”), an entity owned and controlled by its Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board, Joseph Visconti, pursuant to a lease agreement (the “Lease Agreement”), dated January 1, 2021, by and among Twin Vee, Visconti Holdings and Twin Vee Inc., its former majority shareholder company. The Lease Agreement has a five-year term, expiring on December 31, 2025, with an option to renew for an additional five-year term, which Twin Vee exercised. Twin Vee currently pays Visconti Holdings $36,456 per month plus applicable sales and use tax, which is currently 6.5% in St. Lucie County. \n

\n Forza Management Services \n

\n In connection with the closing of Forza’s initial public offering, Twin Vee entered into a transition services agreement (the “Transition Services Agreement”), dated August 16, 2022, with Forza, pursuant to which Twin Vee agreed to provide Forza, at its cost, with certain services, such as procurement, shipping, receiving, and storage and use of its facility, until Forza’s own planned facility was completed. The Transition Services Agreement operated on a month-to-month basis. During the year ended December 31, 2024, Twin Vee received a variable average monthly fee pursuant to the Transition Services Agreement of $41,593 for the period from January 1, 2024 through the date of the Forza merger, November 26, 2024, at which \n

\n 186\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n point the fee ceased. Since the merger of Forza and Twin Vee on November 26, 2024, Twin Vee no longer receives a management fee under this arrangement. \n

\n Black Mountain Lease Agreement \n

\n In August 2022, Forza signed a six-month lease for a duplex on a property in Black Mountain, North Carolina, to be used by its traveling employees during construction of its new manufacturing facility, for $2,500 per month. After the initial term, the lease was extended on a month-to-month basis. In August 2023, the president of Forza, James Leffew, purchased the property, and Forza executed a new lease agreement with Mr. Leffew on the same month-to-month terms. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, lease expense was $0 and $7,500, respectively, paid to Mr. Leffew. The Black Mountain lease ended in 2024. \n

\n Merger with Forza \n

\n On November 26, 2024, Twin Vee’s merger subsidiary merged with and into Forza, with Forza surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Twin Vee. At the effective time of the merger, (a) each outstanding share of Forza common stock (other than shares held by Twin Vee) was converted into the right to receive 0.611666275 shares of Twin Vee Common Stock, (b) each outstanding Forza stock option was converted into an option to purchase 0.611666275 shares of Twin Vee Common Stock per share of Forza common stock covered by such option, (c) each outstanding Forza warrant was assumed by Twin Vee and converted into a warrant to purchase 0.611666275 shares of Twin Vee Common Stock per share of Forza common stock for which such warrant was exercisable, and (d) the 7,000,000 shares of Forza common stock held by Twin Vee were cancelled. The issuance of Twin Vee Common Stock to former Forza shareholders was registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-281788), as amended, declared effective on October 10, 2024. In connection with the merger, the size of Twin Vee’s board of directors was set at five: Joseph Visconti, Preston Yarborough, Neil Ross and Kevin Schuyler remained as directors, and Marcia Kull was appointed as a director, while Bard Rockenbach and James Melvin resigned as directors. \n

\n Indemnification \n

\n The information included under the heading “Management of the Combined Company Following the Business Combination — Limitation of Liability and Indemnification” elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is incorporated by reference into this section.

\n Twin Vee’s Policy Regarding Related Party Transactions \n

\n Twin Vee’s board of directors recognizes that transactions with related persons present a heightened risk of conflicts of interest and/or improper valuation (or the perception thereof). Twin Vee’s board of directors has adopted a written policy on transactions with related persons that is in conformity with the requirements for issuers having publicly held common stock listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market. Under the policy, any related person transaction, and any material amendment or modification to a related person transaction, must be reviewed and approved or ratified by the Audit Committee, which may approve or disapprove such transactions. In connection with the review and approval or ratification of a related person transaction, management must disclose to the committee, among other information, the name of the related person and the basis on which the person is a related person, the material terms of the transaction, including the approximate dollar value of the amount involved, and all material facts as to the related person’s direct or indirect interest in, or relationship to, the transaction. \n

\n See also the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Twin Vee Stockholder Proposal No. 2: The Twin Vee Business Combination Proposal — Interests of Twin Vee’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination.”\n

\n 187\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n DESCRIPTION OF THE COMBINED COMPANY’S SECURITIES \n

\n Upon the consummation of the Business Combination, the authorized capital stock of the Combined Company will consist of [•] shares of Combined Company Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, and [•] shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. Immediately following the Closing, the Combined Company expects that approximately [•] shares of Combined Company Common Stock will be issued and outstanding and that no shares of preferred stock will be issued and outstanding. \n

\n The following summary of the capital stock of the Combined Company, the proposed amended and restated certificate of formation of the Combined Company (the “Proposed Charter”), the proposed amended and restated bylaws of the Combined Company (the “Proposed Bylaws”) and certain provisions of applicable law does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the provisions of applicable law and to the Proposed Charter and the Proposed Bylaws, copies of which are attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annexes B and C, respectively. \n

\n Common Stock \n

\n Holders of shares of Combined Company Common Stock will be entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters on which shareholders of Combined Company Common Stock are entitled to vote generally, including the election of directors or removal of directors elected by shareholders. The holders of Combined Company Common Stock will not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. \n

\n Subject to the rights of the holders of any outstanding preferred stock, holders of shares of Combined Company Common Stock will be entitled to receive ratably such dividends and other distributions (payable in cash, property or capital stock of the Combined Company) when, as and if declared by the Combined Company’s board of directors from time to time out of any assets or funds legally available therefor. The Combined Company does not intend to pay dividends on the Combined Company Common Stock for the foreseeable future. See the section titled “Risk Factors” for more details. \n

\n In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Combined Company, after payment of the debts and other liabilities of the Combined Company, and subject to the rights of the holders of any outstanding preferred stock, holders of shares of Combined Company Common Stock will be entitled to receive all remaining assets of the Combined Company available for distribution to its shareholders, ratably in proportion to the number of shares of Combined Company Common Stock held by them. \n

\n All shares of Combined Company Common Stock to be issued in the Mergers will, when issued, be fully paid and non-assessable. Holders of Combined Company Common Stock will not have preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights, and there will be no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the Combined Company Common Stock. The rights, powers, preferences and privileges of holders of Combined Company Common Stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred stock that the Combined Company may designate and issue in the future. \n

\n Preferred Stock \n

\n No shares of preferred stock will be issued or outstanding immediately following the Closing. The Proposed Charter will authorize the Combined Company’s board of directors, subject to limitations prescribed by law, to issue preferred stock from time to time in one or more series and to fix by resolution, and set forth in a statement of resolution filed pursuant to the Texas Business Organizations Code (the “TBOC”), the powers, designations, preferences, limitations and relative rights, including voting rights, of any wholly unissued series of preferred stock, including, without limitation, dividend rights, dividend rate, conversion rights, rights and terms of redemption (including sinking fund provisions), redemption price or prices, liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any such series. Unless required by law or the rules of the Applicable Stock Exchange, the authorized shares of preferred stock will be available for issuance without further action by the holders of Combined Company Common Stock. Subject to the \n

\n 188\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Proposed Charter and applicable law, the board of directors will be able to determine, with respect to any series of preferred stock, the terms and rights of such series, including, without limitation: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the designation of the series; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the number of shares of the series, which, to the extent permitted by the TBOC and except where otherwise provided in the applicable statement of resolution, the board of directors may increase (but not above the total number of authorized shares of the class) or decrease (but not below the number of shares then outstanding); \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n whether dividends, if any, will be cumulative or non-cumulative and the dividend rate of the series; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the dates at which dividends, if any, will be payable; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the redemption or repurchase rights and price or prices, if any, for shares of the series; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the terms and amounts of any sinking fund provided for the purchase or redemption of shares of the series; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the amounts payable on shares of the series in the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the affairs of the Combined Company; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n whether the shares of the series will be convertible into shares of any other class or series, or any other security, of the Combined Company and, if so, the specification of the other class or series or other security, the conversion price or prices or rate or rates, any rate adjustments, the date or dates as of which the shares will be convertible and all other terms and conditions upon which the conversion may be made; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n to the extent permitted by applicable law, restrictions on the issuance of shares of the same series or of any other class or series; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the voting rights, if any, of the holders of the series. \n

\n Warrants \n

\n FG Warrants \n

\n Pursuant to a subscription agreement and a Warrant Agreement dated as of July 7, 2026 (the “Warrant Agreement”), USFM issued an aggregate of 11,576 warrants to an investor (the “Holder”) at a price of approximately $0.002 per Warrant. At the closing of the Business Combination, these warrants will be terminated and exchanged for an aggregate of 702,895 Combined Company warrants (the “FG Warrants”) \n

\n Each FG Warrant will entitle the Holder to purchase one share of Combined Company Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.12 per share, subject to adjustment (as described below). The Combined Company may, in its sole discretion, lower the exercise price for a period of not less than 20 Business Days upon at least 20 days’ prior written notice, provided the reduction is identical among all FG Warrants. The FG Warrants will become exercisable on the date that is 30 days after the Business Combination and will expire at the earlier of 5:00 p.m. (New York City time) on the date that is ten years after Business Combination and the liquidation of the Combined Company. The Combined Company may, in its sole discretion, extend the expiration date upon at least 20 days’ prior written notice. FG Warrants not exercised by the expiration date will become void. \n

\n The FG Warrants may be exercised by surrender of the FG Warrant (if certificated) with a duly executed subscription form and payment of the exercise price and applicable taxes, either in cash (by certified check or bank draft) or on a “cashless” basis based on the 10-day average closing price of Combined Company Common Stock. The Combined Company is not obligated to deliver common stock upon exercise unless a registration statement covering the underlying common stock is effective and a prospectus is current, or a valid exemption from registration is available, and the shares are registered, qualified or exempt under the securities laws of the Holder’s state of residence; if these conditions are not satisfied, the FG Warrants may \n

\n 189\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n expire worthless. In no event will the Combined Company be required to net cash settle an FG Warrant exercise. No fractional shares will be issued upon exercise; any fractional interest will be rounded up to the nearest whole share. \n

\n The number of shares of Combined Company Common Stock issuable upon exercise of an FG Warrant and the exercise price thereof are subject to customary adjustments in the event of share capitalizations, share splits, consolidations, combinations, reverse share splits, reclassifications or similar events. The exercise price will also be reduced by the amount of cash and the fair market value of any securities or other assets paid per share in any extraordinary dividend (i.e., dividends other than ordinary cash dividends not exceeding $0.50 per share in the aggregate over a 365-day period). \n

\n The FG Warrants contain an elective beneficial ownership limitation. If a Holder elects in writing to be subject to the limitation, the holder may not exercise FG Warrants to the extent the exercise would result in the holder (together with its affiliates) beneficially owning more than 4.9% or 9.8% (or such other amount as the holder specifies) of the outstanding shares of Combined Company Common Stock. Upon notice to the Combined Company, a holder may increase or decrease this limitation, provided that any increase will not be effective until the 61st day after such notice is delivered. \n

\n The FG Warrants may be transferred subject to compliance with applicable law; however, the FG Warrants may not be transferred until 30 days after the closing of Business Combination, except to certain permitted transferees who agree in writing to be bound by the terms of the FG Warrants. The FG Warrants bear a restrictive legend and have not been registered under the Securities Act. \n

\n Holders of FG Warrants will not have any rights of a shareholder, including voting, dividend or preemptive rights, until shares are issued upon exercise. \n

\n Under the Warrant Agreement, the Combined Company must, as soon as practicable but in no event later than 15 Business Days after the closing of the Business Combination, use commercially reasonable efforts to file with the SEC a registration statement registering, under the Securities Act, the shares of Combined Company Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the FG Warrants. The Combined Company is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective and to maintain its effectiveness, and a current prospectus relating thereto, until the expiration of the FG Warrants. \n

\n PubCo Warrants \n

\n As of October 26, 2026, investors had committed approximately $ 1,350,000, representing approximately 5,624 shares of USFM common stock at $240.00 per share and 11,248 PIPE Warrants. At the closing of the Business Combination, each outstanding PIPE Warrant will be terminated and exchanged for a warrant of PubCo (a “PubCo Warrant”) to acquire 62.70 shares of PubCo Common Stock for each share of USFM Common Stock underlying such PIPE Warrant, on the same terms and conditions, including vesting and exercisability, as applied to the PIPE Warrant immediately before the Second Effective Time. \n

\n The terms of the PubCo Warrants are substantially similar to the terms of the FG Warrants, except as follows: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Each PubCo Warrant will entitle the Holder to purchase one share of Combined Company Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.61 per share, subject to adjustment (as described below). The PubCo Warrants will become exercisable on the date that is 30 days after the Business Combination and will expire at the earliest of 5:00 p.m. (New York City time) on the date that is five years after the Business Combination, the liquidation of the Combined Company and, solely with respect to PubCo Warrants called for redemption, the redemption date. \n

\n 190\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n At any time during the exercise period after the last reported sale price of Combined Company Common Stock on any trading day equals or exceeds 125% of the exercise price (initially $350.00, subject to adjustment), the Combined Company may redeem all or less than all of the outstanding PubCo Warrants at $1.00 per PubCo Warrant upon written notice to each holder (with any partial redemption allocated pro rata among holders). Each holder will have 10 days after the notice is deemed given (on the third Business Day after mailing) to exercise its PubCo Warrants in full, for cash or on a cashless basis (subject to an available exemption from registration). The redemption right is not conditioned on an effective registration statement. PubCo Warrants called for redemption and not exercised by 5:00 p.m. (New York City time) on the redemption date will cease to be exercisable, and the holder will be entitled only to the redemption price, payable without interest within 10 Business Days after surrender. If an exercise during the redemption period would cause a holder to exceed its elected beneficial ownership limitation (described below), the excess shares will be held in abeyance for the holder and issued upon request, subject to that limitation. \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n Under the Warrant Agreement, the Combined Company must, as soon as practicable but in no event later than 30 Business Days after the closing of the Business Combination, use commercially reasonable efforts to file with the SEC a registration statement registering, under the Securities Act, the shares of Combined Company Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the PubCo Warrants. \n

\n The foregoing description of the FG Warrants and the PubCo Warrants does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the FG Warrant and the USFM Warrant Agreement copies of which are filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement prospectus forms a part. \n

\n Registration Rights \n

\n At the Closing, USFM, PubCo and the other parties thereto will enter into the Registration Rights Agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, the parties thereto will be granted certain registration rights with respect to the shares of Combined Company Common Stock underlying the FG Exchange Warrant and the PIPE Warrants. See “USFM Shareholder Proposal No. 1: The USFM Business Combination Proposal — Registration Rights Agreement.” \n

\n Annual Shareholder Meetings \n

\n The Proposed Bylaws will provide that annual shareholder meetings will be held on such dates and at such times as designated from time to time by the Combined Company’s board of directors, at such places, if any, within or without the State of Texas as the board of directors may designate. The Combined Company’s board of directors may determine that a meeting be held solely by means of remote communication, at a designated place, or both at a designated place and by means of remote communication, as authorized by Section 6.002(a) of the TBOC. \n

\n Number and Election of Directors \n

\n Upon the Closing, the Combined Company’s board of directors will consist of five directors, all of whom were designated by USFM pursuant to the Merger Agreement and are being elected pursuant to the Director Election Proposal. Under the Proposed Charter and the Proposed Bylaws, the number of directors will thereafter be fixed from time to time solely by resolution of the board of directors, provided that no decrease in the number of directors will shorten the term of an incumbent director. The Combined Company’s board of directors will not be classified. Directors will be elected at each annual meeting of shareholders and will hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote in such election. \n

\n 191\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Removal of Directors \n

\n Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock with respect to the election of directors, the Proposed Charter will provide that a director may be removed from office, with or without cause, by the affirmative vote of shareholders holding at least [two-thirds] of the shares then entitled to vote in an election of directors. Because removal will require a supermajority vote, it may be more difficult for shareholders to remove incumbent directors, which may discourage or delay a change in control of the Combined Company. \n

\n Anti-Takeover Effects of the Proposed Charter and the Proposed Bylaws and Certain Provisions of Texas Law \n

\n The Proposed Charter and the Proposed Bylaws will contain provisions, which are summarized in the following paragraphs, that are intended to enhance the likelihood of continuity and stability in the composition of the Combined Company’s board of directors. These provisions are intended to avoid costly takeover battles, reduce the Combined Company’s vulnerability to a hostile or abusive change of control and enhance the ability of the board of directors to maximize shareholder value in connection with any unsolicited offer to acquire the Combined Company. However, these provisions and certain other provisions of the TBOC may have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, deter or prevent a merger or acquisition of the Combined Company by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or other takeover attempt that a shareholder might consider in its best interest, including those attempts that might result in a premium over the prevailing market price for the shares of Combined Company Common Stock held by shareholders. The Combined Company believes that the benefits of increased protection of its potential ability to negotiate more favorable terms with an unfriendly or unsolicited acquirer outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging a proposal to acquire the Combined Company. \n

\n Authorized but Unissued Capital Stock \n

\n Texas law does not require shareholder approval for any issuance of shares that are authorized and available for issuance. These additional shares may be used for a variety of corporate purposes, including future public offerings, to raise additional capital or to facilitate acquisitions. However, the listing requirements of the Applicable Stock Exchange, which would apply so long as the Combined Company Common Stock remains listed on the Applicable Stock Exchange, generally require shareholder approval of certain issuances equal to or exceeding 20% of the then-outstanding voting power or then-outstanding number of shares of Combined Company Common Stock. \n

\n The Combined Company’s board of directors may generally issue shares of one or more series of preferred stock on terms calculated to discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of the Combined Company or the removal of its management. Moreover, the authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock will be available for future issuances in one or more series without shareholder approval and could be utilized for a variety of corporate purposes, including future offerings to raise additional capital, to facilitate acquisitions and employee benefit plans. \n

\n One of the effects of the existence of authorized and unissued and unreserved common stock or preferred stock may be to enable the Combined Company’s board of directors to issue shares to persons friendly to current management, which issuance could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of the Combined Company by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise, and thereby protect the continuity of its management and possibly deprive its shareholders of opportunities to sell their shares of Combined Company Common Stock at prices higher than prevailing market prices. \n

\n Texas Law \n

\n The Combined Company will be subject to the provisions of Section 21.606 of the TBOC, which provides that a Texas corporation that qualifies as an “issuing public corporation” (as defined in the TBOC) may not engage in specified types of business combinations, including mergers, consolidations and asset \n

\n 192\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n sales, with a person, or an affiliate or associate of that person, who is an “affiliated shareholder” for a period of three years following the date the person became an affiliated shareholder unless: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n prior to the date of the transaction, the Combined Company’s board of directors approved either the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the shareholder becoming an affiliated shareholder; or \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n at or subsequent to the date of the transaction, the business combination is approved at an annual or special meeting of shareholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the affiliated shareholder at a meeting of shareholders called for that purpose not less than six months after the affiliated shareholder’s share acquisition date and not by written consent. \n

\n Generally, a business combination includes a merger, share exchange, asset or stock sale, or other transaction resulting in a financial benefit to the affiliated shareholder. For the purposes of this law, an affiliated shareholder is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns or, within three years prior to the determination of affiliated shareholder status did own, 20% or more of a corporation’s outstanding voting shares. The Combined Company expects the existence of this provision to have an anti-takeover effect with respect to transactions its board of directors does not approve in advance. Section 21.606 of the TBOC may also discourage attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares of Combined Company Common Stock held by shareholders. \n

\n Under the TBOC, class voting is required in connection with certain actions, including particular amendments of a corporation’s certificate of formation, a merger or consolidation requiring shareholder approval and certain sales of all or substantially all of the corporation’s assets. Sections 21.364 and 21.365 of the TBOC provide that, with respect to certain matters for which the affirmative vote of the holders of a specified portion of the shares of a class or series is required by the TBOC, the certificate of formation may provide that all classes or series of stock of a corporation will only be entitled to vote together as a single class or series, and that separate voting by class or series is not required. The Proposed Charter will provide that, except as otherwise required by the Proposed Charter (including any statement of resolution relating to any series of preferred stock), all classes or series of capital stock of the Combined Company will only be entitled to vote together as a single class or series, and separate voting by class or series will not be required, for the purpose of approving any matter, including any “fundamental action” or “fundamental business transaction” (each as defined in the TBOC), and that the approval of any such fundamental action or fundamental business transaction will require the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of all outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single class. \n

\n Vacancies and Newly Created Directorships \n

\n The Proposed Bylaws will provide that, subject to the TBOC and the rights of holders of any series of preferred stock then outstanding, vacancies and newly created directorships resulting from an increase in the authorized number of directors may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director, provided that the board of directors may not fill more than two vacancies created by an increase in the number of directors during the period between two successive annual meetings of shareholders. \n

\n No Cumulative Voting \n

\n The Proposed Charter and the Proposed Bylaws will not permit cumulative voting in the election of directors. Therefore, shareholders holding a majority in voting power of the shares entitled to vote generally in the election of directors will be able to elect all of the Combined Company’s directors. Cumulative voting allows a shareholder to vote a portion or all of its shares for one or more candidates for seats on the board of directors. Without cumulative voting, a minority shareholder may not be able to gain as many seats on the board of directors as the shareholder would be able to gain if cumulative voting were permitted. The absence of cumulative voting makes it more difficult for a minority shareholder to gain a seat on the board of directors to influence the board’s decision regarding a takeover. \n

\n 193\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Special Shareholder Meetings \n

\n The Proposed Charter will provide that, except as otherwise provided by the terms of any series of preferred stock, special meetings of shareholders may be called only by the board of directors, the chairperson of the board of directors, the chief executive officer, the president, or the holders of not less than [50]% of the Combined Company’s then-outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote at such special meeting. The board of directors may postpone or reschedule any previously scheduled special meeting at any time, before or after notice of the meeting has been sent to shareholders. The Proposed Bylaws will provide that only business within the purpose or purposes described in the notice of a special meeting may be conducted at such meeting. These provisions may have the effect of deterring, delaying or discouraging hostile takeovers, or changes in control or management of the Combined Company. \n

\n Director Nominations and Shareholder Proposals \n

\n The Proposed Bylaws will establish advance notice procedures with respect to shareholder proposals and the nomination of candidates for election as directors, other than nominations made by or at the direction of the board of directors or a committee thereof and proposals included in the Combined Company’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. \n

\n To be timely, a shareholder’s notice for an annual meeting generally must be delivered to the secretary of the Combined Company at its principal executive offices not later than the close of business on the 90th day, nor earlier than the close of business on the 120th day, before the anniversary of the previous year’s annual meeting, if such meeting is to be held not more than 30 days in advance of, or not later than 70 days after, such anniversary. For any other annual meeting, the notice must be delivered not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the first public disclosure of the date of such meeting. Shareholders may nominate persons for election to the board of directors at a special meeting only if the board of directors has determined that directors will be elected at such meeting, and any such nominations will be subject to similar notice requirements. \n

\n The Proposed Bylaws also specify detailed requirements as to the form and content of a shareholder’s notice, including information regarding the proposing shareholder, its associated persons and any director nominee, require proposing shareholders to update and supplement such information, and require compliance with Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act by any shareholder soliciting proxies in support of director nominees other than the Combined Company’s nominees. The Proposed Bylaws also allow the board of directors to adopt rules and regulations for the conduct of meetings and the chairperson of the meeting to regulate the conduct of any such meeting, which may have the effect of precluding the conduct of certain business at a meeting if the rules and regulations are not followed. These provisions may also deter, delay or discourage a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to influence or obtain control of the Combined Company. \n

\n Section 21.373 of the TBOC permits a “nationally listed corporation” to elect in its governing documents to impose stock ownership requirements on shareholders seeking to submit a proposal on a matter (other than director nominations and procedural resolutions ancillary to the conduct of a shareholder meeting) for approval at a meeting of shareholders. If a corporation elects to be governed by Section 21.373 of the TBOC, a shareholder or group of shareholders may submit such a proposal only if such shareholder or group of shareholders (i) holds shares entitled to vote at such meeting with a market value of at least $1,000,000 (determined as of the date of submission of the proposal) or equal to at least 3% of the total number of shares eligible to vote at such meeting, (ii) has held such amount for a continuous period of at least six months before the date of the meeting, (iii) holds such amount throughout the meeting and (iv) solicits the holders of shares representing at least 67% of the voting power of shares entitled to vote on the proposal. \n

\n Following the Closing, the Combined Company will not immediately qualify as a nationally listed corporation, as it will not have its principal office in Texas or be listed on a stock exchange with its principal office in Texas. However, if and when the Combined Company qualifies as a nationally listed corporation and elects to impose such stock ownership requirements, these requirements will limit the ability of the Combined Company’s shareholders to submit proposals as compared to shareholders of a Delaware corporation. \n

\n 194\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Shareholder Action by Written Consent \n

\n The Proposed Charter will provide that any action required or permitted to be taken at any annual or special meeting of shareholders may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if a consent or consents in writing or by electronic transmission setting forth the action so taken are signed by the holders of outstanding capital stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted. \n

\n Dissenters’ Rights of Appraisal and Payment \n

\n Under the TBOC, with certain exceptions, holders of Combined Company Common Stock will have dissenters’ rights in connection with certain fundamental business transactions, including certain mergers, share exchanges and sales of all or substantially all of the Combined Company’s assets. Shareholders who properly perfect such rights will be entitled to receive payment of the fair value of their shares, which, if not agreed, will be determined by a court in the county in which the Combined Company’s principal office in Texas is located or, if it has no principal office in Texas, the county of its registered office. \n

\n Shareholders’ Derivative Actions \n

\n Under the TBOC, any of the Combined Company’s shareholders may bring an action in the Combined Company’s name to procure a judgment in its favor, also known as a derivative action, provided that the shareholder bringing the action is a holder of the Combined Company’s shares at the time of the transaction to which the action relates or such shareholder’s stock thereafter devolved by operation of law, the shareholder fairly and adequately represents the interests of the corporation in enforcing the right of the corporation, and the shareholder complies with the demand requirements under the applicable provisions of the TBOC. \n

\n The TBOC and the Combined Company’s governing documents include certain provisions which may limit its shareholders’ ability to bring certain derivative claims against the Combined Company’s officers and directors. For example, the TBOC provides that, if a corporation has a class of stock listed on a national securities exchange or has 500 or more shareholders, no shareholder or group of shareholders may institute or maintain a derivative proceeding in the right of the Company unless such shareholder or group of shareholders, at the time the derivative proceeding is instituted, holds at least 3% of the outstanding shares of the Company. The TBOC also permits corporations to request a court, at the start of a transaction (including related party transactions) or investigation of a derivative claim, to judicially determine the independence and disinterestedness of directors on special committees reviewing transactions or individuals on panels reviewing derivative claims. Future challenges to independence or disinterestedness would require new facts. \n

\n In addition, Section 21.419 of the TBOC sets forth certain presumptions concerning compliance by directors and officers with respect to their duties to a corporation, including the duty of care and duty of loyalty as those duties pertain to transactions with interested persons. Specifically, in taking or declining to take any action on any matters of a corporation’s business, Section 21.419 provides that a director or officer is presumed to have acted (i) in good faith, (ii) on an informed basis, (iii) in furtherance of the interests of the corporation and (iv) in obedience to the law and the corporation’s governing documents. These provisions are described as codifying the business judgment rule. In order to succeed in a cause of action against a director or officer, the Combined Company or a shareholder must rebut one or more of the foregoing presumptions and prove the director or officer’s act or omission constituted a breach of duty as a director or officer and that such breach involved fraud, intentional misconduct, an ultra vires act or a knowing violation of law. \n

\n Section 21.419 applies to a corporation that has a class or series of voting shares listed on a national securities exchange or includes within its governing documents an affirmative election to be governed by such section. In the Proposed Charter, the Combined Company will affirmatively elect, in the manner provided under the TBOC, to be governed by Section 21.419 and any successor provision thereto. \n

\n 195\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n The TBOC also restricts the rights of shareholders of corporations to request inspection of certain corporate books and records unless they have held their shares for at least six months or own at least 5% of the corporation’s outstanding shares. \n

\n These provisions and the expected listing of the Combined Company Common Stock on a national securities exchange may discourage or deter shareholders or management from bringing derivative lawsuits or making books and records requests, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise have benefited the Combined Company and its shareholders. \n

\n Exclusive Forum \n

\n The Proposed Charter will provide that, unless the Combined Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Business Court in the First Business Court Division of the State of Texas (the “Business Court”) (or, if the Business Court determines that it lacks jurisdiction, the federal district court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, or if the federal court does not have jurisdiction, a Texas state district court in Dallas County, Texas) shall, to the fullest extent permitted by the TBOC, be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Combined Company, (ii) any action asserting a claim for or based on a breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any current or former director, officer, other employee, agent or shareholder of the Combined Company to the Combined Company or its shareholders, including a claim alleging the aiding and abetting of such a breach of fiduciary duty, (iii) any action arising pursuant to any provision of the TBOC, the Proposed Charter or the Proposed Bylaws or as to which the TBOC confers jurisdiction on the Business Court, (iv) any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of the Proposed Charter or the Proposed Bylaws, (v) any action asserting a claim related to or involving the Combined Company that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine, (vi) any action asserting an “internal entity claim” as that term is defined in Section 2.115 of the TBOC, or (vii) any other action within the jurisdiction of the Business Court, including any claims within the supplemental jurisdiction of the Business Court. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under U.S. federal securities laws, including the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring or holding any interest in shares of capital stock of the Combined Company shall be deemed to have notice of, and to have consented to, the forum provisions in the Proposed Charter. \n

\n Indemnification of Officers and Directors \n

\n Pursuant to the TBOC, a corporation has the power to indemnify its directors and officers against judgments and certain expenses other than judgments that are actually and reasonably incurred in connection with a proceeding, provided that there is a determination that the individual acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the individual’s conduct was unlawful. Such determination will be made, in the case of an individual who is a director or officer at the time of such determination: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n by a majority of the disinterested and independent directors, even though less than a quorum; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n by special legal counsel selected by the directors, or selected by a committee of the directors as described in the preceding two subparts above; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n by the owners or members of the corporation in a vote that excludes the ownership or membership interests held by each director who is not disinterested and independent; or \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n by a unanimous vote of the owners or members of the corporation. \n

\n 196\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n contingent upon, among other things, such individuals’ commitment to repay any advances unless it is determined ultimately that such individuals are entitled to be indemnified. No indemnification may be made in respect of any proceeding in which such individual is liable to the corporation or improperly received a personal benefit and is found liable for willful misconduct, breach of the duty of loyalty owed to the corporation, or an act or omission deemed not to be committed in good faith. \n

\n The Proposed Charter and Proposed Bylaws will provide for indemnification by the Combined Company of its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Texas law. \n

\n Indemnification Agreements \n

\n Limitations on Liability of Officers and Directors \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n any breach of the director’s or officer’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its shareholders; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n acts or omissions not in good faith (i) that constitute a breach of a duty owed to the corporation or (ii) involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of the law; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n violation of certain provisions of Texas law; or \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n any transaction from which the director or officer received an improper benefit. \n

\n Transfer Agent and Registrar \n

\n The transfer agent and registrar for the Combined Company Common Stock is expected to be Odyssey Transfer and Trust Company. \n

\n 197\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Listing \n

\n PubCo will apply to have the Combined Company Common Stock listed on an Applicable Stock Exchange upon the Closing under the symbol “[ ].” Twin Vee Common Stock is currently listed on Nasdaq under the symbol “VEEE” and is expected to be delisted from Nasdaq in connection with the Closing. \n

\n 198\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n COMPARISON OF USFM’S STOCKHOLDERS’ RIGHTS \n

\n USFM is incorporated under the laws of the State of Colorado, and the rights of USFM stockholders are currently governed by the Colorado Business Corporation Act (the “Colorado Act”), the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of USFM, as filed with the Colorado Secretary of State on January 27, 2026 (the “USFM Articles”), and the bylaws of USFM, as currently in effect (the “USFM Bylaws”). PubCo is incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas. \n

\n Upon completion of the Business Combination, USFM stockholders will become stockholders of the Combined Company. The rights of the former USFM stockholders and the former Twin Vee stockholders will thereafter be governed by the Texas Business Organizations Code (the “TBOC”), the proposed Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation of the Combined Company (the “Proposed Charter”) and the proposed Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Combined Company (the “Proposed Bylaws” and together with the Proposed Charter, the “Combined Company Governance Documents”). The Proposed Charter and the Proposed Bylaws are attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annexes B and C, respectively. The rights of Twin Vee stockholders are summarized separately in the section titled “Comparison of Twin Vee’s Stockholders’ Rights.” \n

\n The following table summarizes certain material differences between the rights of USFM stockholders and the rights of Combined Company stockholders, but is not a complete statement of all such differences or a complete description of the Colorado Act, the TBOC or the provisions referred to in the table. USFM stockholders should carefully read the relevant provisions of the Colorado Act, the TBOC, the USFM Articles, the USFM Bylaws and the Combined Company Governance Documents. For more information on how to obtain documents that are not attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus, see the section titled “Where You Can Find More Information.” \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n USFM Governing Documents (Colorado) \n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n Number of Authorized and Outstanding Shares\n

\n USFM is authorized under the USFM Articles to issue up to five million (5,000,000) shares of common stock, no par value per share. The USFM Articles do not authorize any class of preferred stock.\n

\n As of [•], 2026, there were [•] shares of USFM Common Stock outstanding and no shares of preferred stock outstanding. \n

\n The Proposed Charter authorizes the Combined Company to issue [•] shares of capital stock, consisting of (i) [•] shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and (ii) [•] shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share.\n

\n [Immediately following the Second Effective Time, there are expected to be approximately [•] shares of Combined Company Common Stock outstanding and no shares of Combined Company preferred stock outstanding.]\n

\n Voting Limitations\n

\n The USFM Bylaws provide that each holder of USFM Common Stock is entitled to one vote for each share held. \n

\n The Proposed Charter provides that holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share on each matter properly submitted to the stockholders on which they are entitled to vote.\n

\n Except as otherwise required by law, holders of common stock are not entitled to vote on any amendment to the Proposed Charter that relates solely to the\n

\n 199\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n USFM Governing Documents (Colorado) \n \n	\n \n Combined Company Governance \n \n Documents (Texas) \n \n
		\n terms of one or more outstanding series of preferred stock if the holders of the affected series are entitled to vote on the amendment. \n
\n \n Stockholder Voting Threshold\n \n	\n \n The Colorado Act provide that if a quorum exists, action on a matter other than the election of directors by a voting group is approved if the votes cast within the voting group favoring the action exceed the votes cast within the voting group opposing the action, unless a greater number of affirmative votes is required by articles 101 to 117 of this title or the articles of incorporation.\n \n \n The USFM Articles do not require a greater number of affirmative votes than the Colorado default standard.\n \n	\n Under the Proposed Bylaws, except as otherwise provided by the TBOC, the Proposed Charter or the Proposed Bylaws, matters other than the election of directors are decided by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter who voted for, against or expressly abstained with respect to the matter at a meeting at which a quorum is present. \n
\n \n Stockholder Voting Threshold for Fundamental Transactions\n \n	\n Under the Colorado Act, (i) a plan of merger, conversion or share exchange, (ii) a sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all, or substantially all, of the corporation’s property other than in the usual and regular course of business and (iii) a proposal to dissolve the corporation must each be approved by each voting group entitled to vote separately on the matter by a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the plan or transaction, as applicable, unless a greater vote is required by the Colorado Act, the articles of incorporation, bylaws adopted by the stockholders or the board of directors acting pursuant to the Colorado Act. Neither the USFM Articles nor the USFM Bylaws requires a greater vote. \n	\n \n Under the TBOC, unless the certificate of formation provides otherwise, a “fundamental action” or “fundamental business transaction” (each as defined in the TBOC), such as a merger or a sale of all or substantially all of the corporation’s assets, must be approved by the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of each class entitled to vote on the matter. The certificate of formation may reduce this threshold to not less than a majority of the shares entitled to vote, or may provide for all shares to vote together as a single class.\n \n \n The Proposed Charter provides that, except as otherwise required by law or by the terms of any series of preferred stock (including any statement of resolution establishing such series), any fundamental action or fundamental business transaction requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of all\n \n

\n 200\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n USFM Governing Documents (Colorado) \n \n	\n \n Combined Company Governance \n \n Documents (Texas) \n \n
		\n outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single class, and that no separate class or series vote is required on any matter. \n
\n \n Rights of Preferred Stock\n \n	\n The USFM Articles do not authorize the issuance of preferred stock. \n	\n The Proposed Charter authorizes the Combined Company’s board of directors, without further stockholder action, to issue up to [•] shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the powers, designations, preferences, limitations and relative rights of each series, including voting, dividend, conversion, redemption and liquidation rights. \n
\n \n Cumulative Voting\n \n	\n The USFM Articles provide that cumulative voting is not permitted. \n	\n Under the TBOC, cumulative voting is permitted only if authorized by the certificate of formation. Similar to the USFM Articles, the Proposed Charter provides that stockholders do not have the right to cumulate votes in the election of directors. \n
\n \n Size of Board of Directors\n \n	\n The USFM Bylaws provide that USFM’s board of directors shall consist of not less than one nor more than nine members, the exact number of which was initially fixed by the incorporator and is thereafter fixed from time to time by USFM’s board of directors. USFM’s board of directors currently consists of one director. \n	\n \n The Proposed Charter provides that the number of directors constituting the Combined Company’s board of directors shall be fixed by or in the manner provided in the Proposed Bylaws.\n \n \n The Proposed Bylaws provide that the Combined Company’s board of directors will consist of one or more members, the number of which will be fixed from time to time solely by resolution of the board of directors, and that no decrease in the number of directors will shorten the term of an incumbent director.\n \n \n The Combined Company’s board of directors is expected to consist of five directors immediately following the Closing. \n \n
\n \n Classes of Directors; Election of Directors\n \n	\n \n USFM’s board of directors is not classified.\n \n \n Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at each annual meeting of stockholders\n \n	\n \n Similar to USFM, the Combined Company’s board of directors will not be classified.\n \n \n The Proposed Bylaws provide that directors are elected by a\n \n

\n 201\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n USFM Governing Documents (Colorado) \n \n	\n \n Combined Company Governance \n \n Documents (Texas) \n \n
	\n and hold office until the next annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier resignation or removal.\n	\n \n plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote in the election.\n \n \n Directors are elected at each annual meeting of stockholders and hold office until the expiration of the term for which elected and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. \n \n
\n \n Removal and Resignation of Directors\n \n	\n \n Any USFM director may resign at any time upon notice to USFM. Under the Colorado Act, a director’s resignation is effective when the notice is received by USFM unless the notice specifies a later effective date.\n \n \n Under the Colorado Act, unless the articles of incorporation provide that directors may be removed only for cause, any director may be removed with or without cause by the stockholders of the voting group that elected the director, at a meeting of stockholders called for that purpose, if the votes cast for removal exceed the votes cast against removal. Notice of the meeting must state that the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting is the removal of the director. The USFM Articles do not limit removal to cause. Neither the Colorado Act nor the USFM Articles or the USFM Bylaws authorizes USFM’s board of directors to remove a director. \n \n	\n \n Under the TBOC, unless otherwise provided by the governing documents, the holders of a majority of the shares then entitled to vote in an election of directors may remove a director or the entire board of directors, with or without cause, at a meeting called for that purpose.\n \n \n The Proposed Charter provides that, subject to the rights of holders of any series of preferred stock, a director may be removed, with or without cause, by the affirmative vote of stockholders holding at least [two-thirds] of the shares then entitled to vote in an election of directors.\n \n \n Any director may resign at any time upon written or electronic notice to the Combined Company, effective upon receipt unless a later effective date is specified. \n \n
\n \n Vacancies on the Board of Directors\n \n	\n \n The USFM Bylaws provide that vacancies and newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, though less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. Directors so chosen hold office until the next annual\n \n	\n Similar to the USFM Bylaws, the Proposed Bylaws provide that, subject to the TBOC and the rights of any series of preferred stock, vacancies and newly created directorships may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, though less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. However,\n

\n 202\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n USFM Governing Documents (Colorado) \n \n	\n \n Combined Company Governance \n \n Documents (Texas) \n \n
	\n \n election and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier resignation or removal.\n \n	\n under the TBOC and the Proposed Bylaws, the board of directors may not fill more than two (2) directorships created by an increase in the number of directors between any two (2) successive annual meetings of stockholders; any additional directorships must be filled by the stockholders. \n
\n \n Special Meetings of Stockholders\n \n	\n The USFM Bylaws provide that, unless otherwise prescribed by law or the USFM Articles, special meetings of stockholders may be called by the Chairman (if any), the President, any Vice President (if any), the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary, and shall be called by any such officer at the written request of a majority of USFM’s board of directors or of stockholders owning a majority of the capital stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote. \n	\n \n Under the TBOC, the certificate of formation may set the percentage of shares required for stockholders to call a special meeting at no more than fifty percent (50%) of the shares entitled to vote; absent such a provision, the holders of at least ten percent (10%) of the shares entitled to vote may call a special meeting.\n \n \n The Proposed Charter provides that, subject to the terms of any series of preferred stock, special meetings of stockholders may be called only by the Combined Company’s board of directors, the chairperson of the board, the chief executive officer, the president or the holders of not less than [fifty percent (50%)] of the then-outstanding shares entitled to vote at the special meeting. \n \n
\n \n Quorum\n \n	\n \n The Colorado Act provides that, unless otherwise provided in articles 101 to 117 of Title 7 or in the articles of incorporation, a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter by the voting group constitutes a quorum of that voting group for action on that matter, but a quorum shall not consist of fewer than one-third of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter by the voting group.\n \n \n The USFM Articles do not provide for an alternative quorum standard.\n \n	\n \n Under the TBOC, the certificate of formation may reduce the quorum to not less than one-third of the shares entitled to vote.\n \n \n The Proposed Charter provides that the holders of at least one-third of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at a meeting, present in person, by remote communication (if applicable) or by proxy, constitute a quorum.\n \n \n The Proposed Bylaws provide that, if a quorum is not present or represented by proxy, the chairperson of the meeting or the holders of a majority of the\n \n

\n 203\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n USFM Governing Documents (Colorado) \n \n	\n \n Combined Company Governance \n \n Documents (Texas) \n \n
	\n The USFM Bylaws provide that if a quorum is not present, the stockholders present may adjourn the meeting, without notice other than announcement at the meeting, until a quorum is present.\n	\n \n shares present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote may adjourn the meeting. \n \n
\n \n Notice of Stockholder Meetings\n \n	\n \n The USFM Bylaws provide that written notice of every meeting of the stockholders will be given to each stockholder of record stating the place, date and hour of the meeting, and of each special meeting also stating the purpose or purposes for which it is called. Such notice will be given to each stockholder entitled to vote not less than ten (10) nor more than sixty (60) days before the meeting.\n \n \n Notice may be given by mail, personally, by fax, electronic mail or other electronic transmission, and may be waived in writing before or after the time stated therein. \n \n	\n \n The Proposed Bylaws, similar to the USFM Bylaws, require written notice of each meeting stating the place, if any, date and hour of the meeting, the means of remote communication, if any, and, for a special meeting, the purpose or purposes, to be given not less than ten (10) nor more than sixty (60) days before the meeting to each stockholder entitled to vote as of the record date.\n \n \n In addition, notice of a meeting to consider a “fundamental business transaction” (as defined in the TBOC) must be given to each stockholder, whether or not entitled to vote, not later than twenty-one (21) days before the meeting and must state that a purpose of the meeting is to consider a fundamental business transaction. The Proposed Bylaws permit notice to be given by electronic transmission when permitted by, and in accordance with the requirements of, the TBOC. \n \n
\n \n Advance Notice of Stockholder Proposals and Nominations\n \n	\n The USFM Articles and the USFM Bylaws do not contain advance notice requirements for stockholder nominations of directors or stockholder proposals. \n	\n \n The Proposed Charter requires advance notice of stockholder nominations and business to be given in the manner provided in the Proposed Bylaws. The Proposed Bylaws require a stockholder of record (at the time of notice, on the record date and through the meeting) who is entitled to vote to deliver notice to the Secretary not later than the close of business on the 90th day, nor earlier than the close of business on the 120th day, before the anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting (if the meeting is\n \n

\n 204\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n USFM Governing Documents (Colorado) \n \n	\n \n Combined Company Governance \n \n Documents (Texas) \n \n
		\n \n held not more than thirty (30) days before or seventy (70) days after the anniversary), and otherwise not later than the later of the 90th day before the meeting or the 10th day following public disclosure of the meeting date.\n \n \n The notice must include extensive information about the proposing stockholder, any associated persons and any nominee, including ownership and derivative positions, related agreements and arrangements, a completed nominee questionnaire and representations, and a statement of intent to solicit proxies in accordance with Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act. Nominations at special meetings at which directors are to be elected are subject to similar notice requirements. \n \n
\n \n Stockholder Action by Written Consent\n \n	\n The USFM Articles and the USFM Bylaws permit any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of stockholders to be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, upon the written consent of stockholders holding not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize the action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote were present and voted. Prompt notice of action taken by less than unanimous written consent must be given to non-consenting stockholders. \n	\n Under the TBOC, stockholders may act by less than unanimous written consent only if authorized by the certificate of formation. Similar to the USFM Articles and the USFM Bylaws, the Proposed Charter permits stockholders to act without a meeting by written or electronic consent signed by the holders of shares having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to take the action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote were present and voted. \n
\n \n Limitation of Director and Officer Liability\n \n	\n The USFM Articles provide that no director of USFM will have any personal liability to USFM or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability for (i) any breach of the duty of loyalty, (ii) acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing\n	\n Under the TBOC, a corporation may eliminate or limit the liability of its directors and officers for monetary damages, except for liability for a breach of the duty of loyalty, an act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, a transaction from which the person receives an improper\n

\n 205\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n USFM Governing Documents (Colorado) \n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n violation of law, (iii) voting for or assenting to a distribution made in violation of Colorado Act § 7-106-401, if it is established that the director did not perform his or her duties in compliance with Colorado Act § 7-108-401 (in which case liability is limited to the amount of the distribution that exceeds what could lawfully have been distributed), or (iv) any transaction from which the director directly or indirectly derives an improper personal benefit.\n

\n The Colorado Act permits the articles of incorporation to limit or eliminate the liability of a director to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for any action taken, or any failure to take action, as a director, except liability for (i) the receipt of a financial benefit to which the director is not entitled, (ii) an intentional infliction of harm on the corporation or its stockholders, (iii) voting for or assenting to an unlawful distribution, or (iv) an intentional violation of criminal law.\n

\n benefit, or liability expressly imposed by statute.\n

\n The Proposed Charter provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by the TBOC, a director or officer will not be personally liable to the Combined Company or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer. If the TBOC is amended to further eliminate or limit liability, liability will be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted as so amended. Any repeal or amendment of this provision is prospective only. \n

\n Indemnification of Directors and Officers\n

\n The USFM Articles require USFM to indemnify, to the maximum extent permitted by law, any person who is or was a director or officer, and permit indemnification of other persons, and authorize USFM to purchase insurance and advance expenses.\n

\n The USFM Bylaws require indemnification of directors and officers in third-party and derivative proceedings if the person acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to USFM’s best interests (and, in criminal matters, had no reasonable cause to believe the conduct was unlawful), subject to a determination by disinterested\n

\n The Proposed Charter authorizes the Combined Company, to the fullest extent permitted by the TBOC, to indemnify and advance expenses to its directors, officers, employees and agents through the Proposed Bylaws, agreements, votes of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.\n

\n 206\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n USFM Governing Documents (Colorado) \n \n	\n \n Combined Company Governance \n \n Documents (Texas) \n \n
	\n \n directors, independent legal counsel or the stockholders. Indemnification is mandatory to the extent the person is successful on the merits or otherwise.\n \n \n USFM is not obligated to indemnify in connection with proceedings initiated by the indemnitee unless authorized by USFM’s board of directors, other than proceedings to enforce indemnification rights.\n \n	\n indemnification rights) is required only if the proceeding was authorized by the board of directors. The Proposed Bylaws also permit the Combined Company to maintain insurance and to grant indemnification and advancement rights to employees and agents. \n
\n \n Advancement of Expenses\n \n	\n The USFM Bylaws require advancement of expenses upon receipt of an undertaking to repay if it is ultimately determined that the person is not entitled to indemnification. \n	\n Under the TBOC, a corporation may advance expenses to a director or officer only upon receipt of (i) a written affirmation of the person’s good faith belief that the person has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification under the TBOC and (ii) a written undertaking to repay the amounts advanced if it is finally determined that the person has not met that standard. Accordingly, the Proposed Bylaws provide that the right to indemnification includes the right to advancement of expenses incurred in defending a proceeding in advance of its final disposition, subject to delivery of such affirmation and undertaking if required by the TBOC. \n
\n \n Interested Director Transactions\n \n	\n \n The USFM Articles provide that, absent fraud, directors and officers are not disqualified from dealing with USFM, are not liable to account for profits from such transactions, and may engage in businesses in the same or similar line of business as USFM. Interested directors may be counted toward a quorum.\n \n \n The USFM Bylaws provide that such transactions are not void or voidable solely because of the interest if (i) the material facts are disclosed to or known by USFM’s board of directors or committee and approved in good faith by a majority of the\n \n	\n The Proposed Charter and the Proposed Bylaws do not contain a provision addressing transactions with interested directors or officers. Such transactions will be governed by the TBOC.\n

\n 207\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n USFM Governing Documents (Colorado) \n \n	\n \n Combined Company Governance \n \n Documents (Texas) \n \n
	\n disinterested directors, (ii) the material facts are disclosed to or known by the stockholders and the transaction is approved in good faith by the stockholders, or (iii) the transaction is fair to USFM when authorized.\n
\n \n Fiduciary Duties\n \n	\n In Colorado, fiduciary duties are generally developed by case law. Under the Colorado Act, each director, and each officer with discretionary authority, must discharge his or her duties in good faith, with care and in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the corporation. Directors and officers may rely on information, reports and statements prepared or presented by officers, employees, legal counsel, accountants and other persons they reasonably believe to be reliable and competent, and a director may also rely on a committee of the board of directors of which the director is not a member if the director reasonably believes the committee merits confidence, unless in either case they have knowledge that makes such reliance unwarranted. \n	\n In Texas, fiduciary duties are generally developed by case law. Directors and officers owe duties of loyalty, due care and obedience to the corporation. Directors and officers may rely on information, reports and statements prepared or presented by officers, employees, legal counsel, certified public accountants, investment bankers and other persons they reasonably believe possess professional expertise in the matter, and may (but are not required to) consider the laws, judicial decisions and practices of other states. \n
\n \n Business Judgment Rule\n \n	\n Under the Colorado Act, a director is liable to the corporation or its stockholders for money damages or other money payment for any act, omission to act or decision only if the party asserting liability establishes in a proceeding that, among other things, the challenged act, omission or decision was not in good faith, was not rationally believed to be in the corporation’s best interests, was one as to which the director was at least grossly negligent, involved a failure to make appropriate inquiry when particular facts or circumstances of significant concern came to\n	\n \n Under the TBOC, a corporation listed on a national securities exchange is automatically subject to, and any other corporation may elect in its governing documents to be governed by, TBOC § 21.419, which codifies the business judgment rule, establishing a presumption that directors and officers, in deciding upon matters of business, act in good faith, on an informed basis, in furtherance of the interests of the corporation, and in obedience to the law and the corporation’s governing documents.\n \n \n The Proposed Charter provides that the Combined Company\n \n

\n 208\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n USFM Governing Documents (Colorado) \n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n the director’s attention that would have alerted a reasonably attentive director to the need for inquiry or a sustained or systematic failure to exercise oversight of the corporation’s business and affairs, was a breach of the duty of loyalty, including by directly or indirectly receiving an improper personal benefit, or consisted of or resulted from a vote for or assent to a distribution made in violation of the Colorado Act or the articles of incorporation. In addition, the party seeking to hold a director liable must establish that the corporation or its stockholders suffered money damages and that those damages were caused by the director’s challenged conduct.\n

\n The Colorado Act fixes gross negligence as the applicable standard unless the articles of incorporation change that standard to knowing misconduct, a knowing violation of law or negligence; the USFM Articles do not change the standard, and gross negligence therefore applies. The Colorado Act does not provide a statutory presumption comparable to TBOC § 21.419, and the USFM Articles and the USFM Bylaws do not contain comparable provisions.\n

\n affirmatively elects to be governed by the statutory business judgment rule presumption. \n

\n Required Ownership to Institute a Derivative Proceeding\n

\n The USFM Articles and the USFM Bylaws do not impose a minimum share ownership threshold for stockholders to institute or maintain a derivative proceeding. \n

\n Under the TBOC, a public corporation may require a stockholder, individually or as a group, to hold up to three percent (3%) of its outstanding shares to institute or maintain a derivative proceeding.\n

\n The Proposed Charter provides that, during any time that the Combined Company has a class of its equity securities listed on a national securities exchange or has five hundred (500) or more stockholders, no stockholder may institute or maintain a derivative\n

\n 209\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n USFM Governing Documents (Colorado) \n \n	\n \n Combined Company Governance \n \n Documents (Texas) \n \n
		\n proceeding unless the stockholder holds, at the time the proceeding is instituted, at least [three percent (3%)] of the outstanding shares. \n
\n \n Amendment of Articles of Incorporation / Certificate of Formation\n \n	\n The USFM Articles reserve USFM’s right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision of the USFM Articles in the manner prescribed by statute. The USFM Articles do not impose any supermajority vote requirement; amendments are therefore subject to the default approval requirements of the Colorado Act. \n	\n The Proposed Charter reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision of the Proposed Charter in the manner prescribed by the Proposed Charter and the TBOC. \n
\n \n Amendment of Bylaws\n \n	\n The USFM Articles expressly authorize USFM’s board of directors to make, alter, amend and repeal the bylaws. The USFM Bylaws provide that they may be altered, amended or repealed, or new bylaws adopted, by USFM’s board of directors, provided that notice of the proposed action is contained in the notice of the board meeting and the amendment is approved by a majority of USFM’s entire board of directors (the total number of directors USFM would have if there were no vacancies). \n	\n \n The Proposed Charter authorizes the Combined Company’s board of directors to make, repeal, alter, amend and rescind any or all of the Proposed Bylaws, subject to any additional vote required by the Proposed Bylaws.\n \n \n The Proposed Bylaws provide that the Combined Company’s board of directors is authorized to alter, amend and repeal the Proposed Bylaws or adopt new bylaws.\n \n \n The shareholders may, by the vote of the holders of not less than a majority of the voting power of all outstanding shares of capital stock of the Combined Company entitled to vote in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, make additional bylaws and alter, amend and repeal any bylaws, whether such bylaws were originally adopted by the shareholders or otherwise. \n \n
\n \n Exclusive Forum\n \n	\n The USFM Bylaws provide that, unless USFM consents in writing to an alternative forum, the state or federal courts in Denver County, Colorado, shall be the sole and exclusive forum for bringing any and all internal corporate claims as defined by the Colorado Act. \n	\n As permitted by the TBOC, the Proposed Charter provides that, unless the Combined Company consents in writing to an alternative forum, the Business Court in the First Business Court Division of the State of Texas (or, if it lacks jurisdiction, the federal district court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas\n

\n 210\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n USFM Governing Documents (Colorado) \n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n Division, or, if that court lacks jurisdiction, a Texas state district court in Dallas County) will be the sole and exclusive forum for derivative actions, breach of fiduciary duty claims, claims arising under the TBOC or the Combined Company Governance Documents, claims governed by the internal affairs doctrine, “internal entity claims” and other actions within the Business Court’s jurisdiction. The Proposed Charter also provides that the federal district courts will be the exclusive forum for claims arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. Holders of shares are deemed to have notice of and consented to these provisions.\n

\n In addition, the Proposed Charter provides that holders of shares are deemed to have waived any right to a jury trial in any action asserting an “internal entity claim” and, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any other action within the scope of the exclusive forum provision. \n

\n Appraisal (Dissenters’) Rights\n

\n The USFM Articles provide that stockholders have appraisal rights only to the extent and in the circumstances expressly provided under Colorado Act § 7-113-102 et seq., and that no appraisal, dissenters’ or similar rights are available with respect to any corporate action except as required by applicable Colorado law. Under the Colorado Act, the articles of incorporation may limit or eliminate appraisal rights only for a class or series of preferred shares, and the USFM Articles do not authorize any preferred stock; accordingly, the USFM Articles do not limit the appraisal rights available to holders of USFM Common Stock. The Colorado Act permits\n

\n The Proposed Charter and the Proposed Bylaws do not address dissenters’ rights. Combined Company stockholders will have dissenters’ rights only to the extent provided under the TBOC.\n

\n Under the TBOC, except for the limited classes of mergers, consolidations, sales and asset dispositions for which no shareholder approval is required under Texas law, shareholders of Texas corporations with voting rights have dissenters’ rights in the event of a merger, consolidation, interest exchange, conversion, sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all, or substantially all, the property and assets of the corporation.\n

\n 211\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n USFM Governing Documents (Colorado) \n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n the articles of incorporation, the bylaws or a resolution of the board of directors to extend appraisal rights to additional corporate actions. The USFM Articles do not extend appraisal rights beyond those the Colorado Act requires.\n

\n Under the Colorado Act, a stockholder is entitled to appraisal rights and to payment of the fair value of that stockholder’s shares upon consummation of a merger to which the corporation is a party if stockholder approval of the merger is required and the stockholder is entitled to vote on the merger, except with respect to shares of any class or series that remain outstanding after the merger. These rights are not available, however, for shares of a class or series that, measured as of the record date for the meeting, is a covered security under section 18(b)(1)(A) or 18(b)(1)(B) of the Securities Act, is traded in an organized market with a market value of at least twenty million dollars ($20,000,000) excluding shares held by subsidiaries, senior executives, directors and ten percent (10%) holders, or is issued by a registered open-end management investment company and redeemable at the holder’s option at net asset value. This exception does not apply where the terms of the corporate action require holders to accept consideration other than cash or qualifying securities, or where the corporate action is an interested transaction, in each case as determined under the Colorado Act.\n

\n For a description of the appraisal rights available to USFM stockholders in connection with\n

\n However, a shareholder of a Texas corporation has no dissenters’ rights with respect to any plan of merger or conversion in which there is a single surviving or new domestic or foreign corporation, or with respect to any plan of exchange if:\n

\n (1) the ownership interest, or a depository receipt in respect of the ownership interest, held by the owner is part of a class or series of ownership interests, or depository receipts in respect of ownership interests, that are, on the record date set for purposes of determining which owners are entitled to vote on the plan of merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate: (A) listed on a national securities exchange; or (B) held of record by at least 2,000 owners;\n

\n (2) the owner is not required by the terms of the plan of merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, to accept for the owner’s ownership interest any consideration that is different from the consideration to be provided to any other holder of an ownership interest of the same class or series as the ownership interest held by the owner, other than cash instead of fractional shares or interests the owner would otherwise be entitled to receive; and\n

\n 212\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n USFM Governing Documents (Colorado) \n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n the Second Merger, see the section entitled “Appraisal Rights and Dissenters’ Rights.”\n

\n date of the merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, will be part of a class or series of ownership interests, or depository receipts in respect of ownership interests that are: (i) listed on a national securities exchange or authorized for listing on the exchange on official notice of issuance; or (ii) held of record by at least 2,000 owners; (B) cash instead of fractional ownership interests the owner would otherwise be entitled to receive; or (C) any combination of the ownership interests and cash above.\n

\n Under the TBOC, an owner of an ownership interest in a Texas domestic entity subject to dissenters’ rights is entitled to dissent from an amendment to a Texas for-profit corporation’s certificate of formation to add required provisions to elect to be a public benefit corporation or delete required provisions, which in effect cancels the corporation’s election to be a public benefit corporation if the owner owns shares that were entitled to vote on the amendment; except if the shares held by the owner are part of a class or series of shares listed on a national securities exchange; or held of record by at least 2,000 owners.\n

\n 213\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n COMPARISON OF TWIN VEE’S STOCKHOLDERS’ RIGHTS \n

\n Twin Vee is incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, and the rights of Twin Vee stockholders are currently governed by the DGCL, the Certificate of Incorporation of Twin Vee, as filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on April 7, 2021 (as amended to date, including pursuant to the Certificate of Validation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on September 8, 2026, the “Twin Vee Charter”), and the bylaws of Twin Vee, as currently in effect (the “Twin Vee Bylaws”). PubCo is incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas. \n

\n Upon completion of the Business Combination, Twin Vee stockholders will become stockholders of the Combined Company. The rights of the former USFM stockholders and the former Twin Vee stockholders will thereafter be governed by the TBOC, the Proposed Charter and the Proposed Bylaws. The Proposed Charter and the Proposed Bylaws are attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annexes B and C, respectively, and incorporated herein by reference. The rights of USFM stockholders are summarized separately above in the section titled “Comparison of USFM’s Stockholders’ Rights.” \n

\n The following table summarizes certain material differences between the rights of Twin Vee stockholders and the rights of Combined Company stockholders, but is not a complete statement of all such differences or a complete description of the DGCL, the TBOC or the provisions referred to in the table. Twin Vee stockholders should carefully read the relevant provisions of the DGCL, the TBOC, the Twin Vee Charter, the Twin Vee Bylaws and the Combined Company Governance Documents. For more information on how to obtain documents that are not attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus, see the section titled “Where You Can Find More Information.” \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n
\n (Delaware)\n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n Number of Authorized and Outstanding Shares\n

\n The Twin Vee Charter authorizes Twin Vee to issue 60,000,000 shares of capital stock, consisting of (i) 50,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and (ii) 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. \n

\n Immediately following the Second Effective Time, there are expected to be approximately [•] shares of Combined Company Common Stock outstanding and no shares of Combined Company preferred stock outstanding. \n

\n Voting Limitations\n

\n The Twin Vee Charter provides that holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share on each matter properly submitted to the stockholders on which they are entitled to vote.\n

\n The Twin Vee Bylaws provide that, except as otherwise required by law, the Twin Vee Charter or the Twin Vee Bylaws, in all matters other than the election of directors, the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares present in person or\n

\n The Proposed Charter provides that holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share on each matter properly submitted to the stockholders on which they are entitled to vote.\n

\n Except as otherwise required by law, holders of common stock are not entitled to vote on any amendment to the Proposed Charter that relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding series of preferred stock if the holders of the affected series are\n

\n 214\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n \n (Delaware)\n \n	\n \n Combined Company Governance \n \n Documents (Texas) \n \n
	\n represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter shall be the act of the stockholders. Except as otherwise required by law, the Twin Vee Charter or the Twin Vee Bylaws, directors shall be elected by a plurality of the voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. Where a separate vote by a class or series or classes or series is required, in all matters other than the election of directors, the affirmative vote of the majority of shares of such class or series or classes or series present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting shall be the act of such class or series or classes or series, except as otherwise provided by law, the Twin Vee Charter or the Twin Vee Bylaws.\n	\n entitled to vote on the amendment. \n
\n \n Stockholder Voting Threshold\n \n	\n Under the Twin Vee Bylaws, except as otherwise provided by law, the Twin Vee Charter or the Twin Vee Bylaws, in all matters other than the election of directors, the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter shall be the act of the stockholders. \n	\n Under the Proposed Bylaws, except as otherwise provided by the TBOC, the Proposed Charter or the Proposed Bylaws, matters other than the election of directors are decided by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter who voted for, against or expressly abstained with respect to the matter at a meeting at which a quorum is present. \n
\n \n Stockholder Voting Threshold for Fundamental Transactions\n \n	\n Pursuant to Section 251(c) of the DGCL, approval of a merger of Twin Vee requires the vote of a majority of the outstanding stock of Twin Vee entitled to vote thereon. Pursuant to Section 271(a) of the DGCL, approval of a sale of all or substantially all assets of Twin Vee requires the vote of a majority of the outstanding stock of Twin Vee entitled to vote thereon. \n	\n Under the TBOC, unless the certificate of formation provides otherwise, a “fundamental action” or “fundamental business transaction” (each as defined in the TBOC), such as a merger or a sale of all or substantially all of the corporation’s assets, must be approved by the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of each class entitled to vote on the matter. The corporation’s certificate of\n

\n 215\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n
\n (Delaware)\n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n formation may reduce this threshold to not less than a majority of the shares entitled to vote, or may provide for all shares to vote together as a single class.\n

\n The Proposed Charter provides that, except as otherwise required by law or by the terms of any series of preferred stock (including any statement of resolution establishing such series), any fundamental action or fundamental business transaction requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of all outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single class, and that no separate class or series vote is required on any matter. \n

\n Rights of Preferred Stock\n

\n Pursuant to the Twin Vee Charter, the Board of Directors of Twin Vee is authorized to provide for the issue of all of any of the shares of Twin Vee’s preferred stock in one or more series, and to fix the number of shares and to determine or alter for each such series, such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such designation, preferences, and relative, participating, optional, or other rights and such qualifications, limitations, or restrictions thereof, as shall be stated and expressed in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors providing for the issuance of such shares and as may be permitted by the DGCL. Pursuant to the Twin Vee Charter, the Twin Vee Board of Directors is also authorized to increase or decrease the number of shares of any series subsequent to the issuance of shares of that series, but not below the number of shares of such series then outstanding. In case the number of shares of any\n

\n The Proposed Charter authorizes the Combined Company’s board of directors, without further stockholder action, to issue up to [•] shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the powers, designations, preferences, limitations and relative rights of each series, including voting, dividend, conversion, redemption and liquidation rights.\n

\n 216\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n \n (Delaware)\n \n	\n \n Combined Company Governance \n \n Documents (Texas) \n \n
	\n series of preferred stock shall be decreased in accordance with the foregoing sentence, the shares constituting such decrease shall resume the status that they had prior to the adoption of the resolution originally fixing the number of shares of such series. The number of authorized shares of preferred stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the stock of Twin Vee entitled to vote thereon, without a separate vote of the holders of the preferred stock, or of any series thereof, unless a vote of any such holders is required pursuant to the terms of any certificate of designation filed with respect to any series of preferred stock.\n
\n \n Cumulative Voting\n \n	\n Under the DGCL, cumulative voting is permitted only if authorized in the corporation’s certificate of incorporation. The Twin Vee Charter does not provide that stockholders have the right to cumulate votes in the election of directors. \n	\n Under the TBOC, cumulative voting is permitted only if authorized by the certificate of formation. The Proposed Charter provides that stockholders do not have the right to cumulate votes in the election of directors. \n
\n \n Size of Board of Directors\n \n	\n The Twin Vee Charter states that the number of directors which shall constitute the Board of Directors shall be fixed exclusively by resolutions adopted by a majority of the authorized number of directors constituting the Board of Directors. \n	\n \n The Proposed Charter provides that the number of directors constituting the Combined Company’s board of directors shall be fixed by or in the manner provided in the Proposed Bylaws.\n \n \n The Proposed Bylaws provide that the Combined Company’s board of directors will consist of one or more members, the number of which will be fixed from time to time solely by resolution of the board of directors, and that no decrease in the number of directors will shorten the term of an incumbent director.\n \n \n The Combined Company’s board of directors is expected to consist\n \n

\n 217\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n
\n (Delaware)\n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n of five directors immediately following the Closing. \n

\n Classes of Directors; Election of Directors\n

\n Pursuant to the Twin Vee Charter, subject to the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock to elect directors under specified circumstances, the Board of Directors shall be and is divided into three classes, designated Class I, Class II and Class III.\n

\n Pursuant to the Twin Vee Charter, subject to the rights of holders of any series of preferred stock to elect directors under specified circumstances, each Twin Vee director shall serve for a term ending on the date of the third annual meeting of stockholders following the annual meeting of stockholders at which such director was elected; provided that each director initially assigned to Class I shall serve for a term expiring at Twin Vee’s first annual meeting of stockholders held after the effectiveness of the Twin Vee Charter; each director initially assigned to Class II shall serve for a term expiring at Twin Vee’s second annual meeting of stockholders held after the effectiveness of the Twin Vee Charter; and each director initially assigned to Class III shall serve for a term expiring at Twin Vee’s third annual meeting of stockholders held after the effectiveness of the Twin Vee Charter; provided further, that the term of each director shall continue until the election and qualification of his or her successor and be subject to his or her earlier death, disqualification, resignation or removal. \n

\n The Combined Company’s board of directors will not be classified.\n

\n The Proposed Bylaws provide that directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote in the election.\n

\n Directors are elected at each annual meeting of stockholders and hold office until the expiration of the term for which elected and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal.\n

\n 218\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n
\n (Delaware)\n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n Removal and Resignation of Directors\n

\n Under the DGCL, any director or the entire board of directors may be removed, with or without cause, by the holders of a majority of the shares then entitled to vote at an election of directors, except as follows: (1) unless the corporation’s certificate of incorporation otherwise provides, in the case of a corporation whose board is classified as provided in Section 144(d) of the DGCL, stockholders may effect such removal only for cause; or (2) in the case of a corporation having cumulative voting, if less than the entire board is to be removed, no director may be removed without cause if the votes cast against such director’s removal would be sufficient to elect such director if then cumulatively voted at an election of the entire board of directors, or, if there be classes of directors, at an election of the class of directors of which such director is a part. The DGCL further provides that whenever the holders of any class or series are entitled to elect 1 or more directors by the certificate of incorporation, Section 144(k) of the DGCL shall apply, in respect to the removal without cause of a director or directors so elected, to the vote of the holders of the outstanding shares of that class or series and not to the vote of the outstanding shares as a whole.\n

\n The Twin Vee Charter states that the Twin Vee Board of Directors or any individual director may be removed from office at any time (1) with cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least sixty percent (60%) of the voting power of all the then-outstanding shares of capital stock of Twin Vee, entitled to vote at an election of directors; or (2) without cause by the affirmative vote of the\n

\n Under the TBOC, unless otherwise provided by the governing documents, the holders of a majority of the shares then entitled to vote in an election of directors may remove a director or the entire board of directors, with or without cause, at a meeting called for that purpose.\n

\n The Proposed Charter provides that, subject to the rights of holders of any series of preferred stock, a director may be removed, with or without cause, by the affirmative vote of stockholders holding at least [two-thirds] of the shares then entitled to vote in an election of directors.\n

\n Any director may resign at any time upon written or electronic notice to the Combined Company, effective upon receipt unless a later effective date is specified.\n

\n 219\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n
\n (Delaware)\n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n holders of at least sixty percent (60%) of the voting power of all the then-outstanding shares of the capital stock of Twin Vee entitled to vote generally at an election of directors.\n

\n Vacancies on the Board of Directors\n

\n The Twin Vee Charter states that, subject to any limitations imposed by applicable law and subject to the rights of the holders of any series of Twin Vee preferred stock, any vacancies on the Twin Vee Board of Directors resulting from death, resignation, disqualification, removal or other causes and any newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the number of directors, shall, unless the Twin Vee Board of Directors determines by resolution that any such vacancies or newly created directorships shall be filled by the stockholders and except as otherwise provided by applicable law, be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors then in office, even though less than a quorum of the Twin Vee Board of Directors, and not by the stockholders. Any director elected in accordance with the preceding sentence shall hold office for the remainder of the full term of the director for which the vacancy was created or occurred and until such director’s successor shall have been elected and qualified.\n

\n The Twin Vee Bylaws states that, unless otherwise provided in the Twin Vee Charter or the Twin Vee Bylaws, vacancies and newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors elected by all of the stockholders having the right to vote as a single class shall be filled only by a majority of the directors then in office, although less than a\n

\n [Similar to the Twin Vee Bylaws,] the Proposed Bylaws provide that, subject to the TBOC and the rights of any series of preferred stock, vacancies and newly created directorships may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, though less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. However, under the TBOC and the Proposed Bylaws, the board of directors may not fill more than two (2) directorships created by an increase in the number of directors between any two (2) successive annual meetings of stockholders; any additional directorships must be filled by the stockholders.\n

\n 220\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n
\n (Delaware)\n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n quorum, or by a sole remaining director. If the directors are divided into classes, a person so elected by the directors then in office to fill a vacancy or newly created directorship shall hold office until the next election of the class for which such director shall have been chosen and until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified.\n

\n The Twin Vee Bylaws further state that if, at the time of filling any vacancy or any newly created directorship, the Twin Vee directors then in office constitute less than a majority of the whole board of directors (as constituted immediately prior to any such increase), the Court of Chancery may, upon application of any stockholder or stockholders holding at least 10% of the voting stock at the time outstanding having the right to vote for such directors, summarily order an election to be held to fill any such vacancies or newly created directorships, or to replace the directors chosen by the directors then in office as aforesaid, which election shall be governed by the provisions of Section 211 of the DGCL as far as applicable.\n

\n Special Meetings of Stockholders\n

\n Under the DGCL, special meetings of the stockholders may be called by the board of directors or by such person or persons as may be authorized by the certificate of incorporation or by the bylaws.\n

\n The Twin Vee Charter states that no action shall be taken by the Twin Vee stockholders except at an annual or special meeting of stockholders called in accordance with the Twin Vee Bylaws.\n

\n The Twin Vee Bylaws state that a special meeting of the Twin Vee stockholders, other than those required by statute, may be called\n

\n Under the TBOC, the certificate of formation may set the percentage of shares required for stockholders to call a special meeting at no more than fifty percent (50%) of the shares entitled to vote; absent such a provision, the holders of at least ten percent (10%) of the shares entitled to vote may call a special meeting.\n

\n The Proposed Charter provides that, subject to the terms of any series of preferred stock, special meetings of stockholders may be called only by the Combined Company’s board of directors,\n

\n 221\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n \n (Delaware)\n \n	\n \n Combined Company Governance \n \n Documents (Texas) \n \n
	\n at any time only by (A) the direction of a majority of the board of directors, (B) the chairperson of the board of directors, (C) the chief executive officer or (D) the president (in the absence of a chief executive officer).\n	\n the chairperson of the board, the chief executive officer, the president or the holders of not less than [fifty percent (50%)] of the then-outstanding shares entitled to vote at the special meeting. \n
\n \n Quorum\n \n	\n \n Under the DGCL, the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of any corporation authorized to issue stock may specify the number of shares and/or the amount of other securities having voting power the holders of which shall be present or represented by proxy at any meeting in order to constitute a quorum for, and the votes that shall be necessary for, the transaction of any business, but in no event shall a quorum consist of less than 1/3 of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting, except that, where a separate vote by a class or series or classes or series is required, a quorum shall consist of no less than 1/3 of the shares of such class or series or classes or series.\n \n \n The Twin Vee Bylaws state that the holders of at least 1/3 of the shares of Twin Vee capital stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote, present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at all meetings of the Twin Vee stockholders. \n \n	\n \n Under the TBOC, the certificate of formation may reduce the quorum to not less than one-third of the shares entitled to vote.\n \n \n The Proposed Charter provides that the holders of at least one-third of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at a meeting, present in person, by remote communication (if applicable) or by proxy, constitute a quorum.\n \n \n The Proposed Bylaws provide that, if a quorum is not present or represented by proxy, the chairperson of the meeting or the holders of a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote may adjourn the meeting. \n \n
\n \n Notice of Stockholder Meetings\n \n	\n \n The Twin Vee Bylaws state that, except as otherwise provided in the DGCL, the Twin Vee Charter or the Twin Vee Bylaws, written notice of any meeting of stockholders shall be given not less than 10 nor more than 60 days before the date of the meeting to each stockholder entitled to vote at such meeting as of the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of the meeting.\n \n	\n \n The Proposed Bylaws, similar to the Twin Vee Bylaws, require written notice of each meeting stating the place, if any, date and hour of the meeting, the means of remote communication, if any, and, for a special meeting, the purpose or purposes, to be given not less than ten (10) nor more than sixty (60) days before the meeting to each stockholder entitled to vote as of the record date.\n \n

\n 222\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n
\n (Delaware)\n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n Pursuant to Section 251(c) of the DGCL, due notice of the time, place and purpose of any stockholder meeting to vote upon a merger of Twin Vee shall be given to each holder of stock, whether voting or nonvoting, at the stockholder’s address as it appears on the Twin Vee records, at least 20 days prior to the date of the meeting.\n

\n In addition, notice of a meeting to consider a “fundamental business transaction” (as defined in the TBOC) must be given to each stockholder, whether or not entitled to vote, not later than twenty-one (21) days before the meeting and must state that a purpose of the meeting is to consider a fundamental business transaction. The Proposed Bylaws permit notice to be given by electronic transmission when permitted by, and in accordance with the requirements of, the TBOC. \n

\n Advance Notice of Stockholder Proposals and Nominations\n

\n The Twin Vee Charter states that advance notice of stockholder nominations for the election of directors and of business to be brought by stockholders before any meeting of the Twin Vee stockholders shall be given in the manner provided in the Twin Vee Bylaws.\n

\n The Twin Vee Bylaws permit business to be brought before an annual meeting of stockholders by a Twin Vee stockholder who (1) is a stockholder of record at the time of the giving of the notice required by Section 2.4(i) of the Twin Vee Bylaws and on the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting and (2) has timely complied in proper written form with the notice procedures set forth in Section 2.4(i) of the Twin Vee Bylaws. In addition, for business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder, such business must be a proper matter for stockholder action pursuant to the Twin Vee bylaws and applicable law. Except for proposals properly made in accordance with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder (as so amended and inclusive of\n

\n The Proposed Charter requires advance notice of stockholder nominations and business to be given in the manner provided in the Proposed Bylaws. The Proposed Bylaws require a stockholder of record (at the time of notice, on the record date and through the meeting) who is entitled to vote to deliver notice to the Secretary not later than the close of business on the 90th day, nor earlier than the close of business on the 120th day, before the anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting (if the meeting is held not more than thirty (30) days before or seventy (70) days after the anniversary), and otherwise not later than the later of the 90th day before the meeting or the 10th day following public disclosure of the meeting date.\n

\n The notice must include extensive information about the proposing stockholder, any associated persons and any nominee, including ownership and derivative positions, related agreements and arrangements, a completed nominee questionnaire and representations, and a statement of intent to solicit proxies in accordance with Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act. Nominations at special\n

\n 223\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n
\n (Delaware)\n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n such rules and regulations), and included in the notice of meeting given by or at the direction of the board of directors, for the avoidance of doubt, Section 2.4(i)(C) of the Twin Vee Bylaws shall be the exclusive means for a Twin Vee stockholder to bring business before an annual meeting of stockholders.\n

\n The Twin Vee Bylaws also state that nominations of persons for election or re-election to the board of directors of the corporation shall be made at an annual meeting of stockholders only (A) by or at the direction of the board of directors or (B) by a Twin Vee stockholder who (1) was a stockholder of record at the time of the giving of the notice required by Section 2.4(ii) of the Twin Vee Bylaws and on the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting and (2) has complied with the notice procedures set forth in Section 2.4(ii) of the Twin Vee Bylaws. In addition to any other applicable requirements, for a nomination to be made by a stockholder, the stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in proper written form to the secretary of Twin Vee.\n

\n meetings at which directors are to be elected are subject to similar notice requirements. \n

\n Stockholder Action by Written Consent\n

\n Under Section 228(a) of the DGCL, unless otherwise provided in the certificate of incorporation, any action required by this chapter to be taken at any annual or special meeting of stockholders of a corporation, or any action which may be taken at any annual or special meeting of such stockholders, may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if a consent or consents, setting forth the action so taken, shall be\n

\n Under the TBOC, stockholders may act by less than unanimous written consent only if authorized by the certificate of formation. The Proposed Charter permits stockholders to act without a meeting by written or electronic consent signed by the holders of shares having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to take the action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote were present and voted.\n

\n 224\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n
\n (Delaware)\n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted and shall be delivered to the corporation in the manner required by this section.\n

\n The Twin Vee Bylaws state that no action shall be taken by the Twin Vee stockholders except at an annual or special meeting of stockholders called in accordance with the Twin Vee Bylaws\n

\n Limitation of Director and Officer Liability\n

\n Under Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL, a Delaware corporation’s certificate of incorporation may include a provision eliminating or limiting the personal liability of a director or officer to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer, provided that such provision shall not eliminate or limit the liability of: (i) a director or officer for any breach of the director’s or officer’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders; (ii) a director or officer for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; (iii) a director under Section 174 of the DGCL (related to unlawful stock repurchases or dividends); (iv) a director or officer for any transaction from which the director or officer derived an improper personal benefit; or (v) an officer in any action by or in the right of the corporation. \n

\n Under the TBOC, a corporation may eliminate or limit the liability of its directors and officers for monetary damages, except for liability for a breach of the duty of loyalty, an act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, a transaction from which the person receives an improper benefit, or liability expressly imposed by statute.\n

\n 225\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n
\n (Delaware)\n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n Indemnification of Directors and Officers\n

\n The Twin Vee Charter states that, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, Twin Vee is authorized to provide indemnification of (and advancement of expenses to) directors, officers and agents of Twin Vee (and any other persons to which applicable law permits Twin Vee to provide indemnification) through Bylaw provisions, agreements with such agents or other persons, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise in excess of the indemnification and advancement otherwise permitted by such applicable law.\n

\n The Twin Vee Bylaws sets forth detailed indemnification provisions in favor of Twin Vee officers and directors. \n

\n The Proposed Bylaws require the Combined Company to indemnify and hold harmless its current and former directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the TBOC, provided that indemnification for a proceeding initiated by the indemnitee (other than a proceeding to enforce indemnification rights) is required only if the proceeding was authorized by the board of directors. The Proposed Bylaws also permit the Combined Company to maintain insurance and to grant indemnification and advancement rights to employees and agents. \n

\n Advancement of Expenses\n

\n Under Section 145(e) of the DGCL, expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by an officer or director of the corporation in defending any civil, criminal, administrative or investigative action, suit or proceeding may be paid by the corporation in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such director or officer to repay such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified by the corporation as authorized in this section. Such expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by former directors and officers or other employees and agents of the corporation or by persons serving at the request of\n

\n Under the TBOC, a corporation may advance expenses to a director or officer only upon receipt of (i) a written affirmation of the person’s good faith belief that the person has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification under the TBOC and (ii) a written undertaking to repay the amounts advanced if it is finally determined that the person has not met that standard. Accordingly, the Proposed Bylaws provide that the right to indemnification includes the right to advancement of expenses incurred in defending a proceeding in advance of its final disposition, subject to delivery of such affirmation and undertaking if required by the TBOC.\n

\n 226\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n
\n (Delaware)\n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n the corporation as directors, officers, employees or agents of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise may be so paid upon such terms and conditions, if any, as the corporation deems appropriate. Section 145(f) of the DGCL states that the indemnification and advancement of expenses provided by, or granted pursuant to, the Section 145 of the DGCL shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, both as to action in such person’s official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such office.\n

\n The Twin Vee Bylaws provide that expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by an officer or director of Twin Vee in defending any proceeding shall be paid by Twin Vee in advance of the final disposition of such proceeding upon receipt of a written request therefor (together with documentation reasonably evidencing such expenses) and an undertaking by or on behalf of the person to repay such amounts if it shall ultimately be determined that the person is not entitled to be indemnified under the Twin Vee Bylaws or the DGCL. Such expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by former directors and officers or other employees and agents may be so paid upon such terms and conditions, if any, as the corporation deems reasonably appropriate and shall be subject to the corporation’s expense guidelines. The right to advancement of expenses shall\n

\n 227\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n \n (Delaware)\n \n	\n \n Combined Company Governance \n \n Documents (Texas) \n \n
	\n not apply to any claim for which indemnity is excluded pursuant to the Twin Vee Bylaws, but shall apply to any proceeding referenced in Section 8.6(ii) or 8.6(iii) of the Twin Vee Bylaws prior to a determination that the person is not entitled to be indemnified by Twin Vee.\n
\n \n Interested Director Transactions\n \n	\n The Twin Vee Bylaws state that no contract or transaction between Twin Vee and one or more of its directors or officers, or between Twin Vee and any other corporation, partnership, association, or other organization in which one or more of its directors or officers are directors or officers, or have a financial interest, shall be void or voidable solely for this reason, or solely because the director or officer is present at or participates in the meeting of the board of directors of or committee thereof that authorized the contract or transaction, or solely because his, her or their votes are counted for such purpose, if: (i) the material facts as to his or her relationship or interest and as to the contract or transaction are disclosed or are known to the Twin Vee Board of Directors or the committee and the Twin Vee Board of Directors or committee in good faith authorizes the contract or transaction by the affirmative vote of a majority of the disinterested directors, even though the disinterested directors be less than a quorum; or (ii) the material facts as to his or her relationship or interest and as to the contract or transaction are disclosed or are known to the Twin Vee stockholders entitled to vote thereon, and the contract or transaction as specifically approved in good faith by vote of such stockholders; or (iii) the contract or transaction is fair as\n	\n The Proposed Charter and the Proposed Bylaws do not contain a provision addressing transactions with interested directors or officers. Such transactions will be governed by the TBOC.\n

\n 228\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n \n (Delaware)\n \n	\n \n Combined Company Governance \n \n Documents (Texas) \n \n
	\n \n to Twin Vee as of the time it is authorized, approved, or ratified, by the Twin Vee Board of Directors, a committee or the stockholders. Common or interested directors may be counted in determining the presence of a quorum at a meeting of the board of directors or of a committee that authorizes the contract or transaction.\n \n \n DGCL Section 144 also governs interested director transactions.\n \n
\n \n Fiduciary Duties\n \n	\n In Delaware, fiduciary duties are generally developed by case law. Directors owe duties of loyalty and care. Directors also owe a duty of good faith, which is considered to be an integral component of the duty of loyalty. Under Section 141(e) of the DGCL, a member of the board of directors, or a member of any committee designated by the board of directors, shall, in the performance of such member’s duties, be fully protected in relying in good faith upon the records of the corporation and upon such information, opinions, reports or statements presented to the corporation by any of the corporation’s officers or employees, or committees of the board of directors, or by any other person as to matters the member reasonably believes are within such other person’s professional or expert competence and who has been selected with reasonable care by or on behalf of the corporation. \n	\n In Texas, fiduciary duties are generally developed by case law. Directors and officers owe duties of loyalty, due care and obedience to the corporation. Directors and officers may rely on information, reports and statements prepared or presented by officers, employees, legal counsel, certified public accountants, investment bankers and other persons they reasonably believe possess professional expertise in the matter, and may (but are not required to) consider the laws, judicial decisions and practices of other states. \n
\n \n Business Judgment Rule\n \n	\n In Delaware, under applicable case law, a court presumes that in making a business decision, the directors acted on an informed basis, in good faith, and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interests of the company. In Delaware, under applicable case law, the court will\n	\n Under the TBOC, a corporation listed on a national securities exchange is automatically subject to, and any other corporation may elect in its governing documents to be governed by, TBOC § 21.419, which codifies the business judgment rule, establishing a presumption that\n

\n 229\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n \n (Delaware)\n \n	\n \n Combined Company Governance \n \n Documents (Texas) \n \n
	\n not second-guess the business wisdom of the decision unless the plaintiff overcomes this presumption.\n	\n \n directors and officers, in deciding upon matters of business, act in good faith, on an informed basis, in furtherance of the interests of the corporation, and in obedience to the law and the corporation’s governing documents.\n \n \n The Proposed Charter provides that the Combined Company affirmatively elects to be governed by the statutory business judgment rule presumption. \n \n
\n \n Required Ownership to Institute a Derivative Proceeding\n \n	\n In Delaware, there is no minimum number or percentage of shares required to institute a stockholder derivative proceeding. DGCL Section 327 states that in any derivative suit instituted by a stockholder of a corporation, it shall be averred in the complaint that the plaintiff was a stockholder of the corporation at the time of the transaction of which such stockholder complains or that such stockholder’s stock thereafter devolved upon such stockholder by operation of law. \n	\n \n Under the TBOC, a public corporation may require a stockholder, individually or as a group, to hold up to three percent (3%) of its outstanding shares to institute or maintain a derivative proceeding.\n \n \n The Proposed Charter provides that, during any time that the Combined Company has a class of its equity securities listed on a national securities exchange or has five hundred (500) or more stockholders, no stockholder may institute or maintain a derivative proceeding unless the stockholder holds, at the time the proceeding is instituted, at least [three percent (3%)] of the outstanding shares. \n \n
\n \n Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation / Certificate of Formation\n \n	\n \n The Twin Vee Charter states that Twin Vee reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision contained in the Twin Vee Charter, in the manner now or hereafter prescribed by statute, and all rights conferred upon the stockholders herein are granted subject to this reservation.\n \n \n Under Section 242 of the DGCL, a majority of the stock entitled to vote thereon is required to amend the certificate of incorporation. Section 242(d)(2) provides an exception to the foregoing requirement related to an\n \n	\n The Proposed Charter reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision of the Proposed Charter in the manner prescribed by the Proposed Charter and the TBOC.\n

\n 230\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n
\n (Delaware)\n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n amendment to a certificate of incorporation to increase or decrease the number of authorized shares of capital stock if, among other things, the shares are listed on a national securities exchange immediately before such amendment becomes effective and a majority of votes cast vote in favor of such amendment.\n

\n Amendment of Bylaws\n

\n Under Section 109(a) of the DGCL, the power to adopt, amend or repeal bylaws shall be in the stockholders entitled to vote. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any corporation may, in its certificate of incorporation, confer the power to adopt, amend or repeal bylaws upon the directors.\n

\n The Twin Vee Bylaws state that the Board of Directors is expressly empowered to adopt, amend or repeal the Bylaws of the Corporation. Any adoption, amendment or repeal of the Bylaws of the Corporation by the Board of Directors shall require the approval of a majority of the authorized number of directors. The stockholders shall also have power to adopt, amend or repeal the Bylaws of the Corporation; provided, however, that, in addition to any vote of the holders of any class or series of stock of the Corporation required by law or by this Certificate of Incorporation, such action by stockholders shall require the affirmative vote of the holders of at least sixty-six and two-thirds percent (662∕3%) of the voting power of all of the then-outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election or directors, voting together as a single class \n

\n The Proposed Charter authorizes the Combined Company’s board of directors to make, repeal, alter, amend and rescind any or all of the Proposed Bylaws, subject to any additional vote required by the Proposed Bylaws.\n

\n The Proposed Bylaws provide that the Combined Company’s board of directors is authorized to alter, amend and repeal the Proposed Bylaws or adopt new bylaws.\n

\n The shareholders may, by the vote of the holders of not less than a majority of the voting power of all outstanding shares of capital stock of the Combined Company entitled to vote in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, make additional bylaws and alter, amend and repeal any bylaws, whether such bylaws were originally adopted by the shareholders or otherwise.\n

\n 231\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n
\n (Delaware)\n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n Exclusive Forum\n

\n DGCL Section 115 states that the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws of a Delaware corporation may require, consistent with applicable jurisdictional requirements, that any or all internal corporate claims shall be brought solely and exclusively in any or all of the courts in the State of Delaware, and no provision of the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws may prohibit bringing such claims in the courts of the State of Delaware.\n

\n The Twin Vee Charter states that, unless Twin Vee consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for (1) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of Twin Vee; (2) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of Twin Vee to Twin Vee or Twin Vee’s stockholders; (3) any action asserting a claim against Twin Vee or any director or officer or other employee of the Corporation arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, the Twin Vee Charter or the Twin Vee Bylaws; or (4) any action asserting a claim against Twin Vee or any director or officer or other employee of Twin Vee governed by the internal affairs doctrine. The choice of the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of Twin Vee shall not apply to suits to enforce a duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. \n

\n As permitted by the TBOC, the Proposed Charter provides that, unless the Combined Company consents in writing to an alternative forum, the Business Court in the First Business Court Division of the State of Texas (or, if it lacks jurisdiction, the federal district court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, or, if that court lacks jurisdiction, a Texas state district court in Dallas County) will be the sole and exclusive forum for derivative actions, breach of fiduciary duty claims, claims arising under the TBOC or the Combined Company Governance Documents, claims governed by the internal affairs doctrine, “internal entity claims” and other actions within the Business Court’s jurisdiction. The Proposed Charter also provides that the federal district courts will be the exclusive forum for claims arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. Holders of shares are deemed to have notice of and consented to these provisions. In addition, the Proposed Charter provides that holders of shares are deemed to have waived any right to a jury trial in any action asserting an “internal entity claim” and, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any other action within the scope of the exclusive forum provision.\n

\n 232\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n
\n (Delaware)\n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n Appraisal (Dissenters’) Rights\n

\n See “Appraisal Rights and Dissenters’ Rights” elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus for a discussion of the applicable appraisal rights under Delaware law.

\n The Proposed Charter and the Proposed Bylaws do not address dissenters’ rights. Combined Company stockholders will have dissenters’ rights only to the extent provided under the TBOC.\n

\n (2) the owner is not required by the terms of the plan of merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, to accept for the owner’s ownership interest any consideration that is different\n

\n 233\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n
\n (Delaware)\n

\n Combined Company Governance \n
\n Documents (Texas) \n

\n from the consideration to be provided to any other holder of an ownership interest of the same class or series as the ownership interest held by the owner, other than cash instead of fractional shares or interests the owner would otherwise be entitled to receive; and\n

\n (3) the owner is not required by the terms of the plan of merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, to accept for the owner’s ownership interest any consideration other than: (A) ownership interests, or depository receipts in respect of ownership interests, of another entity of the same general organizational type that, immediately after the effective date of the merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, will be part of a class or series of ownership interests, or depository receipts in respect of ownership interests that are: (i) listed on a national securities exchange or authorized for listing on the exchange on official notice of issuance; or (ii) held of record by at least 2,000 owners; (B) cash instead of fractional ownership interests the owner would otherwise be entitled to receive; or (C) any combination of the ownership interests and cash above.\n

\n 234\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

			\n \n Twin Vee Governing Documents\n \n (Delaware)\n \n			\n \n Combined Company Governance \n \n Documents (Texas) \n \n
						\n shares that were entitled to vote on the amendment; except if the shares held by the owner are part of a class or series of shares listed on a national securities exchange; or held of record by at least 2,000 owners.\n

\n 235\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n SECURITIES ACT RESTRICTIONS ON RESALE OF COMBINED COMPANY SECURITIES \n

\n Pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act (“Rule 144”), a person who has beneficially owned restricted Combined Company Common Stock for at least six months would be entitled to sell their securities provided that (i) such person is not deemed to have been an affiliate of the Combined Company at the time of, or at any time during the three months preceding, a sale and (ii) the Combined Company is subject to periodic reporting requirements under the Exchange Act for at least three months before the sale and has filed all required reports under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the 12 months (or such shorter period as the Combined Company was required to file reports) preceding the sale. \n

\n Persons who have beneficially owned restricted shares of Combined Company Common Stock for at least six months but who are affiliates of the Combined Company at the time of, or at any time during the three months preceding, a sale, would be subject to additional restrictions, by which such person would be entitled to sell within any three-month period only a number of securities that does not exceed the greater of: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n 1.0% of the total number of shares of Combined Company Common Stock then-outstanding; or \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n the average weekly reported trading volume of Combined Company Common Stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to the sale. \n

\n Sales by affiliates of the Combined Company under Rule 144 are also limited by manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about the Combined Company. \n

\n 236\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS \n

\n Stockholder Proposals \n

\n The Proposed Bylaws establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders who wish to present a proposal before an annual meeting of stockholders. The Proposed Bylaws provide that the only business that may be conducted at an annual meeting of stockholders is business that is (i) specified in the notice of such meeting (or any supplement or amendment thereto) given by or at the direction of the Combined Company’s board of directors, (ii) otherwise properly brought before such meeting by or at the direction of the Combined Company’s board of directors or (iii) otherwise properly brought before such meeting by a stockholder present in person who (a) (1) was a record owner of shares of the Combined Company both at the time of giving the notice and at the time of such meeting, (2) is entitled to vote at such meeting, and (3) has complied with the notice procedures specified in the Proposed Bylaws in all applicable respects or (b) properly made such proposal in accordance with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. To be timely for the annual meeting of stockholders of the Combined Company, the written notice under clause (iii)(a) above must be received by the secretary of the Combined Company at its principal executive offices: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n not later than the 90th day; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n not earlier than the 120th day, before the one-year anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, if such meeting is held not more than 30 days before, or not more than 70 days after, the one-year anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. \n

\n For any other annual meeting, notice of a stockholder proposal must be received no earlier than the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and no later than the later of (i) the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or (ii) the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Combined Company. \n

\n Under Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, a stockholder proposal to be included in the proxy statement and proxy card for the annual general meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8 must be received at the principal office of the Combined Company a reasonable time before the Combined Company begins to print and send its proxy materials for such meeting and must comply with Rule 14a-8. \n

\n Stockholder Director Nominees \n

\n The Proposed Bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for appointment at an annual meeting or at a special meeting (but only if the appointment of directors is a matter specified in the notice of meeting given by or at the direction of the person calling such special meeting) of stockholders, subject to the provisions of the Proposed Charter. To nominate a director, the stockholder must provide the information required by the Proposed Bylaws. In addition, the stockholder must give timely notice to the secretary of the Combined Company in accordance with the Proposed Bylaws, which, in general, require that the notice be received by the secretary within the time periods for stockholder proposals (other than proposals pursuant to Rule 14a-8) described above under “— Stockholder Proposals.” \n

\n 237\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS \n

\n Stockholders and interested parties may communicate with the board of directors of USFM, any committee chairperson or the non-management directors as a group by writing to the board or committee chairperson in care of USFM Corporation, 1707 Cole Blvd., Suite 200, Golden, CO 80401. \n

\n Stockholders and interested parties may communicate with the board of directors of Twin Vee or the non-management directors as a group by writing to the board in care of Twin Vee PowerCats Co., 3101 S. US-1, Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982. \n

\n Following the Business Combination, such communications should be sent to USFM Corporation, 1707 Cole Blvd., Suite 200, Golden, CO 80401. Each communication will be forwarded, depending on the subject matter, to the board of directors, the appropriate committee chairperson or all non-management directors. \n

\n 238\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n LEGAL MATTERS \n

\n Haynes & Boone, LLP, has passed upon the validity of the securities of the Combined Company offered by this joint proxy statement/prospectus and certain other legal matters related to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n EXPERTS \n

\n The financial statements of USFM Corporation as of December 31, 2025 and for the period from October 27, 2025 (inception) through December 31, 2025, appearing in this joint proxy statement/prospectus have been audited by EC Barrett, LLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in its report and are included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as an expert in auditing and accounting.

\n The consolidated financial statements of Twin Vee PowerCats Co. as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and for each of the years then ended, have been included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus in reliance upon the report of Grassi & Co., CPAs, P.C., an independent registered public accounting firm, upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing. \n

\n The financial statements of Twin Vee Holdco Inc. as of October 6, 2026 and for the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6, 2026, appearing in this joint proxy statement/prospectus have been audited by EC Barrett, LLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in its report and are included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as an expert in auditing and accounting. \n

\n DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS TO STOCKHOLDERS \n

\n Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, USFM and services that it employs to deliver communications to its stockholders are permitted to deliver to two or more stockholders sharing the same address a single copy of each of USFM’s annual report to stockholders and USFM’s proxy statement. Upon written or oral request, USFM will deliver a separate copy of the annual report to stockholders or proxy statement to any stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of each document was delivered and who wishes to receive separate copies of such documents. Stockholders receiving multiple copies of such documents may likewise request that USFM deliver single copies of such documents in the future. Stockholders may notify USFM of their requests by calling or writing USFM at its principal executive offices at 1707 Cole Blvd., Suite 200, Golden, CO 80401 or (872) 216-1518. \n

\n Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, Twin Vee and services that it employs to deliver communications to its stockholders are permitted to deliver to two or more stockholders sharing the same address a single copy of each of Twin Vee’s annual report to stockholders and Twin Vee’s proxy statement. Upon written or oral request, Twin Vee will deliver a separate copy of the annual report to stockholders or proxy statement to any stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of each document was delivered and who wishes to receive separate copies of such documents. Stockholders receiving multiple copies of such documents may likewise request that Twin Vee deliver single copies of such documents in the future. Stockholders may notify Twin Vee of their requests by calling or writing Twin Vee at its principal executive offices at 3101 S. US-1, Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 or (772) 429-2525. \n

\n 239\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE \n

\n The SEC allows Twin Vee to incorporate certain information into this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference to other information that has been filed with the SEC. The information incorporated by reference is deemed to be part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, except as set forth below and except for any information superseded by information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus or in later filed documents incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The documents that are incorporated by reference contain important information about Twin Vee and you should read this document together with any other documents incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Copies of all or any part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the documents incorporated by reference or the exhibits, are available at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. \n

\n This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference the following documents that have previously been filed with the SEC by Twin Vee (File No. 001-40623), in each case excluding any information furnished but not filed pursuant to the rules promulgated under the Exchange Act: \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n Twin Vee SEC Filings (File No. 001-40623) \n \n			\n \n Period \n \n
	\n Annual Report on Form 10-K \n			\n \n Fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, filed on February 27, 2026\n \n
	\n Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q \n			\n Quarterly period ended March 31, 2026, filed on May 7, 2026; quarterly period ended June 30, 2026, filed on August 6, 2026\n
	\n Current Reports on Form 8-K, excluding any information furnished but not filed pursuant to the rules promulgated under the Exchange Act. \n			\n \n Filed on January 12, 2026, January 21, 2026, February 23, 2026, February 24, 2026, March 16, 2026, March 19, 2026, March 25, 2026, April 3, 2026, April 13, 2026, April 23, 2026, April 30, 2026, May 20, 2026, July 13, 2026, August 5, 2026, August 24, 2026, September 9, 2026, and October 8, 2026. \n \n
	\n The description of the Twin Vee Common Stock contained in Exhibit 4.3 to Twin Vee’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, including any amendment or report filed for the purpose of updating such description. \n			\n \n Filed on February 27, 2026.\n \n

\n In addition, Twin Vee is incorporating by reference any documents it may file under Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and prior to the date of the Twin Vee Special Meeting. Such documents are considered to be part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, effective as of the date such documents are filed with the SEC. \n

\n Twin Vee files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may obtain the information incorporated by reference and any other materials Twin Vee files with the SEC without charge by following the instructions in the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on the next page of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. \n

\n 240\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION \n

\n This joint proxy statement/prospectus is part of a registration statement and constitutes a prospectus of PubCo in addition to being a proxy statement of USFM for the USFM Special Meeting and a proxy statement of Twin Vee for the Twin Vee Special Meeting. As allowed by SEC rules, this joint proxy statement/prospectus does not contain all of the information you can find in the registration statement or the exhibits to the registration statement. Information and statements contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus are qualified in all respects by reference to the copy of the relevant contract or other document included as an annex to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.

\n Twin Vee files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC as required by the Exchange Act. This information is available to you without charge upon your written or oral request. You can obtain the documents incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov or by requesting them in writing or by telephone at the appropriate address below:

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n if you are a USFM stockholder:\n
\n USFM Corporation\n
\n 1707 Cole Blvd., Suite 200\n
\n Golden, CO 80401 Attn: Chief\n
\n Executive Officer (872) 216-1518\n

\n if you are a Twin Vee stockholder: \n
\n Twin Vee PowerCats Co. \n
\n 3101 S. US-1, \n
\n Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 \n
\n Attn: Investor Relations \n
\n (772) 429-2525\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n if you are a USFM stockholder: \n
\n Advantage Proxy, Inc.\n
\n P.O. Box 10904 Yakima, WA 98909 \n
\n Attn: Karen Smith \n
\n Toll Free Telephone: (877) 870-8565 \n
\n Main Telephone: (206) 870-8565 \n
\n E-mail: ksmith@advantageproxy.com \n

\n if you are a Twin Vee stockholder: \n
\n D.F. King & Co., Inc. \n
\n 28 Liberty Street, \n
\n 53rd Floor
New York, New York 10005
Toll-Free (800) 791-3320
TwinVee@dfking.com.

\n You will not be charged for any of these documents that you request. To obtain timely delivery of these documents, you must request them no later than five business days before the date of the USFM Special Meeting or the Twin Vee Special Meeting, as applicable. This means that USFM stockholders requesting documents must do so by [ ], in order to receive them before the USFM Special Meeting and Twin Vee stockholders requesting documents must do so by [ ], in order to receive them before the Twin Vee Special Meeting. \n

\n You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. No one has been authorized to provide you with information that is different from that contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated [ ], and you should assume that the information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is accurate only as of such date. You should assume that the information incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus is accurate as of the date of such incorporated document. Neither the mailing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to USFM stockholders or Twin Vee stockholders, nor the issuance by the Combined Company of shares of Combined Company Common Stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement, will create any implication to the contrary. \n

\n This joint proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, or the solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction to or from any person to whom it is unlawful to make any such offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction. Except where the context otherwise indicates, information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding Twin Vee has been provided by Twin Vee, and information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding USFM has been provided by USFM.\n

\n 241\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n Page \n \n
\n \n TWIN VEE HOLDCO INC.\n \n FINANCIAL STATEMENTS\n \n
\n \n Audit opinion \n \n		\n F-4\n
\n \n Balance Sheet as of October 6, 2026 \n \n		\n F-5\n
\n \n Statement of Operations for the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6,\n \n 2026 \n \n		\n F-6\n
\n \n Statement of Changes in Stockholder’s Deficit for the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6, 2026 \n \n		\n F-7\n
\n \n Statement of Cash Flows for the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6,\n \n 2026 \n \n		\n F-8\n
\n \n Notes to Financial Statements for the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6, 2026 \n \n		\n F-9 – F-11

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n USFM CORPORATION\n \n FINANCIAL STATEMENTS\n \n
	\n \n Balance Sheets \n \n					\n F-14\n
	\n \n Statements of Operations \n \n					\n F-15\n
	\n \n Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity \n \n					\n F-16\n
	\n \n Statements of Cash Flows \n \n					\n F-17\n
	\n \n Notes to Financial Statements \n \n					\n F-18\n

	\n \n USFM CORPORATION\n \n AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS\n \n
	\n \n Report of Independent Registered Audit Firm \n \n					\n F-28\n
	\n \n Balance Sheet \n \n					\n F-29\n
	\n \n Statement of Operations \n \n					\n F-30\n
	\n \n Statement of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity \n \n					\n F-31\n
	\n \n Statement of Cash Flows \n \n					\n F-32\n
	\n \n Notes to Financial Statements \n \n					\n F-33\n

\n F-1\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n TWIN VEE HOLDCO INC. \n

\n Financial Statements \n

\n As of October 6, 2026 and for the period from\n
\n October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6, 2026\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n TWIN VEE HOLDCO INC. \n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n FINANCIAL STATEMENTS \n

	\n \n Page \n \n
\n \n Audit opinion \n \n		\n F-4\n
\n \n Balance Sheet as of October 6, 2026 \n \n		\n F-5\n
\n \n Statement of Operations for the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6,\n \n 2026 \n \n		\n F-6\n
\n \n Statement of Changes in Stockholder’s Deficit for the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6, 2026 \n \n		\n F-7\n
\n \n Statement of Cash Flows for the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6,\n \n 2026 \n \n		\n F-8\n
\n \n Notes to Financial Statements for the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6, 2026 \n \n		\n F-9 – F-11

\n F-3\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n $\"[MISSING$

\n REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM \n

\n To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Twin Vee Holdco Inc.

\n Opinion on the Financial Statements \n

\n We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Twin Vee Holdco Inc. (the “Company”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Twin Vee PowerCats Co., as of October 6, 2026, and the related statements of operations, changes in shareholder’s deficit, and cash flows for the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6, 2026, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of October 6, 2026, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6, 2026, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. \n

\n Basis for Opinion \n

\n These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. \n

\n We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. \n

\n Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. \n

\n We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2026. \n

\n $\"[MISSING$ \n

\n Atlanta, Georgia
October 20, 2026

\n F-4\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n TWIN VEE HOLDCO INC. \n

\n Balance Sheet \n
\n October 6, 2026 \n

\n ASSETS\n
\n \n Cash and cash equivalents \n \n	$	10
\n \n Total assets \n \n	$	10
\n LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIT\n
\n Current liabilities\n
\n \n Due to parent \n \n	$	1,713
\n \n Total liabilities \n \n		1,713
\n Stockholder’s deficit\n
\n \n Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding \n \n		10
\n \n Accumulated deficit \n \n		(1,713)
\n \n Total stockholder’s deficit \n \n		(1,703)
\n \n Total liabilities and stockholder’s deficit \n \n	$	10

\n The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. \n
\n

\n F-5\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n TWIN VEE HOLDCO INC. \n

\n Statement of Operations \n
\n For the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6, 2026 \n

\n \n Revenue \n \n	$	—
\n Operating expenses\n
\n \n Formation costs \n \n		1,713
\n \n Total operating expenses \n \n		1,713
\n \n Loss before income taxes \n \n		(1,713)
\n \n Income tax expense \n \n		—
\n \n Net loss \n \n	$	(1,713)
\n \n Net loss per common share, basic and diluted \n \n	$	(1.71)
\n \n Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted \n \n		1,000

\n The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. \n
\n

\n F-6\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n TWIN VEE HOLDCO INC. \n

\n Statement of Changes in Stockholder’s Deficit \n
\n For the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6, 2026 \n

	\n \n Common\n \n stock \n \n			\n \n Accumulated\n \n deficit \n \n	\n \n Total \n \n
\n \n Balance at inception \n \n		$	—			$	—	$	—
\n \n Issuance of 1,000 common shares \n \n			10				—		10
\n \n Net loss \n \n			—				(1,713)		(1,713)
\n \n Balance at October 6, 2026 \n \n		$	10			$	(1,713)	$	(1,703)

\n The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. \n
\n

\n F-7\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n TWIN VEE HOLDCO INC. \n

\n Statement of Cash Flows \n
\n For the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6, 2026 \n

\n Cash Flows from Operating Activities\n
\n \n Net loss \n \n	$	(1,713)
\n \n Formation costs paid by parent on behalf of the Company \n \n		1,713
\n \n Net cash used in operating activities \n \n		—
\n Cash Flows from Investing Activities\n
\n \n Net cash used in investing activities \n \n		—
\n Cash Flows from Financing Activities\n
\n \n Issuance of common stock \n \n		10
\n \n Net cash provided by financing activities \n \n		10
\n \n Net change in cash and cash equivalents \n \n		10
\n \n Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period \n \n		—
\n \n Cash, end of period\n \n	$	10
\n Supplemental cash flow information\n
\n \n Cash paid for interest \n \n	$	—
\n \n Cash paid for taxes \n \n	$	—
\n Noncash financing activity\n
\n \n Formation costs paid by parent on behalf of the Company \n \n	$	1,713

\n The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. \n
\n

\n F-8\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n TWIN VEE HOLDCO INC.\n

\n Notes to Financial Statements \n
\n For the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6, 2026 \n

\n 1 Organization and Significant Accounting Policies \n

\n Organization \n

\n Twin Vee Holdco Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Texas on October 5, 2026 by Twin Vee PowerCats Co. (“Twin Vee” or the “Parent”). The Company was formed to serve as the holding company in connection with the proposed business combination of Twin Vee and USFM Corporation (“USFM”). Through October 6, 2026, the Company’s activities were limited to organization and preparation for the proposed business combination. The Company has not generated revenue. On October 5, 2026, the Company issued all 1,000 of its authorized common shares to Twin Vee for $10, establishing the Company as a wholly owned subsidiary of Twin Vee. \n

\n On October 7, 2026, the Company, Twin Vee, USFM, Twin Vee Merger Sub Inc. and USFM Merger Sub Inc. entered into an Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger. Upon the closing of that agreement, Twin Vee Merger Sub Inc. will merge with and into Twin Vee, and USFM Merger Sub Inc. will merge with and into USFM, with Twin Vee and USFM surviving as wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. Closing is subject to stockholder approvals, effectiveness of the Company’s registration statement on Form S-4, the pre-closing contingent value rights restructuring, and other closing conditions. These financial statements do not give effect to the proposed mergers. \n

\n Basis of Presentation \n

\n The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and present the Company’s financial position as of October 6, 2026 and its results of operations, changes in stockholder’s deficit and cash flows for the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6, 2026. As of October 6, 2026, the Company has not begun operations nor generated any revenues. \n

\n Formation Costs \n

\n Costs incurred to organize the Company are expensed as incurred. Formation costs for the period were $1,713. \n

\n Use of Estimates \n

\n The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting\n
\n Principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Some of these judgments can be subjective and complex, and, consequently, actual results may differ from these estimates. \n

\n Cash, Cash Equivalents \n

\n Cash and cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase. On October 6, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $10. \n

\n Fair Value of Financial Instruments \n

\n The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, consisting of cash and amounts due to the Parent, approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature. \n

\n Recently Issued But Not Yet Adopted Accounting Pronouncements \n

\n In November 2024, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2024-03, Income Statement — Reporting Comprehensive Income — Expense Disaggregation \n

\n F-9\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), which requires additional disclosures regarding certain expenses included in the income statement. ASU 2025-01 subsequently clarified the effective dates. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company is evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on its financial statement disclosures. \n

\n 2 Related Party Transactions \n

\n Twin Vee paid $1,713 of formation costs on the Company’s behalf during the period from inception through October 6, 2026. The Company recorded these costs as operating expenses and an amount due to its Parent. At October 6, 2026, the outstanding balance due to Twin Vee was $1,713. The payments were made directly by the Parent and did not result in cash receipts or payments by the Company. The payable bears no interest and is expected to be paid in normal commercial terms of 90 days or less. \n

\n 3 Stockholders’ Equity \n

\n The Company is authorized to issue 1,000 common shares with a par value of $0.01 per share. No separate preferred stock class is specified in its certificate of formation. On October 5, 2026, the Company issued 1,000 shares to Twin Vee for aggregate consideration of $10, equal to par value. The Company recorded common stock of $10 and no additional paid-in capital. \n

\n Basic net loss per common share is calculated by dividing net loss of $1,713 by 1,000 weighted-average common shares outstanding for the period, resulting in a net loss per share of ($1.71). Diluted net loss per share equals basic net loss per share because there were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding. \n

\n 4 Income Taxes \n

\n The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740, Income Taxes, and is included in the consolidated federal income tax return of its Parent. Income taxes are allocated to the Company using the separate-return method. \n

\n For the period from October 5, 2026 (inception) through October 6, 2026, the Company incurred a loss before income taxes of $1,713, all attributable to domestic operations. The Company recognized a deferred tax asset of $360 related to organizational costs incurred in connection with its incorporation. A valuation allowance of $360 was established because realization of the deferred tax asset is not considered more likely than not. Accordingly, the Company reported no net deferred tax asset or income tax expense or benefit for the period. \n

\n The Company’s statutory federal income tax rate is 21%. The income tax benefit calculated at the statutory rate was fully offset by the valuation allowance. The Company made no income tax payments during the period. \n

\n The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, as a component of income tax expense. The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits, interest, or penalties as of October 6, 2026. \n

\n The Company was incorporated on October 5, 2026, and has not yet filed an income tax return. Accordingly, no prior tax years are subject to examination by taxing authorities. \n

\n 5 Business Segment Information \n

\n The Company’s activities consist of organization and preparation for the proposed business combination and are managed as a single operating and reportable segment. Joseph Visconti, Chief Executive Officer of Twin Vee, is the Company’s chief operating decision maker. The chief operating decision maker uses net loss as the measure of segment performance to assess financial results and make resource allocation decisions for the Company as a whole. The Company reported no revenue, formation expenses and net loss of $1,713, and total assets of $10 for the period ended October 6, 2026. \n

\n F-10\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n 6 Going Concern \n

\n The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. As discussed in Note 1, the Company was formed to facilitate the proposed business combination and has not commenced substantive operations. As of October 6, 2026, the Company had cash of $10, an accumulated deficit of $1,713, and an amount due to the Parent of $1,713. \n

\n The Company is dependent on the Parent for funding its operating and administrative expenses. The Parent has the intent and ability to provide financial support to the Company for at least one year from the date these financial statements are issued. \n

\n Based on the Parent’s financial support, management has concluded that substantial doubt does not exist regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the date these financial statements are issued. \n

\n 7 Subsequent Events \n

\n No other subsequent events requiring recognition or disclosure are known as of preparation of this draft on October 19, 2026. The Company will complete its evaluation of events occurring after October 6, 2026 through the date the audited financial statements are issued and update this disclosure as appropriate.\n

\n F-11\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n USFM CORPORATION \n

\n FINANCIAL STATEMENTS \n

\n As of June 30, 2026 (unaudited) and December 31, 2025 (audited) and\n
\n For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 (unaudited) and\n
\n the Period from October 27, 2025 (Date of Inception) through December 31, 2025 (audited)\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n TABLE OF CONTENTS \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n Balance Sheets \n \n					\n F-14\n
	\n \n Statements of Operations \n \n					\n F-15\n
	\n \n Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity \n \n					\n F-16\n
	\n \n Statements of Cash Flows \n \n					\n F-17\n
	\n \n Notes to Financial Statements \n \n					\n F-18\n

\n F-13\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n USFM CORPORATION\n

\n BALANCE SHEETS \n

	\n \n June 30,\n \n 2026 \n \n			\n \n December 31,\n \n 2025 \n \n
	\n \n (Unaudited) \n \n			\n \n (Audited) \n \n
\n ASSETS\n
\n Current assets:\n
\n \n Cash \n \n		$	5,346,131		$	39
\n \n Prepaid expenses \n \n			932,911			—
\n \n Total current assets \n \n			6,279,042			39
\n Non-current assets:\n
\n \n Deposit on investment (Note 3) \n \n			500,000			—
\n \n Total other assets \n \n			500,000			—
\n \n TOTAL ASSETS\n \n		$	6,779,042		$	39
\n LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY\n
\n Current liabilities:\n
\n \n Accounts payable \n \n		$	162,011		$	—
\n \n Note payable – related party (Note 4) \n \n			300,000			—
\n \n Accrued interest – related party (Note 4) \n \n			7,521			—
\n \n Total current liabilities \n \n			469,532			—
\n \n Total liabilities \n \n			469,532			—
\n Commitments and contingencies (Note 7) \n
\n Stockholders’ equity:\n
\n \n Common stock, no par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 233,252 and 50,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively \n \n			8,265,263			150
\n \n Subscription receivable \n \n			(33)			—
\n \n Accumulated deficit \n \n			(1,955,720)			(111)
\n \n Total stockholders’ equity \n \n			6,309,510			39
\n \n TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY\n \n		$	6,779,042		$	39

\n The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. \n
\n

\n F-14\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n USFM CORPORATION\n

\n STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS \n

	\n \n Three Months\n \n Ended\n \n June 30, 2026 \n \n			\n \n Six Months\n \n Ended\n \n June 30, 2026 \n \n	\n \n Period from\n \n Inception through\n \n Dec. 31, 2025 \n \n
	\n \n (unaudited) \n \n			\n \n (unaudited) \n \n	\n \n (audited) \n \n
\n \n Revenue \n \n		$	—			$	—	$	—
\n \n Exploration and project expenses \n \n			1,544,805				1,715,264		—
\n \n Consulting and management fees \n \n			95,500				194,184		—
\n \n Operating expenses \n \n			27,195				36,295		111
\n \n Loss from operations \n \n			(1,667,500)				(1,945,743)		(111)
\n Other expense:\n
\n \n Interest expense \n \n			(7,521)				(7,521)		—
\n \n Other expense \n \n			(2,345)				(2,345)		—
\n \n Total other expense \n \n			(9,866)				(9,866)		—
\n \n Loss before income taxes \n \n			(1,677,366)				(1,955,609)		(111)
\n \n Provision for income taxes \n \n			—				—		—
\n \n Net loss\n \n		$	(1,677,366)			$	(1,955,609)	$	(111)
\n \n Net loss per common share – basic and diluted \n \n		$	(8.03)			$	(12.91)	$	(0.01)
\n \n Weighted average shares outstanding – basic and diluted \n \n			208,924				151,490		21,970

\n The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. \n
\n

\n F-15\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n USFM CORPORATION\n

\n STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY \n
\n For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and \n
\n the Period from October 27, 2025 (Date of Inception) through December 31, 2025\n

	\n \n Common\n \n Shares \n \n		\n \n Common\n \n Stock \n \n	\n \n Subscription\n \n Receivable \n \n			\n \n Accumulated\n \n Deficit \n \n	\n \n Total\n \n Equity \n \n
\n \n Balance at October 27, 2025 (inception)\n \n		—			$	—			$	—	$	—	$	—
\n \n Issuance of common stock \n \n		50,000				150				—		—		150
\n \n Net loss \n \n		—				—				—		(111)		(111)
\n \n Balance at December 31, 2025 (audited)\n \n		50,000				150				—		(111)		39
\n \n Issuance of common stock \n \n		130,000				1,050,080				—		—		1,050,080
\n \n Subscription receivable \n \n		—				—				(20,015)		—		(20,015)
\n \n Net loss \n \n		—				—				—		(278,243)		(278,243)
\n \n Balance at March 31, 2026 (unaudited)\n \n		180,000				1,050,230				(20,015)		(278,354)		751,861
\n \n Issuance of common stock \n \n		53,252				7,215,033				—		—		7,215,033
\n \n Receipt of subscription receivable \n \n		—				—				20,015		—		20,015
\n \n Subscription receivable \n \n		—				—				(33)		—		(33)
\n \n Net loss \n \n		—				—				—		(1,677,366)		(1,677,366)
\n \n Balance at June 30, 2026 (unaudited)\n \n		233,252			$	8,265,263			$	(33)	$	(1,955,720)	$	6,309,510

\n The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. \n
\n

\n F-16\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n USFM CORPORATION\n

\n STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS \n

	\n \n Six Months\n \n Ended\n \n June 30, 2026 \n \n			\n \n Period from\n \n Inception through\n \n Dec. 31, 2025 \n \n
	\n \n (unaudited) \n \n			\n \n (audited) \n \n
\n Cash flows from operating activities:\n
\n \n Net loss \n \n		$	(1,955,609)		$	(111)
\n \n Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: \n \n
\n \n Changes in operating assets and liabilities: \n \n
\n \n Prepaid expenses \n \n			(932,911)			—
\n \n Accounts payable \n \n			162,011			—
\n \n Accrued interest \n \n			7,521
\n \n Net cash used in operating activities \n \n			(2,718,988)			(111)
\n Cash flows from investing activities:\n
\n \n Deposit on Investment \n \n			(500,000)
\n \n Net cash used in investing activities \n \n			(500,000)			—
\n Cash flows from financing activities:\n
\n \n Proceeds from issuance of common stock \n \n			8,265,080			150
\n \n Proceeds from note payable – related party \n \n			300,000			—
\n \n Net cash provided by financing activities \n \n			8,565,080			150
\n \n Net increase in cash \n \n			5,346,092			39
\n \n Cash, beginning of period \n \n			39			—
\n \n Cash, end of period\n \n		$	5,346,131		$	39
\n Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:\n
\n \n Common stock issued for subscription receivable \n \n			33			—

\n The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. \n
\n

\n F-17\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n USFM CORPORATION\n

\n NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS \n
\n June 30, 2026 \n
\n (Unaudited) \n

\n NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS \n

\n USFM Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Colorado on October 27, 2025. \n

\n The Company was formed to participate in the exploration and development of mineral concessions in the Disko−Nuussuaq region of Greenland, which encompasses copper, nickel, platinum group elements, and cobalt deposits. On November 1, 2025, the Company entered into binding heads of terms with 80 Mile PLC (“80 Mile”), a company incorporated in England and Wales, to establish the framework for the Company’s participation in the Disko−Nuussuaq Basin exploration project. On May 8, 2026, the Company executed a definitive share purchase agreement with respect to the project (the “Disko SPA”), as described in Notes 2,3,7 and 8. \n

\n The 2026 field program commenced during the second quarter of 2026, and drilling began on June 23, 2026 with two rigs operating under permits granted by the Greenlandic authorities. The Company remains in the development stage and had not commenced principal operations or generated any revenue as of June 30, 2026.\n

\n NOTE 2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES \n

\n Basis of Presentation. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The accompanying financial statements are unaudited. In the opinion of management, the financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, and its results of operations and cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and the period from October 27, 2025 (inception) through December 31, 2025. Because the Company was incorporated on October 27, 2025, no comparative interim period exists for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025. \n

\n Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant estimates relate to the assessment that closing under the Disko SPA is probable and that the deposit on investment is recoverable. Actual results could differ from those estimates. \n

\n Cash. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2026, the Company’s cash consisted of funds held in business checking accounts at two commercial banks. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insures deposits up to $250,000 per depositor at each institution. As of June 30, 2026, the Company’s cash balances exceeded federally insured limits by approximately $5,096,000. The Company has not experienced any losses as a result of uninsured deposits with the commercial banks, and management is of the opinion that the risk is low given the financial strength of the respective commercial banks. \n

\n Foreign Currency. The Company’s functional and reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. A substantial portion of the Company’s vendor obligations are denominated in Danish kroner, Canadian dollars, and British pounds. Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect on the transaction date, and gains and losses on settlement are recognized in the statements of operations. \n

\n Deposit on Investment. Cash consideration paid directly under the Disko SPA toward the acquisition of a 51% equity interest in Nikkeli Project Company Ltd ( as defined in the Disko SPA) is capitalized as a deposit on investment within other assets. Amounts funded for annual work program and budget costs, including drilling, logistics, camp infrastructure, geological services, mobilization, and equipment, are \n

\n F-18\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n NOTE 2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)\n

\n expensed as incurred. Upon closing, the deposit will form part of the Company’s initial cost basis in the acquired interest under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805-50. The deposit is assessed for recoverability when events or changes in circumstances, including any change in management’s assessment of the probability of closing, indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. \n

\n Mineral Property Costs and Exploration Expenditures. The Company is in the exploration stage of development. No mineral property has been placed into production and no reserves have been established. Costs directly associated with acquiring rights to a mineral property — including option payments, purchase prices, and related transaction costs — are capitalized as mineral property costs and carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value. All other costs incurred during the exploration stage, including geological surveys, geophysical studies, drilling programs, sampling, assaying, technical report preparation, environmental assessments, and general and administrative expenses, are expensed as incurred. \n

\n Capitalized mineral property costs are reviewed for impairment whenever facts or circumstances suggest the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company’s capitalization policy will evolve as the Project advances. If and when the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource have been demonstrated, the Company will begin capitalizing development expenditures, including mine infrastructure, shaft sinking, and pre-production development activities. Costs incurred after a mineral property enters production will be capitalized or expensed based on whether they extend the productive life or capacity of the asset or maintain existing operations. The Company has not yet reached the development or production stage for any mineral property \n

\n Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC 740, Income Taxes. Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. \n

\n Net Loss Per Share. Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share, as the Company had no potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the periods presented. Weighted average shares outstanding were 208,924 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, 151,490 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, and 21,970 for the period from inception through December 31, 2025. The warrant described in Note 10 was issued subsequent to June 30, 2026 and is therefore excluded from all periods presented. \n

\n Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The Company follows ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement. The carrying amounts of cash, accounts payable, the note payable, and accrued interest approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of the instruments. The following fair value hierarchy is used to classify assets and liabilities based on the observable and unobservable inputs used to value them: \n

\n Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. \n

\n Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active. \n

\n Level 3: Unobservable inputs based on management’s assessment of the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. \n

\n The Company held no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2026 or December 31, 2025. \n

\n Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements. Management has evaluated all recently issued accounting pronouncements and does not believe that any of them will have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. \n

\n F-19\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n NOTE 2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)\n

\n Operating Segments. ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise that engage in business activities from which it may recognize revenues and incur expenses, and for which separate financial information is available that is regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. \n

\n The Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, who review the assets, operating results, and financial metrics for the Company as a whole. Accordingly, management has determined that there is only one reportable segment. \n

\n The CODM assesses performance for the single segment and allocates resources based on net loss as reported in the statement of operations. The measure of segment assets is total assets as reported in the balance sheet. The key metrics reviewed are as follows: \n

	\n \n Six Months Ended\n \n June 30, 2026 \n \n			\n \n Period from\n \n Inception to \n \n December 31, 2025 \n \n
\n \n Consulting and management fees \n \n		$	194,184			—
\n \n Exploration and project expenses \n \n		$	1,715,264			—
\n \n Cash \n \n		$	5,346,131		$	39
\n \n Deposit on investment \n \n		$	500,000			—

\n Operating expenses are reviewed and monitored by the CODM to manage and forecast cash so that sufficient capital is available to fund the Company’s obligations under the Disko SPA. The CODM also reviews these costs to manage, maintain, and enforce contractual agreements and to confirm that costs are aligned with those agreements and with budget.\n

\n NOTE 3 — DEPOSIT ON INVESTMENT \n

\n Under the Disko SPA, and as consideration for entering into that agreement, the Company committed to fund $30,000,000 over a three-year funding commitment period, of which $7,500,000 is to be funded during the Funding Year 1 period (as defined in the Disko SPA). Upon completion of the transfer contemplated by the Disko SPA, the Company will hold 51% of the Nikkeli Project Company and Disko Exploration Limited will hold 49%. The Company pays no separate cash purchase price for the interest; the committed funding of the project is the consideration for the 51% interest. \n

\n Clause 2 of the Disko SPA states that the funding commitment is the consideration for entering the agreement, and the Company holds no interest in the Nikkeli Project Company, the underlying licenses, or the project prior to closing. The arrangement is an earn-in under which the purchase price takes the form of committed project funding in addition to the deposit made to the seller. Amounts funded are credited toward the Funding Year 1 commitment, consistent with the crediting mechanism in Appendix 1 of the Disko SPA. \n

\n The Company has also recorded a deposit of $500,000 as of June 30, 2026. This deposit relates to direct payments to 80 Mile PLC required for the investment. Management has also concluded that the deposit is recoverable through the value of the 51% interest to be received. \n

\n Management acknowledges that the project is in the exploration stage, that no mineral reserves or resources have been established, and that exploration involves inherent uncertainty. The recoverability conclusion does not depend on the project achieving commercial production; it depends on the 51% interest, at closing, having a value at least equal to the cumulative deposit. If management were to conclude that closing is no longer probable, or that the deposit is not recoverable, the carrying amount would be written down. \n

\n Subsequent to June 30, 2026, the Company has fulfilled its initial obligations under this agreement for the interest in the Nikkeli Project to be transferred. Management expects that transfer to take place prior to December 31, 2026.\n

\n F-20\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n NOTE 4 — NOTE PAYABLE \n

\n On May 1, 2026, the Company issued a promissory note in the principal amount of $300,000 to FG Nexus Inc., a stockholder of the Company. The note bears interest at 15% per annum, calculated on an actual/365-day basis. Interest of $7,521 was incurred and accrued during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and remained unpaid at June 30, 2026. Principal and accrued interest are due within twelve months of the balance sheet date and are accordingly classified as current liabilities. \n

\n In connection with the note, at the closing of the Company’s next priced equity financing round, the Company is required to issue to the lender shares of the same class and series issued in such financing with an aggregate value of $300,000, determined using the same per-share price paid by the lead investor(s) in that financing. The share issuance is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the Company’s cash repayment obligation under the note, and does not constitute a conversion of the note principal into equity. Because this obligation may be settled through the issuance of a variable number of shares with a fixed aggregate value of $300,000, the Company is evaluating whether it should be recognized as a liability under ASC 480 and accounted for as a discount to the note that is amortized to interest expense over the note’s term.\n

\n NOTE 5 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY \n

\n Authorized Shares. The Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, filed with the Colorado Secretary of State on January 27, 2026, authorize the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock, no par value per share. \n

\n The Company’s common stock has no par value, and no stated value has been assigned by the Board of Directors. Accordingly, the full proceeds of each share issuance are credited to common stock, and no amount is allocated to additional paid-in capital. \n

\n Shares Issued and Outstanding. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company issued 183,252 shares of common stock for aggregate consideration of $8,265,113. Of that amount 53,252 shares were issued during the three months ended June 30, 2026 for $7,215,033. As of June 30, 2026, there were 233,252 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. \n

\n Subscription Receivable. As of June 30, 2026, the Company recorded a subscription receivable of $33 representing subscribed common stock for which cash had not yet been received as of the balance sheet date. The subscription receivable is presented as a reduction of stockholders’ equity.\n

\n NOTE 6 — INCOME TAXES \n

\n The Company has incurred net operating losses since inception. The Company has a deferred tax asset arising from its net operating loss carryforwards, which has been fully offset by a valuation allowance due to the uncertainty of future realization. The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the statutory federal corporate tax rate of 21% primarily due to the full valuation allowance established against the deferred tax asset. The Company applies a combined federal and Colorado state rate of 24.5%, consisting of the 21% federal statutory rate and the 4.4% Colorado flat rate, net of federal benefit. \n

\n The following table reconciles the U.S. federal statutory rate to the Company’s effective tax rate: \n

	\n \n Six Months\n \n Ended\n \n June 30, 2026\n \n Amount \n \n			\n \n June 30, \n \n 2026\n \n Rate \n \n	\n \n Three Months\n \n Ended\n \n March 31,\n \n 2026\n \n Amount \n \n		\n \n March 31, \n \n 2026\n \n Rate \n \n	\n \n Inception\n \n through\n \n Dec. 31,\n \n 2025\n \n Amount \n \n			\n \n Dec. 31, \n \n 2025\n \n Rate \n \n
\n \n Tax benefit at federal statutory rate \n \n		$	(410,678)			(21.0)%			$	(21,489)		(21.0)%	$	(23)	(21.0)%
\n \n State income taxes, net of federal benefit \n \n			(67,977)			(3.5)%				(3,592)		(3.5)%		(4)	(3.5)%
\n \n Change in valuation allowance \n \n			478,655			24.5%				25,081		24.5%		27	24.5%
\n \n Income tax provision\n \n		$	—			0%			$	—		0%	$	—	0%

\n F-21\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n NOTE 6 — INCOME TAXES (continued)\n

\n Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets are as follows: \n

	\n \n June 30, 2026 \n \n			\n \n December 31, 2025 \n \n
\n Deferred tax assets: \n
\n \n Net operating loss carryforward \n \n		$	478,682		$	27
\n \n Valuation allowance \n \n			(478,682)			(27)
\n \n Net deferred tax asset\n \n		$	—		$	—

\n As of June 30, 2026, the Company had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $479,000. Federal net operating losses arising after December 31, 2017, may be carried forward indefinitely, subject to the 80% taxable income limitation under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The Company has established a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets because, given its development-stage status and history of losses, it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The valuation allowance increased by $478,655 during the six months ended June 30, 2026 (cumulative increase since inception: $478,682). \n

\n The Company evaluates uncertain tax positions under ASC 740-10. A tax position is recognized only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position. As of June 30, 2026, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits. The Company does not anticipate that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly within the next twelve months. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense; no such amounts were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2026, the six months ended June 30, 2026, or the period from inception through December 31, 2025. Tax years from inception (October 27, 2025) remain open to examination by the U.S. federal and Colorado tax authorities.\n

\n NOTE 7 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES \n

\n Disko Share Purchase Agreement. On May 8, 2026, the Company executed a definitive share purchase agreement (the “Disko SPA”) with 80 Mile PLC (“80 Mile”) and Disko Exploration Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary of 80 Mile). Under the Disko SPA, the Company will acquire 51% of the issued share capital of Nikkeli Project Company Ltd (a Cayman Islands entity that indirectly holds six mineral exploration licenses covering approximately 3,015 square kilometers in the Disko−Nuussuaq Basin of Greenland through a Greenland subsidiary) in exchange for: \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n A funding commitment of $30,000,000 over a three-year period ($7,500,000 in Year 1, $12,500,000 in Year 2, and $10,000,000 in Year 3) toward the exploration and development of the licenses; \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n A cash payment of $500,000 to 80 Mile which has been paid as of June 30, 2026; and \n

\n •\n
\n

\n \n A 10% management fee payable to 80 Mile as operator of the project, which is applied as a deduction from the funding commitment. \n

\n The Disko SPA is subject to certain conditions precedent, including government consents from the Government of Greenland, which had not been received as of June 30, 2026. 80 Mile is appointed as technical and operational manager of the project during the three-year funding commitment period. The Company’s chair will hold a casting vote on the boards of both Nikkeli Project Company and Nikkeli Greenland A/S. Additionally, 80 Mile has the right to appoint two directors to the Company’s board until the Company becomes a public company, with such 80 Mile-appointed directors required for quorum. \n

\n Vessel Charter Contract. On March 18, 2026, the Company entered into a charter contract with KJ Greenland Construction A/S for the use of the vessel KJ Endeavour and a 600-tonne barge to provide maritime mobilization, transport, standby, and demobilization services in support of the Greenland field program. The charter period runs from June 19, 2026 through September 20, 2026, with a minimum of 7.5 chargeable days. The contract provided for a non-refundable deposit of DKK 430,000 ($68,926), which was paid during the second quarter of 2026 and is included in project and exploration costs. The balance is payable within 14 days of a concluding invoice following completion of the charter. The contract is governed by Greenlandic law. \n

\n F-22\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n NOTE 7 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)\n

\n The Company may be subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. As of June 30, 2026, there were no pending or threatened legal proceedings against the Company. \n

\n NOTE 8 — EXPLORATION AND PROJECT EXPENSES \n

\n The Company is an exploration-stage entity engaged in the exploration and evaluation of mineral properties. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2026, the Company incurred costs related to the active exploration of its Greenland Disko Bay mineral exploration project. These costs include field operations, logistics, camp support, professional services, and related expenditures directly associated with the exploration program. No costs have been capitalized as mineral property assets during this period. The following table presents expenditures by general category for the period ended June 30, 2026: \n

	\n \n Six Months\n \n Ended\n \n June 30, 2026 \n \n			\n \n Three Months\n \n Ended\n \n June 30, 2026 \n \n
\n \n Transportation \n \n		$	617,639		$	608,212
\n \n Camp infrastructure and provisions \n \n			440,154			283,339
\n \n Drilling operations and contractors \n \n			293,847			293,847
\n \n Freight and shipping \n \n			203,768			203,768
\n \n Other general expenses \n \n			159,856			155,639
\n \n Total exploration and project expenses\n \n		$	1,715,264		$	1,544,805

\n NOTE 9 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS \n

\n Management has evaluated subsequent events through August 14, 2026. The following material events occurred subsequent to June 30, 2026. The effect of these events are not included in the financial statements. \n

\n Warrant Issuance. On July 7, 2026, the Company issued warrants to FG Merchant Partners LP to purchase 11,576 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $128.62 per share, for aggregate cash consideration of $23.15. The warrant has cashless exercise and will expire ten years after the completion of a business combination. As of June 30, 2026, on a fully diluted basis, the warrants represent approximately 4.7% of the Company’s capitalization. \n

\n Merger Agreement \n

\n On July 12, 2026, Twin Vee PowerCats Co., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), USFM Corporation, a Colorado corporation (the “Acquiror”), and USFM Merger Sub Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Acquiror (“Merger Sub” and together with the Acquiror, the “Acquiror Entities”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation in the Merger (the “Surviving Company”) as a wholly owned subsidiary of Acquiror. The Company’s shares are currently publicly traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market. The Company is evaluating the accounting effects of the transaction and cannot reasonably estimate the financial impact at this time. \n

\n On the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), and as a result of the Merger, each share of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company (the “Shares”), that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than certain Shares to be canceled pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and Dissenting Shares (as defined in the Merger Agreement)) will be converted into the right to receive a pro rata portion of an aggregate number of shares of the Acquiror’s common stock, no par value (“Acquiror Shares”), that represent 10% of the issued and outstanding Acquiror Shares immediately following the Effective Time (calculated on a fully diluted basis) (the “Company Consideration Shares”). \n

\n In addition, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, effective as of the Effective Time, automatically and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, (a) each Company Convertible Security (as defined in \n

\n F-23\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n NOTE 9 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (continued)\n

\n the Merger Agreement) shall be accelerated and fully vested, and converted into the right to receive a pro rata portion of the Company Consideration Shares and (b) each Company Common Stock Warrant (as defined in the Merger Agreement) shall be assumed by the Surviving Company and shall become a corresponding warrant of Acquiror. \n

\n The Company is subject to customary restrictions on its ability to solicit alternative acquisition proposals from third parties and to provide information to, and enter into discussions or negotiations with, third parties regarding alternative acquisition proposals. However, prior to the receipt of the approval of the Merger from the Company’s stockholders, the solicitation restrictions are subject to a customary “fiduciary-out” provision that allows the Company, under certain circumstances, to provide information to and participate in negotiations or discussions with third parties with respect to an alternative acquisition proposal if it determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be a violation of the Company’s board of directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable law. In addition, the Company’s board of directors, after satisfying certain notice requirements to the Acquiror, may change its recommendation with respect to the Merger if it determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the failure to do so under certain circumstances specified in the Merger Agreement would reasonably be expected to be a violation of the Company’s board of directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable law. \n

\n The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights, and provides that, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, the Acquiror may be required to pay the Company a termination fee of $500,000 and the Company would be required to pay the Acquiror a termination fee of $1,500,000. Specifically, if the Merger Agreement is terminated (a) in connection with either failure of the Acquiror to obtain its stockholders approval of the Merger or (b) subject to certain conditions, in the event the Merger is not consummated prior to the “end date” of October 31, 2026, then, in either case, the $500,000 termination fee will be payable by the Acquiror to the Company upon termination. In addition, if the Company terminates the Merger Agreement to accept a Superior Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement) in compliance with the terms of the Merger Agreement or in connection with a Company Intervening Event (as defined in the Merger Agreement), the $1,500,000 termination fee will be payable by the Company to the Acquiror upon termination. \n

\n The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants of the Company, Merger Sub and the Acquiror, including, among others, covenants that: (a) each party will conduct its business in the ordinary course of its business during the interim period between the execution of the Merger Agreement and the Effective Time, (b) each party will not engage in certain types of transactions or take certain actions outside the ordinary course during such period without the prior consent of the other party. The Merger Agreement also requires each of the Company and the Acquiror to call and hold a stockholder meeting and for the Company’s board of directors to recommend that the Company’s stockholders approve the Merger Agreement. \n

\n Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, prior to the closing of the Merger, the Company, a newly formed subsidiary (“Assetco”), and a newly formed Delaware contingent value rights trust (the “Trust”), must consummate the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring (as defined below) pursuant to which such parties shall: (a) form Assetco as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company; (b) cause the contribution of all of the Company Assets and Liabilities (as defined in the Merger Agreement) from the Company to Assetco in exchange for all of Assetco’s issued and outstanding shares of capital stock (the “Assetco Contribution”), using a contribution agreement in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Acquiror; (c) form the Trust as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company; (d) cause the contribution of all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Assetco from the Company to the Trust in exchange for all of the Trust’s contingent value rights interests, using a contribution agreement in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Acquiror; and (e) cause the distribution of the contingent value rights interests from the Company to the Company’s existing stockholders, using a distribution agreement in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Acquiror, after which the Company shall retain no ownership or other interest (whether in the form of stock, trust interests, or otherwise) in either the Trust or Assetco (such steps collectively, the “Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring”). Following closing of the Merger, the Trust will seek to \n

\n F-24\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n NOTE 9 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (continued)\n

\n sell the Company Assets and Liabilities and any net proceeds received from such sales would ultimately accrue to the benefit of existing Company stockholders. \n

\n Consummation of the Merger is subject to various conditions, including (a) obtaining requisite approval of the Merger from the Company’s and the Acquiror’s stockholders, (b) the Registration Statement (as defined in the Merger Agreement) filed by the Acquiror with the SEC becoming effective, (c) the absence of certain laws or orders issued by certain specified governmental entities making illegal or permanently enjoining or prohibiting the Merger, (d) the Company Consideration Shares being approved for listing on the NYSE, NYSE American, or another applicable stock exchange, (e) the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by the parties, subject to certain exceptions, (f) the absence of a material adverse effect on either party that is continuing, (g) consummation of the Pre-Closing CVR Restructuring, and (h) delivery of a fairness opinion. \n

\n Company Support Agreement \n

\n Concurrently with entering into the Merger Agreement, a Company stockholder, in its capacity as a holder of shares or other equity interests of the Company, entered into a Company Support Agreement with the Acquiror (the “Support Agreement”) pursuant to which such Company stockholder agreed, among other things, to vote its shares of Company common stock for the approval of the Merger Agreement and against any alternative proposal.\n

\n F-25\n
\n

\n Table of Contents\n

\n USFM CORPORATION \n

\n AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS \n

\n For the Period from October 27, 2025 (Inception)\n
\n through December 31, 2025\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n TABLE OF CONTENTS \n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

	\n \n Report of Independent Registered Audit Firm \n \n					\n F-28\n
	\n \n Balance Sheet \n \n					\n F-29\n
	\n \n Statement of Operations \n \n					\n F-30\n
	\n \n Statement of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity \n \n					\n F-31\n
	\n \n Statement of Cash Flows \n \n					\n F-32\n
	\n \n Notes to Financial Statements \n \n					\n F-33\n

\n F-27\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n $\"[MISSING$

\n REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM \n

\n To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
USFM Corporation

\n Opinion on the Financial Statements \n

\n We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of USFM Corporation (the “Company”), as of December 31, 2025, and the related statements of operations, changes in shareholder’s equity, and cash flows for the period from October 27, 2025 (inception) through December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period from October 27, 2025 (inception) through December 31, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. \n

\n Basis for Opinion \n

\n These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulators of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. \n

\n We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2026. \n

\n $\"[MISSING$ \n

\n Atlanta, Georgia
June 18, 2026

\n F-28\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n USFM CORPORATION \n

\n BALANCE SHEET \n
\n As of December 31, 2025 \n

\n ASSETS\n
\n Current assets: \n
\n \n Cash \n \n	$	39
\n \n Total current assets \n \n		39
\n \n Total Assets \n \n	$	39
\n LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY\n
\n Current liabilities: \n
\n \n Total current liabilities \n \n		—
\n \n Total liabilities \n \n		—
\n Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) \n
\n Stockholder’s equity: \n
\n \n Common stock, no par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 50,000 shares issued and \n \n outstanding \n \n		150
\n \n Accumulated deficit \n \n		(111)
\n \n Total Stockholder’s equity \n \n		39
\n \n TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY\n \n	$	39

\n The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements \n
\n

\n F-29\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n USFM CORPORATION \n

\n STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS \n
\n For the Period from October 27, 2025 (Inception) through December 31, 2025 \n

\n \n Revenue \n \n	$	—
\n Operating expenses: \n
\n \n General and administrative \n \n		111
\n \n Total operating expenses \n \n		111
\n \n Loss from operations \n \n		(111)
\n \n Provision for income taxes \n \n		—
\n \n Net Loss \n \n	$	(111)
\n \n Net loss per common share – basic and diluted \n \n	$	(0.01)
\n \n Weighted average shares outstanding – basic and diluted \n \n		21,970

\n The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements \n
\n

\n F-30\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n USFM CORPORATION \n

\n STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDER’SEQUITY \n
\n For the Period from October 27, 2025 (Inception) through December 31, 2025 \n

	\n \n Common Shares \n \n		\n \n Common Stock \n \n	\n \n Accumulated\n \n Deficit \n \n			\n \n Total Equity \n \n
\n \n Balance at October 27, 2025 \n \n		—			$	—		$	—	$	—
\n (inception) \n
\n \n Issuance of common stock \n \n		50,000				150			—		150
\n \n Net loss \n \n		—				—			(111)		(111)
\n \n Balance at December 31, 2025 \n \n		50,000			$	150		$	(111)	$	39

\n The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements \n
\n

\n F-31\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n USFM CORPORATION \n

\n STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS \n
\n For the Period from October 27, 2025 (Inception) through December 31, 2025 \n

\n Cash flows from operating activities:\n
\n \n Net loss \n \n	$	(111)
\n \n Net cash used in operating activities \n \n		(111)
\n Cash flows from investing activities:\n
\n \n Net cash used in investing activities \n \n		—
\n Cash flows from financing activities:\n
\n \n Proceeds from issuance of common stock \n \n		150
\n \n Net cash provided by financing activities \n \n		150
\n \n Net increase in cash and cash equivalents \n \n		39
\n \n Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period \n \n		—
\n \n Cash and cash equivalents, end of period\n \n	$	39

\n The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements \n
\n

\n F-32\n
\n

\n Table of Contents \n

\n USFM CORPORATION\n

\n NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS \n
\n December 31, 2025 \n

\n NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS \n

\n USFM Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Colorado on October 27, 2025. \n

\n The Company was formed to participate in the exploration and development of mineral concessions in the Disko Nuussuaq region of Greenland, which encompasses copper, nickel, platinum group elements, and cobalt deposits. On November 1, 2025, the Company entered into binding heads of terms with 80 Mile PLC (“80 Mile”), a company incorporated in England and Wales, to establish the framework for the Company’s participation in the Disko Nuussuaq Basin exploration project. \n

\n The Company is in the development stage and has not commenced principal operations or generated any revenue as of December 31, 2025.\n

\n NOTE 2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES \n

\n Basis of Presentation. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The financial statements reflect the Company’s financial position, results of operations, changes in Stockholder’s equity, and cash flows for the period from October 27, 2025 (inception) through December 31, 2025. \n

\n Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. \n

\n Cash. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2025, the Company’s cash consisted of funds held in a business che