[{"_1":2,"_3":-5,"_4":-5},"loaderData",{"_5":6,"_7":8},"actionData","errors","root",{"_96":97},"routes/item",{"_9":10},"item",{"_11":12,"_13":14,"_15":16,"_17":18,"_19":20,"_21":-5,"_22":23,"_24":25,"_26":27,"_28":29,"_30":29,"_31":32,"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":-5,"_46":47,"_48":-5,"_49":-5,"_50":51,"_52":53,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":57,"_59":60,"_61":40,"_62":63},"id","cr5tle0ki1biwwvwitxgf0iyh","revision",2,"title","高盛集团10月29日结构性票据定价补充文件","originalTitle","GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (0000886982) (Filer)","summary","GS Finance Corp.发行总额225,000美元、2031年11月3日到期的自动赎回挂钩票据，由The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.担保，票据不付息。","reason","source",{"_11":86,"_87":88,"_89":90,"_91":57,"_92":93,"_94":95},"links",{"_83":84,"_63":85},"publishedAt","2026-11-02T19:16:20.000Z","discoveredAt","2026-11-02T19:42:04.003Z","timelineAt","category","ai-products","tags",[81,82],"stockSymbols",[80],"score",25,"selected",false,"channel","news","story",{"_72":73,"_15":74},"x","readingMode","full","author","language","body",{"_76":-5,"_63":77,"_78":-5,"_79":40},"outline",[],"relatedStories",[75],"indexable",true,"markdownAvailable","group",{"_64":65,"_43":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":70},"hasTranslation","bodyLanguage","original","factId","fTA59YHQzYoA",{"_72":73,"_15":74},"reportCount",1,"additionalSourceCount",0,"developmentCount","publicId","fd8f694a-df3a-45bb-9296-5dbf514b1bb5","高盛发行22.5万美元自动赎回挂钩票据",{"_72":73,"_15":74},"zh","

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2)

Registration Statement No. 333-284538

\n \n \n \n

$\"\"$

GS Finance Corp.
\n$225,000
\nAutocallable S&P 500^® Futures 35% VT Adaptive Response 6% Decrement Index (USD) ER-
\nLinked Notes due 2031
\nguaranteed by
\nThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

The notes do not bear interest. The notes will mature\non the stated maturity date (November 3, 2031) unless they are automatically called on any call observation date commencing in November\n2027. Your notes will be automatically called on a call observation date if the closing level of the S&P 500^® Futures\n35% VT Adaptive Response 6% Decrement Index (USD) ER on such date is greater than or equal to 90% of the initial underlier\nlevel of 459.01 (which is the closing level of the index on the trade date (October 29, 2026)), resulting in a payment on the corresponding\ncall payment date equal to (i) the face amount of your notes plus (ii) the product of $1,000 times the applicable\ncall premium amount. The call observation dates, call payment dates and applicable call premium amount for each call payment date are\nspecified on page PS-7 of this pricing supplement.

The index attempts to provide exposure to the S&P 500^®\nFutures Excess Return Index with a rules-based overlay that adjusts exposure to the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return\nIndex on a daily basis. The objective of these rules, taken collectively, is to create an index that provides for volatility-adjusted\nexposure to the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index, coupled with further adjustments based on calendar-based signals\nand price patterns, subject to a maximum exposure of 450% and a maximum daily change in leverage of 100%. In addition, the index is subject\nto a daily decrement of 6.0% per annum.

The S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index tracks the\nperformance of E-mini S&P 500 futures contracts, not the S&P 500^® Index. Generally, the return on an investment\nin a futures contract is correlated with, but not the same as, the return on buying and holding the securities underlying such contract.

The index is subject to risks associated with the use of significant\nleverage. Investors should be aware that the use of leverage will magnify and accelerate any negative performance of the index. The index\nis also subject to a cap on the maximum daily change in leverage of 100%, which may result in the index leveraging up more slowly in the\nevent of a market rally, and/or deleveraging more slowly in the event of a market sell-off, compared to an identical index that does not\ncap the amount of daily leverage change.

In addition, a per annum deduction that is a fixed 6.0% of the index\nlevel, also known as a decrement, is deducted daily, even when the index is not fully invested. The deduction of the decrement has the\neffect of offsetting positive returns, and worsening negative returns, on the performance of the index, and the inclusion of the decrement\nmeans the index will trail the performance of an identical index without such a decrement feature. In addition, the index may be significantly\nuninvested in the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index on any given day, and, in that case, will realize only a portion\nof any gains in the appreciation of the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index or the E-mini S&P 500 futures contracts\non that day and any uninvested portion will earn no return.

The index attempts to provide exposure to the S&P 500^®\nFutures Excess Return Index. The S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index tracks futures contracts on the S&P 500^®\nIndex and is likely to underperform the total return performance of the S&P 500^® Index because of an implicit financing\ncost.

The description above is only a summary. For a more detailed description\nof the index, see “Index Summary” beginning on page PS-3.

If your notes are not automatically called, the amount that you\nwill be paid on your notes on the stated maturity date will be based on the performance of the index as measured from the trade date to\nand including the determination date (October 29, 2031).

If the final underlier level on the determination date is greater\nthan or equal to 90% of the initial underlier level, the return on your notes will be positive and you will receive the maximum\nsettlement amount of $2,022.50 for each $1,000 face amount of your notes.

If the final underlier level declines by up to 40% from the initial\nunderlier level, you will receive the face amount of your notes.

If the final underlier level declines by more than 40% from the initial\nunderlier level, the return on your notes will be negative. You could lose your entire investment in the notes.

The return on your notes is capped. If the notes are automatically called,\nthe maximum payment you would receive for each $1,000 face amount of your notes is equal to (i) $1,000 plus (ii) the product\nof $1,000 times the applicable call premium amount. If your notes are not automatically called, the maximum payment you would receive\non the stated maturity date for each $1,000 face amount of your notes is $2,022.50. If your notes are not automatically called on any\ncall observation date, we will calculate the underlier return to determine your payment at maturity, which is the percentage increase\nor decrease in the final underlier level from the initial underlier level. At maturity, for each $1,000 face amount of your notes, you\nwill receive an amount in cash equal to:

●

if the final underlier level is greater than or equal to 90% of the initial underlier\nlevel, the maximum settlement amount of $2,022.50;

●

if the final underlier level is less than 90% of the initial underlier level, but greater\nthan or equal to 60% of the initial underlier level, $1,000; or

●

if the final underlier level is less than 60% of the initial underlier level, the sum\nof (i) $1,000 plus (ii) the product of (a) the underlier return times (b) $1,000. You will receive less than the\nface amount of your notes.

You should read the disclosure herein to better understand the terms\nand risks of your investment, including the credit risk of GS Finance Corp. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., as well as risks associated\nwith the index, including the use of leverage and a decrement. See page PS-13.

The estimated value of your notes at the time the terms of your notes\nare set on the trade date is equal to approximately $921 per $1,000 face amount. For a discussion of the estimated value and the price\nat which Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC would initially buy or sell your notes, if it makes a market in the notes, see the following page.\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

Original issue date:	November 3, 2026	Original issue price:	100% of the face amount
Underwriting discount:	3.75% of the face amount	Net proceeds to the issuer:	96.25% of the face amount

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other regulatory\nbody has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation\nto the contrary is a criminal offense. The notes are not bank deposits and are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation\nor any other governmental agency, nor are they obligations of, or guaranteed by, a bank.

Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC

Pricing Supplement No. 27,697 dated October 29,\n2026.

The issue price, underwriting discount and net proceeds listed above\nrelate to the notes we sell initially. We may decide to sell additional notes after the date of this pricing supplement, at\nissue prices and with underwriting discounts and net proceeds that differ from the amounts set forth above. The return (whether positive\nor negative) on your investment in notes will depend in part on the issue price you pay for such notes.

GS Finance Corp. may use this prospectus in the initial sale of the\nnotes. In addition, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC or any other affiliate of GS Finance Corp. may use this prospectus in a market-making\ntransaction in a note after its initial sale. Unless GS Finance Corp. or its agent informs the purchaser otherwise in\nthe confirmation of sale, this prospectus is being used in a market-making transaction.

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n

Estimated Value of Your Notes

The estimated value of your notes at the time the terms of your notes are set on the trade date (as determined by reference to pricing models used by Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC (GS&Co.) and taking into account our credit spreads) is equal to approximately $921 per $1,000 face amount, which is less than the original issue price. The value of your notes at any time will reflect many factors and cannot be predicted; however, the price (not including GS&Co.’s customary bid and ask spreads) at which GS&Co. would initially buy or sell notes (if it makes a market, which it is not obligated to do) and the value that GS&Co. will initially use for account statements and otherwise is equal to approximately the estimated value of your notes at the time of pricing, plus an additional amount (initially equal to $79 per $1,000 face amount).

Prior to February 28, 2027, the price (not including GS&Co.’s customary bid and ask spreads) at which GS&Co. would buy or sell your notes (if it makes a market, which it is not obligated to do) will equal approximately the sum of (a) the then-current estimated value of your notes (as determined by reference to GS&Co.’s pricing models) plus (b) any remaining additional amount (the additional amount will decline to zero on a straight-line basis from the time of pricing through February 27, 2027). On and after February 28, 2027, the price (not including GS&Co.’s customary bid and ask spreads) at which GS&Co. would buy or sell your notes (if it makes a market) will equal approximately the then-current estimated value of your notes determined by reference to such pricing models.

\n \n \n

About Your Prospectus

\n \n

The notes are part of the Medium-Term Notes, Series F program of GS\n Finance Corp. and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. This prospectus includes this pricing supplement\n and the accompanying documents listed below. This pricing supplement constitutes a supplement to the documents listed below, does not\n set forth all of the terms of your notes and therefore should be read in conjunction with such documents:

\n \n

S&P 500^® Futures Adaptive Response Indices Supplement No. 2 dated July 27, 2026

\n \n

October 2026 S&P 500^®Futures 35% VT Adaptive Response 6% Decrement Index (USD) ER Supplement Addendum dated October 15, 2026

\n \n

General terms supplement no. 17,745 dated January 20, 2026

\n \n

Prospectus supplement dated February 14, 2025

\n \n

Prospectus dated February 14, 2025

\n \n

The information in this pricing supplement supersedes any conflicting\n information in the documents listed above. In addition, some of the terms or features described in the listed documents may not apply\n to your notes.

\n \n

We refer to the notes we are offering by this pricing supplement as\n the “offered notes” or the “notes”. Each of the offered notes has the terms described below. Please note that\n in this pricing supplement, references to “GS Finance Corp.”, “we”, “our” and “us” mean\n only GS Finance Corp. and do not include its subsidiaries or affiliates, references to “The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.”, our\n parent company, mean only The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and do not include its subsidiaries or affiliates and references to “Goldman\n Sachs” mean The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries and affiliates, including us. The notes will\n be issued under the senior debt indenture, dated as of October 10, 2008, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture, dated as\n of February 20, 2015, each among us, as issuer, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., as guarantor, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee.\n This indenture, as so supplemented and as further supplemented thereafter, is referred to as the “GSFC 2008 indenture” in\n the accompanying prospectus supplement.

\n \n

The notes will be issued in book-entry form and represented by\nmaster note no. 3, dated March 22, 2021.

PS-2

Index\nSummary

This section contains only a brief summary description\nof the index and does not describe all of its important features in detail. The index is complex and before investing in the notes, you\nmust carefully review the more detailed description of the index contained in the S&P 500^® Futures Adaptive Response\nIndices Supplement No. 2 dated July 27, 2026, as well as the risk factors related to the index under “Additional Risk Factors Specific\nto Your Notes – Additional Risks Related to the Underlier” herein.

All information contained in this pricing supplement\nregarding the S&P 500^® Futures 35% VT Adaptive Response 6% Decrement Index (USD) ER set forth in the table below (the\n“index”), including, without limitation, its constituents, method of calculation and changes in their components, has\nbeen derived from publicly available information and other information provided by S&P Dow Jones Indices (the “index sponsor”\nand “index calculation agent”), without independent verification. This information reflects the policies of, and is\nsubject to change by, the index sponsor. The index was developed by the index sponsor, in coordination with an affiliate of GS Finance\nCorp. The index is maintained by the index sponsor and is calculated and published by the index calculation agent. The index sponsor has\nno obligation to continue to publish, and may discontinue the publication of, the index. We also refer to the index as the “underlier”\nin this pricing supplement.

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

Index	Bloomberg \nTicker	Underlying \nAsset	Underlying \nFutures Index	Reference \nIndex	Volatility \nTarget	Maximum \nLeverage	Decrement \nFactor	Live Date
S&P 500^® Futures \n35% VT Adaptive \nResponse 6% \nDecrement Index \n(USD) ER	SPAR35V6	Unfunded rolling \nposition in E- \nmini S&P 500 \nfutures	S&P 500^® \nFutures Excess \nReturn Index	S&P 500^® \nIndex	35%	450%	6%	July 24, \n2026

The index was established on the live date set forth\nin the table above. The index is reported by the Bloomberg Professional^® service (“Bloomberg”) under\nthe ticker symbol set forth in the table above.

Summary Overview

The Index

The index attempts to provide exposure to the underlying\nfutures index, the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index, with a rules-based overlay that adjusts exposure to the underlying\nfutures index on a daily basis. The index uses three primary rules to provide these adjustments:

leverage is applied to the weight of the underlying futures index to attempt\nto achieve a predefined volatility target (the volatility target for the index is set forth in the table above) (the “volatility\ntarget”), with a maximum exposure to the underlying futures index of 450% and a cap on the maximum daily change in exposure\nof 100%;

a base index is calculated for the index (“base index”),\nwhich is designed to adjust exposure to the underlying futures index using certain calendar-based signals and price patterns (collectively,\nthe “signals”) in an attempt to overweight or underweight exposures depending on market conditions, including:

a “mean reversion signal,” which is based upon the assumption that in the short-term, the underlying futures index will\nincrease or decrease in value in the opposite direction of the short-term historical increases or decreases in its value;

a “Federal Open Market Committee schedule (“FOMC”) signal,” which is based on the assumption that equities\nmay outperform going into and on the days on which there is a

PS-3

scheduled release of a statement by the\nFOMC to announce monetary policies (an “FOMC statement day”); and

“turn-of-the-month signals,” which are based on the assumption that equities may mean revert during the final days of\na given month if equities performed negatively that month while the first days of a new month generally yield positive returns for equity\nsecurities;

a per annum deduction that is a fixed percentage of the index level, also\nknown as a decrement, is applied daily, which has the effect of offsetting positive returns, and worsening negative returns, on the performance\nof the index and will result in a drag on the performance of the index.

The objective of these rules, taken collectively,\nis to create an index that provides for volatility-adjusted exposure to the underlying futures index, coupled with further adjustments\nbased on the signals and their underlying assumptions described above. In addition, the inclusion of a decrement is intended to permit\nthe economic terms of structured investments linked to the index to be more favorable to investors than the terms that would otherwise\nbe available on a hypothetical identical index without a decrement, assuming that the estimated value of the structured investments and\nmarket conditions are held constant and that all other structural features of the structured investments are the same.

However, the methodology of the index is premised\non several key market-based assumptions:

that there will be an inverse relationship between performance and volatility,\nso that the underlying futures index will tend to increase in times of lower volatility and decline in times of higher volatility;

that the signals will be effective at adjusting the index’s exposure\nto the underlying futures index and that its underlying assumptions about market performance and timing will be accurate; and

that any improvement in the economic terms of a structured investment linked\nto the index will be sufficient to offset the negative effect of the application of a daily decrement to index performance.

If these assumptions prove to be consistently correct,\nthen a structured investment linked to the index has the potential to outperform a structured investment linked to the underlying futures\nindex by participating in increases on a leveraged basis and declines on a deleveraged basis. There is no guarantee, however, that these\nassumptions will be proven correct over any given time period. If any of these assumptions does not prove to be consistently correct,\nthen the index may perform poorly as a result of having highly leveraged exposure to the underlying futures index at a time of declines\nand/or having reduced exposure to the underlying futures index at a time of increases. In addition, the return on a structured investment\nlinked to the index could be materially lower than the return on a structured investment issued by us and linked to a hypothetical identical\nindex without a decrement.

The index is subject to risks associated with the\nuse of significant leverage, which may be as high as up to 450%. The maximum daily change in leverage to the underlying futures index\nis 100%, which may result in the index leveraging up more slowly in the event of a market rally compared to an identical index that does\nnot cap the amount of daily leverage change. In addition, the same feature may result in the index deleveraging less quickly in the event\nof a market drawdown compared to an identical index that does not have a cap on daily leverage change. In addition, the index may be significantly\nuninvested in the underlying futures index on any given day, and, in that case, will realize only a portion of any gains in the appreciation\nof the underlying futures index or underlying asset on that day. In addition, on each index calculation day, the aggregate weight of the\nsignals in the base index cannot increase or decrease by more than 35% from the previous index calculation day. As a result, the performance\nof the index may be worse than if no cap on the increase or decrease of the aggregate weight of the signals in the base index were applied.\nMoreover, the aggregate weight of the signals in the base index plus 100% (the “base weight”) cannot exceed 135% and\ncannot effectively go lower than 90% based on how the signals

PS-4

are formulated. In addition, the index decrement\nis deducted daily from the index at a rate of 6% per annum, even when the index is not fully invested. Any portion of the index that is\nuninvested in the underlying futures index cannot offset the decrement or contribute to the positive performance of the index and will\nnot earn any return. Because of the deduction of the decrement, the index will trail the performance of an identical index without such\na decrement feature.

No assurance can be given that the investment strategy\nused to construct the index will achieve its intended results or that a structured investment linked to the index will be successful or\nwill outperform a structured investment linked to any alternative index or strategy that might reference the underlying futures index\nor underlying asset.

PS-5

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

CUSIP / ISIN: 40058MJN9 / US40058MJN92

Company (Issuer): GS Finance Corp.

Guarantor: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Underlier: the S&P 500^® Futures\n35% VT Adaptive Response 6% Decrement Index (USD) ER (current Bloomberg symbol: “SPAR35V6 Index”), or any successor underlier,\nas it may be modified, replaced or adjusted from time to time as provided herein. The level of the underlier reflects a deduction of 6.0%\nper annum that accrues daily.

Underlying futures index: with respect to the S&P 500^®\nFutures 35% VT Adaptive Response 6% Decrement Index (USD) ER, the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index

Underlying asset: with respect to the S&P 500^®\nFutures 35% VT Adaptive Response 6% Decrement Index (USD) ER, the E-mini S&P 500 futures contracts

Reference index: with respect to the S&P 500^®\nFutures 35% VT Adaptive Response 6% Decrement Index (USD) ER, the S&P 500^® Index

Face amount: $225,000 in the aggregate on the original\nissue date; the aggregate face amount may be increased if the company, at its sole option, decides to sell an additional amount on a date\nsubsequent to the trade date

Authorized denominations: $1,000 or any integral multiple of\n$1,000 in excess thereof

Principal amount: Subject to redemption by the company as provided\nunder “— Company’s redemption right (automatic call feature)” below, on the stated maturity date the company will\npay, for each $1,000 of the outstanding face amount, an amount, if any, in cash equal to the cash settlement amount.

Cash settlement amount:

●

if the final underlier level is greater than or equal to 90% of the initial underlier level, the sum of (i) $1,000\nplus (ii) the product of (a) $1,000 times (b) the maturity date premium amount;

●

if the final underlier level is less than 90% of the initial underlier level, but greater than or equal to the\ntrigger buffer level, $1,000; or

●

if the final underlier level is less than the trigger buffer level, the sum of (i) $1,000 plus (ii) the product\nof (a) $1,000 times (b) the underlier return

Company’s redemption right (automatic call feature): if\na redemption event occurs, then the outstanding face amount will be automatically redeemed in whole and the company will pay an amount\nin cash on the following call payment date, for each $1,000 of the outstanding face amount, equal to the sum of (i) $1,000 plus\n(ii) the product of (a) $1,000 times (b) the applicable call premium amount specified under “Call observation dates”\nbelow

Redemption event: a redemption event will occur if, as measured\non any call observation date, the closing level of the underlier is greater than or equal to 90% of the initial underlier\nlevel

Initial underlier level: 459.01, which is the closing level of\nthe underlier on the trade date

Final underlier level: the closing level of the underlier\non the determination date, subject to adjustment as provided in “— Consequences of a market disruption event or a non-trading\nday” and “— Discontinuance or modification of the underlier” below

Underlier return: the quotient of (i) the final\nunderlier level minus the initial underlier level divided by (ii) the initial underlier level, expressed as a percentage

Trigger buffer level: 60% of the initial underlier level

Call premium amount: with respect to any call payment date, the\napplicable call premium amount specified in the table set forth under “Call observation dates” below

Maturity date premium amount: 102.25%

Maximum settlement amount: $2,022.50

PS-6

Trade date: October 29, 2026

Original issue date: November 3, 2026

Determination date: October 29, 2031, unless the calculation\nagent determines that a market disruption event occurs or is continuing on such day or such day is not a trading day. In that event, the\ndetermination date will be the first following trading day on which the calculation agent determines that a market disruption event does\nnot occur and is not continuing. In no event, however, will the determination date be postponed to a date later than the originally scheduled\nstated maturity date or, if the originally scheduled stated maturity date is not a business day, later than the first business day after\nthe originally scheduled stated maturity date. On such last possible determination date, if a market disruption event occurs or is continuing\nor such day is not a trading day, that day will nevertheless be the determination date.

Stated maturity date: November 3, 2031, unless that day is not\na business day, in which case the stated maturity date will be postponed to the next following business day. The stated maturity date\nwill also be postponed if the determination date is postponed as described under “— Determination date” above. In such\na case, the stated maturity date will be postponed by the same number of business day(s) from but excluding the originally scheduled determination\ndate to and including the actual determination date.

Call observation dates: the dates specified as such in the table\nbelow, unless the calculation agent determines that a market disruption event occurs or is continuing on that day or that day is not otherwise\na trading day. In that event, such call observation date will be the first following trading day on which the calculation agent determines\nthat a market disruption event does not occur and is not continuing. In no event, however, will a call observation date be postponed to\na date later than the originally scheduled corresponding call payment date or, if the originally scheduled corresponding call payment\ndate is not a business day, later than the first business day after such originally scheduled call payment date. On such last\npossible call observation date applicable to the relevant call payment date, if a market disruption event occurs or is continuing or such\nday is not a trading day, that day will nevertheless be the call observation date.

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

Call Observation Dates	Call Payment Dates	Call Premium Amount
November 2, 2027	November 5, 2027	20.45%
January 31, 2028	February 3, 2028	25.5625%
May 1, 2028	May 4, 2028	30.675%
July 31, 2028	August 3, 2028	35.7875%
October 30, 2028	November 2, 2028	40.9%
January 29, 2029	February 1, 2029	46.0125%
April 30, 2029	May 3, 2029	51.125%
July 30, 2029	August 2, 2029	56.2375%
October 29, 2029	November 1, 2029	61.35%
January 29, 2030	February 1, 2030	66.4625%
April 29, 2030	May 2, 2030	71.575%
July 29, 2030	August 1, 2030	76.6875%
October 29, 2030	November 1, 2030	81.8%
January 29, 2031	February 3, 2031	86.9125%
April 29, 2031	May 2, 2031	92.025%
July 29, 2031	August 1, 2031	97.1375%

Call payment dates: the dates specified as such in the table\nset forth under “— Call observation dates” above, or, if such day is not a business day, the next succeeding business\nday. If a call observation date is postponed as described under “— Call observation dates” above, the related call payment\ndate will be postponed by the same number of business day(s) from but excluding the applicable originally scheduled call observation date\nto and including the actual call observation date.

Closing level: for any given trading day, the official closing\nlevel of the underlier or any successor underlier published by the underlier sponsor on such trading day. Notwithstanding anything to\nthe contrary provided under “— Discontinuance or modification of the underlier” below, if the closing level of the underlier\nbecomes zero on any trading day, it will remain zero for the remainder of the term of this note (even if the underlier is discontinued\nand even if the underlier is restarted with a new base value).

PS-7

Trading day: a day on which the underlier sponsor is open for\nbusiness and the underlier is calculated and published by the underlier sponsor

Successor underlier: any substitute underlier approved by the\ncalculation agent as a successor underlier as provided under “— Discontinuance or modification of the underlier” below

Underlier sponsor: at any time, the person or entity, including\nany successor sponsor, that determines and publishes the underlier as then in effect. The notes are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted\nby the underlier sponsor or any of its affiliates and the underlier sponsor and its affiliates make no representation regarding the advisability\nof investing in the notes.

Underlier stocks: at any time, the stocks that comprise the reference\nindex as then in effect, after giving effect to any additions, deletions or substitutions

Market disruption event: With respect to any given trading day,\nany of the following will be a market disruption event with respect to the underlier:

●

a suspension, absence or material limitation of trading in underlier stocks constituting 20% or more, by weight, of the reference\nindex on their respective primary markets, in each case for more than two consecutive hours of trading or during the one-half hour before\nthe close of trading in that market, as determined by the calculation agent in its sole discretion,

●

a suspension, absence or material limitation of trading in option or futures contracts relating to the reference index or to underlier\nstocks constituting 20% or more, by weight, of the reference index in the respective primary markets for those contracts, in each case\nfor more than two consecutive hours of trading or during the one-half hour before the close of trading in that market, as determined by\nthe calculation agent in its sole discretion, or

●

underlier stocks constituting 20% or more, by weight, of the reference index, or option or futures contracts, if available, relating\nto the reference index or to underlier stocks constituting 20% or more, by weight, of the reference index do not trade on what were the\nrespective primary markets for those underlier stocks or contracts, as determined by the calculation agent in its sole discretion,

and, in the case of any of these events, the calculation agent\ndetermines in its sole discretion that such event could materially interfere with the ability of the company or any of its affiliates\nor a similarly situated person to unwind all or a material portion of a hedge that could be effected with respect to this note.

The following events will not be market disruption events:

●

a limitation on the hours or numbers of days of trading, but only if the limitation results from an announced change in the regular\nbusiness hours of the relevant market, and

●

a decision to permanently discontinue trading in option or futures contracts relating to the reference index or to any underlier stock.

For this purpose, an “absence of trading” in the primary\nsecurities market on which an underlier stock is traded, or on which option or futures contracts relating to the reference index or an\nunderlier stock are traded, will not include any time when that market is itself closed for trading under ordinary circumstances. In contrast,\na suspension or limitation of trading in an underlier stock or in option or futures contracts, if available, relating to the reference\nindex or an underlier stock in the primary market for that stock or those contracts, by reason of:

●

a price change exceeding limits set by that market,

●

an imbalance of orders relating to that underlier stock or those contracts, or

●

a disparity in bid and ask quotes relating to that underlier stock or those contracts,

will constitute a suspension or material limitation of trading in that\nstock or those contracts in that market.

Consequences of a market disruption event or a non-trading day: If\na market disruption event occurs or is continuing on a day that would otherwise be a call observation date or the determination date,\nor such day is not a trading day, then such call observation date or the determination date will be postponed as described under “—\nCall observation dates” or “— Determination date” above.

If the calculation agent determines that the closing level of the underlier\nthat must be used to determine the amount payable on a call payment date or the stated maturity date is not available on the last possible

PS-8

call observation date or the last possible determination date because\nof a market disruption event, a non-trading day or for any other reason (other than as described under “— Discontinuance or\nmodification of the underlier” below), then the calculation agent will nevertheless determine the level of the underlier based on\nits assessment, made in its sole discretion, of the level of the underlier on that day.

Discontinuance or modification of the underlier: If the underlier\nsponsor discontinues publication of the underlier and the underlier sponsor or anyone else publishes a substitute underlier that the calculation\nagent determines is comparable to the underlier and approves as a successor underlier, or if the calculation agent designates a substitute\nunderlier, then the calculation agent will determine the amount payable on the call payment date or the stated maturity date by reference\nto such successor underlier.

If the calculation agent determines that the publication of the underlier\nis discontinued and there is no successor underlier, the calculation agent will determine the amount payable on the applicable call payment\ndate or on the stated maturity date, as applicable, by a computation methodology that the calculation agent determines will as closely\nas reasonably possible replicate the underlier.

If the calculation agent determines that (i) the underlier, the underlier\nstocks or the method of calculating the underlier is changed at any time in any respect — including any addition, deletion or substitution\nand any reweighting or rebalancing of the underlier or the underlier stocks and whether the change is made by the underlier sponsor under\nits existing policies or following a modification of those policies, is due to the publication of a successor underlier, is due to events\naffecting one or more of the underlier stocks or their issuers or is due to any other reason — and is not otherwise reflected in\nthe level of the underlier by the underlier sponsor pursuant to the then-current underlier methodology of the underlier or (ii) there\nhas been a split or reverse split of the underlier, then the calculation agent will be permitted (but not required) to make such adjustments\nin the underlier or the method of its calculation as it believes are appropriate to ensure that the levels of the underlier used to determine\nthe amount payable on a call payment date or the stated maturity date, as applicable, is equitable.

All determinations and adjustments to be made by the calculation agent\nwith respect to the underlier may be made by the calculation agent in its sole discretion. The calculation agent is not obligated to make\nany such adjustments.

Calculation agent: Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC (“GS&Co.”)

Tax characterization: The holder, on behalf of itself and any\nother person having a beneficial interest in this note, hereby agrees with the company (in the absence of a change in law, an administrative\ndetermination or a judicial ruling to the contrary) to characterize this note for all U.S. federal income tax purposes as a pre-paid derivative\ncontract in respect of the underlier.

Overdue principal rate: the effective Federal Funds rate

PS-9

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLES

The following examples are provided for purposes of illustration only. They\nshould not be taken as an indication or prediction of future investment results and are intended merely to illustrate the impact that\nvarious hypothetical closing levels of the underlier on a call observation date and on the determination date could have on the amount\nof cash payable on a call payment date or on the stated maturity date, as the case may be, assuming all other variables remain constant.

The examples below are based on a range of underlier levels that are\nentirely hypothetical; no one can predict what the closing level of the underlier will be on any day throughout the life of your notes,\nand no one can predict what the closing level of the underlier will be on a call observation date or on the determination date. The\nunderlier has been highly volatile in the past — meaning that the underlier level has changed substantially in relatively short\nperiods — and its performance cannot be predicted for any future period.

The information in the following examples reflects hypothetical rates\nof return on the offered notes assuming that they are purchased on the original issue date at the face amount and held to a call payment\ndate or the stated maturity date, as the case may be. If you sell your notes in a secondary market prior to a call payment\ndate or the stated maturity date, as the case may be, your return will depend upon the market value of your notes at the time of sale,\nwhich may be affected by a number of factors that are not reflected in the examples below such as interest rates, the volatility of the\nunderlier, the creditworthiness of GS Finance Corp., as issuer, and the creditworthiness of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., as guarantor. In\naddition, the estimated value of your notes at the time the terms of your notes are set on the trade date (as determined by reference\nto pricing models used by GS&Co.) is less than the original issue price of your notes. For more information on the estimated\nvalue of your notes, see “Additional Risk Factors Specific to Your Notes — The Estimated Value of Your Notes At the Time the\nTerms of Your Notes Are Set On the Trade Date (as Determined By Reference to Pricing Models Used By GS&Co.) Is Less Than the Original\nIssue Price Of Your Notes” on page PS-13 of this pricing supplement. The information\nin the examples also reflects the key terms and assumptions in the box below.

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

Key Terms and Assumptions
Face amount	$1,000
Call premium amount	The applicable call premium amount for each call payment date is specified on page PS-7 of this pricing supplement
Maturity date premium amount	102.25%
Trigger buffer level	60% of the initial underlier level
Neither a market disruption event nor a non-trading day occurs on any originally scheduled call observation date or the originally scheduled determination date
No change in or affecting any of the underlier stocks or the method by which the underlier sponsor calculates the underlier
Notes purchased on original issue date at the face amount and held to a call payment date or the stated maturity date

For these reasons, the actual performance of the underlier over the\nlife of your notes, as well as the amount payable on a call payment date or at maturity, if any, may bear little relation to the hypothetical\nexamples shown below or to the historical underlier level shown elsewhere in this pricing supplement. For information about\nthe underlier levels during recent periods, see “The Underlier — Historical Closing Levels of the Underlier” on page\nPS-27. Before investing in the notes, you should consult publicly available information to determine the level of the underlier\nbetween the date of this pricing supplement and the date of your purchase of the notes.

Also, the hypothetical examples shown below do not take into account\nthe effects of applicable taxes. Because of the U.S. tax treatment applicable to your notes, tax liabilities could affect the\nafter-tax rate of return on your notes to a comparatively greater extent than the after-tax return on the underlier stocks.

Hypothetical Payment on a Call Payment Date

The examples below show the hypothetical payments that we would pay\non a call payment date with respect to each $1,000 face amount of the notes if the closing level of the underlier is greater than or\nequal to 90% of the initial underlier level on the applicable call observation date. While there are sixteen potential call payment\ndates with respect to your notes, the examples below only illustrate the amount you will receive, if any, on the first and second call\npayment dates.

PS-10

If your notes are automatically called on the first call observation\ndate (i.e., on the first call observation date the closing level of the underlier is greater than or equal to 90% of\nthe initial underlier level), the amount in cash that we would deliver for each $1,000 face amount of your notes on the applicable call\npayment date would be the sum of $1,000 plus the product of the applicable call premium amount times $1,000.\nIf, for example, the closing level of the underlier on the first call observation date were determined to be 140% of the initial underlier\nlevel, your notes would be automatically called and the amount in cash that we would deliver on your notes on the corresponding call payment\ndate would be 120.45% of the face amount of your notes or $1,204.50 for each $1,000 of the face amount of your notes.

If, for example, the notes are not automatically called on\nthe first call observation date and are automatically called on the second call observation date (i.e., on the first call observation\ndate the closing level of the underlier is less than 90% of the initial underlier level and on the second call observation date\nthe closing level of the underlier is greater than or equal to 90% of the initial underlier level), the amount in cash that\nwe would deliver for each $1,000 face amount of your notes on the applicable call payment date would be the sum of $1,000 plus\nthe product of the applicable call premium amount times $1,000. If, for example, the closing level of the underlier on the\nsecond call observation date were determined to be 170% of the initial underlier level, your notes would be automatically called and the\namount in cash that we would deliver on your notes on the corresponding call payment date would be 125.5625% of the face amount of your\nnotes or $1,255.625 for each $1,000 of the face amount of your notes.

Hypothetical Payment at Maturity

If the notes are not automatically called on any call observation\ndate (i.e., on each of the call observation dates the closing level of the underlier is less than 90% of the initial underlier level),\nthe amount in cash we would deliver for each $1,000 face amount of your notes on the stated maturity date will depend on the performance\nof the underlier on the determination date, as shown in the table below. The table below assumes that the notes have not been\nautomatically called on any call observation date and reflects hypothetical cash settlement amounts that you could receive on the\nstated maturity date. The levels in the left column of the table below represent hypothetical final underlier levels and are expressed\nas percentages of the initial underlier level. The amounts in the right column represent the hypothetical cash settlement amounts,\nbased on the corresponding hypothetical final underlier level, and are expressed as percentages of the face amount of a note (rounded\nto the nearest one-thousandth of a percent). Thus, a hypothetical cash settlement amount of 100.000% means that the value of the cash\npayment that we would deliver for each $1,000 of the outstanding face amount of the offered notes on the stated maturity date would equal\n100.000% of the face amount of a note, based on the corresponding hypothetical final underlier level and the assumptions noted above.

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

The Notes Have Not Been Automatically Called
Hypothetical Final Underlier Level \n (as Percentage of Initial Underlier Level)	Hypothetical Cash Settlement Amount \n(as Percentage of Face Amount)
300.000%	202.250%
250.000%	202.250%
200.000%	202.250%
150.000%	202.250%
100.000%	202.250%
90.000%	202.250%
80.000%	100.000%
70.000%	100.000%
60.000%	100.000%
59.999%	59.999%
50.000%	50.000%
40.000%	40.000%
25.000%	25.000%
0.000%	0.000%

If, for example, the notes have not been automatically called\non a call observation date and the final underlier level were determined to be 25.000% of the initial underlier level, the cash settlement\namount that we would deliver on your notes at maturity would be 25.000% of the face amount of your notes, as shown in the table above.\nAs a result, if you purchased your notes on the original issue date at

PS-11

the face amount and held them to the stated maturity date, you would\nlose 75.000% of your investment (if you purchased your notes at a premium to face amount you would lose a correspondingly higher percentage\nof your investment). In addition, if the notes have not been automatically called on a call observation date and the final underlier\nlevel were determined to be 300.000% of the initial underlier level, the cash settlement amount that we would deliver on your notes at\nmaturity would be 202.250% of the face amount of your notes, as shown in the table above. As a result, if you held your notes\nto the stated maturity date, the cash settlement amount would be capped, and you would not benefit from any increase in the final underlier\nlevel over 90.000% of the initial underlier level.

The amounts shown above are entirely hypothetical; they are based on\nmarket prices for the underlier stocks that may not be achieved on a call observation date or the determination date, as the case may\nbe, and on assumptions that may prove to be erroneous. The actual market value of your notes on the stated maturity date or at any other\ntime, including any time you may wish to sell your notes, may bear little relation to the hypothetical amounts shown above, and these\namounts should not be viewed as an indication of the financial return on an investment in the offered notes. The hypothetical\namounts on notes held to the stated maturity date in the examples above assume you purchased your notes at the face amount and have not\nbeen adjusted to reflect the actual issue price you pay for your notes. The return on your investment (whether positive or negative) in\nyour notes will be affected by the amount you pay for your notes. If you purchase your notes for a price other than the face amount, the\nreturn on your investment will differ from, and may be significantly lower than, the hypothetical returns suggested by the above examples. Please\nread “Additional Risk Factors Specific to Your Notes — The Market Value of Your Notes May Be Influenced By Many Unpredictable\nFactors” on page PS-15.

Payments on the notes are economically equivalent to the amounts that\nwould be paid on a combination of other instruments. For example, payments on the notes are economically equivalent to a combination of\nan interest-bearing bond bought by the holder and one or more options entered into between the holder and us (with one or more implicit\noption premiums paid over time). The discussion in this paragraph does not modify or affect the terms of the notes or the U.S. federal\nincome tax treatment of the notes, as described elsewhere in this pricing supplement.

\n \n \n

We cannot predict the actual closing level of the underlier on a call observation date or the determination date or what the market value of your notes will be on any particular trading day, nor can we predict the relationship between the underlier level and the market value of your notes at any time prior to the stated maturity date. The actual amount that you will receive, if any, on a call payment date or the maturity date and the rate of return on the offered notes will depend on whether the notes are called, the actual closing level of the underlier on the call observation dates and the actual final underlier level determined by the calculation agent as described above. Moreover, the assumptions on which the hypothetical returns are based may turn out to be inaccurate. Consequently, the amount of cash to be paid in respect of your notes, if any, on the call payment date or the stated maturity date may be very different from the information reflected in the examples above.

PS-12

ADDITIONAL RISK FACTORS SPECIFIC TO YOUR NOTES

\n \n \n

An investment in your notes is subject to the risks described below, as well as the risks and considerations described in the accompanying prospectus, in the accompanying prospectus supplement, under “Additional Risk Factors Specific to the Indices” in the accompanying S&P 500^® Futures Adaptive Response Indices Supplement No. 2 and under “Additional Risk Factors Specific to the Notes” in the accompanying general terms supplement no. 17,745. You should carefully review these risks and considerations as well as the terms of the notes described herein and in the accompanying prospectus, the accompanying prospectus supplement, the accompanying S&P 500^® Futures Adaptive Response Indices Supplement No. 2 and the accompanying general terms supplement no. 17,745. Your notes are a riskier investment than ordinary debt securities. Also, your notes are not equivalent to investing directly in the underlier stocks, i.e., the stocks comprising the reference index. You should carefully consider whether the offered notes are appropriate given your particular circumstances.

Risks Related to Structure, Valuation and Secondary Market Sales

The Estimated Value of Your Notes At the Time\nthe Terms of Your Notes Are Set On the Trade Date (as Determined By Reference to Pricing Models Used By GS&Co.) Is Less Than the Original\nIssue Price Of Your Notes

The original issue price for your notes exceeds the estimated value\nof your notes as of the time the terms of your notes are set on the trade date, as determined by reference to GS&Co.’s pricing\nmodels and taking into account our credit spreads. Such estimated value on the trade date is set forth above under “Estimated Value\nof Your Notes”; after the trade date, the estimated value as determined by reference to these models will be affected by\nchanges in market conditions, the creditworthiness of GS Finance Corp., as issuer, the creditworthiness of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.,\nas guarantor, and other relevant factors. The price at which GS&Co. would initially buy or sell your notes (if GS&Co. makes\na market, which it is not obligated to do), and the value that GS&Co. will initially use for account statements and otherwise, also\nexceeds the estimated value of your notes as determined by reference to these models. As agreed by GS&Co. and the distribution participants,\nthis excess (i.e., the additional amount described under “Estimated Value of Your Notes”) will decline to zero on a straight\nline basis over the period from the date hereof through the applicable date set forth above under “Estimated Value of Your Notes”.\nThereafter, if GS&Co. buys or sells your notes it will do so at prices that reflect the estimated value determined by reference to\nsuch pricing models at that time. The price at which GS&Co. will buy or sell your notes at any time also will reflect its then current\nbid and ask spread for similar sized trades of structured notes.

In estimating the value of your notes as of the time the terms of your\nnotes are set on the trade date, as disclosed above under “Estimated Value of Your Notes”, GS&Co.’s pricing models\nconsider certain variables, including principally our credit spreads, interest rates (forecasted, current and historical rates), volatility,\nprice-sensitivity analysis and the time to maturity of the notes. These pricing models are proprietary and rely in part on\ncertain assumptions about future events, which may prove to be incorrect. As a result, the actual value you would receive if you sold\nyour notes in the secondary market, if any, to others may differ, perhaps materially, from the estimated value of your notes determined\nby reference to our models due to, among other things, any differences in pricing models or assumptions used by others. See\n“— The Market Value of Your Notes May Be Influenced By Many Unpredictable Factors” below.

The difference between the estimated value of your notes as of the time\nthe terms of your notes are set on the trade date and the original issue price is a result of certain factors, including principally the\nunderwriting discount and commissions, the expenses incurred in creating, documenting and marketing the notes, and an estimate of the\ndifference between the amounts we pay to GS&Co. and the amounts GS&Co. pays to us in connection with your notes. We pay to GS&Co.\namounts based on what we would pay to holders of a non-structured note with a similar maturity. In return for such payment,\nGS&Co. pays to us the amounts we owe under your notes.

In addition to the factors discussed above, the value and quoted price\nof your notes at any time will reflect many factors and cannot be predicted. If GS&Co. makes a market in the notes, the\nprice quoted by GS&Co. would reflect any changes in market conditions and other relevant factors, including any

PS-13

deterioration in our creditworthiness or perceived creditworthiness\nor the creditworthiness or perceived creditworthiness of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. These changes may adversely affect the value of\nyour notes, including the price you may receive for your notes in any market making transaction. To the extent that GS&Co. makes a\nmarket in the notes, the quoted price will reflect the estimated value determined by reference to GS&Co.’s pricing models at\nthat time, plus or minus its then current bid and ask spread for similar sized trades of structured notes (and subject to the declining\nexcess amount described above).

Furthermore, if you sell your notes, you will likely be charged a commission\nfor secondary market transactions, or the price will likely reflect a dealer discount. This commission or discount will further\nreduce the proceeds you would receive for your notes in a secondary market sale.

There is no assurance that GS&Co. or any other party will be willing\nto purchase your notes at any price and, in this regard, GS&Co. is not obligated to make a market in the notes. See “Additional\nRisk Factors Specific to the Notes — Your Notes May Not Have an Active Trading Market” on page S-7 of the accompanying general\nterms supplement no. 17,745.

The Notes Are Subject to the Credit Risk of the\nIssuer and the Guarantor

Although the return on the notes will be based on the performance of\nthe underlier, the payment of any amount due on the notes is subject to the credit risk of GS Finance Corp., as issuer of the notes, and\nthe credit risk of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., as guarantor of the notes. The notes are our unsecured obligations. Investors\nare dependent on our ability to pay all amounts due on the notes, and therefore investors are subject to our credit risk and to changes\nin the market’s view of our creditworthiness. Similarly, investors are dependent on the ability of The Goldman Sachs\nGroup, Inc., as guarantor of the notes, to pay all amounts due on the notes, and therefore are also subject to its credit risk and to\nchanges in the market’s view of its creditworthiness. See “Description of the Notes We May Offer — Information About\nOur Medium-Term Notes, Series F Program — How the Notes Rank Against Other Debt” on page S-5 of the accompanying prospectus\nsupplement and “Description of Debt Securities We May Offer – Guarantee by The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.” on page 65\nof the accompanying prospectus.

The Amount You Will Receive on a Call Payment\nDate or on the Stated Maturity Date is Not Linked to the Closing Level of the Underlier at Any Time Other Than on the Applicable Call\nObservation Date or the Determination Date, as the Case May Be

The amount in cash you will receive on a call payment date, if any,\nwill be paid only if the closing level of the underlier on the applicable call observation date is greater than or equal to\n90% of the initial underlier level. Therefore, the closing level of the underlier on dates other than the call observation\ndates will have no effect on any amount paid in respect of your notes on the call payment date. In addition, the cash settlement\namount you will receive on the stated maturity date, if any, will be based on the closing level of the underlier on the determination\ndate. Therefore, for example, if the closing level of the underlier dropped precipitously on the determination date, the cash\nsettlement amount for the notes would be significantly less than it would otherwise have been had the cash settlement amount been linked\nto the closing level of the underlier prior to such drop. Although the actual closing level of the underlier on the call payment dates,\nstated maturity date or at other times during the life of the notes may be higher than the closing level of the underlier on the call\nobservation dates or the determination date, you will not benefit from the closing levels of the underlier at any time other than on the\ncall observation dates or on the determination date.

You May Lose Your Entire Investment in the Notes

You can lose your entire investment in the notes. Assuming your notes\nare not automatically called on any call observation date, the cash settlement amount on your notes, if any, on the stated maturity date\nwill be based on the performance of the underlier as measured from the initial underlier level to the closing level on the determination\ndate. If the final underlier level is less than the trigger buffer level, you will have a loss for each $1,000 of the\nface amount of your notes equal to the product of (i) the underlier return times (ii) $1,000. Thus, you may lose your entire\ninvestment in the notes, which would include any premium to face amount you paid when you purchased the notes.

Also, the market price of your notes prior to a call payment date or\nthe stated maturity date, as the case may be, may be significantly lower than the purchase price you pay for your notes. Consequently,\nif you

PS-14

sell your notes before the stated maturity date, you may receive far\nless than the amount of your investment in the notes.

The Return on Your Notes May Change Significantly\nDespite Only a Small Change in the Underlier Level

If the final underlier level is less than the trigger buffer level,\nyou will receive less than the face amount of your notes and you could lose all or a substantial portion of your investment in the notes.\nThis means that while a decrease in the final underlier level to the trigger buffer level will not result in a loss of principal on the\nnotes, a decrease in the final underlier level to less than the trigger buffer level will result in a loss of a significant portion of\nthe face amount of the notes despite only a small change in the level of the underlier.

The Amount You Will Receive on a Call Payment\nDate or on the Stated Maturity Date, as the Case May Be, Will Be Capped

Regardless of the closing level of the underlier on a call observation\ndate, the amount in cash you may receive on the call payment date is capped. Even if the closing level of the underlier on a call observation\ndate exceeds 90% of the initial underlier level, causing the notes to be automatically called, the amount in cash payable on the call\npayment date will be capped, and you will not benefit from any increases in the closing level of the underlier above 90% of the initial\nunderlier level on any call observation date. If your notes are automatically called on a call observation date, the maximum payment you\nwill receive for each $1,000 face amount of your notes will depend on the applicable call premium amount. In addition, the cash settlement\namount you may receive on the stated maturity date is capped due to the maturity date premium amount.

Your Notes Are Subject to Automatic Redemption

We will automatically call and redeem all, but not part, of your notes\non a call payment date, if the closing level of the underlier on the corresponding call observation date is greater than or equal\nto 90% of the initial underlier level. Therefore, the term for your notes may be reduced. You may not be able to reinvest the proceeds\nfrom an investment in the notes at a comparable return for a similar level of risk in the event the notes are automatically called prior\nto maturity. For the avoidance of doubt, if your notes are automatically called, no discounts, commissions or fees described herein will\nbe rebated or reduced.

Your Notes Do Not Bear Interest

You will not receive any interest payments on your notes. As a result,\neven if the cash settlement amount payable for your notes on the stated maturity date exceeds the face amount of your notes, the overall\nreturn you earn on your notes may be less than you would have earned by investing in a non-indexed debt security of comparable maturity\nthat bears interest at a prevailing market rate.

The Market Value of Your Notes May Be Influenced\nBy Many Unpredictable Factors

When we refer to the market value of your notes, we mean the value that\nyou could receive for your notes if you chose to sell them in the open market before the stated maturity date. A number of factors, many\nof which are beyond our control, will influence the market value of your notes, including:

the level of the underlier;

the volatility—i.e., the frequency and magnitude of changes—in\nthe closing level of the underlier;

the dividend rates of the underlier stocks;

economic, financial, regulatory, political, military, public health and other\nevents that affect stock markets generally and the underlier stocks, and which may affect the closing level of the underlier;

interest rates and yield rates in the market;

the time remaining until your notes mature; and

our creditworthiness and the creditworthiness of The Goldman Sachs Group,\nInc., whether actual or perceived, and including actual or anticipated upgrades or downgrades in our credit ratings or the credit ratings\nof The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. or changes in other credit measures.

PS-15

Without limiting the foregoing, the market value of your notes may be\nnegatively impacted by increasing interest rates. Such adverse impact of increasing interest rates could be significantly enhanced in\nnotes with longer-dated maturities, the market values of which are generally more sensitive to increasing interest rates.

These factors may influence the market value of your notes if you sell\nyour notes before maturity, including the price you may receive for your notes in any market making transaction. If you sell your notes\nprior to maturity, you may receive less than the face amount of your notes. You cannot predict the future performance of the underlier\nbased on its historical performance.

If You Purchase Your Notes at a Premium to Face\nAmount, the Return on Your Investment Will Be Lower Than the Return on Notes Purchased at Face Amount and the Impact of Certain Key Terms\nof the Notes Will Be Negatively Affected

The cash settlement amount you will be paid for your notes on the stated\nmaturity date, if any, or the amount you will be paid on a call payment date will not be adjusted based on the issue price you pay for\nthe notes. If you purchase notes at a price that differs from the face amount of the notes, then the return on your investment in such\nnotes held to a call payment date or the stated maturity date will differ from, and may be substantially less than, the return on notes\npurchased at face amount. If you purchase your notes at a premium to face amount and hold them to a call payment date or the stated maturity\ndate, the return on your investment in the notes will be lower than it would have been had you purchased the notes at face amount or a\ndiscount to face amount.

You Have No Rights in Any Futures Contract Tracked\nBy the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index

Investing in your notes will not make you a holder of any futures contract\ntracked by the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index. Neither you nor any other holder or owner of your notes will have\nany rights with respect to the futures contracts tracked by the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index, including any\nrights of a holder of the futures contracts. Your notes will be paid in cash and you will have no right to receive delivery of any futures\ncontract tracked by the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index.

You Have No Shareholder Rights or Rights to Receive\nAny Underlier Stock

Investing in your notes will not make you a holder of any of the underlier\nstocks. Neither you nor any other holder or owner of your notes will have any rights with respect to the underlier stocks,\nincluding any voting rights, any rights to receive dividends or other distributions, any rights to make a claim against the\nunderlier stocks or any other rights of a holder of the underlier stocks. Your notes will be paid in cash and you will have\nno right to receive delivery of any underlier stocks.

We May Sell an Additional Aggregate Face Amount\nof the Notes at a Different Issue Price

At our sole option, we may decide to sell an additional aggregate face\namount of the notes subsequent to the date of this pricing supplement. The issue price of the notes in the subsequent sale may differ\nsubstantially (higher or lower) from the original issue price you paid as provided on the cover of this pricing supplement.

Additional Risks Related to the Underlier

You should not invest in the notes without also reading the S&P\n500^® Futures Adaptive Response Indices Supplement No. 2 in full, including the sections entitled “The S&P 500^®\nFutures Adaptive Response Indices” and “Additional Risk Factors Specific to The Indices.”

Notes Linked to the Underlier Are Not Suitable\nFor All Investors and Should Be Purchased Only By Investors Who Understand Leverage Risk; the Underlier May Have Leveraged Exposure to\nthe Underlying Futures Index in Falling Stock Markets

Notes linked to the underlier are not suitable for all investors. In\nparticular, notes linked to the underlier will entail leverage risk and should be purchased only by investors who understand leverage\nrisk, including the risks inherent in providing up to 450% leveraged exposure to the underlying futures index,

PS-16

the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index. Investors\nshould be aware that the use of leverage will magnify and accelerate any negative performance of the underlier.

For example, assuming the maximum leverage factor of 450% is applied\nto the underlier in order to achieve its predefined volatility target, for every 1% decrease in the closing level of the underlying futures\nindex, the closing level of the underlier would decline by 4.5% (excluding any decline due to the application of a decrement feature).\nAccordingly, any note linked to the underlier is only suitable for investors who understand and can bear the risks associated with up\nto 4.5 times magnified declines in the performance of the underlier that result from declines in the closing level of the underlying futures\nindex.

In addition, in a falling stock market, the underlier may be exposed\nto more than 100% of the losses in the underlying futures index and the underlier may likely experience lower returns than the underlying\nfutures index.

The Underlier Is Subject to Risks Associated\nWith Leveraged Exposure and There Is a Greater Risk You Will Receive Less Than the Face Amount of Your Notes Relative to Notes Linked\nto the Underlying Futures Index, Assuming All Other Terms Remain the Same

The underlier is designed to provide a target volatility overlay to\nthe base index, and the volatility target level is generally achieved through leveraged exposure to the underlying futures index. To the\nextent that the realized volatility is greater than the volatility target, the underlier would generally be decreasing its exposure to\nthe underlying futures index, and to the extent that the realized volatility is less than the volatility target, the underlier would generally\nbe increasing its exposure to the underlying futures index. Because the underlier may have leveraged exposure to the underlying futures\nindex, the underlier may be more volatile than the underlying futures index and daily changes in the level of the underlying futures index\nmay have a greater impact on the underlier than the underlying futures index, which does not contain a leverage component.

In addition, a base index is calculated for the underlier, which is\ndesigned to adjust exposure to the underlying futures index using certain calendar-based signals and price patterns in an attempt to overweight\nor underweight exposures depending on market conditions. Because the base index calculated for the underlier is designed to provide exposure\nto the underlying futures index based on these calendar-based signals and price patterns, which generally provide leveraged exposure to\nthe underlying futures index in the base index, daily changes in the level of the underlying futures index may have a greater impact on\nthe underlier than the underlying futures index, which does not contain a leverage component.

The Underlier is Subject to Risks Associated\nWith a Cap on the Daily Change in Leverage

The underlier is subject to a maximum daily change in exposure to the\nUnderlying Futures Index of 100%, with a total maximum exposure of 450%. The maximum daily change in leverage may result in the underlier\nleveraging up more slowly in the event of a market rally compared to an identical index that does not cap the amount of daily leverage\nchange. In addition, the same feature may result in the underlier deleveraging less quickly in the event of a market drawdown compared\nto an identical index that does not have a cap on daily leverage change.

In addition, the underlier is subject to a cap on the daily change in\nleverage of the base index. A base index is calculated for the underlier, which is designed to adjust exposure to the underlying futures\nindex using certain calendar-based signals and price patterns in an attempt to overweight or underweight exposures depending on market\nconditions. On each index calculation day, the aggregate weight of the signals in the base index cannot increase or decrease by more than\n35% from the previous index calculation day. As a result, the performance of the underlier may be worse than if no cap on the increase\nor decrease of the aggregate weight of the signals in the base index were applied. In addition, the base weight cannot exceed 135% and\ncannot effectively go lower than 90% based on how the signals are formulated.

PS-17

There Is No Assurance that Calculating Realized\nVolatility as the Average of Short-Term Volatility and Long-Term Volatility Is the Best Way to Measure Realized Volatility

With regard to the underlier, “realized volatility” is a\nmeasurement of variations in the historical daily returns of the base index that is calculated as the average of short-term volatility\nand long-term volatility by reference to either a “short term” or “long term” decay factor, as applicable. When\nthe volatility of the base index increases (or decreases), short-term volatility will increase (or decrease) more quickly than long-term\nvolatility. Generally, a higher “decay factor” gives relatively greater weight to older data, reflecting a longer-term perspective.\nThere is no assurance that calculating realized volatility in this manner is the best way to measure realized volatility. For example,\nit is possible that exclusively relying on short-term volatility or long-term volatility or on the greater of or lesser of short-term\nvolatility and long-term volatility is a more reliable way to measure realized volatility. Further, if realized volatility were calculated\nin a different manner, the underlier would perform differently, including potentially having higher returns.

There Is No Guarantee that the Underlier Will\nAchieve the Volatility Target

The exposure of the underlier to the underlying futures index is subject\nto a maximum leverage factor of 450% and a cap on daily leverage change of 100%, which may limit the ability of the underlier to fully\nachieve the volatility target, if achieving the volatility target would require a leverage factor in excess of the maximum leverage factor\nor the cap on daily leverage change. Therefore, there is no guarantee that the underlier will achieve the volatility target.

In addition, the underlier adjusts its exposure to the underlying futures\nindex in an attempt to achieve the volatility target at the close of each index calculation day based on the realized volatility of the\nbase index from the index calculation day that is two index calculation days prior to the current index calculation day. Due to the fact\nthat realized volatility can fluctuate significantly during a single day, the leverage factor will not reflect the realized volatility\nof the base index as of that index calculation day. As a result, there is no guarantee that the underlier will achieve the volatility\ntarget and it is possible that the underlier may have greater exposure to the underlying futures index when the level of the underlying\nfutures index is decreasing than it would have had if the leverage factor were calculated based on more current levels of realized volatility.

The Underlier is Subject to Risks Associated\nwith the Use of Signals

The base index calculated for the underlier provides exposure to the\nunderlying futures index based on four signals including (1) the mean reversion signal, (2) the Federal Open Market Committee schedule\nsignal, (3) the turn-of-the-month mean reversion signal and (4) the turn-of-the-month long signal. The signal methodology used by the\nunderlier may not be successful. The weight of the underlying futures index will be adjusted, in part, based upon the signals, which may\nnot function as expected in the future or under different market conditions. The signals may not perform as expected should market environments\nchange, and such signals’ effectiveness may wane, disappear or reverse over time. If the effectiveness of the signals wanes, disappears\nor reverses, the changes to the weight of the underlying futures index in the base index as a result of the signals will no longer reflect\nthe underlying assumptions of such signals and the performance of the underlier may suffer. No assurance can be given that the signal-based\nmethodology on which the underlier is based will be successful or that a structured investment linked to the underlier will outperform\na structured investment linked to any alternative methodology (whether or not using a signal-based methodology) that might be employed\nin respect of the underlying futures index or the underlying asset.

In addition, the underlier may be adversely affected by an overlap between\nthe signals. Moreover, the aggregate weight of the signals in the base index cannot increase or decrease by more than 35% from the previous\nindex calculation day and the base weight cannot exceed 135% and cannot effectively go lower than 90% based on how the signals are formulated.\nAs a result, the exposure to the underlying futures index may be higher or lower than would have been the case had only one of the signals\nbeen

PS-18

applied and the performance of the underlier may be worse than if only\none of the signals were applied or no maximum exposure limits were applied.

The Underlier is Subject to Risks Associated\nwith Turn-of-the-Month Signals

The underlier provides exposure to the underlying futures index based\non turn-of-the-month signals, including the turn-of-the-month mean reversion signal and the turn-of-the-month long signal (collectively,\nthe “TOM signals”). The TOM signals seek to capitalize on the view that equities may mean revert during the final days of\na given month if equities have performed negatively that month while the first days of a new month generally yield positive returns for\nequity securities. However, there is no guarantee that the level of the underlying futures index will rise during these periods and unexpected\nmarket conditions or other external events may cause the level of the underlying futures index to fall during these periods. No assurance\ncan be given that the TOM signals will be successful or that they will outperform any alternative strategy.

The Underlier is Subject to Risks Associated\nwith the Mean Reversion Signal

The underlier provides exposure to the underlying futures index based\non the mean reversion signal. The mean reversion signal seeks to capitalize on the view that in the short term, the underlying futures\nindex will increase or decrease in value in the opposite direction of the historical increases or decreases in its value. There is no\nguarantee that the actual performance of the underlying futures index will exhibit any mean reversion and any sustained decline in the\nlevel of the underlying futures index at a time when the mean reversion methodology would suggest that the level should increase may result\nin unexpected losses, which could be significant. No assurance can be given that the mean reversion signal will be successful or that\nit will outperform any alternative strategy.

The Underlier is Subject to Risks Associated\nwith the Federal Open Market Committee Schedule Signal

The underlier provides exposure to the underlying futures index based\non the Federal Open Market Committee schedule signal. The FOMC signal seeks to capitalize on the view that equities may outperform going\ninto and on the days of an FOMC statement day. There is no guarantee that the level of the underlying futures index will rise during these\nperiods and unexpected market conditions or other external events may cause the level of the underlying futures index to fall going into\nand on the days of an FOMC statement day. No assurance can be given that the FOMC signal will be successful or that it will outperform\nany alternative strategy.

The Underlier May Be Significantly Uninvested\n

On an index calculation day, the exposure of the underlier to the underlying\nfutures index may be less than 100% when the realized volatility of the base index is above the volatility target. In addition, the weight\nof the underlying futures index in the base index may be less than 100%, based upon certain calendar-based signals and price patterns\nthat may underweight exposures depending on market conditions. If the underlier’s exposure to the underlying futures index is less\nthan 100%, the underlier will not be fully invested, and any uninvested portion will earn no return. The underlier may be significantly\nuninvested on any given day and will realize only a portion of any gains due to appreciation of the underlying asset on any such day.\nThe decrement is deducted daily from the underlier, even when the underlier is not fully invested, which means that any portion of the\nunderlier that is uninvested in the underlying futures index cannot offset the decrement or contribute to positive performance of the\nunderlier.

The Level of the Underlier Reflects a Per Annum\nDaily Decrement

The underlier is subject to a per annum daily decrement, which\nis a fixed percentage of the respective underlier level that is applied daily. As a result of such decrement, the level of the underlier\nwill trail the value of a hypothetical identical index without a decrement.

PS-19

The decrement will have the effect of offsetting positive returns, and\nworsening negative returns, on the performance of the underlier and will result in a drag on the performance of the underlier. The decrement\nwill adversely affect the performance of the underlier in all cases, whether the underlier appreciates or depreciates. The underlier will\nnot appreciate unless the return of its investment strategy is sufficient to offset the negative effects of the decrement, and then only\nto the extent that the return of its investment strategy is greater than the decrement. As a result of the decrement, the level of the\nunderlier may decline even if the return of its investment strategy is positive.

The Amount of the Decrement Applied to the Underlier\nMay Outweigh Any Intended Benefits of the Decrement Feature

The inclusion of a decrement is intended to permit the economic terms\nof structured investments linked to the underlier to be more favorable to investors than the terms that would otherwise be available on\na hypothetical identical index without a decrement, assuming that the estimated value of the structured investments and market conditions\nare held constant and that all other structural features of the structured investments are the same.

However, for the underlier, any improvement in the economic terms of\na structured investment linked to an underlier may not be sufficient to offset the negative effect of the application of the daily decrement\nto the underlier performance. There can be no assurance that the decrement feature will actually result in the terms of a structured note\nlinked to the underlier having terms that are more favorable to investors than would otherwise be available on a hypothetical identical\nindex without a decrement.

The Underlier May Realize Significant Losses\nif It Is Not Consistently Successful in Increasing Exposure to the Underlying Futures Index in Advance of Increases in the Underlying\nFutures Index and Reducing Exposure to the Underlying Futures Index in Advance of Declines in the Underlying Futures Index

The underlier methodology is premised on several key market-based assumptions:\n(1) that there will be an inverse relationship between performance and volatility, so that the underlying futures index will tend to increase\nin times of lower volatility and decline in times of higher volatility; (2) that the signals will be effective in adjusting the underlier’s\nexposure to the underlying futures index and that their underlying assumptions about market performance and timing will be accurate; and\n(3) that, for the underlier, any improvement in the economic terms of a structured investment linked to the underlier will be sufficient\nto offset the negative effect of the application of a daily decrement to underlier performance. If\nany of these assumptions does not prove to be consistently correct, then the underlier may perform poorly as a result of having highly\nleveraged exposure to the underlying futures index at a time of declines and/or having reduced exposure to the underlying futures index\nat a time of increases.

The Underlier May Not Be Successful or Outperform\nAny Alternative Strategy that Might Be Employed in Respect of the Underlying Futures Index

No assurance can be given that the investment strategy on which the\nunderlier is based will be successful or that a structured investment linked to the underlier will outperform a structured investment\nlinked to any alternative strategy that might be employed with respect to the underlying futures index.

An Affiliate of GS Finance Corp. Coordinated\nwith the Underlier Sponsor in the Development of the Underlier

An affiliate of GS Finance Corp. coordinated with the underlier sponsor\nin its development of the guidelines governing the composition and calculation of the underlier.

The underlier sponsor can implement policies, make judgments or enact\nchanges to the underlier’s methodology that could negatively affect the performance of the underlier. The underlier sponsor can\nalso alter, discontinue or suspend calculation or dissemination of the underlier. Any of these actions could adversely affect the value\nof the notes. The underlier sponsor has no obligation to consider your interests in calculating, maintaining or revising the underlier.

PS-20

In addition, an affiliate of GS Finance Corp. was responsible for developing\nthe guidelines governing the composition and calculation of the underlier, which could have an impact, positive or negative, on the levels\nof the underlier and the value of your notes. GS Finance Corp. was under no obligation to consider your interests as an investor in the\nnotes in its role in developing the guidelines governing the underlier. Furthermore, the inclusion of the underlying futures index in\nthe underlier is not an investment recommendation by the Issuer, the Guarantor (if applicable) or any of their affiliates of the underlying\nfutures index.

The Underlier Has a Limited Operating History

The notes are linked to the performance of the underlier, which was\nlaunched on July 24, 2026. Because the underlier has no live underlier level history prior to that date, limited live historical underlier\nlevel information will be available for you to consider in making an independent investigation of the underlier performance, which may\nmake it difficult for you to make an informed decision with respect to the notes.

The hypothetical performance data prior to the launch of the underlier\non July 24, 2026 refers to simulated performance data created by applying the underlier’s calculation methodology to historical\nprices of the underlying futures index. Such simulated hypothetical performance data has been produced by the retroactive application\nof a back-tested methodology. No future performance of the underlier can be predicted based on the simulated hypothetical performance\ndata or the historical underlier performance information as described herein.

If the Closing Level of the Underlier Becomes\nZero or Negative, the Closing Level of the Underlier Will Remain Zero, Which Would Adversely Impact the Amount Payable on Your Notes and\nYou Will Lose Your Entire Investment in the Notes

The underlier is designed to provide a target volatility overlay to\nthe base index, and the volatility target level is generally achieved through leveraged exposure to the underlying futures index, which\nmeans that any decrease in the level of the underlying futures index will result in a larger decrease in the level of the underlier. If\nthe closing level of the underlier becomes zero or negative on any trading day, the underlier sponsor may discontinue or restart the underlier.\nRegardless of whether the underlier sponsor discontinues or restarts the underlier and notwithstanding anything to the contrary provided\nunder “Terms and Conditions — Discontinuance or modification of the underlier” above, the closing level of the underlier\nwill remain zero for the remainder of the term of your notes (even if the underlier is discontinued and even if the underlier is restarted\nwith a new base value). Thus, you will lose your entire investment in the notes.

Under Certain Circumstances, Your Notes May Have\na Higher Risk of Automatic Redemption Than Notes Linked to the Underlying Futures Index

We will automatically call and redeem all, but not part, of your notes\non a call payment date if, as measured on any call observation date, the closing level of the underlier, is greater than or equal\nto 90% of the initial underlier level. Because the underlier is designed to provide leveraged exposure to the underlying futures index,\nthe underlier will be more volatile than the underlying futures index and daily changes in the level of the underlying futures index will\nnecessarily have a greater impact on the underlier than the underlying futures index, which does not contain a leverage component. As\na result, under certain circumstances, your notes may have a greater risk of being automatically called prior to the stated maturity date,\nas compared to notes linked to the underlying futures index (which does not contain a leverage component), assuming all other terms remained\nthe same. Therefore, the term for your notes may be reduced. You may not be able to reinvest the proceeds from an investment in the notes\nat a comparable return for a similar level of risk in the event the notes are automatically called prior to maturity. For the avoidance\nof doubt, if your notes are automatically called, no discounts, commissions or fees described herein will be rebated or reduced.

PS-21

Risks Relating to the Underlying Futures Index, Reference Index\nand Underlying Asset

The Underlying Futures Index Is Expected to\nUnderperform the Total Return Performance of the S&P 500^® Index Because of an Implicit Financing Cost

The underlying futures index is a futures-based index. As a futures-based\nindex, it is expected to reflect not only the total return performance of its reference index (the S&P 500^® Index),\nbut also the implicit cost of a financed position in that reference index. The cost of this financed position will adversely affect the\nvalue of the underlying futures index. Any increase in market interest rates will be expected to further increase this implicit financing\ncost and will increase the negative effect on the performance of the underlying futures index. Because of this implicit financing cost,\nthe underlying futures index is expected to underperform the total return performance of the S&P 500^® Index.\nIn addition, in a high interest rate environment, the underlying futures index may even underperform the price return performance of the\nS&P 500^® Index.

The Policies of the Underlier Sponsor and Changes\nthat Affect the Underlying Futures Index or the Securities Comprising the Reference Index Could Affect the Payment Amount on Your Notes\nand Their Market Value

The policies of the underlier sponsor concerning the calculation of\nthe level of the underlier, additions, deletions or substitutions of securities comprising the reference index, the S&P 500^®\nIndex, and the manner in which changes affecting the securities comprising the reference index or its issuers, such as stock dividends,\nreorganizations or mergers, are reflected in the level of the underlying futures index or the reference index, as applicable, could affect\nthe level of the underlier and, therefore, the amount payable on your notes and the market value of your notes. The amount payable on\nyour notes and their market value could also be affected if the underlier sponsor changes these policies, for example, by changing the\nmanner in which it calculates the level of the underlier or if the underlier sponsor discontinues or suspends calculation or publication\nof the level of the underlier, in which case it may become difficult to determine the market value of your notes. If events such as these\noccur, the calculation agent for the notes — which initially will be GS&Co., our affiliate — may determine the closing\nlevel of the underlying futures index — and thus the amount payable on your notes — in a manner it considers appropriate,\nin its sole discretion. We describe the discretion that the calculation agent of the notes will have in determining the closing level\nof the Indices on any trading day and the amount payable on your notes more fully under “Terms and Conditions — Discontinuance\nor modification of the underlier” above. See also “Discontinuance or Modification of an Underlier That Is an Index or an Exchange-Traded\nFund” on page S-28 of the accompanying general terms supplement no. 17,745.

Except to the Extent The Goldman Sachs Group,\nInc. Is One of the Companies Whose Common Stock Comprises the Reference Index, and Except to the Extent That We or Our Affiliates May\nCurrently or in the Future Own Securities of, or Engage in Business With, the Issuers of Securities Comprising the Reference Index or\nOwn the Underlying Asset, There Is No Affiliation Between Us and the Issuers of Securities Comprising the Reference Index

The underlying futures index is linked to the underlying asset, currently\nlisted for trading on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. The common stock of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is one of the securities comprising\nthe reference index. In addition, we or our affiliates may currently or from time to time in the future own securities of, or engage in\nbusiness with, the issuers of securities comprising the reference index or own the underlying asset. We are not otherwise affiliated with\nthe issuers of securities comprising the reference index or the sponsor of the reference index. Neither we nor any of our affiliates have\nparticipated in the preparation of any publicly available information or made any “due diligence” investigation or inquiry\nwith respect to the underlying futures index or the reference index, any of the other issuers of the securities comprising the reference\nindex or the underlying asset. You, as an investor in your notes, should make your own investigation into the underlying futures index,\nthe reference index, the issuers of the securities comprising the reference index and the E-mini S&P 500 futures contracts. See “Background\non the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index” and “Background on the S&P 500^® Index”\nin the accompanying S&P 500^® Futures Adaptive Response Indices Supplement No. 2 for additional

PS-22

information about the underlying futures index, the E-mini S&P 500\nfutures contracts and the reference index.

None of the issuers of securities comprising the reference index are\ninvolved in the offering of your notes in any way and none of them have any obligation of any sort with respect to your notes. Thus, none\nof the issuers of securities comprising the reference index have any obligation to take your interests into consideration for any reason,\nincluding in taking any corporate actions that might adversely affect the level of the underlying futures index or the reference index\nor making any investment decision for the underlying futures index or the reference index.

Linking to an Equity Futures Contract Is Different\nfrom Linking to the Underlier or the Underlying Futures Index

The underlying futures index is linked to the underlying asset, the\nE-mini S&P 500 futures contract, currently listed for trading on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Consequently, the return on your\nnotes will be related to the performance of an equity futures contract and not the reference index. On a given day, a “futures price”\nis the price at which market participants may agree to buy or sell the asset underlying a futures contract in the future, and the “spot\nprice” is the current price of such underlying asset for immediate delivery. A variety of factors can lead to a disparity between\nthe price of a futures contract at a given point in time and the spot price of its underlying asset, such as the expected dividend yields\nof any stocks that comprise such underlying asset, the implicit financing cost associated with the futures contract and market expectations\nrelated to the future price of the futures contract’s underlying asset. Purchasing an equity futures contract is similar to borrowing\nmoney to buy the underlying asset of such futures contract because it enables an investor to gain exposure to such underlying asset without\nhaving to pay the full cost of such exposure up front, and therefore entails a financing cost. As a result, the underlier is expected\nto reflect not only the performance of the reference index, but also the implicit financing cost in the underlying asset contract, among\nother factors. Such implicit financing cost will adversely affect the level of the underlier. Any increase in market interest rates will\nbe expected to further increase this implicit financing cost and will have an adverse effect on the level of the underlier and, therefore,\nthe value of and return on the notes.

The price movement of a futures contract is typically correlated with\nthe movements of the price of its underlying asset, but the correlation is generally imperfect, and price movements in the spot market\nmay not be reflected in the futures market (and vice versa). Accordingly, your notes may underperform a similar investment that more directly\nreflects the return on the reference index.

Negative Roll Yields Will Adversely Affect the\nLevel of the Underlier Over Time and Therefore the Amount Payable on the Notes

The underlying futures index is linked to the underlying asset rather\nthan the reference index. Futures contracts normally specify a certain date for cash settlement of a financial future (such as a futures\ncontract on a securities index) or delivery of the underlying physical commodity for a deliverable future. As the exchange-traded futures\ncontract that comprises the underlier approaches expiration, it is replaced by a similar contract that has a later expiration. Thus, for\nexample, a futures contract purchased and held in September may specify a December expiration. As time passes, the contract expiring in\nDecember may be replaced by a contract for delivery in March. This process is referred to as “rolling.”

As a futures contract approaches expiration, its value will generally\napproach the spot price of its underlying asset because by expiration it will closely represent a contract to buy or sell such underlying\nasset for immediate delivery. If the market for a futures contract is in “contango,” where the price of the futures contract\nwith a later expiration date during a rolling period is higher than the spot price of its underlying asset, then the value of such futures\ncontract would tend to decline over time (assuming the spot price and other relevant factors remain unchanged), because the higher futures\nprice would decline as it approaches the lower spot price by expiration. This negative effect on the futures price is referred to as a\nnegative “carry” or “roll yield” and is realized over the term of such contract. A negative roll yield will adversely\naffect the level of the underlier over time and therefore the amount payable on the notes.

PS-23

Because of the potential effects of negative roll yields, it is possible\nfor the level of the underlier to decrease significantly over time even when the level of the reference index is stable or increasing.

Futures Contracts Are Not Assets with Intrinsic\nValue

The underlying futures index is linked to the underlying asset currently\nlisted for trading on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Trading in futures contracts transfers the risk of future price movements from\none market participant to another. This means that for every gain, there is an equal and offsetting loss. Futures contracts themselves\nare not assets with intrinsic value, and simply reflect, in the case of cash-settled contracts, certain rights to payment or obligations\nto make payments to the other party to the contract. Accordingly, market participants taking the opposite side of the underlying asset\ntrades may believe that the level of the reference index will move against the interests of the underlying futures index.

You Have No Rights in Any Futures Contract Tracked\nBy the Underlying Futures Index

Investing in your notes will not make you a holder of any futures contract\ntracked by the underlying futures index. Neither you nor any other holder or owner of your notes will have any rights with respect to\nthe futures contracts tracked by the underlying futures index, including any rights of a holder of the futures contracts. Your notes will\nbe paid in cash and you will have no right to receive delivery of any futures contract tracked by the underlying futures index.

Owning the Notes Is Not the Same as Directly\nOwning the Underlier Stocks or Futures Contract Directly or Indirectly Tracked by the Underlying Futures Index

Your return on the notes will not reflect the return you would have\nrealized on a direct investment in the underlying asset currently listed for trading on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange or any of the\nunderlier stocks comprising the reference index. For example, as an investor in the notes, you will not have rights to receive dividends\nor other distributions or any other rights, including voting rights, with respect to any underlier stocks comprising the reference index.\nThe calculation agent for the notes will calculate the amount payable to you at maturity by reference to the level of the underlier on\nthe determination date, and will not include the amount of any of those dividend payments or other distributions. Therefore, the return\non your investment will not be the same as the return based on the purchase of any stocks or futures contracts that are tracked directly\nor indirectly by the underlying futures index.

Suspension or Disruptions of Market Trading in\nStocks or Futures Contracts May Adversely Affect the Value of the Notes

Securities markets and futures markets are subject to temporary distortions\nor other disruptions due to various factors, including the lack of liquidity in the markets, the participation of speculators, and government\nregulation and intervention. In addition, futures markets typically have regulations that limit the amount of fluctuation in some futures\ncontract prices that may occur during a single business day. These limits are generally referred to as “daily price fluctuation\nlimits,” and the maximum or minimum price of a contract on any given day as a result of these limits is referred to as a “limit\nprice.” Once the limit price has been reached in a particular contract, no trades may be made at a price beyond the limit, or trading\nmay be limited for a specified period of time. Limit prices have the effect of precluding trading in a particular contract or forcing\nthe liquidation of contracts at potentially disadvantageous times or prices. These circumstances could affect the level of the underlying\nfutures index and, therefore, could adversely affect the level of the underlier and the amount payable on the notes.

Risks Related to Tax

The Tax Consequences of an Investment in Your\nNotes Are Uncertain

The tax consequences of an investment in your notes are uncertain, both\nas to the timing and character of any inclusion in income in respect of your notes.

PS-24

The Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) announced\nin 2007 that it is considering issuing guidance regarding the tax treatment of an instrument such as your notes, and any such guidance\ncould adversely affect the value and the tax treatment of your notes. Among other things, the IRS may decide to require the holders to\naccrue ordinary income on a current basis and recognize ordinary income on payment at maturity, and could subject non-U.S. investors to\nwithholding tax. In addition, members of Congress have proposed legislative changes to the tax treatment of derivative contracts. It is\nnot possible to predict whether a similar or identical bill will be enacted in the future, or whether any such bill would affect the tax\ntreatment of your notes. We describe these developments in more detail under “Supplemental Discussion of U.S. Federal\nIncome Tax Consequences – United States Holders – Possible Change in Law” below. You should consult your tax advisor\nabout this matter. Except to the extent otherwise provided by law, GS Finance Corp. intends to continue treating the notes for U.S. federal\nincome tax purposes in accordance with the treatment described under “Supplemental Discussion of U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences”\nbelow unless and until such time as Congress, the Treasury Department or the IRS determine that some other treatment is more appropriate.\nPlease also consult your tax advisor concerning the U.S. federal income tax and any other applicable tax consequences to you of owning\nyour notes in your particular circumstances.

Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) Withholding\nMay Apply to Payments on Your Notes, Including as a Result of the Failure of the Bank or Broker Through Which You Hold the Notes to Provide\nInformation to Tax Authorities

Please see the discussion under “United States Taxation —\nTaxation of Debt Securities — Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) Withholding” in the accompanying prospectus for a\ndescription of the applicability of FATCA to payments made on your notes.

PS-25

THE UNDERLIER

The S&P 500^® Futures 35% VT Adaptive Response 6%\nDecrement Index (USD) ER is designed to provide exposure to the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index with a rules-based\noverlay that adjusts exposure to the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index on a daily basis. Leverage is applied to\nthe weight of the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index to attempt to achieve a predefined volatility target of 35%,\nwith a maximum exposure to the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index of 450%. A base index is calculated for the underlier,\nwhich is designed to adjust exposure to the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index using certain calendar-based signals\nand price patterns in an attempt to overweight or underweight exposures depending on market conditions. A per annum deduction that is\na fixed percentage of the underlier level, known as a decrement, is applied daily, which has the effect of offsetting positive returns\non the performance of the underlier and will result in a drag on the performance of the underlier. No assurance can be given that the\ninvestment strategy used to construct the underlier will achieve its intended results or that a structured investment linked to the underlier\nwill be successful or will outperform any alternative index or strategy that might reference the S&P 500^® Futures Excess\nReturn Index. For additional information on the underlier, see the accompanying S&P 500^® Futures Adaptive Response\nIndices Supplement No. 2 and October 2026 S&P 500^® Futures 35% VT Adaptive Response 6% Decrement Index (USD) ER Supplement\nAddendum; see also “Index Summary” above.

PS-26

Historical Closing Levels of the Underlier

The closing level of the underlier has fluctuated in the past and may,\nin the future, experience significant fluctuations. In particular, the underlier has recently experienced extreme and unusual volatility.\nAny historical upward or downward trend in the closing level of the underlier during the period shown below is not an indication that\nthe underlier is more or less likely to increase or decrease at any time during the life of your notes.

You should not take the historical closing levels of the underlier\nas an indication of the future performance of the underlier, including because of the volatility described above. We cannot give you\nany assurance that the future performance of the underlier or the underlier stocks will result in you receiving an amount greater than\nthe outstanding face amount of your notes on the stated maturity date.

Neither we nor any of our affiliates make any representation to you\nas to the performance of the underlier. Before investing in the offered notes, you should consult publicly available information to determine\nthe levels of the underlier between the date of this pricing supplement and the date of your purchase of the offered notes and, given\nthe recent volatility described above, you should pay particular attention to recent levels of the underlier. The actual performance\nof the underlier over the life of the offered notes, as well as the cash settlement amount at maturity, may bear little relation to the\nhistorical levels shown below.

The graph below shows the daily closing levels of the underlier from\nJanuary 1, 2021 through October 29, 2026 (using hypothetical performance data and historical closing levels). As a result, the following\ngraph does not reflect the global financial crisis which began in 2008, which had a materially negative impact on the price of most equity\nsecurities and, as a result, the level of most equity indices. Since the underlier was launched on July 24, 2026 and has a limited operating\nhistory, the graph includes hypothetical performance data for the underlier prior to its launch on July 24, 2026. The hypothetical performance\ndata prior to July 24, 2026 was obtained from the underlier sponsor’s website, without independent verification. The historical\nclosing levels from July 24, 2026 to October 29, 2026 were obtained from Bloomberg Financial Services, without independent verification.\n(In the graph, the hypothetical historical closing levels can be found to the left of the vertical solid line marker and the historical\nclosing levels can be found to the right of the vertical solid line marker.) You should not take the hypothetical performance data or\nhistorical levels of the underlier as an indication of the future performance of the underlier.

PS-27

Historical Performance of the S&P 500^®\nFutures 35% VT Adaptive Response 6% Decrement Index (USD) ER

$\"\"$

PS-28

Comparative Performance of the S&P 500^®\nFutures 35% VT Adaptive Response 6% Decrement Index (USD) ER and the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index

The graph below shows the performance, from January 1, 2021 through\nOctober 29, 2026, of the underlier and the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index.

For comparative purposes, each of the underlier and the S&P 500^®\nFutures Excess Return Index have been adjusted to have a closing level of 100.00 on January 1, 2021 by dividing the applicable closing\nlevel on each day by that index’s closing level on January 1, 2021 and multiplying the quotient by 100.00.

Since the underlier was launched on July 24, 2026 and has a limited\noperating history, the graph includes hypothetical performance data for the underlier prior to its launch on July 24, 2026. The hypothetical\nperformance data for the underlier prior to July 24, 2026 used to create this graph was obtained from the underlier sponsor’s website,\nwithout independent verification. The daily historical closing levels of the underlier from July 24, 2026 to October 29, 2026 used to\ncreate this graph were obtained from Bloomberg Financial Services, without independent verification. (In the graph, historical closing\nlevels can be found to the right of the vertical solid line marker.) The daily historical closing levels of the S&P 500^®\nFutures Excess Return Index from January 1, 2021 through October 29, 2026 used to create this graph were obtained from Bloomberg Financial\nServices, without independent verification. You should not take this graph, the hypothetical performance data of the underlier or the\nhistorical closing levels of the indices used to create this graph as an indication of the future performance of any index, including\nthe underlier, or the correlation (if any) between the level of the underlier and the level of the S&P 500^® Futures\nExcess Return Index.

As described above, the leverage factor causes the underlier to be more\nvolatile than the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index and therefore causes the underlier to underperform the S&P\n500^® Futures Excess Return Index when the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index declines. This underperformance\nwill be especially dramatic when the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index experiences a rapid and significant decline\nbetween the measurement of realized volatility of the base index on the index calculation day that is two index calculation days prior\nto the current index calculation day (“T - 2”) and the calculation of the leverage factor on an index calculation day (“T”).

Comparative Performance of the S&P 500^®\nFutures 35% VT Adaptive Response 6% Decrement Index (USD) ER and the S&P 500^® Futures Excess Return Index

$\"\"$

PS-29

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCUSSION OF U.S. FEDERAL INCOME\nTAX CONSEQUENCES

The following section supplements and, to the extent of any inconsistency,\nsupersedes the discussion of U.S. federal income taxation in the accompanying prospectus contained in the \"United States Taxation”\nsection. This section, when read in conjunction with certain subsections of the \"United States Taxation\" section in the\naccompanying prospectus referenced herein, represents the opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, counsel to The Goldman Sachs Group,\nInc. and GS Finance Corp. (“our counsel”).

This section is a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax\nconsequences of the ownership and disposition of the notes. It generally assumes that you will purchase a note for cash at its stated\nprincipal amount and hold it as a capital asset for tax purposes within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,\nas amended (the “Code”). Prospective investors who purchase notes at a different time or for a different price may\nhave consequences that differ from those described below. This section is only a summary of the general tax characteristics and treatment\nof the notes and does not describe all of the U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be relevant to you in light of your particular\ncircumstances, including any differing tax consequences that may be applicable to you if you are, for instance:

•

a dealer or trader in securities that elects to use a mark-to-market method of tax accounting with respect to the notes;

•

a financial institution;

•

a life insurance company;

•

a “regulated investment company”;

•

a “real estate investment trust”;

•

an accrual method taxpayer subject to special tax accounting rules as a result of its use of financial statements;

•

a tax-exempt organization;

•

a partnership;

•

a person that owns the notes as a hedge or that is hedged against interest rate risks;

•

a person that owns the notes as part of a “straddle” or conversion transaction for tax purposes or who has entered into\na “constructive sale” with respect to a note; or

•

a United States holder (as defined below) whose functional currency for tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar.

If an entity that is classified as a partnership for\nU.S. federal income tax purposes holds the notes, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status\nof the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partnership holding the notes or a partner in such a partnership,\nyou should consult your tax advisor as to your particular U.S. federal tax consequences of holding and disposing of the notes.

Although this section is based on the Code, its legislative history,\nexisting and proposed regulations under the Code, published rulings and court decisions, all as currently in effect, no statutory, judicial\nor administrative authority directly discusses how your notes should be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, as a result,\nthe U.S. federal income tax consequences of your investment in your notes are uncertain. Moreover, these laws are subject to change, possibly\non a retroactive basis. This discussion does not address the effects of any applicable state, local or non-U.S. tax laws or the potential\napplication of the Medicare tax or any alternative minimum tax.

PS-30

\n \n \n \n

You should consult your tax advisor concerning the U.S. federal income tax and other tax consequences of your investment in the notes, including the application of state, local or other tax laws and the possible effects of changes in federal or other tax laws.

United States Holders

This subsection describes the tax consequences to you if you are a United\nStates holder. You are a United States holder if you are a beneficial owner of notes and you are:

•

a citizen or individual resident of the United States;

•

a domestic corporation; or

•

an estate or trust the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source.

Tax Treatment. You will be obligated pursuant to the terms of\nthe notes – in the absence of a change in law, an administrative determination or a judicial ruling to the contrary – to characterize\nyour notes for all U.S. federal income tax purposes as pre-paid derivative contracts in respect of the underlier that are treated as “open\ntransactions.” In the opinion of our counsel, this characterization is a reasonable interpretation of current law. Except as otherwise\nstated below, the discussion below assumes that the notes will be so treated.

Subject to the discussion below regarding the constructive\nownership rules, upon the sale, exchange, redemption or maturity of your notes, you should recognize capital gain or loss equal to the\ndifference between the amount realized on the sale, exchange, redemption or maturity and your tax basis in your notes. Your tax basis\nin your notes should generally be equal to the amount that you paid for the notes. Such capital gain or loss should generally be short-term\ncapital gain or loss if you hold the notes for one year or less and should be long-term capital gain or loss if you hold the notes for\nmore than one year. Short-term capital gains are generally subject to tax at the marginal tax rates applicable to ordinary income.

The constructive ownership rules of Section 1260\nof the Code could possibly apply to your notes. If your notes were subject to the constructive ownership rules, then any long-term capital\ngain that you realize upon the sale, exchange, or maturity of your notes would be recharacterized as ordinary income (and you would be\nsubject to an interest charge on deferred tax liability with respect to such recharacterized capital gain) to the extent that such capital\ngain exceeds the amount of “net underlying long-term capital gain” (as defined in Section 1260 of the Code). Because the application\nof the constructive ownership rules is unclear, you are strongly urged to consult your tax advisor with respect to the possible application\nof the constructive ownership rules to your investment in the notes.

No statutory, judicial or administrative authority directly discusses\nhow your notes should be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, the U.S. federal income tax consequences of your investment\nin the notes are uncertain and alternative characterizations are possible. We do not plan to request a ruling from the IRS, and the IRS\nor a court might not agree with the treatment described herein. Accordingly, we urge you to consult your tax advisor in determining the\ntax consequences of an investment in your notes in your particular circumstances, including the application of state, local or other tax\nlaws and the possible effects of changes in federal or other tax laws.

Alternative Treatments. Because there is no judicial or administrative\nauthority discussing how your notes should be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the IRS might assert that a treatment other\nthan that described above is more appropriate. For example, the IRS could treat your notes as debt instruments subject to special rules\ngoverning contingent payment debt instruments.

Under those rules, the amount of interest you are required to take into\naccount for each accrual period would be determined by constructing a projected payment schedule for the notes and applying rules similar\nto those for accruing original issue discount on a hypothetical noncontingent debt instrument with that projected payment schedule. This\nmethod is applied by first determining the comparable yield – i.e.,

PS-31

the yield at which we would issue a noncontingent fixed rate debt instrument\nwith terms and conditions similar to your notes – and then determining a payment schedule as of the applicable original issue date\nthat would produce the comparable yield. These rules may have the effect of requiring you to include interest in income in respect of\nyour notes prior to your receipt of cash attributable to that income.

If the rules governing contingent payment debt instruments apply, any\ngain you recognize upon the sale, exchange, redemption or maturity of your notes would be treated as ordinary interest income. Any loss\nyou recognize at that time would be treated as ordinary loss to the extent of interest you included as income in the current or previous\ntaxable years in respect of your notes, and, thereafter, as capital loss.

If the rules governing contingent payment debt instruments apply, special\nrules would apply to persons who purchase a note at a price other than the adjusted issue price as determined for tax purposes.

You should consult your tax advisor as to possible alternative characterizations\nof your notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Possible Change in Law. In 2007, the IRS released\na notice stating that the IRS and the Treasury Department are actively considering issuing guidance regarding the proper U.S. federal\nincome tax treatment of an instrument such as the offered notes, including whether the holders should be required to accrue ordinary income\non a current basis and whether gain or loss should be ordinary or capital. It is not possible to determine what guidance they will ultimately\nissue, if any. It is possible, however, that under such guidance, holders of the notes will ultimately be required to accrue income currently\nand this could be applied on a retroactive basis. The IRS and the Treasury Department are also considering other relevant issues, including\nwhether foreign holders of such instruments should be subject to withholding tax on any deemed income accruals. In addition, members\nof Congress have proposed legislative changes to the tax treatment of derivative contracts. It is not possible to predict whether a similar\nor identical bill will be enacted in the future, or whether any such bill would affect the tax treatment of your notes.

Except to the extent otherwise provided by law, GS Finance Corp. intends\nto continue treating the notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes in accordance with the treatment described above unless and until\nsuch time as Congress, the Treasury Department or the IRS determine that some other treatment is more appropriate.

It is impossible to predict what any such legislation or administrative\nor regulatory guidance might provide, and whether the effective date of any legislation or guidance will affect notes that were issued\nbefore the date that such legislation or guidance is issued. You are urged to consult your tax advisor as to the possibility that any\nlegislative or administrative action may adversely affect the tax treatment of your notes.

Non-United States Holders

This section applies to you only if you are a non-United States holder.\nYou are a non-United States holder if you are the beneficial owner of the notes and are, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

•

a nonresident alien individual;

•

a foreign corporation; or

•

an estate or trust that in either case is not subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis on income or gain from the\nnotes.

You are not a non-United States holder for purposes of this discussion\nif you are (i) an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of disposition of a note, or\n(ii) a former citizen or resident of the United States. In addition, you are not a non-United States holder if income in respect\nof your notes is effectively connected with the conduct of a United States trade or business. If you are or may become a person described\nin this paragraph during the period in which you hold a note, you should consult your tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal tax consequences\nof an investment in the notes.

PS-32

Under the characterization of the notes described above, subject to\nthe discussions below and \"United States Taxation — Taxation of Debt Securities — Non-United States Holders” in\nthe accompanying prospectus, you should generally not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on the payment on your note,\nassuming income on the notes is not effectively connected with your conduct of a United States trade or business. However,\nunder generally applicable information reporting and backup withholding requirements you may be required to provide an applicable IRS\nForm W-8 (or otherwise establish an exemption) in order to avoid backup withholding on the payment on the notes. See the accompanying\nprospectus under \"United States Taxation — Taxation of Debt Securities — Backup Withholding and Information Reporting\n— Non-United States Holders.\"

As discussed above, alternative characterizations of the notes for U.S.\nfederal income tax purposes are possible, and the law applicable to the notes could change (including retroactively). Should an alternative\ncharacterization of the notes, by reason of a change or clarification of the law, by regulation or otherwise, cause payments with respect\nto the notes to become subject to withholding tax, we will withhold tax at the applicable statutory rate and we will not make payments\nof any additional amounts. Prospective non-United States holders of the notes should consult their tax advisors in this regard.

Possible Withholding Under Section 871(m) of the Code. The United\nStates Treasury Department has issued regulations under which amounts paid or deemed paid on certain financial instruments (“871(m)\nfinancial instruments”) that are treated as attributable to U.S.-source dividends could be treated, in whole or in part depending\non the circumstances, as a “dividend equivalent” payment that is subject to tax at a rate of 30% (or a lower rate under an\napplicable treaty), which in the case of any amounts you receive upon the sale, exchange, redemption or maturity of your notes, could\nbe collected via withholding. If these regulations were to apply to the notes, we (or an applicable withholding agent) may be required\nto withhold such taxes if any U.S.-source dividends are paid on the stocks included in the underlier during the term of the notes. We\ncould also require you to make certifications (e.g., on an applicable IRS Form W-8) prior to the maturity of the notes in\norder to avoid or minimize withholding obligations, and we could withhold accordingly (subject to your potential right to claim a refund\nfrom the IRS) if such certifications were not received or were not satisfactory. If withholding was required, we would not be required\nto pay any additional amounts with respect to amounts so withheld. These regulations generally will apply to 871(m) financial instruments\n(or a combination of financial instruments treated as having been entered into in connection with each other) issued (or significantly\nmodified and treated as retired and reissued) on or after January 1, 2029, but will also apply to certain 871(m) financial instruments\n(or a combination of financial instruments treated as having been entered into in connection with each other) that have a delta (as defined\nin the applicable Treasury regulations) of one and are issued (or significantly modified and treated as retired and reissued) on or after\nJanuary 1, 2017. In addition, these regulations will not apply to financial instruments that reference a “qualified index”\n(as defined in the regulations). We have determined that, as of the issue date of your notes, your notes will not be subject\nto withholding under Section 871(m). In certain limited circumstances, however, you should be aware that it is possible for\nnon-United States holders to be liable for tax under these rules with respect to a combination of transactions treated as having been\nentered into in connection with each other even when no withholding is required. You should consult your tax advisor concerning\nthese regulations, subsequent official guidance and regarding any other possible alternative characterizations of your notes for U.S.\nfederal income tax purposes.

Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) Withholding

Pursuant to Treasury regulations, Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act\n(FATCA) withholding (as described in “United States Taxation—Taxation of Debt Securities—Foreign Account Tax Compliance\nAct (FATCA) Withholding” in the accompanying prospectus) will generally apply to obligations that are issued on or after July 1,\n2014; therefore, the notes will generally be subject to the FATCA withholding rules.

THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF OWNING AND DISPOSING OF THE NOTES ARE UNCLEAR. YOU\nSHOULD CONSULT YOUR TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF OWNING AND DISPOSING OF THE NOTES, INCLUDING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES UNDER\nSTATE, LOCAL, NON-U.S. AND OTHER TAX LAWS AND THE POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN U.S. FEDERAL OR OTHER TAX LAWS.

PS-33

Supplemental\nplan of distribution; conflicts of interest

See “Supplemental Plan of Distribution” on page S-51 of\nthe accompanying general terms supplement no. 17,745 and “Plan of Distribution — Conflicts of Interest” on page 127\nof the accompanying prospectus; GS Finance Corp. estimates that its share of the total offering expenses, excluding underwriting discounts\nand commissions, will be approximately $10,000.

GS Finance Corp. will sell to GS&Co., and GS&Co. will purchase\nfrom GS Finance Corp., the aggregate face amount of the offered notes specified on the front cover of this pricing supplement. GS&Co.\nproposes initially to offer the notes to the public at the original issue price set forth on the cover page of this pricing supplement,\nand to certain securities dealers at such price less a concession not in excess of 3.75% of the face amount. GS&Co.\nis an affiliate of GS Finance Corp. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and, as such, will have a “conflict of interest” in\nthis offering of notes within the meaning of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) Rule 5121. Consequently, this offering\nof notes will be conducted in compliance with the provisions of FINRA Rule 5121. GS&Co. will not be permitted to sell notes in this\noffering to an account over which it exercises discretionary authority without the prior specific written approval of the account holder.\nWe have been advised that GS&Co. will also pay a fee to iCapital Markets LLC, a broker-dealer in which an affiliate of GS Finance\nCorp. holds an indirect minority equity interest, for services it is providing in connection with this offering.

We will deliver the notes against payment therefor in New York, New\nYork on November 3, 2026. Under Rule 15c6-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, trades in the secondary market generally are required\nto settle in one business day, unless the parties to any such trade expressly agree otherwise. Accordingly, purchasers who wish to trade\nnotes on any date prior to one business day before delivery will be required to specify alternative settlement arrangements to prevent\na failed settlement.

We have been advised by GS&Co. that it intends to make a market\nin the notes. However, neither GS&Co. nor any of our other affiliates that makes a market is obligated to do so and any of them may\nstop doing so at any time without notice. No assurance can be given as to the liquidity or trading market for the notes.

The notes will not be listed on any securities exchange or interdealer\nquotation system.

PS-34

VALIDITY\nOF THE NOTES

In the opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, as special counsel\nto GS Finance Corp. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., when the notes offered by this pricing supplement have been issued by GS Finance\nCorp. pursuant to the GSFC 2008 indenture (as defined in the accompanying prospectus supplement), the trustee has made the appropriate\nentries or notations to the master global note that represents such notes (the “master note”), and such notes have been delivered\nagainst payment as contemplated herein, such notes will be valid and binding obligations of GS Finance Corp. and the related guarantee\nwill be a valid and binding obligation of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., enforceable in accordance with their terms, subject to applicable\nbankruptcy, insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, concepts of reasonableness and equitable principles\nof general applicability (including, without limitation, concepts of good faith, fair dealing and the lack of bad faith), provided\nthat such counsel expresses no opinion as to (i) the effect of fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent transfer or similar provision of applicable\nlaw on the conclusions expressed above and (ii) any provision of the GSFC 2008 indenture that purports to avoid the effect of fraudulent\nconveyance, fraudulent transfer or similar provision of applicable law by limiting the amount of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.’s\nobligation under the related guarantee. This opinion is given as of the date hereof and is limited to the laws of the State of New York\nand the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. In addition, this opinion is subject to customary assumptions about\nthe trustee’s authorization, execution and delivery of the GSFC 2008 indenture and its authentication of the master note and the\nvalidity, binding nature and enforceability of the GSFC 2008 indenture with respect to the trustee, all as stated in the letter of such\ncounsel dated February 12, 2025, which is Exhibit 5.7 to the Pre-Effective Amendment No.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed\nby The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. on February 12, 2025.

PS-35

We have not authorized anyone to provide any information or to make\nany representations other than those contained or incorporated by reference in this pricing supplement, the accompanying general terms\nsupplement no. 17,745, the accompanying S&P 500^® Futures Adaptive Response Indices Supplement No. 2, the accompanying\nOctober 2026 S&P 500^® Futures 35% VT Adaptive Response 6% Decrement Index (USD) ER Supplement Addendum, the accompanying\nprospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus. We take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability\nof, any other information that others may give you. This pricing supplement, the accompanying general terms supplement no. 17,745, the\naccompanying S&P 500^® Futures Adaptive Response Indices Supplement No. 2, the accompanying October 2026 S&P 500^®\nFutures 35% VT Adaptive Response 6% Decrement Index (USD) ER Supplement Addendum, the accompanying prospectus supplement and the accompanying\nprospectus is an offer to sell only the notes offered hereby, but only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to\ndo so. The information contained in this pricing supplement, the accompanying general terms supplement no. 17,745, the accompanying S&P\n500^® Futures Adaptive Response Indices Supplement No. 2, the accompanying October 2026 S&P 500^® Futures\n35% VT Adaptive Response 6% Decrement Index (USD) ER Supplement Addendum, the accompanying prospectus supplement and the accompanying\nprospectus is current only as of the respective dates of such documents.

$225,000

GS Finance Corp.

Autocallable S&P 500^® Futures\n35% VT Adaptive Response 6% Decrement Index
\n(USD) ER-Linked Notes due 2031

guaranteed by

The Goldman Sachs
\nGroup, Inc.

_______________

$\"\"$

_______________
\n

Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC

","zhKind","complete","GS","公司与财报","金融","aihot","/items/cr5tle0ki1biwwvwitxgf0iyh","https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/886982/000095010326016603/0000950103-26-016603-index.htm","rss-sec-xbrl","name","SEC · EDGAR 财务披露","kind","rss","firstParty","iconUrl","/api/img-proxy?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sec.gov%2Fthemes%2Fcustom%2Fuswds_sec%2Fassets%2Fimg%2Ffavicons%2Fapple-touch-icon.png&mode=avatar&exp=1794787200&sig=270e7b5318cf7a7e","iconSrcSet","/api/img-proxy?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sec.gov%2Fthemes%2Fcustom%2Fuswds_sec%2Fassets%2Fimg%2Ffavicons%2Fapple-touch-icon.png&mode=avatar-48&exp=1794787200&sig=36f9a73be64b856b 48w, /api/img-proxy?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sec.gov%2Fthemes%2Fcustom%2Fuswds_sec%2Fassets%2Fimg%2Ffavicons%2Fapple-touch-icon.png&mode=avatar-96&exp=1794787200&sig=c36ad63403ebd4b9 96w","changelogVersion","2026-10-01T08:00"]